Unveiling the Influence of Women CEOs,CEO Duality and CEO Compensation on Firm Performance: Evidence from India

Abstract

This article examines the relationship between women chief executive officers (CEOs), CEO duality and CEO compensation on firm performance with upper echelons theory. The final sample of the study comprises 76 Indian non-financial companies listed on the National Stock Exchange from 2019 to 2024. The secondary database CMIE Prowess and companies’ annual reports were used to collect the variables of the study. Both random effects model and fixed effects model were employed for analysis. The results of the study reveal that both women CEOs and CEO duality have a positive but insignificant impact on return on assets (ROA), whereas CEO compensation has a significantly positive association with ROA. Additionally, the results also indicate that women CEOs and CEO compensation have an insignificant association, while CEO duality has a statistically significant and positive association with return on equity. The study is beneficial to policymakers and regulators in making long-run sustainable decisions.

Keywords

CEO characteristics women CEO CEO duality CEO compensation firm performance India

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abdeljawad

, & Masri

R. M.

(2020). Board characteristics and corporate performance: Evidence from Palestine. An-Najah University Journal for Research-B. Humanities , 34(4), 745–770.

Abdella

A. B.

, Naghavi

, & Fah

B. C. Y.

(2018). The effect of corruption, trade openness and political stability on foreign direct investment: Empirical evidence from BRIC countries. International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences , 5(3), 32–38.

Abhilash

, Shenoy

S. S.

, & Shetty

D. K.

(2023). Overview of corporate governance research in India: A bibliometric analysis. Cogent Business and Management , 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2023.2182361

Abujassar

(2024). CEO duality, managerial ownership, large shareholders, and firm performance: An analysis using panel data approaches. Kurdish Studies , 12(2), 5907–5917.

Adams

R. B.

, & Ferreira

(2009). Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance. Journal of Financial Economics , 94(2), 291–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2008.10.007

Affes

, & Jarboui

(2023). The impact of corporate governance on financial performance: A cross-sector study. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance , 20(4), 374–394.

Agarwal

(2018). SEBI (LODR) (Amendment) Regulations, 2018: A route to achieving a global level corporate governance structure in India. Supremo Amicus , 7, 32–40.

Agung

I. G. N.

(2021). Quantile regression: Applications on experimental and cross section data using EViews (1st ed.). John Wiley and Sons. https://www.amazon.in/Applications-Quantile-Regression-Experimental-Section/dp/1119715172

Agyei-Mensah

B. K.

(2021). The impact of board characteristics on corporate investment decisions: An empirical study. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society , 21(4), 569–586.

10.

Ahmad

G. N.

, Prasetyo

M. R. P.

, Buchdadi

A. D.

, Widyastuti

, & Kurniawati

(2022). The effect of CEO characteristics on firm performance of food and beverage companies in Indonesia, Malaysia and Singapore. Calitatea , 23(186), 111–122.

11.

Al-Absy

M. S. M.

(2023). Impactful female directors and earnings management: The moderating effect of ownership concentration. Administrative Sciences , 13(5), 129. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci13050129

12.

Ali

M. H.

, Alam

S. S.

, Nor

S. M.

, Amin

S. I. M.

, & Omar

(2019). Elucidation of supply chain integration in halal food industry. Malaysian Applied Biology , 48(2), 71–76.

13.

Ali

, Naseem

M. A.

, Jiang

, Rehman

R. U.

, Malik

, & Ahmad

M. I.

(2022). “How” and “when” CEO duality matter? Case of a developing economy. Sage Open , 12(3). https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/21582440221116113

14.

Ali

, Rehman

R. U.

, Suleman

, & Ntim

C. G.

(2022). CEO attributes, investment decisions, and firm performance: New insights from upper echelons theory. Managerial and Decision Economics , 43(2), 398–417.

15.

Almici

(2023). Does sustainability in executive remuneration matter? The moderating effect of Italian firms’ corporate governance characteristics. Meditari Accountancy Research , 31(7), 49–87.

16.

Alqisie

(2014). Do corporate governance indicators lead the firm to adopt high/low level of financial leverage? Case of Jordan. Journal of Management Research , 6(3). https://doi.org/10.5296/jmr.v6i3.5636

17.

Al-Sayani

Y. M.

, Al-Matari

E. M.

, Mohamad Nor

M. N.

, Amran

N. A.

, & Alsayani

M. A.

(2024). Board chairman characteristics and impression management: An empirical investigation. Further analysis. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society , 24(1), 198–223.

18.

Al-Shammari

H. A.

(2021). CEO compensation and firm performance: The mediating effects of CEO risk taking behaviour. Cogent Business and Management , 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2021.1894893

19.

Altarawneh

, Shafie

, & Ishak

(2020). CEO characteristics: A literature review and future directions. Academy of Strategic Management Journal , 19(1), 1–10.

20.

Amin

, Ali

, & Ur Rehman

(2024). Effects of female CEO and female CFO on internationalization and firm performance. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society , 24(7), 1577–1596. https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/cg-12-2022-0512/full/pdf?title=effects-of-female-ceo-and-female-cfo-on-internationalization-and-firm-performance

21.

Amran

N. A.

, Yusof

M. A. M.

, Ishak

, & Aripin

(2014). Do characteristics of CEO and chairman influence government-linked companies’ performance? Procedia Social Behaviour Sciences , 109, 799–803.

22.

Anas

, Gulzar

, Tabash

M. I.

, Ahmad

, Yazdani

, & Alam

M. F.

(2023). Investigating the nexus between corporate governance and firm performance in India: Evidence from COVID-19. Journal of Risk and Financial Management , 16(7), 307.

23.

Angwaomaodoko

E. A.

(2025). Corporate governance and firm performance: Investigating the impact of governance structures on economic outcome. Path of Science , 10(12), 1001–1011.

24.

Anyigbah

, Kong

, Edziah

B. K.

, Ahoto

A. T.

, & Ahiaku

W. S.

(2023). Board characteristics and corporate sustainability reporting: Evidence from Chinese listed companies. Sustainability , 15(4), 3553. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15043553

25.

Arora

(2022). Gender diversity in boardroom and its impact on firm performance. Journal of Management and Governance , 26(3), 735–755.

26.

Aryani

Y. A.

, Santoso

, Gantyowati

, Setiawan

, & Susanto

K. P.

(2025). Does educational background of chief executive officers influence impression management? Cogent Business and Management , 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2024.2442094

27.

Aslam

, Haron

, & Tahir

M. N.

(2019). How director remuneration impacts firm performance: An empirical analysis of executive director remuneration in Pakistan. Borsa Istanbul Review , 19(2), 186–196.

28.

Balasubramanian

B. N.

, Barua

S. K.

, & Karthik

(2015). Influence of board diversity and characteristics on CEO compensation: Contingent effects of concentrated ownership (IIMA working papers WP2015-03-37). Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad, Research and Publication Department.

29.

Bao

, & Xue

(2023). CEO duality, CEO compensation, and earnings management: Evidence from China. Corporate Ownership and Control , 20(3), 317–327.

30.

Bature

, Lasisi

, Abdulkadir

, & Adenomon

(2024). Testing for stationarity on selected linear and non-linear time series models of different orders. FUDMA Journal of Renewable and Atomic Energy , 1(1), 90–102.

31.

Blanes

, De Fuentes

, & Porcuna

(2021). Corporate social responsibility and managerial compensation: Further evidence from Spanish listed companies. Sustainability , 13(13), 7341.

32.

Bouaziz

, Salhi

, & Jarboui

(2020). CEO characteristics and earnings management: Empirical evidence from France. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting , 18(1), 77–110.

33.

Bouteska

, & Mefteh-Wali

(2021). The determinants of CEO compensation: New insights from United States. Journal of Applied Accounting Research , 22(4), 663–686.

34.

Brahma

, Nwafor

, & Boateng

(2021). Board gender diversity and firm performance: The UK evidence. International Journal of Finance and Economics, 26(4), 5704–5719.

35.

Cahyono

, Harymawan

, Djajadikerta

H. G.

, & Noman

A. H. M.

(2024). Corporate business strategy, CEO’s managerial ability, and environmental disclosure: The perspective of stakeholder theory. Business Strategy and the Environment , 33(8), 8149–8189.

36.

Canace

T. G.

, Cianci

A. M.

, Liu

, & Tsakumis

G. T.

(2020). Paid for looks when others are looking: CEO facial traits, compensation, and corporate visibility. Journal of Business Research , 115, 85–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.04.037

37.

Castrillon

M. A. G.

(2021). The concept of corporate governance. Revista Científica “Vision de Futuro” , 25(2), 178–194.

38.

Chakraborty

, & Mahakud

(2023). CEO attributes and foreign shareholdings: Evidence from an emerging economy. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting . https://doi.org/10.1108/JFRA-05-2022-0166

39.

Chang

, Lee

, & Shim

(2019). CEO duality and firm performance: Does economic policy uncertainty mediate the relation? International Review of Finance , 19(4), 877–891.

40.

Chatterjee

, & Nag

(2023). Do Women on boards enhance firm performance? Evidence from top Indian companies. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance , 20(2), 155–167.

41.

Chen

, & Hassan

(2022). Management gender diversity, executive’s compensation and firm performance. International Journal of Accounting and Information Management , 30(1), 115–142.

42.

Clarke

(2004). Cycles of crisis and regulation: The enduring agency and stewardship problems of corporate governance. Corporate Governance: An International Review , 12(2), 153–161.

43.

Colombelli

, D’Ambrosio

, & Ravetti

(2024). Women in innovative start-ups and regional inclusiveness: ‘Green’ and socially-responsible companies. Regional Studies , 59(1).

44.

Companies Act . (2013). Securities and Exchange Board of India (sebi.gov.in). CompaniesAct2013.pdf (mca.gov.in).

45.

Darouichi

, Kunisch

, Menz

, & Cannella

A. A.

Jr (2021). CEO tenure: An integrative review and pathways for future research. Corporate Governance: An International Review , 29(6), 661–683.

46.

Das Gupta

, & Pathak

(2022). Role of educational, regional and religious attributes of CEOs in performance of Indian family firms. International Journal of Managerial Finance , 18(5), 997–1027.

47.

Das Gupta

, & Pathak

(2024). CEO education and corporate social performance: moderation effects of CEO characteristics and firm’s governance quality. Benchmarking: An International Journal , 31(10), 3624–3654.

48.

Davis

J. H.

, Schoorman

F. D.

, & Donaldson

(2018). Toward a stewardship theory of management. In Business ethics and strategy (Vol. 1, pp. 473–500). Routledge.

49.

Debnath

, Das

, Laskar

, Khan

S. B.

, Dhand

, & Kaushal

(2021). CEO duality and firm performance: An empirical study on listed companies from an emerging market. Corporate Governance Organizational Behaviour Review , 5(2), 194–202.

50.

Devarapalli

, & Mohapatra

L. M.

(2024). Impact of corporate governance characteristics on integrated reporting quality: An empirical analysis, evidence from India. Indian Journal of Corporate Governance , 17(1), 9–32.

51.

Dey

, Engel

, & Liu

(2011). CEO and board chair roles: To split or not to split? Journal of Corporate Finance , 17(5), 1595–1618.

52.

Dixit

, Manna

, & Singh

(2024). The effects of CEO duality, board size, and informal social networks on sustainable innovation and firm performance. Corporate Ownership and Control , 21(2), 165–177. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/381171015_The_effects_of_CEO_duality_board_size_and_informal_social_networks_on_sustainable_innovation_and_firm_performance

53.

Dorata

N. T.

, & Petra

S. T.

(2008). CEO duality and compensation in the market for corporate control. Managerial Finance , 34(5), 342–353.

54.

El Abiad

, Abraham

, El-Chaarani

, Skaf

, Binsaddig

R. O.

, & Jafar

S. H.

(2024). The impact of CEO characteristics on the financial performance of family businesses listed in the euronext exchange. Journal of Risk and Financial Management , 17(3), 129.

55.

Emestine

I. E.

, & Setyaningrum

(2019). CEO characteristics and firm performance; empirical studies from ASEAN countries. In 2018 International Conference on Islamic Economics and Business (ICONIES 2018) 101, 423–427.

56.

Fama

E. F.

, & Jensen

M. C.

(1983). Separation of ownership and control. The Journal of Law and Economics , 26(2), 301–325.

57.

Farag

, & Mallin

(2018). The influence of CEO demographic characteristics on corporate risk-taking: Evidence from Chinese IPOs. The European Journal of Finance , 24(16), 1528–1551.

58.

Farooq

, & Ahmad

(2023). Nexus between board characteristics, firm performance and intellectual capital: An emerging market evidence. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society , 23(6), 1269–1297.

59.

Febrianto

H. G.

, & Pambudi

J. E.

(2024). CEO dualism and corporate value: A digital corporate governance perspective. Jurnal Reviu Akuntansi dan Keuangan , 14(4), 912–932.

60.

Freeman

R. E.

(2020). The stakeholder approach revisited. Zeitschrift für Wirtschafts- und Unternehmensethik , 657–671. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-16205-4-55

61.

Gala

, Kashmiri

, & Nicol

(2024). Effect of CEO-TMT pay ratio on the value of new product introductions. International Journal of Corporate Governance , 14(4), 357–378.

62.

Garg

M. C.

, & Tanwer

(2024). Impact of board characteristics and capital structure on firm value: Evidence from the Indian corporate sector. Afro-Asian Journal of Finance and Accounting , 14(5), 708–734.

63.

Ghardallou

(2022). Corporate sustainability and firm performance: The moderating role of CEO education and tenure. Sustainability , 14(6), 3513. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14063513

64.

Goel

(2021). Board composition and performance of Indian companies: The moderating effect of CEO duality. SCMS Journal of Indian Management , 18(4). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/357367639_Board_Composition_and_Firm_Performance_Empirical_Evidence_from_Selected_Indian_Companies

65.

Grey

, Flynn

, & Adu

D. A.

(2024). An examination of how executive remuneration and firm performance are influenced by Chair-CEO diversity attributes. International Review of Financial Analysis , 94, 103290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2024.103290

66.

Gujarati

D. N.

(2009). Basic econometrics . Tata McGraw Hill Education. https://www.amazon.in/Basic-Econometrics-Damodar-Gujarati/dp/0071333452

67.

Gupta

, & Mahakud

(2020). CEO characteristics and bank performance: Evidence from India. Managerial Auditing Journal , 35(8), 1057–1093.

68.

Gupta

, Mahakud

, & Verma

(2021). CEO’s education and investment-cash flow sensitivity: An empirical investigation. International Journal of Managerial Finance , 17(4), 589–618.

69.

Haldar

, Shah

, Nageswara Rao

S. V. D.

, Stokes

, Demirbas

, & Dardour

(2018). Corporate performance: Does board independence matter?—Indian Evidence. International Journal of Organizational Analysis , 26(1), 185–200.

70.

Hambrick

D. C.

, & Mason

P. A.

(1984). Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review , 9(2), 193–206.

71.

Harymawan

, Nasih

, Ratri

M. C.

, & Nowland

(2019). CEO busyness and firm performance: Evidence from Indonesia. Heliyon , 5(5), 2405–8440.

72.

Hassan

, Atif

, & Zhang

(2024). Exploring the affiliation of corporate social responsibility, innovation performance, and CEO gender diversity: Evidence from the US. Journal of Risk and Financial Management , 17(1), 23. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm17010023

73.

Hassan

M. K.

, Houston

, Karim

M. S.

, & Sabit

(2023). CEO duality and firm performance during the 2020 coronavirus outbreak. The Journal of Economic Asymmetries , 27, e00278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeca.2022.e00278

74.

Hausman

J. A.

(1978). Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica , 46(6), 1251–1271.

75.

Hazzaa

O. T.

, Abdullah

D. F.

, & Sadaa

A. M.

(2024). Influence of CEO characteristics and audit committee on financial performance: Evidence from Iraq. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity , 10(2), 100290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2024.100290

76.

Hernandez-Nicolas

C. M.

, Martin-Ugedo

J. F.

, & Minguez-Vera

(2022). Women CEOs and firm performance in the construction industry: Evidence from Spain. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management , 29(3), 1343–1357.

77.

Hopp

, Wentzel

, & Rose

(2023). Chief executive officers’ appearance predicts company performance, or does it? A replication study and extension focusing on CEO successions. The Leadership Quarterly , 34(4), 101437. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2020.101437

78.

Hosmer

L. T.

(1982). The importance of strategic leadership. The Journal of Business Strategy , 3(2), 47–57.

79.

Hundal

(2017). Multiple directorships of corporate boards and firm performance in India. Corporate Ownership and Control , 14(4), 150–164.

80.

Hussain

S. M.

, Ahmad

, Fazal

, & Menegaki

A. N.

(2024). The impact of female directorship on firm performance: A systematic literature review. Review of Managerial Science , 18(3), 913–939.

81.

Ibrahim

M. Y.

, & Ahmad

A. C.

(2017). Physical characteristics of the chief executive officer and firm accounting and market-based performance. Asian Journal of Accounting and Governance , 8, 27–37.

82.

Ibrahim

S. I.

, & Yahaya

O. A.

(2024). An inquiry into the nexus between a CEO and working capital management quality. Journal of Smart Economic Growth , 9(1), 135–163.

83.

Jaiswal

, & Mandal

(2024). Gender diversity in the boardroom and firm financial performance: A study on selected pharmaceutical companies in India. Chief Patron , 147–154.

84.

Jejeniwa

T. O.

, Mhlongo

N. Z.

, & Jejeniwa

T. O.

(2024). Diversity and inclusion in the workplace: A conceptual framework comparing the USA and Nigeria. International Journal of Management and Entrepreneurship Research , 6(5), 1368–1394.

85.

Jensen

M. C.

, & Meckling

W. H.

(1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics , 3(4), 305–360.

86.

Jiang

, Luo

, Xia

, Hitt

, & Shen

(2023). Resource dependence theory in international business: Progress and prospects. Global Strategy Journal , 13(1), 3–57.

87.

Jouber

(2022). Women leaders and corporate social performance: Do critical mass, CEO managerial ability and corporate governance matter? Management Decision , 60(5), 1185–1217.

88.

Kacperczyk

, Younkin

, & Rocha

(2023). Do employees work less for female leaders? A multi-method study of entrepreneurial firms. Organization Science , 34(3), 1111–1133.

89.

Kaur

(2020). CEOs characteristics corporate financing and corporate performance [Unpublished thesis, Guru Nanak Dev University]. https://shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/handle/10603/366816

90.

Kaur

H. (Ed.)

. (2021). Facets of corporate governance and corporate social responsibility in India . Springer. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-981-33-076-3

91.

Kaur

, & Singh

(2018). Measuring the immeasurable corporate reputation. Metamorphosis , 17(1), 53–64.

92.

Kaur

, & Singh

(2019). Do CEO characteristics explain firm performance in India? Journal of Strategy and Management , 12(3), 409–426.

93.

Kaur

, & Singh

(2021). The impact of CEOs’ characteristics on corporate leverage: Indian scenario. Vision , 25(4), 428–438.

94.

Khan

, Shafqat

M. M.

, Qureshi

S. A.

, Shafique

, Bilal

, & Ullah

(2021). CEO duality and firm performance in the pharmaceutical industry of China: The moderating role of ownership type. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change , 15(5), 1031–1045.

95.

Kishan

, & Kiran

V. U.

(2024). Board gender diversity and firm performance: The case of S&P BSE Sensex companies. IUP Journal of Accounting Research and Audit Practices , 23(2), 52.

96.

Krause

, Semadeni

, & Withers

M. C.

(2016). That special someone: When the board views its chair as a resource. Strategic Management Journal , 37(9), 1990–2002.

97.

Kubo

, & Nguyen

T. T. P.

(2021). Female CEOs on Japanese corporate boards and firm performance. Journal of the Japanese and International Economies , 62, 101163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjie.2021.101163

98.

Kultys

(2016). Controversies about agency theory as theoretical basis for corporate governance. Oeconomia Copernicana , 7(4), 613–634.

99.

Kumar

N. K.

(2023). Autocorrelation and heteroscedasticity in regression analysis. Journal of Business and Social Sciences , 5(1), 9–20.

100.

Kumar

(2024). The impact of executives’ compensation and corporate governance attributes on voluntary disclosures: Does audit quality matter? Journal of Applied Accounting Research , 25(2), 240–263.

101.

Kumar

, Gupta

, & Arora

J. R.

(2019). Taxmann’s auditing and corporate governance . Taxmann. https://www.taxmann.com/bookstore/product/40004962-auditing-corporate-governance?srsltid=AfmBOoqWa74WObLBYOQjZwi_p3IuhHhh1Id2d8Y08jr84X-hlxqAmUEd

102.

Kyere

, & Ausloos

(2021). Corporate governance and firms financial performance in the United Kingdom. International Journal of Finance and Economics , 26(2), 1871–1885.

103.

La Rocca

, Fasano

, La Rocca

, & Neha

(2024). Women in CEO duality and firm performance in Europe. Journal of Management and Governance , 28(1), 177–214.

104.

Law

K. F. P.

, & Ningnan

(2022). Effect of individual CEOs’ characteristics on firms’ performance: Evidence from China. Journal of Accounting and Finance , 14(3), 215–228.

105.

H. T. M.

, Ting

I. W. K.

, Kweh

Q. L.

, & Ngo

H. L. T.

(2023). CEO duality, board size and firm performance: Evidence in Vietnam. International Journal of Business Excellence , 29(1), 98–120.

106.

Lee

S. Y.

, & Ko

E. J.

(2022). Effects of founder CEO duality and board size on foreign IPOs’ survival in US markets. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society , 22(5), 1054–1077.

107.

Lee

, & Marvel

(2014). Revisiting the entrepreneur gender–performance relationship: A firm perspective. Small Business Economics , 42(4), 769–786.

108.

Levin

, Lin

C. F.

, & Chu

C. S. J.

(2002). Unit root tests in panel data: asymptotic and finite-sample properties. Journal of Econometrics , 108(1), 1–24.

109.

Liu

, Peng

, Huang

, Liu

, Duan

, & Lin

(2022). Independent director-CEO friendliness and sustainable growth capability in enterprises: The moderating role of CSR and executive compensation. Cross Cultural and Strategic Management , 30(1), 69–92.

110.

Lohde

A. S. K.

, Campopiano

, & Calabrò

(2021). Beyond agency and stewardship theory: Shareholder–manager relationships and governance structures in family firms. Management Decision , 59(2), 390–405.

111.

, Ge

, & Zhao

(2024). Top management team diversity and adaptive firm performance: The moderating roles of overlapping team tenure and severity of threat. Journal of Organizational Change Management , 37(1), 1–23.

112.

Mahajan

, Lim

W. M.

, Sareen

, Kumar

, & Panwar

(2023). Stakeholder theory. Journal of Business Research , 166, 114104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.114104

113.

Makri

, Makan

L. T.

, & Kabra

K. C.

(2024). Board characteristics and integrated reporting in an emerging market: Evidence from India. Asian Journal of Accounting Research , 9(1), 2–12.

114.

Manna

, Sahu

T. N.

, & Gupta

(2016). Impact of ownership structure and board composition on corporate performance in Indian companies. Indian Journal of Corporate Governance , 9(1), 44–66.

115.

Mansoor

, Ellahi

, Khan

, & Rahman

(2017). CEO power, board size and firm performance: Evidence from Pak, China, USA and India banking sector. Journal of Managerial Sciences , 9(3), 371–383.

116.

Maqsood

U. S.

, Wang

, & Zahid

R. A.

(2024). Digital age imperatives and firm internal control quality: Evidence from CEOs personal trait and type of state-owned enterprises. Managerial Auditing Journal , 39(6), 700–727.

117.

Masimba

, & Shadreck

(2021). Comparison of arch family models using e-views computer software packages: A case of Zimbabwe Stock Exchange. Indiana Journal of Multidisciplinary Research , 1(1), 1–10.

118.

Matousek

, & Tzeremes

N. G.

(2016). CEO compensation and bank efficiency: An application of conditional nonparametric frontiers. European Journal of Operational Research , 251(1), 264–273.

119.

Mehrotra

, Mohanty

, & Sharma

(2021). Do Board quality and promoters’ holdings affect firm performance? Evidence from small and medium-sized enterprises. FIIB Business Review , 12(1), 100–108. https://doi.org/10.1177/2319714520980286

120.

Moedu

V. O.

, Amahalu

N. N.

, & Nworie

G. O.

(2023). Controlling inventory levels of listed industrial goods firms in Nigeria: Effect on firm profit. Journal of Global Accounting , 9(2), 1–19.

121.

Mubeen

, Han

, Abbas

, & Hussain

(2020). The effects of market competition, capital structure, and CEO duality on firm performance: A mediation analysis by incorporating the GMM model technique. Sustainability , 12(8), 3480. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12083480

122.

Mubeen

, Han

, Abbas

, Álvarez-Otero

, & Sial

M. S.

(2021). The relationship between CEO duality and business firms’ performance: The moderating role of firm size and corporate social responsibility. Frontiers in psychology , 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.669715

123.

Mukherjee

, & Sen

S. S.

(2017). Sustainable growth: A study on some selected banks in India. Wealth: International Journal of Money, Banking and Finance , 6(1). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/325957481_Sustainable_Growth_A_Study_on_Some_Selected_Banks_in_India

124.

Mukherjee

, & Sen

S. S.

(2022). Impact of CEO attributes on corporate reputation, financial performance, and corporate sustainable growth: Evidence from India. Financial Innovation , 8(1), 40.

125.

Mumu

J. R.

, Saona

, Russell

H. I.

, & Azad

M. A. K.

(2021). Corporate governance and remuneration: A bibliometric analysis. Journal of Asian Business and Economic Studies , 28(4), 242–262.

126.

Musa

, Abdul Latif

, & Abdul Majid

(2023). CEO attributes, board independence, and real earnings management: Evidence from Nigeria. Cogent Business and Management , 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2023.2194464

127.

Muttakin

M. B.

, & Khan

(2025). CEO tenure, board monitoring and competitive corporate culture: How do they influence integrated reporting? Journal of Accounting Literature , 47(1), 75–99.

128.

Nee

E. O. Y.

, Shabbir

M. F.

, & Asif

(2024). Aligning CEO compensation with sustainability performance: The role of CEO duality, board size, and compensation committees. Discover Sustainability , 5, 447.

129.

Nguyen

D. V.

, Nguyen

N. H. K.

, & Dinh

T. T.

(2023). CEO attributes and firm performance: Evidence from companies listed on Ho Chi Minh Stock Exchange. Cogent Economics and Finance , 11(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2023.2282838

130.

Nguyen

, Bai

, Hou

, & Vu

M. C.

(2021). Corporate governance and dynamics capital structure: Evidence from Vietnam. Global Finance Journal , 48, 100554.

131.

Nikmo

(2021). Board nationality diversity and firm performance: Empirical evidence from OMX Helsinki [Unpublished Bachelor’s thesis, Talliann University of Technology]. https://digikogu.taltech.ee/et/Download/b32a0df3-22f9-4b93-86ef-3e0320f0038f

132.

Odubuasi

A. C.

, Anene

J. I.

, & Okeke

P. C.

(2022). Do chief executive officer’s attributes impact on the performance of Nigerian firms? Journal of Business Administration Research , 11(2), 1927–9515.

133.

Omri

N. A. E.

, & Alfaleh

A. M.

(2024). The effects of boardroom gender diversity on corporate performance: Empirical evidence from a sample of European listed companies. Business Economics , 59, 86–100.

134.

Osazevbaru

H. O.

(2022). Chief executive officer duality, nationality and firms’ growth opportunities. Asian Journal of Social Sciences and Management Studies , 9(2), 51–59.

135.

Osei Bonsu

, Liu

, & Yawson

(2024). The impact of CEO attributes on corporate decision-making and outcomes: A review and an agenda for future research. International Journal of Managerial Finance , 20(2), 503–545.

136.

Oussii

A. A.

, & Klibi

M. F.

(2023). Do CEO duality and expertise affect earnings management behavior? The moderating effect of family ownership. Journal of Family Business Management , 13(4), 1392–1409. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2023.2282838

137.

Padungsaksawasdi

, & Treepongkaruna

(2024). Corporate social responsibility, board characteristics, and family business in Thailand. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management , 31(2), 1340–1353.

138.

Palaniappan

(2017). Determinants of corporate financial performance relating to board characteristics of corporate governance in Indian manufacturing industry: An empirical study. European Journal of Management and Business Economics , 26(1), 67–85.

139.

Pandey

, Andres

, & Kumar

(2023). Mapping the corporate governance scholarship: Current state and future directions. Corporate Governance: An International Review , 31(1), 127–160.

140.

Pandya

(2011). Corporate governance structures and financial performance of selected Indian banks. Journal of Management and Public Policy , 2(2), 4–21. http://jmpp.in/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/Hemal-Pandya.pdf

141.

Patnaik

, & Suar

(2020). Does corporate governance affect CEO compensation in Indian manufacturing firms? Journal of Public Affairs , 20(3), e2115. https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.2115

142.

Peni

(2012). CEO and chairperson characteristic and firm performance. Journal of Management and Governance , 18(1), 185–205.

143.

Pfeffer

, & Salancik

G. R.

(2015). External control of organizations—Resource dependence perspective. Organizational Behavior , 2(1), 373–388.

144.

Pham

N. H.

(2023). CEO characteristics and bank performance: Case of Vietnamese commercial banks. Cogent Economics and Finance , 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2022.2162687

145.

Potharla

, & Amirishetty

(2021). Non-linear relationship of board size and board independence with firm performance—Evidence from India. Journal of Indian Business Research , 13(4), 503–532.

146.

Rahman

M. J.

, & Chen

(2023). CEO characteristics and firm performance: Evidence from private listed firms in China. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society , 23(3), 458–477.

147.

Rahman

J. M.

, & Yilun

(2021). Firm size, firm age, and firm profitability: Evidence from China. Journal of Accounting, Business and Management , 28(1), 101–115.

148.

Raju

, Subramanyam

, & Dasaraju

(2012). Emergence of corporate governance in India. EXCEL International Journal of Multidisciplinary Management Studies , 2(5), 74–90.

149.

Ramadanti

, Mulyasari

, & Astuti

K. D.

(2023). Do chief executive officer (CEO) characteristics influence financial performance? Jurnal Riset Akuntansi Terpadu , 16(2), 142–151.

150.

Razali

M. W. M.

, Azmi

A. A. binti U.

, Hwang

J. Y. T.

, & Lunyai

(2022). Chief executive officer (CEO) characteristics and firm value: Evidence from Malaysia. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences , 12(9), 1537–1552.

151.

Reddy

(2023). Are CEOs paid for performance? A study of CEO’s compensation in the public sector corporations. Journal of Economic Analysis , 2(1), 16–36.

152.

Rehman

, Jun

J. C.

, Rehman

, Zeeshan

, Adeel

, Saleem

, & Rehman

(2021). Unravelling the nexus between CEO characteristics and financial performance in Pakistani listed firms. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change , 15(6), 65–91.

153.

Rodríguez-Fernández

, Carvajal

A. B. F.

, & Ruiz-Gómez

L. M.

(2020). Evolution of European Union’s energy security in gas supply during Russia–Ukraine gas crises (2006–2009). Energy Strategy Reviews , 30, 100518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2020.100518

154.

Saha

(2023). The impact of board-level female directors on firm performance: Evidence from India. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal , 42(8), 945–967. https://doi.org/10.1108/EDI-07-2022-0172

155.

Saha

, Kabir

M. N.

, & Chowdhury

A. H.

(2023). The impact of CEO attributes on sustainability performance: Evidence from an emerging economy. Accounting Research Journal , 36(6), 539–557.

156.

Sahoo

, Srivastava

K. B.

, Gupta

, Mittal

S. K.

, Bakhshi

, & Agarwal

(2023). Board meeting, promoter CEO and firm performance: Evidence from India. Cogent Economics and Finance , 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2023.2175465

157.

Saidu

(2019). CEO characteristics and firm performance: Focus on origin, education and ownership. Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research , 9(1), 29. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40497-019-0153-7

158.

Sama

L. M.

, Stefanidis

, & Casselman

R. M.

(2022). Rethinking corporate governance in the digital economy: The role of stewardship. Business Horizons , 65(5), 535–546.

159.

Sattar

, Biswas

P. K.

, & Roberts

(2023). Private firm performance: Do women directors’ matter? Meditari Accountancy Research , 31(3), 602–634.

160.

Securities and Exchange Board of India. (2018). SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) (Amendment) Regulations, 2018 . https://www.sebi.gov.in

161.

Shabbir

M. F.

, Hanaysha

J. R.

, Oon

E. Y. N.

, Asif

, & Aslam

H. D.

(2024). Aligning CEO compensation with sustainability performance: The role of CEO duality, board size, and compensation committees. Discover Sustainability , 5(1), 447.

162.

Shah

S. G. M.

, Sarfraz

, & Ivascu

(2021). Assessing the interrelationship corporate environmental responsibility, innovative strategies, cognitive and hierarchical CEO: A stakeholder theory perspective. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management , 28(1), 457–473.

163.

Shen

(2021). CEO characteristics: A review of influential publications and a research agenda. Accounting and Finance , 61(1), 361–385.

164.

Shen

, Wallace

, Reddy

, & Ramiah

(2022). An investigation of CEO characteristics on firm performance. Accounting and Finance , 62(3), 3563–3607.

165.

Shittu

, & Che-Ahmad

(2024). Corporate governance and equity value: Empirical evidence from Nigerian firms. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society , 24(2), 462–484.

166.

Short

C. E.

, & Hubbard

T. D.

(2023). Extending upper echelons theory: How evaluators influence signal interpretation and evaluation. In Cognitive aids in strategy (Vol. 6, pp. 47–64). Emerald Publishing Limited.

167.

Sinebe

M. T.

(2024). The impact of CEO attributes on firm value: Moderating role of firm size. International Journal of Intellectual Discourse , 7(2), 139–151.

168.

Singh

K. B.

, Patil

D. T.

, & Khandelwal

(2021, March). CEOs compensation and firm performance: Evidence from Bhutan. In 2021 International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Knowledge Economy (ICCIKE) , 350–354. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCIKE51210.2021.9410718

169.

Singhathep

, & Pholphirul

(2015). Female CEOs, firm performance, and firm development: Evidence from Thai manufacturers. Gender Technology and Development , 19(3), 320–334.

170.

Smirnova

A. S.

, & Zavertiaeva

M. A.

(2017). Which came first, CEO compensation or firm performance? The causality dilemma in European companies. Research in International Business and Finance , 42, 658–673.

171.

Song

H. J.

, & Kang

K. H.

(2019). The moderating effect of CEO duality on the relationship between geographic diversification and firm performance in the US lodging industry. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management , 31(3), 1488–1504.

172.

Soni

T. K.

, & Singh

(2020). Directors’ remuneration, corporate governance and firm performance linkages: Evidence from the emerging country. Corporate Ownership and Control, 18(1), 382–392.

173.

Srivastava

, Das

, & Pattanayak

J. K.

(2019). Impact of corporate governance attributes on cost of equity: Evidence from an emerging economy. Managerial Auditing Journal , 34(2), 142–161.

174.

Suherman

, Mahfirah

T. F.

, Usman

, Kurniawati

, & Kurnianti

(2023). CEO characteristics and firm performance: Evidence from a Southeast Asian country. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society , 23(7), 1526–1563.

175.

Sun

, & Zou

(2021). Political connection, CEO gender, and firm performance. Journal of Corporate Finance , 71, 101918. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2021.101918

176.

Tang

(2017). CEO duality and firm performance: The moderating roles of other executives and block holding outside directors. European Management Journal, 35(3), 362–372.

177.

Tanwer

, & Garg

M. C.

(2024). Do corporate governance dynamics drive performance of state-owned and non-state-owned enterprises? An Indian perspective. Asian Journal of Business Ethics , 13(1), 1–30.

178.

Teixeira

, Ventura

A. F. A.

, Chandani

, Pathak

, & Ubarhande

(2025). India: Corporate governance in India: Significant advances made and ways forward. In

, Lee

S. Y.

, & Brickley

J. A.

(Eds), Corporate governance in capital markets: Navigating governance systems of publicly traded firms (pp. 213–236). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-94751-3_9

179.

Terjesen

, Aguilera

R. V.

, & Lorenz

(2016). Legislating a woman’s seat on the board: Institutional factors driving gender quotas for boards of directors. Journal of Business Ethics , 128(2), 233–251. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2083-1

180.

Urbański

, Haque

A. U.

, Lang

J. W.

, & Kozlovski

(2025). The impact of total quality management and business networks on company export performance in emerging vs. developed economies: Evidence from furniture enterprises in Pakistan and the UK. European Journal of International Management , 25(2), 257–284.

181.

Urquhart

, & Zhang

(2022). PhD CEOs and firm performance. European Financial Management , 28(2), 433–481.

182.

Vieira

, & Madaleno

(2024). Corporate governance and firm performance: Does capital structure matter? The Challenges of Era 5.0 in Accounting and Finance Innovation , 273–294.

183.

L. V.

, Nguyen

H. T. H.

, & Le

H. T. T.

(2021). Do female CEOs make a difference in firm operations? Evidence from Vietnam. Accounting and Finance , 61(S1), 1489–1516.

184.

Voinea

C. L.

, Rauf

, Naveed

, & Fratostiteanu

(2022). The impact of CEO duality and financial performance on CSR disclosure: Empirical evidence from state-owned enterprises in China. Journal of Risk and Financial Management , 15(1), 37.

185.

Wang

(2022). CEO power and acquisition performance: A meta-analysis. In Advances in mergers and acquisitions (21, pp. 117–148). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1479-361X20220000021008

186.

Wang

, Pei

, & Liang

(2022). Founder CEO, CEO characteristics, and firm innovation efficiency: An empirical study of China’s GEM-Listed companies. Sustainability , 14(14), 8250.

187.

Wang

, Zhang

, Ullah

, & Ullah

(2021). Executive compensation and corporate performance of energy companies around the world. Energy Strategy Reviews , 38, 100749. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2021.10074

188.

Wickramasinghe

W. M.

, Athukorala

P. P.

, Senarathne

S. G.

, & Yapa

Y. P.

(2023). Examine the reliability of econometrics software: An empirical comparison of time series modelling. Open Journal of Statistics , 13(1), 25–45.

189.

Wijethilake

, & Ekanayake

(2020). CEO duality and firm performance: The moderating roles of ceo informal power and board involvements. Social Responsibility Journal , 16(8), 1453–1474.

190.

M. L.

(2021). CEO salary, personal characteristics, and firm performance in Chinese-listed firms: A cross-sectional econometric modelling approach. Journal of Management. Economics, and Industrial Organization , 5(3), 14–30.

191.

Xie

, Guo

, Daniel

S. J.

, & Liu

(2024). The dynamic relation between board gender diversity and firm performance: The moderating role of shareholder activism. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting , 62(1), 225–246.

192.

Yahya

(2025). Female leadership and ESG performance of firms: Nordic evidence. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society , 25(1), 109–127.

193.

Yan

, Yan

, Zhang

, Bi

, Tian

, Mubeen

, & Abbas

(2024). Does CEO power affect manufacturing firms’ green innovation and organizational performance? A mediational approach. Sustainability , 16(14), 6015.

194.

Yang

, & Liu

(2017). The empirical study on CEO power and investment efficiency. Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research , 21, 40–45.

195.

(2023). CEO duality and firm performance: A systematic review and research agenda. European Management Review , 20(2), 346–358.

196.

Zandi

, Mohamad

, Keong

O. C.

, & Ehsanullah

(2019). CEO compensation and firm performance. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change , 7(7), 316–327.

197.

Zeshan

, Rasool

, Cerchione

, Centobelli

, & Morelli

(2024). The impact of digitalization on CSR commitment: The role of human resource management system and employee autonomy. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management . https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.3021

198.

Zoghlami

(2021). Does CEO compensation matter in boosting firm performance? Evidence from listed French firms. Managerial and Decision Economics , 42(1), 143–155.

199.

Zolotoy

, O’Sullivan

, & Martin

G. P.

(2022). Behavioural agency and firm productivity: Revisiting the incentive alignment qualities of stock options. Journal of Management Studies , 59(7), 1756–1787.