Research and scholarship find that the use of guardianship is increasing across the United States despite developments in law, legislation, and policy intended to protect individual rights and promote less restrictive alternatives. In Wyoming, there has long been talk of “ghost guardianships”—where adults are ordered into guardianship without being provided the due process rights and protections guaranteed by state law. This article presents the initial results of our review of all guardianship cases filed in Wyoming in 2021 to determine whether ghost guardianships are a widespread, system-wide problem. Our review finds that a substantial majority of Wyoming adult involuntary guardianship cases violated the due process rights of the proposed ward. In this article, we summarize research and scholarship into the potential dangers of guardianship and present our methodology, findings, and recommendations for ways Wyoming and other states may protect the rights of people facing guardianship.
Abuses in guardianship of the elderly and infirm: A national disgrace. A briefing by the chairman of the Subcommittee on Health and Long-term Care of the Select Committee on Aging, 100th Cong. 1 (1987), H.R. Rpt. 100-641 (opening statement of Chairman Claude Pepper). AL Code § 26-2A-102, 2012.
BehzadniaB.DeciE. L.DeHaanC. R. (2020). Predicting relations among life goals, physical activity, health, and well-being in elderly adults: A self-determination theory perspective on healthy aging. In: NgB.HoG. (Eds.), Self-determination theory and healthy aging: Comparative contexts on physical and mental well-being (pp. 47–71). Springer.
5.
BenishK. J. (2019). Wyoming is more likely than not behind in guardianship proceedings: The unconstitutional standard for guardianship under Wyoming statute Sec. 3-2-104. Wyoming Law Review, 19, 391.
6.
BlanckP.MartinisJ. G. (2015). “The right to make choices”: The national resource center for supported decision-making. Inclusion, 3(1), 24–33.
7.
BoleniusK.LamasK.SandmanP. O.LindkvistM.EdvardssonD. (2019). Perceptions of self-determination and quality of life among Swedish home care recipients-A cross-sectional study. BMC Geriatrics, 19(1).
8.
Boni-SaenzA. A. (2015). Sexuality and incapacity. Ohio State Law Journal, 76, 1201.
BrowningM.BigbyC.DouglasJ. (2021). A process of decision-making support: Exploring supported decision-making practice in Canada. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability, 46(2), 138–149.
11.
Butler v. Bd. of Cnty Commissioners for San Miguel Cnty., 924 F.3d 1326 (Mem) (10th Cir. 2019).
12.
Cruzan v. Dir., Mo. Dep’t of Health., 497 U.S. 261 (1990).
13.
DeciE. L. (1975). Intrinsic motivation. Plenum Publishing Corp.
14.
DeviN.ProdingerB.PennycottA.SoobenR.BickenbachJ. (2020). Investigating supported decision-making for persons with mild to moderate intellectual disability using Institutional ethnography. Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities, 17(2), 143–156.
15.
DinersteinR. D. (2012). Implementing legal capacity under Article 12 of the UN convention on the rights of persons with disabilities: The difficult road from guardianship to supported decision-making. Human Rights Brief, 19(2), 2.
16.
EnckG. G. (2021). Healthcare decisions are always supported decisions. The American Journal of Bioethics, 21(11), 29–32.
17.
FlemingR.RobinsonC. (1993). Care of incompetent adults: A brief history of guardianship. The Arizona Attorney, 30, 16–42.
18.
FrolikL. (1998). Guardianship reform: When the best is the enemy of the good. Stanford Law and Policy Review, 9, 347–355.
19.
Georgia v. Brailsford, 3 U.S. 1 (1794).
20.
GoodingP.McSherryB.Arstein-KerslakeA. (2023). Supported decision-making in criminal proceedings: A sociolegal empirical study. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 34(1), 28–38.
21.
HardingR.TaşcıoğluE. (2018). Supported decision-making from theory to practice: Implementing the right to enjoy legal capacity. Societies, 8(2), 25.
22.
HardyD. (2008). Who is guarding the guardians? A localized call for improved guardianship systems and monitoring. National Academy of Elder Law Attorneys Journal, 4(1), 7.
23.
HatchM. J.CraneS. A.MartinisJ. G. (2015). Unjustified isolation is discrimination: The Olmstead case against overbroad and undue organizational and public guardianship. Inclusion, 3(2), 65–74.
24.
HicksonL.KhemkaI.GoldenH.ChatzistyliA. (2015). Randomized controlled trial to evaluate an abuse prevention curriculum for women and men with intellectual and developmental disabilities. American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 120(6), 490–503.
25.
In Interest of DG, 825 P.2d 369 (Wyo.1992).
26.
In the Matter of Josh Frauendienst(a)., Wyo. (Laramie). Docket No. 49-443 (Order dated October4, 2021).
27.
In the Matter of Josh Frauendienst(b). Wyo. (Laramie). Docket No. 49-443 (Proposed Ward’s Objection to Permanent Guardianship, dated October12, 2021).
28.
In the Matter of Josh Frauendienst(c). Wyo. (Laramie). Docket No. 49-443 (Stipulated Dismissal of Petition, dated October25, 2021).
29.
In the Matter of Josh Frauendienst(d). Wyo. (Laramie). Docket No. 49-443 (Order Granting Dismissal, dated November9, 2021).
30.
In the Matter of the Guardianship and Conservatorship of Edward J. Lorenz, District Court, Laramie County (WY), Docket No. 48-543.
31.
In the Matter of the Guardianship of Everett Parker(a), Wyo. (Laramie), Docket No. 49-369 (2021).
32.
In the Matter of the Guardianship of Everett Parker(b), Wyo. (Laramie), Docket No. 49-369 (Supplemental Report dated August 24, 2021).
33.
In the Matter of the Guardianship and Conservatorship of Emery Scott Olson, District Court, Laramie County (WY), Docket No.: No. 45-341.
34.
In the Matter of the Guardianship and Conservatorship of Jared D. Sowers(a). Wyo. (Platte), Docket NO. PR-2009-1 (Order dated January5, 2009).
35.
In the Matter of the Guardianship and Conservatorship of Jared D. Sowers(b). Wyo. (Platte), Docket NO. PR-2009-1 (Order dated July28, 2022).
36.
In the Matter of the Guardianship of Everett Parker(a), Wyo. (Laramie), Docket No. 49-369 (2021).
37.
In the Matter of the Guardianship of Everett Parker, Wyo. (Laramie), Docket No. 49-369 (Supplemental Report dated August24, 2021).
38.
JayesM.AustinL.BrownL. J. (2022). Supported decision-making and mental capacity assessment in care homes: A qualitative study. Health & Social Care in the Community, 30(4), e1061–e1069.
39.
JonesE. E.BerglasS. (1978). Control of attributions about the self through self-handicapping strategies: The appeal of alcohol and the role of underachievement. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 4(2), 200–206.
40.
KappM. B. (1999). Geriatrics and the law: Understanding patient rights and professional responsibilities. Springer.
41.
KhemkaI. (2000). Increasing independent decision-making skills of women with mental retardation in simulated interpersonal situations of abuse. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 105(5), 387–401.
42.
KhemkaI.HicksonL.ReynoldsG. (2005). Evaluation of a decision-making curriculum designed to empower women with mental retardation to resist abuse. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 110(3), 193–204.
43.
KohnN. A.BlumenthalJ. A.CampbellA. T. (2012). Supported decision-making: A viable alternative to guardianship. Penn State Law Review, 117, 1111.
44.
KohnN. A.KossC. (2016). Lawyers for legal ghosts: The legality and ethics of representing persons subject to guardianship. Washington Law Review, 91, 581.
45.
KokanovićR.BrophyL.McSherryB.FloreJ.Moeller-SaxoneK.HerrmanH. (2018). Supported decision-making from the perspectives of mental health service users, family members supporting them and mental health practitioners. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 52(9), 826–833.
46.
Lefebure v. D’Aquilla, 15 F.4th 670 (5th Cir. 2021).
MartinisJ.BlanckP. (2019). Supported decision-making: From justice for Jenny to justice for all. Something Else Solutions Press.
51.
MartinisJ.HarrisJ.FoxD.BlanckP. (2023). State guardianship laws and supported decision-making in the United States after Ross and Ross v. Hatch: Analysis and implications for research, policy, education, and advocacy. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 34(1), 8–16.
McDougallJ.EvansJ.BaldwinP. (2010). The importance of self-determination to perceived quality of life for youth and young adults with chronic conditions and disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 31(4), 252–260.
55.
Mehring v. State, 860 P.2d 1011 (Wyo. 1993).
56.
Moore v. City of East Cleveland, Ohio, 431 U.S. 494 (1977).
57.
Mormon Church v. United States, 136 U.S. 1 (1890).
58.
National Council on Disability (Ed.). (2018). Beyond guardianship: Toward alternatives that promote greater self-determination. Government Printing Office.
O’SullivanJ. L. (2001). Role of the attorney for the alleged incapacitated person. Stetson Law Review, 31, 687.
61.
Obergefell v. Hodges, 576 U.S. 644 (2015).
62.
PaytonS. (1992). The concept of the person in the parens patriae jurisdiction over previously competent persons. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 17(6), 605–645.
63.
PetersonA.KarlawishJ.LargentE. (2021). Supported decision-making with people at the margins of autonomy. The American Journal of Bioethics, 21(11), 4–18.
64.
PowersL. E.GeenenS.PowersJ.Pommier-SatyaS.TurnerA.DaltonL. D.. . .SwankP. (2012). My life: Effects of a longitudinal, randomized study of self-determination enhancement on the transition outcomes of youth in foster care and special education. Children and Youth Services Review, 34(11), 2179–2187.
65.
ReynoldsS. L. (2002). Guardianship primavera: A first look at factors associated with having a legal guardian using a nationally representative sample of community-dwelling adults. Aging and Mental Health, 6, 109–120.
66.
Ross and Ross v. Hatch, Case No. CWF-120000-426 (Circuit Court of Newport News, VA) (2013).
67.
SchmidtW. C. (1995). Guardianship: Court of last resort for the elderly and disabled. Carolina Academic Press.
68.
ShogrenK. A.WehmeyerM. L.PalmerS. B.RifenbarkG. G.LittleT. D. (2015). Relationships between self-determination and postschool outcomes for youth with disabilities. The Journal of Special Education, 48(4), 256–267.
69.
State of Wyoming ex re. TRL by Avery v. RLP, 772 P.2d 1054 (Wyo. 1989).
70.
TeasterP.WoodE.LawrenceS.SchmidtW. (2007). Wards of the state: A national study of public guardianship. Stetson Law Review, 37, 193–241.
UekertB.Van DuizendR. (2011). Adult guardianships: A “best guess” national estimate and the momentum for reform. In Future trends in state courts 2011: Special focus on access to justice.
74.
VehmasS. (2019). Persons with profound intellectual disability and their right to sex. Disability & Society, 34(4), 519–539.
75.
WehmeyerM. L. (2005). Self-determination and individuals with severe disabilities: Re-examining meanings and misinterpretations. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 30(3), 113–120.
76.
WinickB. J. (1995). The side effects of incompetency labeling and the implications for mental health law. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 1(1), 6.
77.
WrightJ. L. (2004). Protecting who from what, and why, and how: A proposal for an integrative approach to adult protective proceedings. Elder Law Journal, 12, 53.
78.
WrightJ. L. (2010). Guardianship for your own good: Improving the well-being of respondents and wards in the USA. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 33(5–6), 350–368.
