The influence of melodic and rhythmic redundancies on recognition memory for unknown musical themes

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the influence of melodic and rhythmic redundancies, and their interaction with tonality, on recognition memory for music. Forty-four non-musicians performed a recognition task with unknown musical material. Stimuli created for experimental purposes were made up of 48 short melodies (half tonal and half non-tonal) and were characterized by the presence of three kinds of musical redundancy: melodic only, rhythmic only, or both melodicrhythmic. In a first phase, subjects listened to a study list of 24 stimuli. After 20 minutes, a test list containing 48 stimuli (24 previously heard and 24 novel ones) was administered, and subjects were asked to indicate for each item whether the melody: was recognized from the study list (R response); evoked a sense of familiarity (K response); or was not recognized at all (X response). Major results showed that tonality influences semantic, but not episodic memory, and that the two systems are differentially affected by the type of redundancy (especially melodic-rhythmic, which has a large effect on episodic memory but is ineffective for semantic memory). Moreover, tonality and the type of redundancy systematically interact only in the episodic memory system. Thus, evidence supports disassociation of the two memory systems. Furthermore, R and X responses showed a symmetry in their trend, suggesting a role for X responses as counterparts of the R responses within the episodic memory system. Melodic-rhythmic redundancy demonstrated the most prominent effects on the episodic system, whereas the assessment comparing melodic versus rhythmic only as the pre-eminent type of redundancy was more ambiguous. Finally, non-tonal stimuli were found to be more sensitive than tonal stimuli, whereby they showed differential effectiveness regarding redundancy type, a result which suggests that they could prove serviceable in future studies concerning recognition memory for music.

Keywords

recognition memory precise recollection sense of familiarity music processing melodic redundancy rhythmic redundancy tonality/non-tonality remember/know judgments

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Boltz

M.G.

(1993). The generation of temporal and melodic expectancies during musical listening. Perception & Psychophysics, 53, 585–600.

Butler

(1990). A study of event hierarchies in tonal and post-tonal music. Psychology of Music, 18, 4–17.

Conway

M.A.

Gardiner

J.M.

Perfect

T.J.

Anderson

Cohen

(1997). Changes in memory awareness during learning: The acquisition of knowledge by psychology undergraduates. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 126, 393–413.

Cuddy

L.L.

Cohen

A.J.

Miller

(1979). Melody recognition: The experimental application of musical rules. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 33, 148–57.

Cutietta

R.A.

Booth

G.D.

(1996). The influence of metre, mode, interval type, and contour in repeated melodic free-recall. Psychology of Music, 24, 222–36.

Deliège

(1993). Mechanisms of cue extraction in memory for musical time. Contemporary Music Review, 9, 191–207.

Deliège

(1996). Cue abstraction as a component of categorisation processes in music listening. Psychology of Music, 24, 131–156.

Dowling

W.J.

(1978). Scale and contour: Two components of a theory of memory for melodies. Psychological Review, 85, 341–54.

Dowling

W.J.

Kwak

Andrews

M.W.

(1995). The time course of recognition of novel melodies. Perception & Psychophysics, 57, 136–49.

10.

Dubuc

Karlsson

Lalonde

(2005). Determinants of capacious memory: A process-dissociation and experiential approach. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 46, 217–27.

11.

Gardiner

J.M.

Java

R.I.

(1990). Recollective experience in word and nonword recognition. Memory and Cognition, 18, 23–30.

12.

Gardiner

J.M.

Kaminska

Dixon

Java

R. I.

(1996). Repetition of previously novel melodies sometimes increases both remember and know responses in recognition memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3, 366–71.

13.

Hebert

Peretz

(1997). Recognition of music in long-term memory: Are melodic and temporal patterns equal partners? Memory and Cognition, 25, 518–33.

14.

Imberty

(1993). How do we perceive atonal music? Suggestions for a theoretical approach. Contemporary Music Review, 9, 325–37.

15.

Java

R.I.

Kaminska

Gardiner

J.M.

(1995). Recognition memory and awareness for famous andobscure musical themes. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 7, 41–53.

16.

Java

R.I.

Gregg

V.H.

Gardiner

J.M.

(1997). What do people actually remember (and know) in “remember/know” experiments? European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 9, 187–97.

17.

Jones

M.R.

Boltz

(1989). Dynamic attending and responses to time. Psychological Review, 96, 459–91.

18.

Jones

M.R.

Ralston

J.T.

(1991). Some influences of accent structure on melody recognition. Memory and Cognition, 19, 8–20.

19.

Jones

M.R.

Summerell

Marshburn

(1987). Recognizing melodies: A dynamic interpretation. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 39A, 89–121.

20.

Kidd

Boltz

Jones

M.R.

(1984). Some effects of rhythmic context on melody recognition. American Journal of Psychology, 97, 153–73.

21.

Krumhansl

C.L.

(2000). Rhythm and pitch in music cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 159–79.

22.

Lerdahl

Jackendoff

(1983). A generative theory of tonal music. Cambridge, MIT Press.

23.

Lerdahl

(1989). Structure de prolongation dans l'atonalité. In McAdams

Deliège

(eds) La musique et les sciences cognitives, Bruxelles, Mardaga.

24.

Mäntylä

(1986). Optimizing cue effectiveness: Recall of 500 and 600 incidentally learned words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 12, 66–71.

25.

McAuley

J.D.

Stevens

Humphreys

M.S.

(2004). Play it again: Did this melody occur more frequently or was it heard more recently? The role of stimulus familiarity in episodic recognition of music. Acta Psychologica, 116, 93–108.

26.

Belardinelli

Olivetti M.

(2006). Beyond global and local theories of musical creativity: Looking for specific indicators of mental creativity during music processing. In Deliège

Wiggins

(eds) Musical creativity: Multidisciplinary research in theory and practice. London, Psychology Press.

27.

Palmer

Jungers

Jusczyk

P.W.

(2001). Episodic memory for musical prosody. Journal of Memory and Language, 45, 526–45.

28.

Peretz

Coltheart

(2003). Modularity of music processing. Nature Neuroscience, 6, 688–91.

29.

Platel

Baron

J.C.

Desgranges

Bernard

Eustache

(2003). Semantic and episodic memory for music are subserved by distinct neural networks. Neuroimage, 20, 244–56.

30.

Rajaram

(1993). Remembering and knowing: Two means of access to the personal past. Memory and Cognition, 21, 89–102.

31.

Rajaram

(1996). Perceptual effects on remembering: Recollective processes in picture recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 22, 365–77.

32.

Reinitz

M.T.

Morrisey

Demb

(1994). The role of attention in face encoding. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 20, 161–68.

33.

Schwarzer

(1997). Analytic and holistic modes in the development of melody perception. Psychology of Music, 25, 35–56.

34.

Trehub

S.E.

Schellenberg

Hill

(1997). The origins of music perception and cognition: A developmental perspective. In Deliege

Sloboda

(eds) Perception and cognition of music, Hove, Psychology Press.

35.

Tulving

(1972). Episodic and semantic memory. In Tulving

Donaldson

(eds) Organization of memory. New York, Academic Press.

36.

Tulving

(1985). How many memory systems are there? American Psychologist, 40, 385–98.