Signaling theory typically assumes that attention is always given to observable signals. We study signal receivers’ formation of signal sets—the signals to which receivers attend and that they can use for subsequent interpretations. Drawing on a cognitive perspective, we argue that signal receivers’ human capital influences the volume and type of signals they attend to and the time they take to form signal sets. Using eye tracking, we show that equity crowdfunders do not attend to many signals that are easily observable on a campaign page, and that differences in crowdfunders’ human capital uniquely affect their signal set formation.
AdhikariS.StarkD. E. (2017). Video-based eye tracking for neuropsychiatric assessment. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1387(1), 145–152.https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.13305
2.
AhlersG. K. C.CummingD.GüntherC.SchweizerD. (2015). Signaling in equity crowdfunding. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 39(4), 955–980.https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12157
3.
AllinsonC. W.HayesJ. (1996). The cognitive style index: A measure of intuition‐analysis for organizational research. Journal of Management Studies, 33(1), 119–135.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.1996.tb00801.x
4.
AllisonT. H.DavisB. C.WebbJ. W.ShortJ. C. (2017). Persuasion in crowdfunding: An elaboration likelihood model of crowdfunding performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 32(6), 707–725.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2017.09.002
AndersonN. C.RiskoE. F.KingstoneA. (2011). Exploiting human sensitivity to gaze for tracking the eyes. Behavior Research Methods, 43(3), 843–852.https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-011-0078-8
7.
AnglinA. H.ShortJ. C.DroverW.StevensonR. M.McKennyA. F.AllisonT. H. (2018). The power of positivity? The influence of positive psychological capital language on crowdfunding performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 33(4), 470–492.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2018.03.003
8.
AnglinA. H.ShortJ. C.KetchenD. J.AllisonT. H.McKennyA. F. (2020). Third-party signals in crowdfunded microfinance: The role of microfinance institutions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 44(4), 623–644.https://doi.org/10.1177/1042258719839709
9.
AshbyN. J. S.JohnsonJ. G.KrajbichI.WedelM. (2016). Applications and innovations of eye-movement research in judgment and decision making. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 29(2–3), 96–102.https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.1956
10.
BaidC.AllisonT. H. (2019). How crowdfunding deals get done: Signalling, communication and social capital perspectives. InLandströmH.ParhankangasA.MasonC. (Eds.), Handbook of research on crowdfunding. Edward Elgar Publishing.
11.
BapnaS.GancoM. (2020). Gender gaps in equity crowdfunding: Evidence from a randomized field experiment. SSRN Electronic Journal.https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3263533
12.
BaronR. A.EnsleyM. D. (2006). Opportunity recognition as the detection of meaningful patterns: Evidence from comparisons of novice and experienced entrepreneurs. Management Science, 52(9), 1331–1344.https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1060.0538
13.
BaronR. A.MarkmanG. D. (2003). Beyond social capital: The role of entrepreneurs’ social competence in their financial success. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(1), 41–60.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(00)00069-0
14.
BeckerG. (1994). Human capital. University of Chicago Press.
15.
BerghD. D.ConnellyB. L.KetchenD. J.ShannonL. M. (2014). Signalling theory and equilibrium in strategic management research: An assessment and a research agenda. Journal of Management Studies, 51(8), 1334–1360.https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12097
16.
BitektineA. (2011). Toward a theory of social judgments of organizations: The case of legitimacy, reputation, and status. Academy of Management Review, 36(1), 151–179.https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2009.0382
17.
BlasegD.CummingD.KoetterM. (2021). Equity crowdfunding: High-quality or low-quality entrepreneurs?Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 45(3), 505–530.https://doi.org/10.1177/1042258719899427
18.
BottN. T.MaderoE. N.GlennJ. M.LangeA. R.AndersonJ. J.NewtonD. O.BrennanA. H.BuffaloE. A.RentzD. M.ZolaS. M. (2020). Device-embedded cameras for eye tracking-based cognitive assessment: Implications for teleneuropsychology. Telemedicine and e-Health, 26(4), 477–481.https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2019.0039
19.
BrunsV.HollandD.ShepherdD. A.WiklundJ. (2008). The role of human capital in loan officers’ decision policies. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32(3), 485–506.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2008.00237.x
20.
CamererC. F.HogarthR. M. (1999). The effects of financial incentives in experiments: A review and capital-labor-production framework. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 19(1–3), 7–42.https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007850605129
21.
CertoS. T. (2003). Influencing initial public offering investors with prestige: Signaling with board structures. Academy of Management Review, 28(3), 432–446.https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2003.10196754
22.
CiuchtaM. P.LetwinC.StevensonR. M.McMahonS.HuvajM. N. (2018). Betting on the coachable entrepreneur: Signaling and social exchange in entrepreneurial pitches. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 42(6), 860–885.https://doi.org/10.1177/1042258717725520
23.
CiuchtaM. P.LetwinC.StevensonR. M.McMahonS. R. (2016). Regulatory focus and information cues in a crowdfunding context. Applied Psychology, 65(3), 490–514.https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12063
24.
ColemanJ. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, S95–S120.https://doi.org/10.1086/228943
25.
ColomboM. G.GrilliL. (2005). Founders’ human capital and the growth of new technology-based firms: A competence-based view. Research Policy, 34(6), 795–816.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.03.010
26.
ColomboO. (2021). The use of signals in new-venture financing: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 47(1), 237–259.https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206320911090
27.
ColquittJ. A. (2008). From the editors: Publishing laboratory research in AMJ—A question of when, not if. Academy of Management Journal, 51(4), 616–620.https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2008.33664717
28.
ConnellyB. L.CertoS. T.IrelandR. D.ReutzelC. R. (2011). Signaling theory: A review and assessment. Journal of Management, 37(1), 39–67.https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310388419
29.
CourtneyC.DuttaS.LiY. (2017). Resolving information asymmetry: Signaling, endorsement, and crowdfunding success. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41(2), 265–290.https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12267
CummingD.MeoliM.VismaraS. (2021). Does equity crowdfunding democratize entrepreneurial finance?Small Business Economics, 56(2), 533–552.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-019-00188-z
32.
CummingD. J.VanackerT.ZahraS. A. (2021). Equity crowdfunding and governance: Toward an integrative model and research agenda. Academy of Management Perspectives, 35(1), 69–95.https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2017.0208
33.
CyertR. M.MarchJ. G. (1963). A behavioral theory of the firm (Vol. 2, pp.169–187). Prentice-Hall.
34.
DavisB. C.HmieleskiK. M.WebbJ. W.CoombsJ. E. (2017). Funders’ positive affective reactions to entrepreneurs’ crowdfunding pitches: The influence of perceived product creativity and entrepreneurial passion. Journal of Business Venturing, 32(1), 90–106.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2016.10.006
35.
DimovD. P.ShepherdD. A. (2005). Human capital theory and venture capital firms: Exploring “home runs” and “strike outs”. Journal of Business Venturing, 20(1), 1–21.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2003.12.007
36.
DroverW.WoodM. S.CorbettA. C. (2018). Toward a cognitive view of signalling theory: Individual attention and signal set interpretation. Journal of Management Studies, 55(2), 209–231.https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12282
37.
DuZ.LiM.WangK. (2019). “The more options, the better?” Investigating the impact of the number of options on backers’ decisions in reward-based crowdfunding projects. Information & Management, 56(3), 429–444.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2018.08.003
38.
DuchowskiA. T. (2017). Eye tracking methodology. Springer.
39.
DuclosR. (2015). The psychology of investment behavior: (De)biasing financial decision-making one graph at a time. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 25(2), 317–325.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2014.11.005
FaulF.ErdfelderE.LangA.-G.BuchnerA. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191.https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
43.
FedericoG.BrandimonteM. A. (2019). Tool and object affordances: An ecological eye-tracking study. Brain and Cognition, 135, 103582.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2019.103582
44.
ForbesD. P. (2005a). Managerial determinants of decision speed in new ventures. Strategic Management Journal, 26(4), 355–366.https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.451
GollI.RasheedA. A. (2005). The relationships between top management demographic characteristics, rational decision making, environmental munificence, and firm performance. Organization Studies, 26(7), 999–1023.https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840605053538
47.
GrégoireD. A.BinderJ. K.RauchA. (2019). Navigating the validity tradeoffs of entrepreneurship research experiments: A systematic review and best-practice suggestions. Journal of Business Venturing, 34(2), 284–310.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2018.10.002
48.
HallenB. L. (2008). The causes and consequences of the initial network positions of new organizations: From whom do entrepreneurs receive investments?Administrative Science Quarterly, 53(4), 685–718.https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.53.4.685
49.
HansenD. W.JiQ. (2010). In the eye of the beholder: A survey of models for eyes and gaze. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 32(3), 478–500.https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2009.30
50.
HervéF.ManthéE.SannajustA.SchwienbacherA. (2019). Determinants of individual investment decisions in investment-based crowdfunding. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 46(5–6), 762–783.https://doi.org/10.1111/jbfa.12372
51.
HittM. A.BiermantL.ShimizuK.KochharR. (2001). Direct and moderating effects of human capital on strategy and performance in professional service firms: A resource-based perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 44(1), 13–28.
52.
HodgeF.PronkM. (2006). The impact of expertise and investment familiarity on investors’ use of online financial report information. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 21(3), 267–292.https://doi.org/10.1177/0148558X0602100304
53.
HolmqvistK.NyströmM.AnderssonR.DewhurstR.JarodzkaH.Van de WeijerJ. (2011). Eye tracking: A comprehensive guide to methods and measures. Oxford University Press.
54.
HornufL.SchwienbacherA. (2017). Should securities regulation promote equity crowdfunding?Small Business Economics, 49(3), 579–593.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-017-9839-9
55.
JanisseM. P. (1977). Pupillometry: The psychology of the pupillary response. Halsted Press.
56.
JansenR. J. G.CurşeuP. L.VermeulenP. A. M.GeurtsJ. L. A.GibcusP. (2013). Information processing and strategic decision-making in small and medium-sized enterprises: The role of human and social capital in attaining decision effectiveness. International Small Business Journal: Researching Entrepreneurship, 31(2), 192–216.https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242611406762
57.
JiangL.YinD.LiuD. (2019). Can joy buy you money? The impact of the strength, duration and phases of an entrepreneur’s peak displayed joy on funding performance. Academy of Management Journal, 62(6), 1848–1871.https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2017.1423
58.
KooikerM. J. G.PelJ. J. M.VerbuntH. J. M.de WitG. C.van GenderenM. M.van der SteenJ. (2016). Quantification of visual function assessment using remote eye tracking in children: Validity and applicability. Acta Ophthalmologica, 94(6), 599–608.https://doi.org/10.1111/aos.13038
59.
KorniotisG. M.KumarA. (2011). Do older investors make better investment decisions?Review of Economics and Statistics, 93(1), 244–265.https://doi.org/10.1162/REST_a_00053
60.
LaBergeD. (1995). Perspectives in cognitive neuroscience. Attentional processing: The brain’s art of mindfulness. Harvard University Press.
61.
LichtensteinS.FischhoffB. (1977). Do those who know more also know more about how much they know?Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 20(2), 159–183.https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073(77)90001-0
62.
LordR. G.MaherK. J. (1990). Alternative information-processing models and their implications for theory, research, and practice. Academy of Management Review, 15(1), 9–28.https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1990.4308219
63.
MahmoodA.LuffarelliJ.MukeshM. (2019). What’s in a logo? The impact of complex visual cues in equity crowdfunding. Journal of Business Venturing, 34(1), 41–62.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2018.09.006
McKennyA. F.AllisonT. H.KetchenD. J.ShortJ. C.IrelandR. D. (2017). How should crowdfunding research evolve? A survey of the entrepreneurship theory and practice editorial board. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41(2), 291–304.https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12269
66.
MeissnerM.OllJ. (2019). The promise of eye-tracking methodology in organizational research: A taxonomy, review, and future avenues. Organizational Research Methods, 22(2), 590–617.https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428117744882
67.
MitchellR. K.BusenitzL. W.BirdB.Marie GaglioC.McMullenJ. S.MorseE. A.SmithJ. B. (2007). The central question in entrepreneurial cognition research 2007. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 31(1), 1–27.
68.
MurnieksC. Y.CardonM. S.SudekR.WhiteT. D.BrooksW. T. (2016). Drawn to the fire: The role of passion, tenacity and inspirational leadership in angel investing. Journal of Business Venturing, 31(4), 468–484.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2016.05.002
69.
NahapietJ.GhoshalS. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242–266.https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1998.533225
NicolaouN.PhanP. H.StephanU. (2021). The biological perspective in entrepreneurship research. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 45(1), 3–17.
72.
ParuchuriS.HanJ.-H.PrakashP. (2021). Salient expectations? Incongruence across capability and integrity signals and investor reactions to organizational misconduct. Academy of Management Journal, 64(2), 562–586.https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2018.0698
73.
PeerE.BrandimarteL.SamatS.AcquistiA. (2017). Beyond the Turk: Alternative platforms for crowdsourcing behavioral research. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 70(1), 153–163.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2017.01.006
74.
PloyhartR. E.MoliternoT. P. (2011). Emergence of the human capital resource: A multilevel model. Academy of Management Review, 36(1), 127–150.https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2009.0318
75.
PlummerL. A.AllisonT. H.ConnellyB. L. (2016). Better together? Signaling interactions in new venture pursuit of initial external capital. Academy of Management Journal, 59(5), 1585–1604.https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2013.0100
76.
RauchA.RijsdijkS. A. (2013). The effects of general and specific human capital on long–term growth and failure of newly founded businesses. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 37(4), 923–941.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2011.00487.x
77.
ScheafD. J.DavisB. C.WebbJ. W.CoombsJ. E.BornsJ.HollowayG. (2018). Signals’ flexibility and interaction with visual cues: Insights from crowdfunding. Journal of Business Venturing, 33(6), 720–741.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2018.04.007
78.
SemmelmannK.WeigeltS. (2018). Online webcam-based eye tracking in cognitive science: A first look. Behavior Research Methods, 50(2), 451–465.https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-017-0913-7
ShaneS.DroverW.ClingingsmithD.CerfM. (2020). Founder passion, neural engagement and informal investor interest in startup pitches: An fMRI study. Journal of Business Venturing, 35(4), 105949.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2019.105949
81.
ShepherdD. A.McmullenJ. S.OcasioW. (2017). Is that an opportunity? An attention model of top managers’ opportunity beliefs for strategic action. Strategic Management Journal, 38(3), 626–644.https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2499
82.
ShepherdD. A.WiklundJ. (2006). Successes and failures at research on business failure and learning from it. Foundations and Trends® in Entrepreneurship, 2(5), 1–35.https://doi.org/10.1561/0300000007
83.
SimonH. A. (1971). Designing organizations for an information-rich world. International Library of Critical Writings in Economics, 70, 187–202.
84.
SimonH. A.KasteleinT. J.KuipersS. K.NijenhuisW. A.WagenaarG. R. (1976). From substantive to procedural rationality. InKasteleinT. J.KuipersS. K.NijenhuisW. A.WagenaarG. R. (Eds.), 25 years of economic theory (pp.65–86). Springer.
85.
SmithJ. B.MitchellJ. R.MitchellR. K. (2009). Entrepreneurial scripts and the new transaction commitment mindset: Extending the expert information processing theory approach to entrepreneurial cognition research. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(4), 815–844.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2009.00328.x
SteigenbergerN.WilhelmH. (2018). Extending signaling theory to rhetorical signals: Evidence from crowdfunding. Organization Science, 29(3), 529–546.https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2017.1195
88.
StevensonR. M.CiuchtaM. P.LetwinC.DingerJ. M.VancouverJ. B. (2019). Out of control or right on the money? Funder self-efficacy and crowd bias in equity crowdfunding. Journal of Business Venturing, 34(2), 348–367.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2018.05.006
89.
StroeS.SirénC.ShepherdD.WincentJ. (2020). The dualistic regulatory effect of passion on the relationship between fear of failure and negative affect: Insights from facial expression analysis. Journal of Business Venturing, 35(4), 105948.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2019.105948
90.
StuartT. E.HoangH.HybelsR. C. (1999). Interorganizational endorsements and the performance of entrepreneurial ventures. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 315–349.https://doi.org/10.2307/2666998
91.
TetlockP. E.PetersonR. S.BerryJ. M. (1993). Flattering and unflattering personality portraits of integratively simple and complex managers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(3), 500–511.https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.64.3.500
Van BalenT.TarakciM.SoodA. (2019). Do disruptive visions pay off? The impact of disruptive entrepreneurial visions on venture funding. Journal of Management Studies, 56(2), 303–342.https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12390
94.
van KnippenbergD.DahlanderL.HaasM. R.GeorgeG. (2015). Information, attention, and decision making. Academy of Management Journal, 58(3), 649–657.https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2015.4003
95.
VanackerT.ForbesD. P. (2016). Disentangling the multiple effects of affiliate reputation on resource attraction in new firms. Organization Science, 27(6), 1525–1547.https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2016.1090
96.
VanackerT.ForbesD. P.KnockaertM.ManigartS. (2020). Signal strength, media attention, and resource mobilization: Evidence from new private equity firms. Academy of Management Journal, 63(4), 1082–1105.https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2018.0356
97.
VismaraS. (2016). Equity retention and social network theory in equity crowdfunding. Small Business Economics, 46(4), 579–590.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-016-9710-4
98.
VismaraS. (2018). Information cascades among investors in equity crowdfunding. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 42(3), 467–497.https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12261
99.
Walthoff-BormX.SchwienbacherA.VanackerT. (2018). Equity crowdfunding: First resort or last resort?Journal of Business Venturing, 33(4), 513–533.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2018.04.001
100.
WarnickB. J.DavisB. C.AllisonT. H.AnglinA. H. (2021). Express yourself: Facial expression of happiness, anger, fear, and sadness in funding pitches. Journal of Business Venturing, 36(4), 106109.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2021.106109
101.
WiersemaM. F.BantelK. A. (1992). Top management team demography and corporate strategic change. Academy of Management Journal, 35(1), 91–121.https://doi.org/10.5465/256474
ZafarS.WaddinghamJ.ZacharyM.ShortJ. (2021). Search behavior and decision confidence in equity crowdfunding: An information search process model perspective. Journal of Small Business Management, 2(4), 1–34.https://doi.org/10.1080/00472778.2020.1861285
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
