Multiple Dimensions of Reform

Abstract

We conducted a study using mixed methods to explore implementation of reform legislation and related outcomes for students with disabilities and those placed at risk of school failure. Designed to promote equal educational opportunities, the legislation included provisions for (a) redistributing state funding so that schools would have more equal access to resources and (b) requiring all schools to adopt and use state standards and standards-based assessments. Almost one fourth of the public schools in the state participated in the study, including schools that gained, lost, or were not affected by the redistribution of state education funds. A cross-case analysis identified both benefits and challenges for students with disabilities and those placed at risk of school failure, suggesting a need to ensure that reforms focus on outcomes for all students and include adequate resources and professional development opportunities for educators and administrators in both general and special education.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Brigham v. State of Vermont, Vermont Supreme Court, No. 96 — 502, filed February 5, 1997.

Equal Educational Opportunity Act of 1997, Section 2, 16 V.S.A. §1.

Furney, K.S. , Hasazi, S.B. , Clark/kKeefe, K. , & Hartnett, J. (2003). A longitudinal analysis of shifting policy landscapes in special and general education reform. Exceptional Children , 70(1), 81—94.

Gall, M.D. , Borg, W.R. , & Joyce, J.P. (1996). Educational research (6th ed.). White Plains, NY: Longman .

Glesne, C. (1999). Becoming qualitative researchers: An introduction (2nd ed.). White Plains, NY : Longman.

Greene, J.C. (2000). Understanding social programs through evaluation . In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 981—1000). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, (20 U.S.C., sec. 1401 [25]).

Lincoln, Y. , & Guba, E.G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

McDonnell, L.M. , McLaughlin, M.J. , & Morison, P. (1997). Educating one and all: Students with disabilities and standards-based reform. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

10.

McLaughlin, M.J. (1999). Access to the general education curriculum: Paperwork and procedure or redefining special education. Journal of Special Education Leadership, 12(1), 9—14.

11.

McLaughlin, M.J. , Nolet, V. , Rhim, L.M. , & Henderson, K. (1999). Integrating standards: Including all students . Teaching Exceptional Children, 31(3), 66—71.

12.

Miles, M. , & Huberman, A.M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis . Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

13.

Moustakas, C. (1990). Heuristic research: Design, methodology, and applications . Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

14.

Nelson, J. , Francis, J. , & Gilbert, A. (1997). Act 60 handbook: Implementing Vermont's Equal Educational Opportunity Act. Burlington: Vermont School Boards Association and Vermont Superintendents Association .

15.

Nolet, V. , & McLaughlin, M.J. (2000). Accessing the general curriculum . Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press .

16.

Patton, M.Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

17.

Picus, L. (1998, April). Income sensitive property taxes and school finance reform in Vermont. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.

18.

Proulx, R. , & Jimerson, L. (1998). Business as usual? Not in Vermont. School Business Affairs, 64(4), 9—14.

19.

Rist, R.C. (2000). Influencing the policy process with qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 1001—1017). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

20.

Shriner, J.G. , & DeStefano, L. (2003). Participation and accommodation in state assessment: The role of individualized education programs. Exceptional Children, 69(2), 147—172.

21.

Thurlow, M.L. (2000). Standards-based reform and students with disabilities: Reflections on a decade of change. Focus on Exceptional Children , 33(3), 1—16.

22.

Thurlow, M. , House, A. , Boys, C. , Scott, D. , & Ysseldyke, J. (2000). State participation and accommodations policies for students with disabilities: 1999 Update. (Synthesis Report No. 33). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes.

23.

Thurlow, M. , & Johnson, D. (2002). High-stakes testing of students with disabilities . Journal of Teacher Education, 51(4), 305—314.

24.

Turnbull, H.R. , Turnbull, A. , Wehmeyer, M. , & Park, J. (2003). A quality of life framework for special education outcomes. Remedial and Special Education, 24(2), 67—74.

25.

Vermont framework of standards and learning opportunities. (2000). Montpelier: Vermont Department of Education.

26.

Yanow, D. (2000). Conducting interpretive policy analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.