Industrial relations and unemployment benefit schemes in the Visegrad countries during the COVID-19 pandemic

Abstract

German

French

The COVID-19 pandemic and the ensuing economic and technological adjustment increased the risk of unemployment, underemployment and skills mismatch across Europe. These increased risks highlighted the importance of national unemployment benefit schemes for income security. This article examines the role of industrial relations in shaping unemployment benefit regimes in the Visegrad countries during the COVID-19 pandemic. We adopted an actor-oriented approach based on desk research and 12 semi-structured interviews with the representatives of trade unions and employers in all the Visegrad countries. Our research showed that the capacities of the trade unions and employers' associations to shape the unemployment benefit regimes were rather limited. State control over social policy remained very strong and shaped the dynamics of industrial relations, without inclusive involvement of social partners. National governments sought to implement measures to protect employment (mainly wage subsidies), rather than to reform existing unemployment support regimes.

Keywords

Unemployment benefits short-time work industrial relations Visegrad countries Central and Eastern Europe COVID-19 pandemic

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aidukaite

(2011) Welfare reforms and socio-economic trends in the ten new EU member states of Central and Eastern Europe. Journal of Communist and Post-Communist Studies 44(3): 211–219.

Aidukaite

Saxonberg

Szelewa

, et al. (2021) Social policy in the face of a global pandemic: Policy responses to the COVID-19 crisis in Central and Eastern Europe. Social Policy and Administration 55(2): 358–373.

Asenjo

Pignatti

(2019) Unemployment insurance schemes around the world: Evidence and policy options. ILO Research Department Working Paper No. 49. Geneva: International Labour Organization.

Astrov

Holzner

(2021) The Visegrád Countries: Coronavirus Pandemic, EU Transfers, and their Impact on Austria. wiiw Policy Notes No 43. Vienna: The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies, wiiw.

Baccaro

Howell

(2011) A common neoliberal trajectory: The transformation of industrial relations in advanced capitalism. Politics & Society 39(4): 521–563.

Baccaro

Howell

(2017) Trajectories of Neoliberal Transformation: European Industrial Relations Since the 1970s. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Banaszewska

Pilc

(2020) Unemployment benefits in CEE countries. Does their limited scope match societal preferences? In: Woźniak-Jęchorek

Pilc

(eds) Labour Market Institutions and Productivity. London: Routledge, pp. 90–115.

Baxandall

(2003) Postcommunist unemployment politics: Historical legacies and the curious acceptance of job loss. In: Ekiert

Hanson

(eds) Capitalism and Democracy in Central and Eastern Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 248–288.

Bernaciak

Kahancová

(eds) (2017) Innovative union practices in Central-Eastern Europe. Brussels: European Trade Union Institute. Available at: https://www.etui.org/sites/default/files/17%20Bernaciak%20Kahancov%C3%A1%20Innovative%20union%20practices%20CEE%20Web%20version.pdf (accessed 15 November 2021).

10.

Bohle

Greskovits

(2007) Neoliberalism, embedded neoliberalism, and neocorporatism: Paths towards transnational capitalism in Central-Eastern Europe. West European Politics 30(3): 443–466.

11.

Bohle

Greskovits

(2012) Capitalist Diversity on Europe’s Periphery. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

12.

Bonoli

(2010) The political economy of active labour market policy. Politics and Society 38(4): 435–457.

13.

Crouch

(1993) Industrial Relations and European State Traditions. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

14.

Crowley

(2004 Explaining labor weakness in post-communist Europe: Historical legacies and comparative perspective. East European Politics and Societies 18(3): 394–429.

15.

Crowley

Ost

(eds) (2001) Workers After Workers’ States. Labor and Politics in Postcommunist Eastern Europe. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.

16.

Drahokoupil

(2021) Job retention schemes in Europe: Czechia. Brussels: ETUI. Available at: https://www.etui.org/sites/default/files/2021-09/Job%20retention%20schemes%20in%20Europe%20-%20Czechia_2021.pdf (accessed 15 January 2022).

17.

Eurofound (2020) Involvement of National Social Partners in Policymaking – 2019. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.

18.

Fetzer

(2009) Beyond convergence versus path dependence, the internationalization of industrial relations at Ford Germany and Britain (1967–1985). MPIfG Working Paper 09/3. Cologne, Germany: Max-Planck-Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung.

19.

Gasparri

Tassinari

(2020) ‘Smart’ industrial relations in the making? Insights from analysis of union responses to digitalization in Italy. Relations industrielles/Industrial Relations 75(4): 796–817.

20.

György

(2021) Job retention schemes in Europe: Hungary. Brussels: ETUI. Available at: https://www.etui.org/sites/default/files/2021-11/Job%20retention%20schemes%20in%20Europe%20-%20Hungary_2021.pdf (accessed 10 January 2022).

21.

Haggard

Kaufman

(2008) Development, Democracy, and Welfare States: Latin America, East Asia, and Eastern Europe. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

22.

Hall

Soskice

(2001) Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

23.

Hárs

(2021) Industrial relations and social dialogue. Hungary: Working life in the COVID-19 pandemic 2020. Working paper. Eurofound. Available at: https://www.eurofound.europa.Eu/sites/default/files/wpef21018.pdf (accessed 10 December 2021).

24.

Hijzen

Martin

(2013) The role of short-time work schemes during the global financial crisis and early recovery: A cross-country analysis. IZA Discussion Paper No. 7291. Bonn: IZA.

25.

Hyman

(2008) The state in industrial relations. In: Blyton

Bacon

Fiorito

, et al (eds) The SAGE Handbook of Industrial Relations. London: SAGE Publications Ltd, pp. 258–283.

26.

Jahn

(2018) Distribution regimes and redistribution effects during retrenchment and crisis: A cui bono analysis of unemployment replacement rates of various income categories in 31 welfare states. Journal of European Social Policy 28(5): 433–451.

27.

Kahancová

(2015) Central and Eastern European trade unions after the EU enlargement: Successes and failures for capacity building. Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research 21(3): 343–357.

28.

Katzenstein

(1985) Small States in World Markets: Industrial Policy in Europe. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

29.

Kochan

(2004) Collective actors in industrial relations: What future? Industrielle Beziehungen : Zeitschrift für Arbeit, Organisation und Management 11(1/2): 6–14.

30.

Kováčová

(2021) Job retention schemes in Europe: Slovakia. Brussels: ETUI. Available at: https://www.etui.org/sites/default/files/2021-11/Job%20retention%20schemes%20in%20Europe%20-%20Slovakia_2021.pdf (accessed 10 January 2022).

31.

Kuitto

(2016) Post-Communist Welfare States in European Context. Patterns of Welfare Policies in Central and Eastern Europe. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.

32.

Long

(2001) Development Sociology. Actor Perspectives. London and New York: Routledge.

33.

McGuire

(2013) Analysing union power, opportunity and strategic capability: Global and local union struggles against the general agreement on trade in services. Global Labour Journal 5(1): 45–67.

34.

Madsen

(2003) Introduction of ‘labour market pensions’ strengthens bargaining system. Available at: http://www.eiro.eurofound.eu.int/2003/10/feature/dk0310103f.html (accessed 1 May 2006).

35.

Meardi

(2012) Social Failures of EU Enlargement: A Case of Workers Voting With Their Feet. London: Routledge.

36.

Müller

Schulten

Drahokoupil

(2022) Job retention schemes in Europe during the COVID 19 pandemic – different shapes and sizes and the role of collective bargaining. Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research 28(2): 247–265.

37.

Müller

Vandaele

Waddington

(eds) (2019) Collective bargaining in Europe: Towards an endgame. Brussels: European Trade Union Institute. Available at: https://www.etui.org/sites/default/files/Collective%20Bargaining%20Vol%20I%20final%20web%20version.pdf (accessed 10 January 2022).

38.

Nölke

Vliegenthart

(2009) Enlarging the varieties of capitalism: The emergence of dependent market economies in East Central Europe. World Politics 61(4): 670–702.

39.

OECD (2020) OECD Employment Outlook 2020: Worker Security and the COVID-19 Crisis. Paris: OECD Publishing.

40.

OPZZ (The All-Poland Alliance of Trade Unions) (2017) Zasiłki dla bezrobotnych

41.

[Unemployment benefits]. January 27, 2014. Available at: https://www.opzz.org.pl/opinie-i-analizy/polityka-spoleczna/zasilki-dla-bezrobotnych?fbclid=IwAR1hLXKnG1RjbHUtPVdgl6PpZtnzxu2VDnmVc9xL3n4TFoHLn5DQ2nywEfg (accessed 10 May 2022).

42.

Ost

(2000) Illusory corporatism in Eastern Europe: Neoliberal tripartism and postcommunist class identities. Politics & Society 28(4): 503–530.

43.

Rogalewski

(2020) How Law and Justice (mis)used the pandemic to dismantle social dialogue in Poland. Social Europe. Available at: https://socialeurope.eu/how-law-and-justice-misused-the-pandemic-to-dismantle-social-dialogue-in-poland (accessed 10 December 2021).

44.

Roland

(2004) Understanding institutional change: Fast-moving and slow-moving institutions. Studies in Comparative International Development 38(4): 109–131.

45.

Scharle

(2014) True and false remedies for long time unemployment in Visegrad countries. CASE Network Studies & Analyses, No. 475. Warsaw, Poland: Center for Social and Economic Research (CASE).

46.

Spieser

(2007) Labour market policies in post-communist Poland : explaining the peaceful institutionalisation of unemployment. Politique européenne 1(21): 97–132.

47.

Streeck

(1998) The internationalization of industrial relations in Europe: Prospects and problems. Politics & Society 26(4): 429–459.

48.

Surdykowska

(2021) Job retention schemes in Europe: Poland. Brussels: ETUI. Available at: https://www.etui.org/sites/default/files/2021-10/Job%20retention%20schemes%20in%20Europe%20-%20Poland_2021.pdf (accessed 10 December 2021).

49.

Szikra

Tomka

(2009) Social policy in East Central Europe: Major trends in the 20th century. In: Cerami

Vanhuysee

(eds) Post-Communist Welfare Pathways: Theorizing Social Policy Transformations in Central and Eastern Europe. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 17–34.

50.

Thelen

(2001) Varieties of labor politics in the developed democracies. In: Hall

Soskice

(eds) Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 76–92.

51.

Trampusch

(2007) Industrial relations as a source of social policy: A typology of the institutional conditions for industrial agreements on social benefits. Social Policy and Administration 41(3): 251–270.

52.

Vanhuysse

(2007) Workers without power: Agency, legacies, and labour decline in East European Varieties of Capitalism. Czech Sociological Review 43(3): 495–522.

53.

Varga

(2015) Trade unions and austerity in Central and Eastern Europe: Did they do something about it? Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research 21(3): 313–326.

54.

Visser

(2009) The quality of industrial relations and the Lisbon Strategy. In: European Commission (ed.) Industrial Relations in Europe 2008. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, pp. 45–72.

55.

Visser

(2015) Data base on institutional characteristics of trade unions, wage setting, state intervention and social pacts, 1960–2014 (ICTWS). Version 5.0. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Amsterdam Institute for Advanced Labour Studies AIAS.

56.

ZUS (2020) Dodatek solidarnościowy [Solidarity supplement]. Available at: https://www.zus.pl/o-zus/aktualnosci/-/publisher/aktualnosc/1/dodatek-solidarnosciowy/2593418 (accessed 15 November 2021).