Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2022-6
Barriers and Solutions to Passing State Legislation to Protect the Rights of Parents With Disabilities: Lessons From Interviews With Advocates,Attorneys,and Legislators
Parents with disabilities experience discrimination within the child welfare, family law, and adoption and foster care systems. In response, there have been increasing calls for states to pass legislation prohibiting discrimination against parents with disabilities, and as of 2020, 28 states have passed or are considering such legislation. This qualitative study explored the perspectives of 19 advocates, attorneys, and legislators on barriers and solutions for passing legislation to protect the rights of parents with disabilities. Participants identified three barriers: (a) legislators’ pejorative attitudes toward parents with disabilities, (b) external opposition, and (c) legislative barriers. Participants also identified eight solutions: (a) cross-disability advocacy, (b) education, (c) relationship-building, (d) bipartisanship, (e) support from state and national organizations, (f) strong sponsors, (g) incrementalism, and (h) model legislation. Study findings should help to inform ongoing legislative advocacy to protect the rights of parents with disabilities.
AlbertS.PowellR. M. (2020). Supporting disabled parents and their families: Perspectives and recommendations from parents, attorneys, and child welfare professionals. Journal of Public Child Welfare. https://doi.org/10.1080/15548732.2020.175177
AndrewsE. E.AyersK. (2016). Parenting with disability: Experiences of disabled women. In Miles-CohenS. E.SignoreC. (Eds.), Eliminating inequities for women with disabilities: An agenda for health and wellness (pp. 209–225). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/14943-011
5.
BraddockD. L.ParishS. L. (2001). An institutional history of disability. In AlbrehtG.SellmanK. D.BuryM. (Eds.), Handbook of disability studies (pp. 11–68). SAGE.
6.
BreedenC.OlkinR.TaubeD. J. (2008). Child custody evaluations when one divorcing parent has a physical disability. Rehabilitation Psychology, 53(4), 445–455. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013023
7.
CallowE.BucklandK.JonesS. (2011). Parents with disabilities in the United States: Prevalence, perspectives, and proposal for legislative change to protect the right to family in the disability community. Texas Journal on Civil Liberties & Civil Rights, 17(1), 9–42.
8.
CreswellJ. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among the five approaches. SAGE.
9.
DavisL. J. (2016). Enabling acts: The hidden story of how the Americans with Disabilities Act gave the largest US minority its rights. Beacon Press.
10.
DeZelarS.LightfootE. (2018). Use of parental disability as a removal reason for children in foster care in the U.S. Children and Youth Services Review, 86, 128–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2018.01.027
11.
DonoghueC. (2003). Challenging the authority of the medical definition of disability: An analysis of the resistance to the social constructionist paradigm. Disability & Society, 18(2), 199–208.
12.
EconomouT. D. (2016). The plight of the disabled parent in contested child custody cases: Is there federal redress under the Americans with Disabilities Act (nearly) twenty-five years hence. Charleston Law Review, 10, 71–103.
13.
Family Preservation for Parents with Disability Act, Co. Rev. Stat. 24-34-805. (2018).
14.
Foster-FishmanP.JimenezT.ValentiM.KelleyT. (2007). Building the next generation of leaders in the disabilities movement. Disability & Society, 22(4), 341–356.
15.
FridkinK. L.KenneyP. J.CrittendenJ. (2006). On the margins of democratic life: The impact of race and ethnicity on the political engagement of young people. American Politics Research, 34(5), 605–626.
16.
Garcia-IriarteE.KramerJ. C.KramerJ. M.HammelJ. (2008). Who did what? A participatory action research project to increase group capacity for advocacy. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 22(1), 10–22.
17.
HarryB.SturgesK. M.KlingnerJ. K. (2005). Mapping the process: An exemplar of process and challenge in grounded theory analysis. Educational Researcher, 34(2), 3–13.
18.
HsiehH. F.ShannonS. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687
19.
HuntingtonC. (2001). Legislative advocacy for health professions educators. Education for Health, 14(2), 241–250.
20.
Jackson-ElmooreC. (2006). Influencing state policy: Information, access and timing. American Journal of Health Education, 37(3), 159–169.
21.
KaplanK.BrusilovskiyE.O’SheaA. M.SalzerM. S. (2019). Child protective service disparities and serious mental illnesses: Results from a national survey. Psychiatric Services, 70(3), 202–208. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.201800277
22.
KirshbaumM.OlkinR. (2002). Parents with physical, systemic, or visual disabilities. Sexuality and Disability, 20(1), 65–80.
23.
KrahnG.CampbellV. A. (2011). Evolving views of disability and public health: The roles of advocacy and public health. Disability and Health Journal, 4(1), 12–18.
24.
LaLiberteT.PiescherK.MickelsonN.LeeM. H. (2017). Child protection services and parents with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 30(3), 521–532.
25.
LanciM. (2018). In the child’s best interests? Rethinking consideration of physical disability in child custody disputes. Columbia Law Review, 118(3), 875–914.
26.
LandmarkL. J.ZhangD.JuS.McVeyT. C.JiM. Y. (2017). Experiences of disability advocates and self-advocates in Texas. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 27(4), 203–211.
27.
LightfootE.DeZelarS. (2016). The experiences and outcomes of children in foster care who were removed because of a parental disability. Children and Youth Services Review, 62, 22–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2015.11.029
28.
MalacridaC. (2009). Performing motherhood in a disablist world: Dilemmas of motherhood, femininity and disability. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 22(1), 99–117.
29.
MellingerM. S.KolomerS. (2013). Legislative advocacy and human service nonprofits: What are we doing?Journal of Policy Practice, 12(2), 87–106.
30.
MutchersonK. M. (2009). Disabling dreams of parenthood: The fertility industry, anti-discrimination, and parents with disabilities. Law & Inequality, 27, 311–364.
31.
National Council on Disability. (2012). Rocking the cradle: Ensuring the rights of parents with disabilities and their children.
O’DayB. (2006). Centers for independent living: Advocates for disability rights. Community Development, 37(3), 4–12.
36.
O’DayB.GoldsteinM. (2005). Advocacy issues and strategies for the 21st century: Key informant interviews. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 15(4), 240–250.
PowellR. M. (2017). Safeguarding the rights of parents with intellectual disabilities in child welfare cases: The convergence of social science and law. CUNY Law Review, 20(1), 127–149.
40.
PowellR. M. (2019). Family law, parents with disabilities, and the Americans with disabilities act. Family Court Review, 57(1), 37–53.
41.
SaldañaJ. (2016). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (3rd ed.). SAGE.
42.
SocioCultural Research Consultants. (2020). Dedoose Version 8.3.17, web application for managing, analyzing, and presenting qualitative and mixed-method research data. SocioCultural Research Consultants, LLC.
43.
VaughanS. K.ArsneaultS. (2008). Not-for-profit advocacy: Challenging policy images and pursuing policy change. Review of Policy Research, 25(5), 411–428.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
