Public transportation is fundamental for people with disabilities to access meaningful opportunities. However, their access to public transit is still limited, partly due to the policies establishing the accessibility requirements of public transportation services. We conducted a policy scan analysis of the local, provincial/state, and federal public transportation policies in Canada and the United States. With this scan, we analyzed the policies’ aims, the definition of disabilities, and the content of those policies. The policy analysis revealed that the definition of disability was inconsistent across jurisdictions, creating a discrepancy between those who have access to accessible transport and those who do not. The analysis also showed that policies in the United States and Canada mainly focused on the built environment, the adaptations of vehicles, and the provision of services. In contrast, only a few policies covered social accessibility, such as interaction with the staff, which underscores a significant policy gap and suggests the need for more training requirements in the policies. Funding to transport agencies for people with disabilities was also a missing piece highlighted in this comparative analysis, particularly in Canada. Policymakers need to develop funding mechanisms to ensure a better implementation of accessibility in services and infrastructure.
ArkseyH.O’MalleyL. (2005). Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616
5.
BabinardJ.WangW.BennettC. R.MehndirattaS. (2012). Accessibility of urban transport for people with disabilities and limited mobility: Lessons from East Asia and the Pacific. Transport Notes, 44, 77969. https://hdl.handle.net/10986/17104
6.
BezyakJ. L.SabellaS.HammelJ.McDonaldK.JonesR. A.BartonD. (2020). Community participation and public transportation barriers experienced by people with disabilities. Disability and Rehabilitation, 42(23), 3275–3283. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2019.1590469
7.
BezyakJ. L.SabellaS. A.GattisR. H. (2017). Public transportation: An investigation of barriers for people with disabilities. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 28(1), 52–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/1044207317702070
8.
BickenbachJ. E. (1993). Physical disability and social policy. University of Toronto Press.
BlaisD.El-GeneidyA. (2014, January12–16). Better living through mobility: The relationship between access to transportation, well-being and disability [Paper presentation]. Transportation Research Board 93rd Annual Meeting, Washington, DC, United States. https://tram.mcgill.ca/Research/Publications/Development_disability.pdf
11.
BoyceW.McCollM. A.TremblayM.BickenbachJ.CrichtonA.AndrewsS.GereinN.D’AubinA. (2001). Seat at the table: People with disabilities and policy making. McGill-Queen’s University Press.
12.
BrumbaughS. (2018). Travel patterns of American adults with disabilities: Bureau of Transportation Statistics (Issue Brief). U.S. Department of Transportation, Bureau of Transportation Statistics. https://rb.gy/j77931
13.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2020). Disability and health data system. https://rb.gy/h6v6aj
14.
Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning. (2017). Transit trends: Exploring transit use and investment. Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning. https://tinyurl.com/cmap-illi-ttsnapshot
DiPetrilloS.LubinA.Loukaitou-SiderisA.SalehianC.GibsonS. C.WilliamsK. M.GreenT. T. (2018). Improving pathways to fixed-route transit: Transit agency practices to expand access for all users. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2672(8), 578–587. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198118769902
17.
DirthT. P.BranscombeN. R. (2017). Disability models affect disability policy support through awareness of structural discrimination. Journal of Social Issues, 73(2), 413–442. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12224
18.
DuriB.LukeR. (2022). Transport barriers encountered by people with disability in Africa: An overview. Journal of Transport and Supply Chain Management, 16, a826. https://doi.org/10.4102/jtscm.v16i0.826
19.
GriséE.BoisjolyG.MaguireM.El-GeneidyA. (2019). Elevating access: Comparing accessibility to jobs by public transport for individuals with and without a physical disability. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 125, 280–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2018.02.017
20.
GuillenD. R.SolerJ. A. C.LucasJ. C. S. (2024). Transport accessibility for disabled people in the European Union. Journal of Infrastructure, Policy and Development, 8(4), 3445. https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd.v8i4.3445
21.
HahnH. (1985). Introduction: Disability policy and the problem of discrimination. American Behavioral Scientist, 28(3), 293–318. https://doi.org/10.1177/000276485028003002
22.
HammelJ.MagasiS.HeinemannA.GrayD. B.StarkS.KisalaP.CarlozziN. E.TulskyD.GarciaS. F.HahnE. A. (2015). Environmental barriers and supports to everyday participation: A qualitative insider perspective from people with disabilities. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 96(4), 578–588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2014.12.008
23.
HarpurP.SteinM. A. (2017). The convention on the rights of persons with disabilities as a global tipping point for the participation of persons with disabilities. In ThompsonW. R. (Ed.), Oxford research encyclopedia of politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
24.
HeebR.TaffS. D.BakhshiP. (2021). Exploring the nuances of disability policy in the United States and Canada through an occupational lens. Annals of International Occupational Therapy, 4(4), e260–e268. https://doi.org/10.3928/24761222-20210921-03
25.
HenlyM.BruckerD. L. (2019). Transportation patterns demonstrate inequalities in community participation for working-age Americans with disabilities. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 130, 93–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2019.09.042
26.
HernandezD.RodriguezS. (2024). Same network, same access to urban opportunities? Accessibility via public transportation for wheelchair users. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 35(2), 118–127.
27.
HidalgoD.UrbanoC.OlivaresC.TinjacaN.PerezJ. M.PardoC. F.RogriguezM.GranadaI.NavasC.GlenC.RamosC.GutierrezM. C.PedrazaL. (2020). Mapping universal access experiences for public transport in Latin America. Transportation Research Record, 2674(12), 70–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198120949536
28.
JonasdottirS. K.EgilsonS. Þ.PolgarJ. (2020). Services, systems and policies shaping the built environment for people with mobility impairments. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research, 22(1), 371–381. http://doi.org/10.16993/sjdr.730
29.
KerstenM. L.CoxonK.WilsonN. J. (2020). Traversing the community is uncertain, socially complex, and exhausting: Autistic youth describe experiences of traveling to participate in their communities. Journal of Transport & Health, 18, Article 100922. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2020.100922
30.
LidI. M.SolvangP. K. (2016). (Dis) ability and the experience of accessibility in the urban environment. ALTER—European Journal of Disability Research / Revue Européenne De Recherche Sur Le Handicap, 10(2), 181–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.alter.2015.11.003
31.
LitmanT. (2003, April4). Social inclusion as a transport planning issue in Canada [Paper Presentation]. Transport and Social Exclusion G7 Comparison Seminar, London, England. https://www.vtpi.org/soc_ex.pdf
32.
LowiT. J. (1964). American business, public policy, case studies, and political theory. World Politics, 16, 687–715. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2009452
33.
LubinA.FeeleyC. (2016). Transportation issues of adults on the Autism Spectrum: Findings from focus group discussions. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2542(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.3141/2542-01
34.
MaiselJ. L.RanahanM. E.ChoiJ. (2021). Factors influencing fixed-route transit decision-making: Exploring differences by disability and community type. Journal of Public Transportation, 23(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.5038/2375-0901.23.1.1
35.
McCollM. A.GittermanA.GoldowitzD. (2019). Knowledge translation from disability studies to policy makers: Literature review and expert consultation. Canadian Journal of Disability Studies, 8(5), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.15353/cjds.v8i5.560
36.
McCollM. A.JaiswalA.JonesS.RobertsL.MurphyC. (2017). A review of disability policy in Canada (3rd ed.). Canadian Disability Policy Alliance.
37.
McCollM. A.JongbloedL. (Eds.). (2006). Disability and social policy in Canada (2nd ed.). Captus University Publications.
38.
McCollM. A.RobertsL. (2015). Policy governing employment supports for people with disabilities in Canada. Canadian Disability Participation Project and Canadian Disability Policy Alliance.
39.
McCollM. A.RobertsL.Latimer-Cheung BasmadjianR. (2017). Policy governing sport and exercise for people with disabilities in Canada. Canadian Disability Policy Alliance.
40.
McDanielsB. W.HarleyD. A.BeachD. T. (2018). Transportation, accessibility, and accommodation in rural communities. In HarleyD. A.YsasiN. A.BishopM. L.FlemingA. R. (Eds.), Disability and vocational rehabilitation in rural settings (pp. 43–57). Springer.
41.
MorrisS.FawcettG.BriseboisL.HughesJ. (2018). Canadian survey on disability reports: A demographic, employment and income profile of Canadians with disabilities aged 15 years and over, 2017. Statistics Canada. https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/pub/89-654-x/89-654-x2018002-eng.htm
42.
MwakaC. R.BestK. L.CunninghamC.GagnonM.RouthierF. (2024). Barriers and facilitators of public transport use among people with disabilities: A scoping review. Frontiers in Rehabilitation Sciences, 4, 1336514.
43.
ØksenholtK. V.AarhaugJ. (2018). Public transport and people with impairments—Exploring non-use of public transport through the case of Oslo, Norway. Disability & Society, 33(8), 1280–1302. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2018.1481015
44.
ParkJ.ChowdhuryS. (2022). Towards an enabled journey: Barriers encountered by public transport riders with disabilities for the whole journey chain. Transport Reviews, 42(2), 181–203. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2021.1955035
45.
ParkK.EsfahaniH. N.NovackV. L.SheenJ.HadayeghiH.SongZ.ChristensenK. (2023). Impacts of disability on daily travel behaviour: A systematic review. Transport Reviews, 43: 178–203. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2022.2060371
46.
PrescottM.MillerW. C.RouthierF.MortensonW. B. (2020). Factors affecting the activity spaces of people who use mobility devices to get around the community. Health & Place, 64, 102375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2020.102375
47.
PrinceM. J. (2010). What about a disability rights act for Canada? Practices and lessons from America, Australia, and the United Kingdom. Canadian Public Policy, 36(2), 199–214. https://doi.org/10.3138/cpp.36.2.199
48.
RanahanM. E.MaiselJ. L.LenkerJ. A. (2018). How transit agencies implement best practice strategies in complementary ADA paratransit eligibility. Journal of Public Transportation, 21(2), 73–85. https://doi.org/10.5038/2375-0901.21.2.5
49.
RemillardE. T.CampbellM. L.KoonL. M.RogersW. A. (2022). Transportation challenges for persons aging with mobility disability: Qualitative insights and policy implications. Disability and Health Journal, 15(1), Article 101209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dhjo.2021.101209
50.
RisserR.LexellE. M.BellD.IwarssonS.StahlA. (2015). Use of local public transport among people with cognitive impairments—A literature review. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behavior, 29, 83–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2015.01.002
51.
RodrigueJ.-P.NotteboonT.SlackB. (2024). The nature of transport policy. In RodrigueJ.-P. (Ed.), The geography of transport systems (6th ed.; pp. 272–295). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003343196
52.
RosenbloomS. (2007). Transportation patterns and problems of people with disabilities. In FieldM. J.JetteA. M. (Eds.), The future of disability in America (pp. 519–560). National Academic Press.
53.
SajibS. H. (2022). Identifying barriers to the public transport accessibility for disabled people in Dhaka: A qualitative analysis. Transactions on Transport Sciences, 1, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.5507/tots.2022.004
54.
SchalockR. L. (2017). Introduction to the special issue on disability policy in a time of change. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 55(4), 215–222. https://doi.org/10.1352/1934-9556-55.4.215
SmithE. M.RobertsL.McCollM. A.Martin GinisK. A.MillerW. C. (2018). National evaluation of policies governing funding for wheelchairs and scooters in Canada. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 85(1), 46–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/0008417417719723
TillmannV.HavemanM.StopplerR.KvasS.MonningerD. (2013). Public bus driver and social inclusion: Evaluation of their knowledge and attitudes toward people with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities, 10(4), 307–313. https://doi.org/10.1111/jppi.12057
59.
Translink. (2021). Transit service performance review 2021. https://rb.gy/74bqjk
WahyuniE. S.MurtiB.JoebagioH. (2016). Public transport accessibility for people with disabilities. Journal of Health Policy and Management, 1(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.26911/thejhpm.2016.01.01.01
65.
WasfiR.Steinmetz-WoodM.LevinsonD. (2017). Measuring the transportation needs of people with developmental disabilities: A means to social inclusion. Disability and Health Journal, 10(2), 356–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dhjo.2016.10.008
WuH.AvnerP.BoisjolyG.BragaC. K. V.El-GeneidyA.HuangJ.KerzhnerT.MurphyB.NiedzielskiM. A.PereiraR. H. M.PritchardJ. P.StewartA.WangJ.LevinsonD. (2021). Urban access across the globe: An international comparison of different transport modes. Urban Sustainability, 1, Article 16. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42949-021-00020-2
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
