In the present study, we address the perceptual basis for developing abstract concepts by investigating if there are any differences in the way sighted and blind 10-year-olds conceptualize some basic musical relations. Thirty-four sighted and nine blind US elementary school students (seven congenitally blind) were exposed to 10 diametrically-opposed musical stimuli (a high and low tone, a quick and slow succession of pitches, a major and minor chord, and so on) and asked to verbally describe what the first and what the second part of the sequence sounded like. Upon transcription, their verbalizations were classified into higher-order conceptual categories. Distributions of responses so grouped were then compared. Results support the theoretical position that metaphorization is the principal mechanism in conceptualizing musical elements, and suggest a preference for visuo-spatial descriptions of the sequences. While sighted children’s verbalizations seemed more referential and took less time to produce overall, the conceptual categories in the two groups reveal no differences. We suggest three possible explanations for this result: (1) the studied concepts might be more abstractly spatial, rather than visually-grounded, for both populations; (2) the concepts might derive from visuo-spatial stimulation for the sighted, and more generally embodied experience in the blind, which however produces the same linguistic output; (3) the concepts might be visuo-spatial in the sighted, and the blind could have adopted the terminology upon hearing it from the sighted, irrespective of their own sensory experience.
AdlingtonR. (2003). Moving beyond motion: Metaphors for changing sound. Journal of the Royal Musical Association, 128(2), 297–318.
2.
AfonsoA.BlumA.KatzB. F. G.TarrouxP. (2010). Structural properties of spatial representations in blind people: Scanning images constructed from haptic exploration or from locomotion in a 3-D audio virtual environment. Memory & Cognition, 38(5), 591–604.
3.
AksnesH. (2001). Music and its resonating body. Danish Yearbook of Musicology, 29, 81–101.
4.
AntovićM. (2007). Optimality and metaphor theory in music and language cognition (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Niš, Serbia.
5.
AntovićM. (2009). Musical metaphor in Serbian and Romani children: An empirical study. Metaphor & Symbol, 24(3), 184–202.
6.
ArnheimR. (1969). Visual thinking. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
7.
AshleyR. (2004). Musical pitch space across modalities: Spatial and other mappings through language and culture. In LipskombS.AshleyR.GjerdingenR.WebsterP. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Music Perception and Cognition (pp. 64–71). Adelaide, Australia: Causal Productions.
8.
BednyM.CaramazzaA.GrossmanE.Pascual-LeoneA.SaxeR. (2008). Concepts are more than percepts: The case of action verbs. Journal of Neuroscience, 28(44), 11347–11353.
9.
BednyM.CaramazzaA.Pascual-LeoneA.SaxeR. (2012). Typical neural representations of action verbs develop without vision. Cerebral Cortex, 22(2), 286–293.
10.
BednyM.SaxeR. (2012). Insights into the origins of knowledge from the cognitive neuroscience of blindness. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 29(1–2), 56–84.
11.
BernsteinL. (1976). The Unanswered Question. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
12.
BigelowA. (1988). Blind children’s concepts of how people see. Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness, 82(2), 65–68.
13.
BoldtW. (1969). The development of scientific thinking in blind children and adolescents. Education of the Visually Handicapped, 1(1), 5–8.
14.
BoroditskyL.PrinzJ. (2008). What thoughts are made of? In SeminG. R.SmithE. R. (Eds.), Embodied grounding: Social, cognitive, affective, and neuroscientific approaches (pp. 98–111). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
15.
BrowerC. (2000). A cognitive theory of musical meaning. Journal of Music Theory, 44(2), 323–379.
16.
ButterworthB. L. (1980). Evidence for pauses in speech. In ButterworthB. L. (Ed.), Language production. Volume 1: Speech and talk (pp. 155–176). London, UK: Academic Press.
17.
CabreraD.MorimotoM. (2007). Influence of fundamental frequency and source elevation on the vertical localization of complex tones and complex tone pairs. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 122(1), 478–488.
18.
CarreirasM.CodinaB. (1992). Spatial cognition of the blind and sighted: Visual and amodal hypothesis. Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive/Current Psychology of Cognition, 12(1), 51–78.
19.
CasasantoD.PhillipsW.BoroditskyL. (2003). Do we think about music in terms of space: Metaphoric representation of musical pitch. In AltermanR.KirschD. (Eds.), Proceedings of 25th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (p. 1323). Boston, MA: Cognitive Science Society.
20.
ChafeW. (1987). Cognitive constraints on information flow. In TomlinR. (Ed.), Coherence and grounding in discourse (pp. 21–51). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
21.
ChomskyN. (1988). Language and problems of knowledge. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
22.
CollignonO.VandewalleG.VossP.AlbouyG.CharbonneauG.LassondeM.LeporeF. (2011). Functional specialization for auditory-spatial processing in the occipital cortex of congenitally blind humans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108(11), 4435–4440.
23.
CoxA. (1999). The metaphoric logic of musical motion and space (Unpublished doctoral dissertation).University of Oregon, Eugene.
24.
CummingN. (1994). Metaphor in Roger Scruton’s aesthetics of music. In PopleA. (Ed.), Theory, analysis and meaning in music (pp. 3–28). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
25.
CutsforthT. D. (1932). The unreality of words to the blind. Teachers Forum, 4(1), 86–89.
26.
DoddsA. G.CarterD. D. C. (1983). Memory for movement in blind children: The role of previous visual experience. Journal of Motor Behavior, 15(4), 343–352.
27.
EitanZ.EitanO.GranotR. (2012). Listening in the dark: Congenital and early blindness and cross-domain mappings in music. Psychomusicology: Music, Mind and Brain, 22(1), 33–45.
28.
EitanZ.GranotR. (2006). How music moves: Musical parameters and images of motion. MusicPerception, 23(3), 221–247.
29.
EitanZ.TimmersR. (2010). Beethoven’s last piano sonata and those who follow crocodiles: Cross-domain mappings of auditory pitch in a musical context. Cognition, 114(3), 405–422.
30.
EpsteinR.GamlinP. (1994). Young children’s comprehension of simple and complex metaphors presented in pictures and words. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 9(3), 179–191.
31.
EspositoA.StejskalV.SmékalZ.BourbakisN. (2007). The significance of empty speech pauses: Cognitive and algorithmic issues. In MeleF.RamellaG.SantilloS.VentrigliaF. (Eds.), Advances in brain, vision and artificial intelligence (pp. 542–554). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
32.
FeldS. (1981). Flow like a waterfall: The metaphors of Kaluli musical theory. Yearbook for Traditional Music, 13, 22–47.
33.
FlowersP.WangC. (2002). Matching verbal description to music excerpt: The use of language by blind and sighted children. Journal of Research in Music Education, 50(3), 202–214.
34.
ForcevilleC.Urios-AparisiE. (2009). Multimodal metaphor. Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.
35.
FugielB. (2011). Waveform circularity from added sawtooth and square wave acoustical signals. Music Perception, 28(4), 415–424.
36.
GalleseV.LakoffG. (2005). The brain’s concepts: The role of the sensory-motor system in conceptual knowledge. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 22(3), 455–479.
37.
GardnerH.SilvermanJ.DenesG.SemenzaC.RosenstielA.K. (1977). Sensitivity to musical denotation and connotation in organic patients. Cortex, 13(3), 242–256.
38.
GlaznieksA. (2011). Why focus on target domains? The importance of domain knowledge in children’s understanding of metaphors. In HandlS.SchmidH. (Eds.), Windows to the mind: Metaphor, metonymy and conceptual blending (pp. 63–84). Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.
39.
GleitmanL. (1990). The structural sources of verb meaning. Language Acquisition, 1(1), 3–55.
40.
GuckM. (1997). Two types of metaphoric transference. In RobinsonJ. (Ed.), Music and meaning(pp. 201–214). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
41.
HallA. (1983). Methods of equivalence grouping by congenitally blind children: Implications for education. Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness, 77(4), 172–174.
42.
HesposS. J.BaillargeonR. (2001). Infants’ knowledge about occlusion and containment events: A surprising discrepancy. Psychological Science, 12(2), 141–147.
43.
HurovitzC.DunnS.DomhoffG.FissH. (1999). The dreams of blind men and women: A replication and extension of previous findings. Dreaming, 9(2–3), 183–193.
44.
JackendoffR. (1987). Consciousness and the computational mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
45.
JohnsonM. (1987). The body in the mind. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
46.
JohnsonM.LarsonS. (2003). Something in the way she moves: Metaphors of musical motion. Metaphor & Symbol, 18(2), 63–84.
47.
KephartJ.G.KephartC.P.SchwartzG.C. (1974). A journey into the world of the blind child. Exceptional Children, 40(6), 421–427.
48.
KerrN.FoulkesD.SchmidtM. (1982). The structure of laboratory dream reports in blind and sighted subjects. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 170(5), 286–294.
49.
KleinJ. (1819). Lehrbuch zum Unterrichte der Blinden, um ihnen ihren Zustand zu erleichtern, sie nützlich zu beschäftigen und sie zur bürgerlichen Brauchbarkeit zu bilden [Textbook on the Education of the Blind, to Be Used to Facilitate their Condition, So they Could Get Properly Employed and Become Useful to Society]. Wien, Austria: Schaumburg.
50.
LakoffG.JohnsonM. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh. New York, NY: Basic Books.
51.
LandauB. (2002). Spatial cognition. In RamachandranV. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the human brain (Vol. 4, pp. 395–418). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
52.
LandauB.GleitmanL. R. (1985). Language and experience: Evidence from the blind child. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
53.
LandauB.DessalegnB.GoldbergA. (2010). Language and space: Momentary interactions. InChiltonP.EvansV. (Eds.), Language, cognition, and space: The state of the art and new directions (pp. 51–77). London, UK: Equinox.
54.
LarsonS. (2012). Musical forces: Motion, metaphor and meaning in music. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
55.
LerdahlF. (2004). Tonal Pitch Space. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
56.
LidjiP.KolinskyR.LochyA.MoraisH. (2007). Spatial associations for musical stimuli: A piano in the head?Journal of Experimental Psychology, 33(5), 1189–1207.
57.
MadsenC.DarrowA. (1989). The relationship between music aptitude and sound conceptualization of the visually impaired. Journal of Music Therapy, 26(2), 71–78.
58.
MahonB.AnzellottiS.SchwarzbachJ.ZampiniM.CaramazzaA. (2009). Category-specific organization in the human brain does not require visual experience. Neuron, 63(3), 397–405.
59.
MandlerJ. (2010). The spatial foundations of the conceptual system. Language & Cognition, 2(1), 21–44.
60.
MarmorG. S. (1977). Age at onset of blindness in visual imagery development. Perception & Motor Skills, 45(3), 1031–1034.
61.
MillarS. (1997). Reading by touch. London, UK: Routledge.
62.
MillerD. (1985). Reading comes naturally: A mother and her blind child’s experiences. Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness, 79(1), 1–4.
63.
MorrongielloB.TimneyB.HumphreyG.AndersonS.SkoryC. (1995). Spatial knowledge in blind and sighted children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 59(2), 211–233.
64.
NorrisM.SpauldingP. J.BrodieF. H. (1957). Blindness in children. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
65.
PerlmanM. (2004). Unplayed melodies: Javanese gamelan and the genesis of music theory. Berkeley: University of California Press.
66.
PrattC. (1930). The spatial character of high and low tones. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 13(3), 278–285.
67.
RogersT.Lambon RalphM.GarradP.BozeatS.McClellandJ.HodgesJ.PattersonK. (2004). Structure and deterioration of semantic memory: A neuropsychological and computational investigation. Psychological Review, 111(1), 205–235.
68.
RofflerS.ButlerR. (1968). Factors that influence the localization of sound in the vertical plane. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 43(6), 1255–1259.
69.
RusconiE.KwanB.GiordanoB.UmiltaC.ButterworthB. (2006). Spatial representation of pitch height: The SMARC effect. Cognition, 99(2), 113–129.
70.
SaslawJ. (1996). Forces, containers, and paths: The role of body-derived image schemas in the conceptualization of music. Journal of Music Theory, 40(2), 217–43.
71.
ScrutonR. (1997). The aesthetics of music. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
72.
SeitzJ. A. (1998) Nonverbal metaphor: A review of theories and evidence.Genetic, social and general psychology monographs,124, 95-119.
73.
ShepardR. (1982). Geometrical approximations to the structure of musical pitch. Psychological Review, 89(4), 305–333.
74.
SpelkeE. S.HesposS. J. (2002). Conceptual development in infancy: The case of containment. In SteinN. L.BauerP. J.RabinowitzM.MandlerG. (Eds.), Representation, memory, and development: Essays in honor of Jean Mandler (pp. 223–246). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
75.
StankovL.SpilsburyG. (1979). The measurement of auditory abilities of blind, partially sighted and sighted children. Applied Psychological Measurement, 2(4), 491–503.
76.
StephensB.GrubeC. (1982). Development of Piagetian reasoning in congenitally blind children. Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness, 76(4), 133–143.
77.
SweetserE. (1990). From etymology to pragmatics. Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press.
78.
TalmyL. (2000). Toward a cognitive semantics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
79.
Thinus-BlancC.GaunetF. (1997). Representation of space in blind persons: Vision as a spatial sense?Psychological Bulletin, 121(1), 20–42.
80.
TomaselloM. (2005). Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA & London, UK: Harvard University Press.
81.
TorrJ.SimpsonA. (2003). The emergence of grammatical metaphor: Literacy-oriented expressions in the everyday speech of young children. In Simon-VandenbergenA.TaverniersM.RavelliL. (Eds.), Grammatical metaphor: Views from systemic functional linguistics (pp. 169–183). Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
82.
TrainorL.TrehubS. (1992). The development of referential meaning in music. Music Perception, 9(4): 455–470.
83.
TreitlerL. (1997). Language and the interpretation of music. In RobinsonJ. (Ed.), Music and meaning(pp. 23–56). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
84.
UngarS. (2000). Cognitive mapping without visual experience. In KitchinR.FreundschuhS. (Eds.), Cognitive mapping: Past, present and future (pp. 221–248). London, UK: Routledge.
85.
UrwinC. (1978). The development of communication between blind infants and their mothers. In LockA. (Ed.), Action, gesture and symbol: The emergence of language (pp. 79–108). New York, NY: Academic Press.
86.
VinterA.FernandesV.OrlandiO.MorganP. (2012). Verbal definitions of familiar objects in blind children reflect their peculiar perceptual experience. Child: Care, Health and Development. Advance online publication. doi:10.1111/cch.12002
87.
WalkerA. R. (1985). Mental imagery and musical concepts: Some evidence from the congenitally blind. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 85(1), 229–237.
88.
WarrenD. (1994). Blindness and children. An individual difference approach. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
89.
WelchG. (1991). Visual metaphors for sound: A study of mental imagery, language and pitch perception in the congenitally blind. Canadian Journal of Research in Music Education, 33(1), 215–222.
90.
ZangwillN. (2007). Music, metaphor and emotion. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 65(4), 391–400.
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
