In recent years, increased rivalry between China and the EU has been seen as a threat to cooperation, including in the field of higher education and scientific research. We explore how cooperation in research between China and the EU has developed over time via a bibliometric analysis of international co-authorships within four different funding agencies (CAS, MOST, JRC, and ESA). Our findings suggest that EU-China cooperation has continued to strengthen, despite a new options for “rivalry to increase between these two parties”. We suggest that this is explained by the benefits that both the EU and China receive from collaboration, albeit such benefits differ in type. Possibly, our findings are also a byproduct of adjustments triggered initially by the US “China Initiative”. The dilemma of whether to collaborate or not is likely to become more pressing, as the policies of some funding agencies have implications for national defense and security.
AghionP.AntoninC.PaluskiewiczL.StrombergD.WargonR.WestinK.SunX. (2023). Does Chinese research hinge on US co-authors? Evidence from the China initiative. https://cep.lse.ac.uk/pubs/download/dp1936.pdf
2.
BaiA.WuC.YangK. (2021). Evolution and features of China’s central government funding system for basic research. Frontiers Research Metrics Analytics, 6, 751497. https://doi.org/10.3389/frma.2021.751497
3.
BrinzaA.Bērziņa-Čerenkova-ČerenkovaU. A.CorreP. L.SeamanJ.TurcsányiR.VladisavljevS. (2024). EU-China relations: De-risking or de-coupling: the future of the EU strategy towards China: in-depth analysis. European Parliament.
4.
CaiY. (2019). China-Europe higher education cooperation: Opportunities and challenges. Frontiers of Education in China, 14, 167–179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11516-019-0009-5
5.
d’HoogheI.LammertinkJ. (2020). Towards sustainable Europe-China collaboration in higher education in research. Leiden Asia Center.
GeunaA. (1999). The economics of knowledge production. Edward Elgar.
9.
Gómez-EspésA.FärberM.JatowtA. (2024). Benefits of international collaboration in computer science: A case study of China, the European union, and the United States. Scientometrics, 129(2), 1155–1171.
10.
HuangM. H.HuangM. J. (2018). An analysis of global research funding from subject field and funding agencies perspectives in the G9 countries. Scientometrics, 115(2), 833–847. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2677-y
11.
HuangC.SuJ.XieX.YeX.LiZ.PorterA.LiJ. (2015). A Bibliometric Study of China’s science and technology policies: 1949-2010. Scientometrics, 102(2), 1521–1539. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1406-4
12.
Isfandyari-MoghaddamA.SaberiM. K.Tahmasebi-LimoniS.MohammadianS.NaderbeigiF. (2023). Global scientific collaboration: A social network analysis and data mining of the co-authorship networks. Journal of Information Science, 49(4), 1126–1141. https://doi.org/10.1177/01655515211040655
13.
JangB.ChoungJ. Y.KangI. (2022). Knowledge production patterns of China and the US: Quantum technology. Scientometrics, 127, 5691–5719. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-022-04478-4
LeydesdorffL.BornmannL.WagnerC. S. (2019). The relative influences of government funding and international collaboration on citation impact. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 70(2), 198–201. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24109
17.
LeydesdorffL.WagnerC. (2008). International collaboration in science and the formation of a core group. Journal of Informetrics, 2, 317–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2008.07.003
18.
LeydesdorffL.WagnerC.BornmannL. (2014). The European union, China, and the United States in the top-1% and top-10% layers of most-frequently cited publications: Competition and collaborations. Journal of Informetrics, 8, 606–617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2014.05.002
MariniG. (2023). International co-authored publications: The effect of joining the European union or being part of the European research area. Hungarian Educational Research Journal, 13(2), 276–297. https://doi.org/10.1556/063.2022.00192
22.
MariniG. (2024). The megaproject race to fight COVID-19. A scientometric assessment of the national institute of allergy and infectious diseases (NIAID) international funding. In CantoniF.CorazzaL.De NitoE.Di NautaP.FavariE. (Eds.), Complexity and sustainability in megaprojects. MERIT 2023. Lecture notes in civil engineering, 493. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-59703-9_16.
23.
MariniG.LombardiS. (2025). Mega science and re-nationalization in the field of semiconductors. An evidence-based exploration of Decoupling triggered by the China initiative. In CantoniF.FavariE.BorghettiF.De NitoV. Di NautaP. AllenaM. (Eds.), Sustaining the future: Addressing grand challenges through megaprojects. MERIT 2024. Lecture notes in civil engineering. Springer(in press).
MorilloF.Álvarez-BornsteinB. (2018). How to automatically identify major research sponsors selecting keywords from the WoS funding agency field. Scientometrics, 117, 1755–1770. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2947-8
26.
OlechnickaA.PloszajA.Celinska-JanowiczD. (2019). The geography of scientific collaboration. Routledge.
27.
ShihT. (2023). Research integrity and security: Exploring funding agency roles in supporting responsible internationalization and reciprocity-Insight paper. Pre-print.
28.
ShihT.ForsbergE. (2023). Origins, motives and challenges in Western–Chinese research collaborations amid recent geopolitical tensions – findings from Swedish–Chinese research collaborations. Higher Education, 85, 651–667. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-022-00859-z
WangX.LiuD.DingK.WangX. (2012). Science funding and research output: A study on 10 countries. Scientometrics, 91, 591–599. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0576-6
31.
WangL.WangX.PhilipsenN. J. (2017). Network structure of scientific collaborations between China and the EU member states. Scientometrics, 113, 765–781. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2488-6
32.
WangL.WangX.PiroF. N.PhilipsenN. J. (2020). The effect of competitive public funding on scientific output: A comparison between China and the EU. Research Evaluation, 29(4), 418–429. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvaa023
33.
ZhouP.CaiX.LyuX. (2020). An in-depth analysis of government funding and international collaboration in scientific research. Scientometrics, 125, 1331–1347. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03595-2
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
