In musicology, there has been a long debate about a meaningful partitioning and description of music history regarding composition styles. Particularly, concepts of historical periods have been criticized since they cannot account for the continuous and interwoven evolution of style. To systematically study this evolution, large corpora are necessary suggesting the use of computational strategies. This article presents such strategies and experiments relying on a dataset of 2000 audio recordings, which cover more than 300 years of music history. From the recordings, we extract different tonal features. We propose a method to visualize these features over the course of history using evolution curves. With the curves, we re-trace hypotheses concerning the evolution of chord transitions, intervals, and tonal complexity. Furthermore, we perform unsupervised clustering of recordings across composition years, individual pieces, and composers. In these studies, we found independent evidence of historical periods that broadly agrees with traditional views as well as recent data-driven experiments. This shows that computational experiments can provide novel insights into the evolution of styles.
AdlerG.StrunkW. O. (1934). Style-criticism. Musical Quarterly, 20(2), 172–176.
2.
BárdosL. (1961). Modális Harmóniák [Modal harmonies]. Budapest, Hungary: Ed. Zenemukiadó.
3.
BelaievV. (1930). The signs of style in music. Musical Quarterly, 16(3), 366–377.
4.
BellmannH. G. (2012). Categorization of tonal music style: A quantitative investigation (PhD thesis). Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia.
5.
BenetosE.DixonS.GiannoulisD.KirchhoffH.KlapuriA. (2013). Automatic music transcription: Challenges and future directions. Journal of Intelligent Information Systems, 41(3), 407–434.
6.
ByrdD.SimonsenJ. G. (2015). Towards a standard testbed for optical music recognition: Definitions, metrics, and page images. Journal of New Music Research, 44(3), 169–195.
7.
ChoT.BelloJ. P. (2014). On the relative importance of individual components of chord recognition systems. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing, 22(2), 477–492.
8.
ClarkeH. L. (1956). Toward a musical periodization of music. Journal of the American Musicological Society, 9(1), 25–30.
9.
EfronB. (1992). Bootstrap methods: Another look at the jackknife. In KotzS.JohnsonN. L. (Eds.), Breakthroughs in statistics (pp. 569–593). New York, NY: Springer.
10.
FrankP. L. (1955). Historical or stylistic periods?Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 13(4), 451–457.
GodtI. (1984). Style periods of music history considered analytically. College Music Symposium, 24, 33–48.
14.
GómezE.HerreraP. (2004). Estimating the tonality of polyphonic audio files: Cognitive versus machine learning modelling strategies. In Proceedings of the International Society for Music Information Retrieval Conference (ISMIR) (pp. 92–95). Barcelona, Spain.
15.
GoodM. (2006). Lessons from the adoption of MusicXML as an interchange standard. In Proceedings of XML. Boston, MA.
16.
HoninghA.BodR. (2010). Pitch class set categories as analysis tools for degrees of tonality. In Proceedings of the International Society for Music Information Retrieval Conference (ISMIR) (pp. 459–464). Utrecht, The Netherlands.
17.
HoninghA.WeydeT.ConklinD. (2009). Sequential association rules in atonal music. In ChewE.ChildsA.ChuanC. H. (Eds.), Mathematics and Computation in Music (MCM) (pp. 130–138). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
18.
IzmirliÖ. (2009). Tonal-atonal classification of music audio using diffusion maps. In Proceedings of the International Society for Music Information Retrieval Conference (ISMIR) (pp. 687–691). Kobe, Japan.
19.
de la MotteD.PraterJ. L. (1991). The study of harmony: An historical perspective. Dubuque, IA: William C. Brown.
20.
LaRueJ. (1962). On style analysis. Journal of Music Theory, 6(1), 91–107.
21.
LaRueJ. (1992). Guidelines for style analysis. Sterling Heights, MI: Harmonie Park Press.
22.
LeeK. (2006). Automatic chord recognition from audio using enhanced pitch class profile. In Proceedings of the International Computer Music Conference (ICMC) (pp. 306–311). New Orleans, LA.
23.
MacQueenJ. (1967). Some methods for classification and analysis of multivariate observations. In Proceedings of the Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, Volume 1 (pp. 281–297). Berkeley, CA.
24.
MauchM.DixonS. (2010a). Approximate note transcription for the improved identification of difficult chords. In Proceedings of the International Society for Music Information Retrieval Conference (ISMIR) (pp. 135–140). Utrecht, The Netherlands.
25.
MauchM.DixonS. (2010b). Simultaneous estimation of chords and musical context from audio. IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing, 18(6), 1280–1289.
26.
MauchM.MacCallumR. M.LevyM.LeroiA. M. (2015). The evolution of popular music: USA 1960–2010. Royal Society Open Science, 2(5).
27.
MüllerM. (2015). Fundamentals of music processing. New York, NY: Springer.
28.
MüllerM.EwertS. (2010). Towards timbre-invariant audio features for harmony-based music. IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing, 18(3), 649–662.
29.
PapadopoulosH.PeetersG. (2012). Local key estimation from an audio signal relying on harmonic and metrical structures. IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing, 20(4), 1297–1312.
30.
PascallR. (2001). Style. In RootD. (Ed.), Grove music online: Oxford music online. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
31.
PearsonK. (1901). On lines and planes of closest fit to systems of points in space. Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science, 2(11), 559–572.
32.
PuginL.KepperJ.RolandP.HartwigM.HankinsonA. (2012). Separating presentation and content in MEI. In Proceedings of the International Society for Music Information Retrieval Conference (ISMIR) (pp. 505–510). Porto, Portugal.
33.
Rodriguez ZivicP. H.ShifresF.CecchiG. A. (2013). Perceptual basis of evolving Western musical styles. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(24), 10034–10038.
34.
Roig-FrancolíM. A. (2011). Harmony in context. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Humanities/Social Sciences/Languages.
35.
SappC. S. (2005). Visual hierarchical key analysis. ACM Computers in Entertainment, 3(4), 1–19.
36.
SchulenbergD. (2014). The music of Carl Philipp Emanuel Bach. Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press.
37.
ShehA.EllisD. P. W. (2003). Chord segmentation and recognition using EM-trained hidden Markov models. In Proceedings of the International Society for Music Information Retrieval Conference (ISMIR) (pp. 185–191). Baltimore, MA.
38.
StreichS. (2006). Music complexity: A multi-faceted description of audio content (PhD thesis). Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain.
39.
van de ParS.McKinneyM. F.RedertA. (2006). Musical key extraction from audio using profile training. In Proceedings of the International Society for Music Information Retrieval Conference (ISMIR) (pp. 328–329). Victoria, Canada.
40.
ViroV. (2011). Peachnote: Music score search and analysis platform. In Proceedings of the International Society for Music Information Retrieval Conference (ISMIR) (pp. 359–362). Miami, FL.
41.
WebsterJ. (2004). The eighteenth century as a music-historical period?Eighteenth Century Music, 1(1), 47–60.
42.
WeißC. (2017). Computational methods for tonality-based style analysis of classical music audio recordings (PhD thesis). Ilmenau University of Technology, Ilmenau, Germany.
43.
WeißC.MauchM.DixonS. (2014). Timbre-invariant audio features for style analysis of classical music. In Proceedings of the Joint Conference 40th International Computer Music Conference (ICMC) and 11th Sound and Music Computing Conference (SMC) (pp. 1461–1468). Athens, Greece.
44.
WeißC.MüllerM. (2014). Quantifying and visualizing tonal complexity. In Proceedings of the Conference on Interdisciplinary Musicology (CIM) (pp. 184–187). Berlin, Germany.
45.
WeißC.MüllerM. (2015). Tonal complexity features for style classification of classical music. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (ICASSP) (pp. 688–692). Brisbane, Australia.
46.
WhiteC. W. (2013). Some statistical properties of tonality, 1650–1900 (PhD thesis). Yale University, New Haven, CT.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
