This article seeks to understand how racial cues in social media narratives influence individuals’ discernment of falsehoods and their engagement with such content. Built on multiple frameworks, such as motivated reasoning and the illusory truth effect, this study conducted a novel survey experiment that manipulated two types of racial cues: racial identifier (the primary subject was illegal immigrants vs people in general) and issue framing (crime vs economy). Results showed that explicit racial identifier—specifying the subject to be illegal immigrants—boosted people’s capacity to discern false narratives, especially those about the economic issue. We also uncovered the moderating roles of analytical thinking (cognitive reflection (CR) and actively open-minded thinking (AOT)) and the racial diversity of one’s personal contacts, which, in general, indicated a buffering effect. These findings underscore the importance of cognitive and network-based factors in combating false information about socially marginalised groups in the USA.
AbrajanoM., LajevardiN., & UribeL. (2024). Context, contact, and misinformation about socially marginalised groups in the United States. Journal of Race, Ethnicity, and Politics, 9(2), 335–376. https://doi.org/10.1017/rep.2023.44
2.
AhmedS., & MatthesJ. (2017). Media representation of Muslims and Islam from 2000 to 2015: A meta-analysis. International Communication Gazette, 79(3), 219–244. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748048516656305
3.
AllportG. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Addison-Wesley.
4.
BanksA. J. (2016). Are group cues necessary? How anger makes ethnocentrism among whites a stronger predictor of racial and immigration policy opinions. Political Behaviour, 38, 635–657. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-016-9330-3
5.
Batista PereiraF., BuenoN. S., NunesF., & PavãoN. (2022). Fake news, fact checking, and partisanship: The resilience of rumors in the 2018 Brazilian elections. Journal of Politics, 84(4), 2188–2201. https://doi.org/10.1086/719419
6.
BronsteinM. V., PennycookG., BearA., RandD. G., & CannonT. D. (2019). Belief in fake news is associated with delusionality, dogmatism, religious fundamentalism, and reduced analytic thinking. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 8(1), 108–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2018.09.005
7.
BurkeK. (1969). A rhetoric of motives. University of California Press.
8.
ClaytonK., BlairS., BusamJ. A., ForstnerS., GlanceJ., GreenG., KawataA., KovvuriA., MartinJ., MorganE., SandhuM., SangR., Scholz-BrightR., WelchA. T., WolffA. G., ZhouA., & NyhanB. (2020). Real solutions for fake news? Measuring the effectiveness of general warnings and fact-check tags in reducing belief in false stories on social media. Political Behavior, 42, 1073–1095. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-019-09533-0
9.
ColemanS. (2018). The elusiveness of political truth: From the conceit of objectivity to intersubjective judgement. European Journal of Communication, 33(2), 157–171. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323118760319
10.
CoverR., HawA., & ThompsonJ. D. (2022). Marginalising the marginalised: Fake news as a tool of populist power. In Fake news in digital cultures: Technology, populism and digital misinformation (pp. 93–107). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-80117-876-120221007
11.
CullotyE., & SuiterJ. (2021). Anti-immigration disinformation. In The Routledge companion to media disinformation and populism (pp. 221–230). Routledge.
12.
DixonT. L. (2006). Psychological reactions to crime news portrayals of Black criminals: Understanding the moderating roles of prior news viewing and stereotype endorsement. Communication Monographs, 73(2), 162–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637750600690643
13.
DixonT. L. (2008). Network news and racial beliefs: Exploring the connection between national television news exposure and stereotypical perceptions of African Americans. Journal of Communication, 58(2), 321–337. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.00387.x
14.
DixonT. L., & WilliamsC. L. (2015). The changing misrepresentation of race and crime on network and cable news. Journal of Communication, 65(1), 24–39. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12133
15.
EitleD., D’AlessioS. J., & StolzenbergL. (2002). Racial threat and social control: A test of the political, economic, and threat of black crime hypotheses. Social Forces, 81(2), 557–576. https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.2003.0007
16.
FarrisE. M., & Silber MohamedH. (2018). Picturing immigration: How the media criminalises immigrants. Politics, Groups, and Identities, 6(4), 814–824. https://doi.org/10.1080/21565503.2018.1484375
17.
GauntR. (2011). Effects of intergroup conflict and social contact on prejudice: The mediating role of stereotypes and evaluations. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 41(6), 1340–1355. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2011.00762.x
18.
GilliamF. D.Jr., & IyengarS. (2000). Prime suspects: The influence of local television news on the viewing public. American Journal of Political Science, 560–573. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2669264
19.
GramboK. (2018). Fake news and racial, ethnic, and religious minorities: A precarious quest for truth. InNaryC. S.(Ed.), University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law (pp. 1299–1348). https://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/jcl/vol21/iss5/4
20.
HellwigT., & SinnoA. (2017). Different groups, different threats: Public attitudes towards immigrants. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 43(3), 339–358. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2016.1202749
21.
HumprechtE. (2019). Where ‘fake news’ flourishes: A comparison across four Western democracies. Information, Communication & Society, 22(13), 1973–1988. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2018.1474241
22.
IyengarS., & KinderD. R. (2010). News that matters: Television & American opinion. University of Chicago Press.
23.
JohnsonD. (2001). Punitive attitudes on crime: Economic insecurity, racial prejudice, or both?Sociological Focus, 34(1), 33–54. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20832101
24.
JuhászA., & SzicherleP. (2017). The political effects of migration-related fake news, disinformation and conspiracy theories in Europe. https://politicalcapital.hu/pc-admin/source/documents/FES_PC_FakeNewsMigrationStudy_EN_20170607.pdf
25.
KimH. J., & CameronG. T. (2011). Emotions matter in crisis: The role of anger and sadness in the publics’ response to crisis news framing and corporate crisis response. Communication Research, 38(6), 826–855. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650210385813
26.
KovářJ. (2020). A security threat or an economic consequence? An analysis of the news framing of the European Union’s refugee crisis. International Communication Gazette, 82(6), 564–587. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748048519832778
27.
KundaZ. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108(3), 480–498. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.480
28.
MastroD., Behm-MorawitzE., & OrtizM. (2007). The cultivation of social perceptions of Latinos: A mental models approach. Media Psychology, 9(2), 347–365. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213260701286106
29.
MendelbergT. (2001). The race card: Campaign strategy, implicit messages, and the norm of equality. Princeton University Press.
30.
MerollaJ., RamakrishnanS. K., & HaynesC. (2013). “Illegal,” “undocumented,” or “unauthorised”: Equivalency frames, issue frames, and public opinion on immigration. Perspectives on Politics, 11(3), 789–807. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592713002077
31.
MoncrieffeJ., & EybenR. (2013). The power of labelling: How people are categorised and why it matters. Routledge.
32.
MoslehM., PennycookG., ArecharA. A., & RandD. G. (2021). Cognitive reflection correlates with behavior on Twitter. Nature Communications, 12(1), 921. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-20043-0
33.
MuhammedT. S., & MathewS. K. (2022). The disaster of misinformation: A review of research in social media. International Journal of Data Science and Analytics, 13(4), 271–285. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41060-022-00311-6
34.
NonneckeB., Perez de AchaG., ChoiA., CrittendenC., Gutierrez CortesF. I., Martin Del CampoA., & Miranda-VillanuevaO. M. (2022). Harass, mislead, & polarize: An analysis of Twitter political bots’ tactics in targeting the immigration debate before the 2018 US midterm election. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 19(4), 423–434. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2021.2004287
35.
PasekJ., StarkT. H., KrosnickJ. A., & TompsonT. (2015). What motivates a conspiracy theory? Birther beliefs, partisanship, liberal-conservative ideology, and anti-Black attitudes. Electoral Studies, 40, 482–489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2014.09.009
36.
PennycookG. (2017). A perspective on the theoretical foundation of dual process models. In Dual process theory 2.0 (pp. 5–27). Routledge.
37.
PennycookG., CannonT. D., & RandD. G. (2018). Prior exposure increases perceived accuracy of fake news. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 147(12), 1865–1880. https://dx.doi.org/10.1037/xge0000465
38.
PennycookG., & RandD. G. (2019). Lazy, not biased: Susceptibility to partisan fake news is better explained by lack of reasoning than by motivated reasoning. Cognition, 188, 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.011
39.
PennycookG., & RandD. G. (2020). Who falls for fake news? The roles of bullshit receptivity, overclaiming, familiarity, and analytic thinking. Journal of Personality, 88(2), 185–200. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12476
40.
PennycookG., & RandD. G. (2021). The psychology of fake news. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 25(5), 388–402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2021.02.007
41.
PeraltaC. B., SánchezR. P., & GonzálezI. S. (2022). Individual evaluation vs fact-checking in the recognition and willingness to share fake news about COVID-19 via WhatsApp. Journalism Studies, 23(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2021.1994446
42.
PettigrewT. F. (1998). Intergroup contact theory. Annual Review of Psychology, 49(1), 65–85.
43.
Ramírez BergC. (2012). Immigrants, Aliens, and extraterrestrials: Science fiction’s Alien “other” as (among other things) new Latino imagery. In Film genre reader IV (pp. 402–432). University of Texas Press.
ScheufeleD. A. (1999). Framing as a theory of media effects. Journal of Communication, 49(1), 103–122. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1999.tb02784.x
46.
ShoemakerP., & ReeseS. D. (1996). Mediating the message: Theories of influences on mass media content. Longman.
47.
SmelterT. J., & CalvilloD. P. (2020). Pictures and repeated exposure increase perceived accuracy of news headlines. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 34(5), 1061–1071. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3684
48.
SquiresC. R., & JacksonS. J. (2010). Reducing race: News themes in the 2008 primaries. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 15(4), 375–400. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161210372962
49.
StanovichK. E., & WestR. F. (2007). Natural myside bias is independent of cognitive ability. Thinking & Reasoning, 13(3), 225–247. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546780600780796
50.
SuiM., & PaulN. (2017). Latino portrayals in local news media: Underrepresentation, negative stereotypes, and institutional predictors of coverage. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 46(3), 273–294. https://doi.org/10.1080/17475759.2017.1322124
51.
SuiM., PaulN., ShahP., SpurlockB., ChastantB., & DunawayJ. (2018). The role of minority journalists, candidates, and audiences in shaping race-related campaign news coverage. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 95(4), 1079–1102. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699018762078
52.
SutherlandA. D., & Dykstra-DeVetteT. A. (2018). Constructing identification and division through fake news reports of refugees. Language, Discourse & Society, 6(1), 19–31.
SzakacsJ., & BognarE. (2021). The impact of disinformation campaigns about migrants and minority groups in the EU. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meetdocs/2014_2019/plmrep/COMMITTEES/INGE/DV/2021/07-12/IDADisinformation_migrant_minorities_EN.pdf
55.
TajfelH., & TurnerJ. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. InWilliamsJ. A. & WorchelS.(Eds), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). Wadsworth.
56.
ValentinoN. A., HutchingsV. L., & WhiteI. K. (2002). Cues that matter: How political ads prime racial attitudes during campaigns. American Political Science Review, 96(1), 75–90. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055402004240
57.
WhiteI. K. (2007). When race matters and when it doesn’t: Racial group differences in response to racial cues. American Political Science Review, 101(2), 339–354. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055407070177
58.
WrightC. L., DeFrancescoT., HamiltonC., & MachadoL. (2019). The influence of media portrayals of immigration and refugees on consumer attitudes: An experimental design. Howard Journal of Communications, 31(4), 388–410. https://doi.org/10.1080/10646175.2019.1649762
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
