Abstract
Rabbit hemorrhagic disease virus 2 (RHDV2) causes an often-fatal disease of rabbits that has resulted in outbreaks in rabbitries in Europe, Africa, Australia, and Asia. RHD has historically been characterized as a foreign animal disease in the United States. In July 2019, RHDV2 was detected in rabbits on Orcas Island along the northwestern coast of Washington (WA) State following reports of deaths in multiple feral and domestic rabbits. We document and highlight here the unique clinical presentation and gross and histologic lesions observed in this recent WA outbreak. Affected rabbits died without premonitory signs or displayed hyporexia and/or lethargy for ≤1 d prior to death. The most consistent pathologic finding was random, multifocal hepatocellular necrosis, often with concurrent multifocal-to-diffuse splenic necrosis. The lack of significant clinical signs in conjunction with the random distribution of hepatic necrosis in the WA outbreak contrasts with previous reports of RHDV2 disease progression.
Rabbit hemorrhagic disease (RHD) is caused by a calicivirus (
RHDV2 was first identified in 2010 in France, but has since spread throughout Europe and to Australia, Africa, and North America.
19
The first North American reports of RHDV2 to the World Organisation for Animal Health (OIE) were in 2016 (Quebec, Canada) and 2018 (British Columbia, Canada; Ohio, USA).
19
RHDV2 affects a broader host range, including hares of the
Although epidemiologic and geographic data regarding RHDV2 outbreaks in Europe are documented extensively,2,6,7,15,17,18 published reports of clinicopathologic findings in natural outbreaks of RHDV2 are relatively scarce. One case report outlined the clinical and pathologic findings in 2 pet rabbits naturally infected with RHDV2 in Spain 5 ; both rabbits had a 1-d history of hyporexia or anorexia and lethargy. A blood chemistry panel revealed marked increases in gamma-glutamyl transferase, alkaline phosphatase, bile acids, and bilirubin with decreased activity of aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase, suggestive of severe liver damage in both animals. Both rabbits developed profound icterus and died 22 and 30 h after admission, respectively. A postmortem examination performed on one rabbit revealed severe portal-to-midzonal hepatocellular necrosis. Additionally, this animal had severe necrosuppurative bronchopneumonia and moderate cardiomyocyte necrosis.
In the spring of 2019, multiple feral domestic rabbit deaths were reported on Orcas Island, an island in the San Juan archipelago in the northwest corner of WA (pers. comm., Washington State Department of Agriculture veterinarians). These reports followed the detection of RHDV2 in coastal areas of British Columbia, Canada in 2018. 20 Over the ensuing summer, fall, and winter of 2019, the Washington Animal Disease Diagnostic Laboratory (WADDL; Pullman, WA, USA) received 7 cases comprising 14 RHDV2-positive rabbits (Suppl. Table 1). Case 1 was a 2-y-old, 4-H pet, Norwegian dwarf buck from Orcas Island submitted for postmortem examination in July 2019. Gross examination was unremarkable. Fresh samples of liver and spleen were submitted to the USDA-APHIS Foreign Animal Disease Diagnostic Laboratory (FADDL; Plum Island, NY, USA) for detection of RHDV2. This decision was based on the number and manner of rabbit deaths and the geographic proximity of these cases to the Canadian RHDV2 outbreak. Cases 2–5 included rabbit carcasses from Orcas Island and 1 carcass from San Juan Island, which arrived at WADDL in July and August of 2019. Fresh liver specimens from 9 of these bodies were forwarded to FADDL, which confirmed infection with RHDV2 in all submissions. Case 6 was a single adult feral domestic rabbit from Whidbey Island, north of Seattle, WA, submitted in October 2019. In December 2019, 108 of 145 rabbits from a rescue organization died on a premises in Clallam county located in the northwestern WA mainland; 3 of the 108 rabbits were submitted to WADDL for examination (case 7). Overall, 14 liver samples were forwarded from WADDL to FADDL for antigen (ag-ELISA) and reverse-transcription PCR (RT-PCR); infection with RHDV2 was confirmed in all 14 samples. 9 RHDV1 was not detected in any of the 14 samples.
All rabbits were autopsied at WADDL upon arrival. Gross examinations were severely limited in most cases because of the poor postmortem condition of the cadavers. Two of the carcasses had cavitary effusions: case 1 had moderate acute hemoabdomen, and case 6 had moderate hydrothorax. Only case 7 had grossly identifiable multifocal-to-coalescent hepatic necrosis as evidenced by a dark-red to tan liver and markedly friable parenchyma. Cases 2–5 were grossly normal apart from autolysis.
Representative samples of visceral organs from all 14 RHDV2 confirmed carcasses were collected for histologic evaluation. Tissues were considered too autolyzed from case 6 to yield reliable histologic diagnoses and are excluded from the histologic descriptions. Cases 1–5 and 7 had histologic evidence of hepatocellular necrosis. In all samples, necrosis was categorized as multifocal-random and panlobular and included necrosis of individual to small groups of hepatocytes (Fig. 1A, 1B). There was no significant inflammatory component in 10 of 13 rabbits. However, in case 7, hepatocellular necrosis was accompanied by periportal-to-midzonal lymphoplasmacytic inflammation. In the 3 rabbits in case 7, a coexisting chronic disease process caused by

Rabbit hemorrhagic disease virus 2 infection in rabbits.
These cases followed a temporal and geographic progression from the RHDV2 reports in British Columbia, Canada in 2018 to the islands off the northwestern coast of Washington in the summer of 2019, with ultimate progression to mainland northwestern Washington by the winter of 2019. However, it is unknown if the outbreak in WA is a direct continuation of the outbreak in British Columbia.
Only one submitter described clinical disease characterized by lethargy and anorexia and rapid death (case 3). The short clinical course of affected rabbits in the WA outbreak described here is in contrast to the previously described experimental infection of RHDV2 in Europe that described a prolonged, 5-d disease course. 13 Similarly, in the case report of 2 naturally infected pet rabbits from Spain, the affected rabbits were hyporexic for 1 d, developed progressive lethargy for 1–2 additional days, and finally succumbed to disease by day 5. 5 This may suggest that the isolate of RHVD2 circulating in WA is a more virulent isolate than has been described previously. However, the RHDV2 disease courses described here are reported by owners and submitters; although an important source of epidemiologic information for each case, the clinical course of each animal, particularly the feral rabbits, may not have been observed closely. Additionally, these rabbits originated from a variety of husbandry conditions and were of multiple age groups (Suppl. Table 1). Some animals had additional coinfections or presumably unrelated lesions and disease processes. These variables make it difficult to draw direct comparisons from previous experimental infections regarding the severity and duration of disease course. Additional experimental investigation of the WA isolate must be conducted to definitively demonstrate the virulence of this isolate.
Although the postmortem examination findings in RHDV2 natural outbreaks in Europe are similar to those detected in our WA cases, there are several notable differences. Icterus has historically been a prominent finding in the European cases but was not a feature in any of the bodies submitted to WADDL. Notably, European cases with histologic lesions had clear periportal hepatocellular necrosis.6,18 In the WA cases described here, the distribution of necrosis was random and affected hepatocytes in all zones of the lobule. It is unknown whether this represents a difference in viral cellular tropism or disease pathogenesis, a difference in host immune response, or another variable.
Differences between the RHDV2-associated disease detected in the European outbreaks and our WA outbreak should be considered when assessing unexpected rabbit deaths. Overall, given that cases of RHDV2 infection have been detected in the mainland United States, and with the continuing outbreak within the southwestern United States, 3 vigilance for RHDV2 should remain high. Unexpected deaths or multiple mortalities in groups of rabbits, regardless of age, should be evaluated for infection with RHDV2.
Supplemental Material
sj-pdf-1-vdi-10.1177_10406387211022466 – Supplemental material for Clinical and pathologic findings in an outbreak in rabbits of natural infection by rabbit hemorrhagic disease virus 2 in the northwestern United States
Supplemental material, sj-pdf-1-vdi-10.1177_10406387211022466 for Clinical and pathologic findings in an outbreak in rabbits of natural infection by rabbit hemorrhagic disease virus 2 in the northwestern United States by Laura B. A. Williams, Steven E. Edmonds, Susan R. Kerr, Liam E. Broughton-Neiswanger and Kevin R. Snekvik in Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation
Footnotes
Acknowledgements
We thank Dr. Amber Itle for identifying and helping to coordinate these cases. We also thank the WADDL faculty, residents, and staff involved in the diagnostic case workups.
Declaration of conflicting interests
The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Funding
This study was financially supported by the USDA APHIS National Animal Health Laboratory Network (NAHLN) grant AP20VSD&B000C052.
Supplemental material
Supplemental material for this article is available online.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
