Bitonal music is characterized by a certain, dissonant effect that had been believed to be clearly audible by everyone. However, Wolpert found that non-musicians were unable to identify bitonal versions of originally monotonal musical passages as such in a free response task. The present study replicated Wolpert’s findings, but also had participants rate song clips for likeableness, correctness and pleasantness. Bitonal music was rated lower on all dimensions independent of the individual’s level of musical training, with no difference in ratings by non-musicians and musicians. In addition, following a brief training session, non-musicians (less than one year of musical training) identified whether clips were monotonal or bitonal at equivalently high rates as the intermediate (mean 2.4 years) and expert (mean 9.2 years) musician groups.
Alain, C., Arnott, S.R., & Picton, T.W. ( 2001). Bottom-up and top-down influences on auditory scene analysis: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27(1), 72-89.
2.
Babbitt, M. ( 1952). Review of Structural Hearing, by Felix Salzer. Journal of the American Musicological Society, 5(3), 260-265.
3.
Bartók, B. ( 1931/1976). The influence of peasant music on modern music. In B. Suchoff (Ed.), Béla Bartók Essays (pp. 340-344). Lincoln, NE : University of Nebraska Press.
4.
Bartók, B. ( 1943/1976). Harvard lectures. In B. Suchoff (Ed.), Béla Bartók Essays (pp. 354-392). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
5.
Berger, A. ( 1978). Problems of pitch organization in Stravinsky. Perspectives of New Music, 2(1), 11-42.
6.
Boretz, B. ( 1973). Meta-variations, Part IV: Analytical fallout (I). Perspectives of New Music, 11(1), 146-223.
7.
Bregman, A.S. ( 1990). Auditory scene analysis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
8.
Bregman, A.S. ( 1993). Auditory Scene Analysis: Hearing in complex environments . In S. McAdams & E. Bigand (Eds.), Thinking in sound: The cognitive psychology of human audition (pp. 10-36). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
9.
Casella, A. ( 1924). Tone-problems of to-day. The Musical Quarterly, 10(2), 159-171.
10.
Cope, D. ( 1977). New music composition. New York: Schirmer Books.
11.
Costa, M., Fine, P., & Ricci Bitti, P.E. (2004). Interval distributions, mode, and tonal strength of melodies as predictors of perceived emotion. Music Perception, 22(1), 1-14
12.
Dallin, L. ( 1974). Techniques of twentieth century composition: A guide to the materials of modern music (3rd ed.). Dubuque, IA: William C. Brown.
13.
Dart, T. ( 2001). Eye music. In S. Sadie & J. Tyrrell (Eds.), The new Grove dictionary of music and musicians (2nd ed.). London: Macmillan.
14.
DeVoto, M. ( 1993). Paris, 1918-45. In R. P. Morgan (Ed.), Modern times: From World War I to the present (pp. 33-59). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
15.
Fishman, Y.I., Volkov, I.O., Noh, M.D., Garell, P.C., Bakken, H., Arezzo, J.C., et al. (2001). Consonance and dissonance of musical chords: Neural correlates in auditory cortex of monkeys and humans. Journal of Neurophysiology, 86(6), 2761-2788.
16.
Forte, A. ( 1955). Contemporary tone structures. New York: Columbia University Press.
17.
Gabrielsson, A., & Lindström, E. (2001). The influence of musical structure on emotional expression. In P. N. Juslin & J. A. Sloboda (Eds.), Music and emotion: Theory and research (pp. 221-248). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
18.
Gagnon, L., & Peretz, I. ( 2003). Mode and tempo relative contributions to ‘happy-sad’ judgments in equi-tone melodies. Cognition and Emotion, 17(1), 25-40.
19.
Gosselin, N., Samson, S., Adolphs, R., Noulhiane, M., Roy, M., Hasboun, D., et al. (2006). Emotional responses to unpleasant music correlates with damage to the parahippocampal cortex. Brain , 129, 2585-2692.
20.
Halpern, A.R., Martin, J.S., & Reed, T.D. ( 2008). An ERP study of major-minor classification in melodies . Music Perception, 25(3), 181-191.
21.
Harrison, D. ( 1997). Bitonality, pentatonicism, and diatonicism in a work by Milhaud. In J. M. Baker, D. W. Beach, & J. Bernard (Eds.), Music theory in concept and practice (pp. 393-408). Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press.
22.
Hyer, B. ( 2001). Tonality. In S. Sadie & J. Tyrrell (Eds.), The new Grove dictionary of music and musicians (2nd ed.). London: Macmillan.
23.
Koechlin, C. ( 1925). Évolution de l’harmonie: Période contemporaine, depuis Bizet et César Franck jusqu’à nos jours [The evolution of harmony: The contemporary period, from Bizet and César Franck to the present day]. In A. Lavignac & L. d. L. Laurencie (Eds.), Encyclopédie de la musique et dictionnaire du Conservatoire; 2e partie: technique, esthétique, pédagogie (pp. 591-760). Paris: Delagrave.
24.
Koelsch, S., Fritz, T., Cramon, D.Y.V., Müller, K., & Friederici, A.D. (2006). Investigating emotion with music: An fMRI Study. Human Brain Mapping, 27, 239-250.
25.
Koelsch, S., & Mulder, J. ( 2002). Electric brain responses to inappropriate harmonies during listening to expressive music. Clinical Neurophysiology, 113, 862-869.
26.
Krumhansl, C.L. ( 1983). Perceptual structures for tonal music. Music Perception, 1(1), 28-62.
27.
Krumhansl, C.L. ( 1990). Cognitive foundations of musical pitch. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
28.
Krumhansl, C.L., & Schumckler, M.A. (1986). The Petroushka chord: A perceptual investigation. Music Perception, 4(2), 153-184.
29.
Leaver, A.M., & Halpern, A.R. ( 2004). Effects of training and melodic features on mode perception . Music Perception, 22(1), 117-143.
30.
Lerdahl, F. ( 2001). Tonal pitch space. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
31.
Lerdahl, F., & Jackendoff, R. (1983). A generative theory of tonal music. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
32.
Médicis, F.D. ( 2005). Darius Milhaud and the debate on polytonality in the French press of the 1920s. Music and Letters, 86(4), 573-591.
33.
Messing, S. ( 1988). Neoclassicism in music: From the genesis of the concept through the Schoenberg/Stravinsky polemic. Ann Arbor, MI : UMI Research Press.
34.
Milhaud, D. (1923/1982). Polytonalité et atonalité [Polytonality and atonality]. In J. Drake (Ed.), Notes sur la musique: Essais et chroniques (pp. 173-188). Paris: Flammarion.
35.
Morgan, R.P. ( 1991). Twentieth-century music: A history of musical style in modern Europe and America. New York: W. W. Norton.
36.
Peretz, I., & Zatorre, R.J. ( 2005). Brain organization for music processing. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 89-114.
37.
Plomp, R., & Levelt, W.J.M. (1965). Tonal consonances and critical bandwith. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 37, 1110-1123.
38.
Randel, D. M. (Ed.). (1986). The new Harvard dictionary of music. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
39.
Rasch, R., & Plomp, R. ( 1999). The perception of musical tones. In D. Deutsch (Ed.), The psychology of music (pp. 89-112). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
40.
Regnault, P., Bigand, E., & Besson, M. ( 2001). Different brain mechanisms mediate sensitivity to sensory consonance and harmonic context: Evidence from auditory event-related brain potentials. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 13, 241-255.
41.
Schoenberg, A. (1923/1975). New music. In L. Stein (Ed.), Style and idea: Selected writings of Arnold Schoenberg (pp. 137-139). Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.
42.
Schoenberg, A. (1925/1975). Tonality and form. In L. Stein (Ed.), Style and idea: Selected writings of Arnold Schoenberg (pp. 255-257). Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.
43.
Schoenberg, A. ( 1926/1975). Opinion or Insight? In L. Stein (Ed.), Style and idea: Selected writings of Arnold Schoenberg (pp. 258-264). Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.
44.
Smith Brindle, R. ( 1986). Musical composition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
45.
Stein, D. ( 2005). Introduction to musical ambiguity. In D. Stein (Ed.), Engaging music: Essays in music analysis (pp. 77-88). New York: Oxford University Press.
46.
Stein, L. ( 1975). Schoenberg: Five statements. Perspectives of New Music, 14(1), 161-173.
Stravinsky, I., & Craft, R. ( 1962). Expositions and developments. New York: Doubleday.
49.
Strunk, S. ( 2002). Harmony. In B. Kernfeld (Ed.), The new Grove dictionary of jazz (2nd ed.). London: Macmillan .
50.
Symms, B.R. ( 1996). Music of the twentieth century: Style and structure (2nd ed.). New York: Schirmer Books.
51.
Tymoczko, D. ( 2002). Stravinsky and the octatonic: A reconsideration. Music Theory Spectrum, 24(1), 68-102.
52.
Tymoczko, D. ( 2003a). Octatonicism reconsidered again. Music Theory Spectrum, 25(1), 185-202.
53.
Tymoczko, D. ( 2003b). Polytonality and superimpositions. Unpublished paper. Retrieved January 2008, from http://www.music.princeton.edu/~dmitri/polytonality.pdf
54.
van den Toorn, P.C. ( 1975). Some characteristics of Stravinsky’s diatonic music . Perspectives of New Music, 14(1), 104-138.
55.
van den Toorn, P.C. ( 1983). The music of Igor Stravinsky. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
56.
van den Toorn, P.C. ( 1987). Stravinsky and the Rite of Spring: The beginnings of a musical language. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.
57.
van den Toorn, P.C. ( 2003). The sounds of Stravinsky. Music Theory Spectrum, 25(1), 167-185.
58.
Watkins, G. ( 1995). Soundings: Music in the twentieth century. New York: Schirmer Books.
59.
Whittall, A. ( 2001a). Bitonality. In S. Sadie & J. Tyrrell (Eds.), The new Grove dictionary of music and musicians (2nd ed.). London: Macmillan.
60.
Whittall, A. ( 2001b). Form. In S. Sadie & J. Tyrrell (Eds.), The new Grove dictionary of music and musicians (2nd ed.). London: Macmillan.
61.
Williams, J.K. ( 1997). Theories and analyses of twentieth-century music. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace College Publication s.
62.
Wolpert, R.S. ( 1990). Recognition of melody, harmonic accompaniment, and instrumentation: Musicians vs. nonmusicians. Music Perception, 8(1), 95-106.
63.
Wolpert, R.S. ( 2000). Attention to key in a non-directed music listening task: Musicians vs. Nonmusicians. Music Perception, 18(2), 225-230.
