The notion of effectual networks is one of the central concepts in the effectuation research. However, there has been little conceptual and empirical work on how they emerge and what structures they have. This article incorporates the concept of complex adaptive systems from complexity theory to understand both their dynamic and structural elements. We examine the effectual networks and networking of 10 startups from Finland and offer a process-system model of effectual networks. We derive propositions that connect dynamic and structural entrepreneur-related factors of their emergence and outline directions for future research at the intersection of effectuation and complexity theory.
AlsosG. A.ClausenT. H.MauerR.ReadS.SarasvathyS. D. (2019). Effectual exchange: From entrepreneurship to the disciplines and beyond. Small Business Economics, 12(2), Advance online publication. doi:10.1007/s11187-019-00146-9.doi:10.1007/s11187-019-00146-9
2.
AndersonP. (1999). Perspective: Complexity theory and organization science. Organization Science, 10(3), 216–232.doi:10.1287/orsc.10.3.216
3.
AndersonP.MeyerA.EisenhardtK.CarleyK.PettigrewA. (1999). Introduction to the special issue: Applications of complexity theory to organization science. Organization Science, 10(3), 233–236.doi:10.1287/orsc.10.3.233
4.
ArendR. J.SarooghiH.BurkemperA. (2015). Effectuation as ineffectual? Applying the 3E theory-assessment framework to a proposed new theory of entrepreneurship. Academy of Management Review, 40(4), 630–651.doi:10.5465/amr.2014.0455
5.
BizziL.LangleyA. (2012). Studying processes in and around networks. Industrial Marketing Management, 41(2), 224–234.doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2012.01.007
6.
BurnesB. (2005). Complexity theories and organizational change. International Journal of Management Reviews, 7(2), 73–90.doi:10.1111/j.1468-2370.2005.00107.x
7.
BurnsB. L.BarneyJ. B.AngusR. W.HerrickH. N. (2016). Enrolling stakeholders under conditions of risk and uncertainty. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 10(1), 97–106.doi:10.1002/sej.1209
8.
BurtR. (1995). Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
9.
BurtR. (2004). Structural holes and good ideas. American Journal of Sociology, 110(2), 349–399.doi:10.1086/421787
ChandlerG. N.DeTienneD. R.McKelvieA.MumfordT. V. (2011). Causation and effectuation processes: A validation study. Journal of Business Venturing, 26(3), 375–390.doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2009.10.006
12.
ChilesT. H.MeyerA. D.HenchT. J. (2004). Organizational emergence: The origin and transformation of Branson, Missouri's musical theaters. Organization Science, 15(5), 499–519.doi:10.1287/orsc.1040.0095
13.
ChoiT. Y.DooleyK. J.RungtusanathamM. (2001). Supply networks and complex adaptive systems: Control versus emergence. Journal of Operations Management, 19(3), 351–366.doi:10.1016/S0272-6963(00)00068-1
14.
CilliersP. (2001). Boundaries, hierarchies and networks in complex systems. International Journal of Innovation Management, 5(2), 135–147.doi:10.1142/S1363919601000312
15.
Coleman, Jr.H. J. (1999). What enables self-organizing behavior in businesses. Emergence, 1(1), 33–49.doi:10.1207/s15327000em0101_3
16.
CovielloN. E. (2006). The network dynamics of international new ventures. Journal of International Business Studies, 37(5), 713–731.doi:10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400219
17.
DewN. (2009). Serendipity in entrepreneurship. Organization Studies, 30(7), 735–753.doi:10.1177/0170840609104815
18.
DewN.SarasvathyS. D. (2007). Innovations, stakeholders and entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Ethics, 74(3), 267–283.
19.
DewN.ReadS.SarasvathyS. D.WiltbankR. (2011). On the entrepreneurial genesis of new markets: Effectual transformations versus causal search and selection. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 21(2), 231–253.doi:10.1007/s00191-010-0185-1
20.
Diánez-GonzálezJ. P.Camelo-OrdazC. (2019). The influence of the structure of social networks on academic spin-offs’ entrepreneurial orientation. Industrial Marketing Management, 80, 84–98.doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2017.12.009
21.
DooleyK. (1996). A nominal definition of complex adaptive systems. The Chaos Network, 8(1), 2–3.
22.
DooleyK. J.Van de VenA. H. (1999). Explaining complex system dynamics. Organization Science, 10(3), 358–372.
23.
DrazinR.SandelandsL. (1992). Autogenesis: A perspective on the process of organizing. Organization Science, 3(2), 230–249.doi:10.1287/orsc.3.2.230
24.
EdmondsonA. C.McmanusS. E. (2007). Methodological fit in management field research. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1246–1264.doi:10.5465/amr.2007.26586086
25.
EisenhardtK. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550.doi:10.5465/amr.1989.4308385
26.
EisenhardtK. M.GraebnerM. E. (2007). Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 25–32.doi:10.5465/amj.2007.24160888
27.
EngelY.KaandorpM.ElfringT. (2017). Toward a dynamic process model of entrepreneurial networking under uncertainty. Journal of Business Venturing, 32(1), 35–51.doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2016.10.001
28.
EricssonK. (2018). The differential influence of experience, practice, and deliberate practice on the development of superior individual performance of experts. InEricssonK.HoffmanR.KozbeltA.WilliamsA. (Eds.), The cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (Cambridge Handbooks in Psychology, pp. 745-769). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
29.
FischerE.ReuberA. R. (2011). Social interaction via new social media: (How) can interactions on Twitter affect effectual thinking and behavior?Journal of Business Venturing, 26(1), 477–493.doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2010.09.002
30.
FisherG. (2012). Effectuation, causation, and bricolage: A behavioral comparison of emerging theories in entrepreneurship research. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36(5), 1019–1051.doi:10.1111/j.1540-6520.2012.00537.x
31.
FletcherM.PlakoyiannakiE. (2011). Case selection in international business: key issues and common misconceptions. InPiekkariR.WelchC. (Eds.), Rethinking the case study in international business and management research (pp.171–190). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
32.
GioiaD. A.CorleyK. G.HamiltonA. L. (2013). Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: Notes on Gioia methodology. Organizational Research Methods, 16(1), 15–31.
33.
GranovetterM. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481–510.doi:10.1086/228311
34.
GranovetterM. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380.doi:10.1086/225469
35.
GreveA.SalaffJ. W. (2003). Social networks and entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 28(1), 1–22.doi:10.1111/1540-8520.00029
36.
GummessonE. (2000). Qualitative methods in management research (2nd ed). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
37.
GuptaV. K.ChilesT. H.McMullenJ. S. (2016). A process perspective on evaluating and conducting effectual entrepreneurship research. Academy of Management Review, 41(3), 540–544.doi:10.5465/amr.2015.0433
38.
HåkanssonH.SnehotaI. (1995). Developing relations in business networks. London: Thompson.
39.
HåkanssonH.FordD. (2002). How should companies interact in business networks?Journal of Business Research, 55(2), 133–139.doi:10.1016/S0148-2963(00)00148-X
40.
HalinenA.TörnroosJ-Å. (2005). Using case methods in the study of contemporary business networks. Journal of Business Research, 58(9), 1285–1297.doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2004.02.001
41.
HalinenA.TörnroosJ-Å.EloM. (2013). Network process analysis: An event-based approach to study business network dynamics. Industrial Marketing Management, 42(8), 1213–1222.doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2013.05.001
42.
HansenE. L. (1995). Entrepreneurial networks and new organization growth. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 19(4), 7–19.doi:10.1177/104225879501900402
43.
HarmelingS. S.SarasvathyS. D. (2011). When contingency is a resource: Educating entrepreneurs in the Balkans, the Bronx, and beyond. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 37(4), 713–744.doi:10.1111/j.1540-6520.2011.00489.x
44.
HarveyD. L.ReedM. H. (1994). The evolution of dissipative social systems. Journal of Social and Evolutionary Systems, 17(4), 371–411.doi:10.1016/1061-7361(94)90020-5
45.
HinterhuberH. H.HirschA. (1998). Starting up a strategic network. Thunderbird International Business Review, 40(3), 185–207.doi:10.1002/tie.4270400302
46.
HiteJ. M.HesterlyW. S. (2001). The evolution of firm networks: From emergence to early growth of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 22(3), 275–286.doi:10.1002/smj.156
47.
HoangH.AntoncicB. (2003). Network-based research in entrepreneurship: A critical view. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(2), 165–187.
48.
HogueM.LordR. G. (2007). A multilevel, complexity theory approach to understanding gender bias in leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 18(4), 370–390.doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2007.04.006
49.
JackS.DoddS. D.AndersonA. R. (2008). Change and the development of entrepreneurial networks over time: A processual perspective. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 20(2), 125–159.doi:10.1080/08985620701645027
50.
JackS.MoultS.AndersonA. R.DoddS. (2010). An entrepreneurial network evolving: Patterns of change. International Small Business Journal: Researching Entrepreneurship, 28(4), 315–337.doi:10.1177/0266242610363525
51.
JackS. L. (2010). Approaches to studying networks: Implications and outcomes. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(1), 120–137.doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2008.10.010
52.
JarilloJ. C. (1988). On strategic networks. Strategic Management Journal, 9(1), 31–41.doi:10.1002/smj.4250090104
53.
JiangY.RülingC. -C. (2019). Opening the black box of effectuation processes: Characteristics and dominant types. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 43(1), 171–202.doi:10.1177/1042258717744204
54.
JohannisssonB. (1998). Personal networks in emerging knowledge-based firms: Spatial and functional patterns. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 10(4), 297–312.doi:10.1080/08985629800000017
55.
KarriR.GoelS. (2008). Effectuation and over-trust: Response to Sarasvathy and Dew. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32(4), 739–748.doi:10.1111/j.1540-6520.2008.00251.x
KauffmanS. A. (1993). Origins of order: Self-organization and selection in evolution. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
58.
KerrJ.CovielloN. (2019). Formation and constitution of effectual networks: A systematic review and synthesis. International Journal of Management Reviews, 21(3), 370–397.doi:10.1111/ijmr.12194
59.
KilduffM.TsaiW. (2003). Social networks and organizations. London: SAGE Publications.
60.
KitsonA.BrookA.HarveyG.JordanZ.MarshallR.O’SheaR.WilsonD. (2018). Using complexity and network concepts to inform healthcare knowledge translation. International Journal of Health Policy and Management, 7(3), 231–243.doi:10.15171/ijhpm.2017.79
61.
KnightF. H. (1964). Risk, uncertainty and profit. New York, USA: Augustus M. Kelley.
62.
KoonB.LowH. (1997). Managing business relations and positions in industrial networks. Industrial Marketing Management, 26, 189–202.
63.
LarsonA. (1991). Partner networks: Leveraging external ties to improve entrepreneurial performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 6(3), 173–188.doi:10.1016/0883-9026(91)90008-2
64.
LarsonA.StarrJ. A. (1993). A network model of organization formation. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 17(2), 5–15.
65.
LaskovaiaA.ShirokovaG.MorrisM. H. (2017). National culture, effectuation, and new venture performance: Global evidence from student entrepreneurs. Small Business Economics, 49(3), 687–709.doi:10.1007/s11187-017-9852-z
66.
LechnerC.DowlingM. (2003). Firm networks: External relationships as sources for the growth and competitiveness of entrepreneurial firms. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 15(1), 1–26.doi:10.1080/08985620210159220
67.
LewinR. (1992). Complexity: Life at the edge of chaos. New York: MacMillan.
68.
LichtensteinB. B.CarterN. M.DooleyK. J.GartnerW. B. (2007). Complexity dynamics of nascent entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(2), 236–261.doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2006.06.001
69.
LissackM. R. (1999). Complexity: The science, its vocabulary, and its relation to organizations. Emergence, 1(1), 110–126.doi:10.1207/s15327000em0101_7
70.
MaguireS.McKelveyB.MirabeauL.ÖztasN. (2006). Complexity science and organization studies. InCleggS.HardyC.LawrenceT.NordW. R. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organization studies (pp.165–214). London: Sage.
71.
MatalamäkiM. J. (2017). Effectuation, an emerging theory of entrepreneurship: Towards a mature stage of the development. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 24(4), 928–949.doi:10.1108/JSBED-02-2017-0030
72.
McElroyM. W. (2000). Integrating complexity theory, knowledge management and organizational learning. Journal of Knowledge Management, 4(3), 195–203.doi:10.1108/13673270010377652
73.
McKelveyB. (2004). Toward a complexity science of entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 19(3), 313–341.doi:10.1016/S0883-9026(03)00034-X
74.
McKelvieA.ChandlerG. N.DeTienneD. R.JohanssonA. (2019). The measurement of effectuation: Highlighting research tensions and opportunities for the future. Small Business Economics, 24(4).doi:10.1007/s11187-019-00149-6
75.
MilesM. B.HubermanA. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded source book (2nd ed). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
76.
MorelB.RamanujamR. (1999). Through the looking glass of complexity: The dynamics of organizations as adaptive and evolving systems. Organization Science, 10(3), 278–293.doi:10.1287/orsc.10.3.278
77.
NeergaardH.UlhøiJ. P. (2006). Government agency and trust in the formation and transformation of Interorganizational Entrepreneurial networks. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(4), 519–539.doi:10.1111/j.1540-6520.2006.00133.x
78.
OkhuysenG.BonardiJ. -P. (2011). The challenges of building theory by combining lenses. Academy of Management Review, 36(1), 6–11.doi:10.5465/amr.36.1.zok006
79.
ParkheA. (1993). ‘Messy’ Research, methodological predispositions and theory development in international joint ventures. Academy of Management Review, 18(2), 227–268.
80.
PartanenJ.ChettyS. K.RajalaA. (2011). Innovation types and network relationships. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 38(5), 1027–1055.doi:10.1111/j.1540-6520.2011.00474.x
81.
PattonM. Q. (2015). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Saint Paul, MN: SAGE Publications.
82.
PerryJ. T.ChandlerG. N.MarkovaG. (2012). Entrepreneurial effectuation: A review and suggestions for future research. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36(4), 837–861.doi:10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00435.x
83.
PlowmanD. A.SolanskyS.BeckT. E.BakerL.KulkarniM.TravisD. V. (2007). The role of leadership in emergent, self-organization. The Leadership Quarterly, 18(4), 341–356.doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2007.04.004
84.
PodolnyJ. M. (2001). Networks as the pipes and prisms of the market. American Journal of Sociology, 107(1), 33–60.doi:10.1086/323038
85.
ReadS.SarasvathyS. D. (2005). Knowing what to do and doing what you know:Effectuation as a form of entrepreneurial expertise. Journal of Private Equity, 9(1), 45–62.
86.
ReadS.SongM.SmithW. (2009). A meta-analytic review of effectuation and venture performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 24(6), 573–587.doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2008.02.005
87.
ReadS.DewN.SarasvathyS. D.SongM.WiltbankR. (2009). Marketing under uncertainty: The logic of effectuation approach. Journal of Marketing, 73(3), 1–18.doi:10.1509/jmkg.73.3.1
88.
ReadS.SarasvathyS. D.DewN.WiltbankR. (2016). Response to Arend, Sarooghi, and Burkemper (2015): Cocreating effectual entrepreneurship research. Academy of Management Review, 41(3), 528–536.doi:10.5465/amr.2015.0180
89.
ReadS.SarasvathyS. D.DewN.WiltbankR. (2017). Effectual entrepreneurship (2nd ed). New York: Routledge.
90.
ReymenI. M. M. J.AndriesP.BerendsH.MauerR.StephanU.van BurgE. (2015). Understanding dynamics of strategic decision making in venture creation: A process study of effectuation and causation. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 9(4), 351–379.doi:10.1002/sej.1201
91.
RitterT.WilkinsonI. F.JohnstonW. J. (2004). Managing in complex business networks. Industrial Marketing Management, 33(3), 175–183.doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2003.10.016
92.
SarasvathyS. D.DewN. (2008). Effectuation and Over-Trust: Debating Goel and Karri. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32(4), 727–737.doi:10.1111/j.1540-6520.2008.00250.x
93.
SarasvathyS. D. (2001). Causation and Effectuation: Toward a theoretical shift from economic inevitability to entrepreneurial contingency. Academy of Management Review, 26(2), 243–263.doi:10.5465/amr.2001.4378020
94.
SarasvathyS. D. (2008). Effectuation: Elements of entrepreneurial expertise. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
95.
SarasvathyS. D.VenkataramanS. (2011). Entrepreneurship as method: Open questions for an entrepreneurial future. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(1), 113–135.doi:10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00425.x
96.
SchneiderM.SomersM. (2006). Organizations as complex adaptive systems: Implications of complexity theory for leadership research. The Leadership Quarterly, 17(4), 351–365.doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.04.006
97.
SarasvathyS. D.DewN. (2005). New market creation through transformation. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 15(5), 533–565.doi:10.1007/s00191-005-0264-x
98.
SarasvathyS. D.DewN. (2003). “Effectual Networks: A pre-commitment approach to bridging the gap between opportunism and trust” Proceedings of the Academy of Management Annual Meeting
, Seattle, USA.
99.
SimonH. (1969). The science of the artificial (2nd ed). Boston, MA: MIT Press.
100.
SimonH. A.ChaseW. G. (1973). Skill in chess. American Scientist, 61, 393–403.
101.
SimonH. A. (1993). Altruism and economics. American Economic Review, 83, 156–161.
102.
Slotte-KockS.CovielloN. (2010). Entrepreneurship research on network processes: A review and ways forward. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34(1), 31–57.doi:10.1111/j.1540-6520.2009.00311.x
103.
SmolkaK. M.VerheulI.Burmeister–LampK.HeygensP. (2018). Get it together! synergistic effects of causal and effectual decision–making logics on venture performance. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 42(4), 571–604.doi:10.1177/1042258718783429
104.
StaberU. (1993). Friends, acquaintances, strangers: Gender differences in the structure of entrepreneurial networks. Journal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship, 11(1), 73–82.doi:10.1080/08276331.1993.10600450
105.
StakeR. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.
106.
SullivanD. M.FordC. M. (2013). How entrepreneurs use networks to address changing resource requirements during early venture development. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 38(3), 551–574.doi:10.1111/etap.12009
107.
SvyantekD. J.DeShonR. P. (1993). Organizational attractors: A chaos theory explanation of why cultural change efforts often fail. Public Administration Quarterly, 339–355.
108.
ThiétartR. A.ForguesB. (1995). Chaos theory and organization. Organization Science, 6(1), 19–31.doi:10.1287/orsc.6.1.19
UzziB. (1997). Social structure and competition in Interfirm networks: The paradox of Embeddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(1), 35–67.doi:10.2307/2393808
111.
WalbyS. (2007). Complexity theory, systems theory, and multiple intersecting social inequalities. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 37(4), 449–470.doi:10.1177/0048393107307663
112.
WelterC.KimS. (2018). Effectuation under risk and uncertainty: A simulation model. Journal of Business Venturing, 33(1), 100–116.doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2017.11.005
113.
WiltbankR.ReadS.DewN.SarasvathyS. D. (2009). Prediction and control under uncertainty: Outcomes in angel investing. Journal of Business Venturing, 24(2), 116–133.doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2007.11.004
114.
YinR. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.
