Ecuador’s research output relative to other Latin American countries has been low historically; however, over the last 10 years, the government has put various policies in place to help remedy this situation. This is an analysis of Ecuadorian research productivity from 2006 to 2015. The scientific productivity of Ecuador has increased 5.16 times over the past years, exceeding Latin American growth. Over 80% of Ecuadorian publications include international collaboration mainly with the United States and some European and Latin American countries.
Álvarez-MuñozP.Pérez-MontoroM. (2015). Analysis of production and scientific visibility of Ecuador in the Andean context Análisis de la producción y de la visibilidad científica de Ecuador en el contexto Andino (2000-2013). El Profesional De La Información, 24, 577-586.
2.
AndradeD. C.LópezB. A.Ramírez-CampilloR.BeltránA. R.RodríguezR. P. (2013). Bibliometric analysis of South American research in sports science from 1970 to 2012. Motriz: Revista De Educação Física, 19, 783-791.
3.
BoshoffN. (2010). South-South research collaboration of countries in the Southern African Development Community (SADC). Scientometrics, 84, 481-503.
4.
CartelleM.HolbanA. M.EscalanteS.CevallosM. (2015). Epidemiology of tropical neglected diseases in Ecuador in the last 20 years. PLoS ONE, 10(9), e0138311.
5.
CavaciniA. (2015). What is the best database for computer science journal articles?Scientometrics, 102, 2059-2071.
6.
CEAACES [Consejo de Evaluación, Acreditación y Aseguramiento de la Calidad de la Educación Superior – Council for the Evaluation, Accreditation and Quality Assurance of Higher Education] . (2017). Modelo de evaluación institucional de universidades y escuelas politécnicas [Model of institutional evaluation of universities and polytechnic schools]. Retrieved from http://dptoevaluacion.sangregorio.edu.ec/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/Modelo-de-evaluacio%CC%81n-institucional-2016.pdf
7.
ChadeganiA. A.SalehiH.YunusM. M.FarhadiH.FooladiM.FarhadiM.EbrahimN. A. (2013). A comparison between two main academic literature collections: Web of Science and Scopus databases. Asian Social Science, 9(5), 18-26.
8.
CocciaM.RolfoS. (2007). How research policy changes can affect organization and productivity of public research institutes? Analysis within the Italian national system of innovation. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 9, 215-233.
Federal Ministry of Education and Research. (2008). Strengthening Germany’s role in the global knowledge society: Strategy of the federal government for the internationalization of science and research. Retrieved from https://www.bmbf.de/pub/Internationalization_Strategy.pdf
11.
GlänzelW. (2001). National characteristics in international scientific co-authorship relations. Scientometrics, 51, 69-115.
12.
HarrisE. (2004). Building scientific capacity in developing countries. EMBO Reports, 5(1), 7-11.
13.
HassanS.-U.SarwarR.MuazzamA. (2015). Tapping into intra- and international collaborations of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation states across science and technology disciplines. Science and Public Policy, 43, 690-701.
14.
HeitorM.HortaH.MendonçaJ. (2014). Developing human capital and research capacity: Science policies promoting brain gain. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 82, 6-22.
15.
HuamaníC.RomaníF.González-AlcaideG.MejiaM. O.RamosJ. M.EspinozaM.CabezasC. (2014). South American collaboration in scientific publications on Leishmaniasis: Bibliometric analysis in Scopus (2000-2011). Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo, 56, 381-90.
16.
Inglesi-LotzR.PourisA. (2011). Scientometric impact assessment of a research policy instrument: The case of rating researchers on scientific outputs in South Africa. Scientometrics, 88, 747-760.
KingD. A. (2004). The scientific impact of nations. Nature, 430, 311-316.
21.
KwiekM. (2015). The internationalization of research in Europe: A quantitative study of 11 national systems from a micro-level perspective. Journal of Studies in International Education, 19, 341-359.
22.
LaudelG. (2001). Collaboration, creativity and rewards: Why and how scientists collaborate. International Journal of Technology Management, 22, 762-781.
23.
LemarchandG. A. (2015). Latin America. In SchneegansS. (Ed.). UNESCO science report: Towards, 2030 (pp. 174-209). Paris, France: UNESCO.
24.
LoorF.CarrielV. (2014). Investigación y desarrollo en Ecuador: un análisis comparativo entre América Latina y el Caribe [Research and development in Ecuador: An analysis comparison between Latin America and the Caribbean] (2000 - 2012). Compendium, 1(2), 28-46.
25.
LoyolaR. D.Diniz-FilhoJ. A.BiniL. M. (2012). Obsession with quantity: A view from the south. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 27, 585-588.
MedinaJ.CorderoL.CarrilloP.RodriguezD.CastilloJ. A.AstudilloI.. . . PowellM. (2016). Investigación científica. In RamírezR. (Ed.), Universidad urgente para una sociedad emancipada [Urgent university for an emancipated society] (pp. 461-494). Quito, Ecuador: SENESCYT-IESALC.
28.
MelinG.PerssonO. (1996). Studying research collaboration using co-authorships. Scientometrics, 36, 363-377.
29.
MongeonP.Paul-HusA. (2016). The journal coverage of Web of science and Scopus: A comparative analysis. Scientometrics, 106, 213-228.
30.
MoraE. A. (2015). La investigación científica en las universidades ecuatorianas [Scientific research in Ecuadorian universities]. Anales, 57, 61-72.
31.
NarinF.StevensK.WhitlowE. S. (1991). Scientific cooperation in Europe and the citation of multinationally authored papers. Scientometrics, 21, 313-323.
PourisA. (2012). Scientometric research in South Africa and successful policy instruments. Scientometrics, 91, 317-325.
35.
PourisA.HoY. S. (2014). Research emphasis and collaboration in Africa. Scientometrics, 98, 2169-2184.
36.
SaltonG.BergmarkD. (1979). A citation study of computer science literature. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 22, 393-440.
37.
SisaI.EspinelM.FornasiniM.MantillaG. (2011). La producción científica en ciencias de la salud en Ecuador [Scientific production of health sciences in Ecuador]. Revista Panamericana De Salud Pública, 30, 388-392.
38.
SmithK.MarinovaD. (2005). Use of bibliometric modelling for policy making. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 69, 177-187.
39.
SolarinS. A.YenY. Y. (2016). A global analysis of the impact of research output on economic growth. Scientometrics, 108, 855-874.
40.
UlnicaneI. (2015). Why do international research collaborations last? Virtuous circle of feedback loops, continuity and renewal. Science and Public Policy, 42, 433-447.
41.
Van HoofH. B.EljuriM. I.EstrellaM.TorresL. (2013). Ecuador’s higher education system in times of change. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 12, 345-355.
