Using data from the Toronto Stock Exchange 300 companies for a
7-year period, the authors examine the role that institutional activism types and
three salient board monitoring mechanisms— CEO/board chair split, board
composition, and compensation committee independence—play in influencing CEO
contingent compensation in Canada. The authors find that the effect of
institutional activism, especially proxy based, is stronger on contingent CEO
compensation and that its effects span a longer time. As opposed to the
interactions of cumulative proxy-based activism with any of the three monitoring
mechanisms, the interactions of cumulative non-proxy-based activism with both
CEO/board chair split and compensation committee independence appear to influence
CEO contingent compensation. The study's implications are given.
Alchian, A.A., & Demsetz, H.1972. Production, information costs, and economic
organization . American Economic Review,
62: 777-795.
2.
Baysinger, B.D., Kosnik, R.D., & Turk, T.A.1991. Effects of board and ownership structure on
corporate R&D strategy. Academy of Management
Journal, 34:
205-214.
3.
Beatty, R.P., & Zajac, E.J.1994. Managerial incentives, monitoring, and risk
bearing: A study of executive compensation, ownership, and board structure in
initial public offerings. Administrative Science
Quarterly, 39:
313-315.
4.
Bebchuk, L.A., & Fried, J.M.2004. Pay without performance: The unfulfilled promise of
executive compensation. Cambridge, MA:
Harvard University Press.
5.
Bolino, M.1999. Citizenship and impression management: Good
soldiers or good actors? Academy of Management
Review, 24:
82-98.
6.
Boyd, B.K.1994. Board control and CEO compensation.
Strategic Management Journal, 15:
335-344.
7.
Brickley, J.A., Lease, R.C., & Smith, C.W.1988. Ownership structure and voting over antitakeover
amendments . Journal of Financial Economics,
20: 267-291.
8.
Bushee, B.J.1998. The influence of institutional investors on myopic
R&D investment behavior. Accounting Review,
73: 305-333.
9.
Carleton, W.T., Nelson, J.E., & Weisbach, M.S.1998. The influence of institutions on corporate
governance through private negotiations: Evidence from TIAA-CREF .
Journal of Finance, 53:
1335-1362.
10.
Chung, K.H., & Pruitt, S.W.1994. A simple approximation of Tobin's
q. Financial Management,
23(3):
70-74.
11.
Clyde, P.1997. Do institutional investors police
management? Managerial and Decision Economics,
18(1):
1-10.
12.
Conyon, M.J.2006. Executive compensation and
incentives. Academy of Management Perspectives,
20(1):
25-44.
13.
Conyon, M.J., & Peck, S.I.1998. Board control, remuneration committees, and top
management compensation. Academy of Management
Journal, 41:
146-157.
Crystal, G.S.1991. In search of excess. New
York: Norton &
Co.
16.
Cyert, R., Kang, S., & Kumar, P., 2002. Corporate governance, takeovers, and
top-management compensation: Theory and evidence.
Management Science, 48:
453-469.
17.
Daily, C.M., & Dalton, D.R.1994. Bankruptcy and corporate governance: The impact of
board composition and structure. Academy of Management
Journal, 37:
1603-1617.
18.
Daily, C.M., & Dalton, D.R.1997. CEO and board chair roles held jointly and
separately: Much ado about nothing? Academy of Management
Executive, 11(3):
11-20.
19.
Daily, C.M., Johnson, J.L., Ellstrand, A.E., & Dalton, D.R.1998. Compensation committee composition as a determinant
of CEO compensation. Academy of Management
Journal, 41:
209-220.
20.
Daily, C.M., & Schwenk, C.1996. Chief executive officers, top management teams, and
boards of directors: Congruent and countervailing forces?Journal of Management, 22:
185-208.
21.
David, P., Bloom, M., & Hillman, A.J.2007. Investor activism, managerial responsiveness, and
corporate social performance. Strategic Management
Journal, 28:
91-100.
22.
David, P., Hitt, M.A., & Gimeno, J.2001. The influence of activism by institutional
investors on R&D. Academy of Management
Journal, 44:
144-157.
23.
David, P., Kochhar, R., & Levitas, E.1998. The effect of institutional investors on the level
and mix of CEO compensation. Academy of Management
Journal, 41:
200-208.
24.
Deephouse, D.L.2000. Media reputation as a strategic resource. An
integration of mass communication and resource-based theories.
Journal of Management, 26:
1091-1112.
25.
Dierickx, I., & Cool, K.1989. Asset stock accumulation and the sustainability of
competitive advantage. Management Science,
35: 1504-1511.
26.
Ezzamel, M., & Watson, R.1998. Market comparison earnings and the bidding-up of
executive cash compensation: Evidence from the United Kingdom.
Academy of Management Journal, 41:
221-231.
27.
Fama, E.F., & Jensen, M.C.1983. Separation of ownership and
control. Journal of Law and Economics,
26: 301-325.
28.
Finkelstein, S., & Hambrick, D.C.1988. Chief executive compensation: A synthesis and
reconciliation. Strategic Management Journal ,
9: 543-558.
29.
Fombrun, C.1996. Reputation: Realizing value from the corporate
image. Boston: Harvard
Business School Press.
30.
Gelinas, P., Magnan, M., & St-Onge, S.2004. Increased compensation costs: An
externality of mandatory executive compensation disclosure.
Paper presented at the annual conference of the Administrative Sciences
Association of Canada, Quebec City, Quebec,
Canada.
31.
Gillan, S.L., & Starks, L.T.2000. Corporate governance proposals and shareholder
activism: The role of institutional owners. Journal of
Financial Economics , 57:
275-305.
32.
Gomez-Mejia, L.R.1994. Executive compensation: A review and integration of the
literature. In G. R. Ferris (Ed.), Research in personnel and human resource management,
Vol. 12: 161-222. Greenwich,
CT: JAI Press.
33.
Gray, S.R., & Cannella, A.A.1997. The role of risk in executive
compensation. Journal of Management,
23: 517-540.
34.
Hall, B.J., & Murphy, K.J.2002. Stock options for undiversified
executives. Journal of Accounting and Economics,
33(1):
3-42.
35.
Hambrick, D.C., & Cannella, B.1989. Strategy implementation as substance and
selling. Academy of Management Executive,
3(4):
278-285.
36.
Hambrick, D.C., & Finkelstein, S.1995. The effects of ownership structure on conditions at
the top: The case of CEO pay raises. Strategic Management
Journal, 16:
175-193.
37.
Hameon, J.1995. Bosses get 18% raises.
Toronto Star, September 7: B1.
38.
Hansen, G.S., & Hill, C.W.L.1991. Are institutional owners myopic? A time-series
study of four technology-driven industries. Strategic
Management Journal , 12:
1-16.
39.
Hartzell, J.C., & Starks, L.T.2003. Institutional investors and executive
compensation. Journal of Finance,
68: 2351-2374.
40.
Harvey, K.D., & Shrieves, R.E.2001. Executive compensation structure and corporate
governance choices. Journal of Financial Research
, 24: 495-512.
41.
Hill, C.W.L., & Phan, P.1991. CEO tenure as a determinant of CEO
pay. Academy of Management Journal,
34: 707-717.
42.
Hoskisson, R.E., Hitt, M.A., Johnson, R.A., & Grossman, W.2002. Conflicting voices: The effects of institutional
ownership heterogeneity and internal governance on corporate innovation
strategies. Academy of Management Journal,
45: 697-716.
43.
Hutchinson, M.1996. The promotion of active shareholdership for corporate
social responsibility in Canada. Toronto,
Ontario, Canada: Michael Jantzi Research
Associates Inc.
44.
Iacobucci, E.1996. The law and economics of executive compensation.
In I. Iacobucci (Ed.), Value for money: Executive compensation in the 1990s:
1-56. Toronto,
Ontario , Canada: C. D. Howe
Institute.
45.
Jensen, M.C., & Meckling, W.H.1976. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency
cost, and ownership structure. Journal of Financial
Economics, 3:
305-360.
46.
Jensen, M.C., Murphy, K.J., & Wruck, E.2004. Remuneration: Where we've been, how we got to here, what
are the problems, and how to fix them, ECGI Working Paper Series in Finance No.
44. Retrieved June 10, 2006, from http://www.ecgi.org/wp
47.
Khan, R., Dharwadkar, R., & Brandes, P.2005. Institutional ownership and CEO compensation: A
longitudinal examination. Journal of Business
Research, 58:
1078-1088.
48.
Klein, A.1998. Firm performance and board committee
structure. Journal of Law and Economics,
41: 275-303.
49.
Kochhar, R., & David, P.1996. Institutional investors and firm innovation: A test
of competing hypotheses. Strategic Management
Journal, 17:
73-84.
50.
Kpmg1995. Executive compensation practices in the TSE 300
companies1995 . Toronto, Ontario, Canada:
Author .
51.
Lambert, R.E., & Larcker, D.F.1991. Executive compensation, corporate decision making, and
shareholder wealth: A review of the evidence. In F. Foulkes (Ed.), Executive compensation: A strategic guide for the
1990s: 98-125.
Boston: Harvard Business School
Press.
52.
MacIntosh, J.G.1996. Institutional shareholders and corporate governance
in Canada. Canadian Business Law Journal,
26(1):
145-188.
53.
Magnan, M.L., St-Onge, S., & Thorne, L.1995. A comparative analysis of the determinants of
executive compensation between Canadian and US firms.
Industrial Relations , 50(2):
297-318.
54.
Main, B.G.M., & Johnston, J.1993. Remuneration committees and corporate
governance. Accounting and Business Research,
23: 351-362.
55.
Mangel, R., & Singh, H.1993. Ownership structure, board relationships and CEO
compensation in large US corporations. Accounting and
Business Research , 23:
339-350.
56.
McFarland, J.2002. Boards rapped over CEO
compensation. Globe and Mail, April 24:
B7.
57.
McFarland, J.2004. CEOs rake it in as profits and stock prices
rebound. Globe and Mail, April 30:
B1.
58.
McFarland, J.2006. CEO pay discussion. Retrieved September 05, 2006,
from http://theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/TRGAM
59.
Mercer Investment Consulting.2005. Fearless forecast-A consensus forecast of Canadian and
global capital markets and industry trends. Toronto,
Ontario, Canada:
Author.
60.
Mintzberg, H.1983. Power in and around organizations.
Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice
Hall.
61.
Mitchell, R.K., Agle, B.R., & Wood, D.J.1997. Toward a theory of stockholder identification and
salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts.
Academy of Management Review, 22:
853-886.
62.
Montgomery, K.E.1996. Market shift-The role of institutional investors in
corporate governance. Canadian Business Law
Journal, 26(1):
189-201.
63.
Murphy, K.J.1999. Executive compensation. In O. Ashenfelter & D. Card (Eds.), Handbook of labor economics: 2485-2563.
Amsterdam:
Elsevier.
64.
Neubaum, D.O., & Zahra, S.A.2006. Institutional ownership and corporate social
performance: The moderating effects of investment horizon, activism, and
coordination. Journal of Management,
32: 108-131.
65.
Ocasio, W.1994. Political dynamics and the circulation of power:
CEO succession in U.S. industrial corporations, 1960-1990.
Administrative Science Quarterly, 39:
285-312.
66.
Park, Y.W., Nelson, T., & Huson, M.R.2001. Executive pay and the disclosure
environmentCanadian evidence. Journal of Financial Research,
24(3):
347-365.
67.
Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G.R.1978. The external control of organizations: A resource
dependence perspective. New York:
Harper.
68.
Pound, J.1992. Beyond takeovers: Politics comes to corporate
control . Harvard Business Review,
70(2):
83-93.
69.
Prevost, A.K., & Rao, R.P.2000. Of what value are shareholder proposals sponsored
by public pension funds? Journal of Business,
73: 177-195.
70.
Rediker, K.J., & Seth, A.1995. Board of directors and substitution effects of
alternative governance mechanisms. Strategic Management
Journal, 16:
85-99.
71.
Sanders, W.G., & Carpenter, M.A.2003. Strategic satisfying? A behavioral-agency theory
perspective on stock repurchase program announcements.
Academy of Management Journal, 46:
160-178.
72.
Schlenker, B. (1980). Impression management.
Monterey, CA:
Brooks/Cole.
73.
Shareholder Association for Research & Education (SHARE).2005. Key proxy vote surveys, 2001-2005.
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada:
Author.
74.
Singh, P., & Agarwal, N.2002. The effects of firm strategy on the level and
structure of executive compensation. Canadian Journal of
Administrative Sciences, 19(1):
42-56.
75.
Smith, M.P.1996. Shareholder activism by institutional investors:
Evidence from CalPers. Journal of Finance,
51: 227-252.
76.
Smyth, J.E., Soberman, D.A., & Easson, A.J.2004. The law and business administration in Canada
(10th ed.). Scarborough,
Ontario, Canada: Prentice
Hall.
77.
Tihanyi, L., Johnson, R.A., Hoskisson, R.E., & Hitt, M.A.2003. Institutional ownership differences and
international diversification: The effects of boards of directors and
technological opportunity . Academy of Management
Journal, 46:
195-211.
78.
Tosi, H.L., & Gomez-Mejia, L.R.1989. The decoupling of CEO pay and
performance. Administrative Science Quarterly,
34: 169-189.
79.
Tosi, H.L., & Gomez-Mejia, L.R.1994. CEO compensation monitoring and firm
performance. Academy of Management Journal,
37: 1002-1016.
80.
Udayasankar, K., Das, S.S., & Lim, P.X.2006. Substitutes or complements? The effect of
ownership and board of directors on CEO-chairperson duality.
Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of
Management, Atlanta, Georgia.
81.
Useem, M.1996. Investor capitalism: How money managers are changing the
face of corporate America. New York:
Basic Books.
82.
Van Clieaf, M.2004. Are boards and CEOs accountable for the right level
of work?Ivey Business Journal, May-June:
1-12.
83.
Walsh, J.P., & Seward, J.K.1990. On the efficiency of internal and external
corporate control mechanisms. Academy of Management
Review, 15:
421-458.
84.
Wang, E., Musila, J., & Chowdhury, S.D.2005. How shareholder activists pick their
targets. Ivey Business Journal,
November/December: 1-7.
85.
Weisbach, M.S.1988. Outside directors and CEO turnover.
Journal of Financial Economics, 20:
431-460.
86.
Westphal, J.D., & Zajac, E.J.1994. Substance in symbolism in CEOs' long-term incentive
plans . Administrative Science Quarterly,
39: 367-390.
87.
Wiseman, R.M., & Gomez-Mejia, L.1998. A behavioral agency model of managerial
risk-taking. Academy of Management Review,
23: 133-153.
88.
Wooldridge, J.M.2003. Introductory econometrics: A modern approach.
Mason, OH:
South-Western.
89.
Yang, J., Wang, E., & An, J.2007. An empirical analysis of Canadian
shareholder proposals . Paper presented at the annual
conference of the Administrative Sciences Association of Canada,
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
90.
Yermack, D.1996. Higher market valuation of companies with a small
board of directors. Journal of Financial
Economics, 40:
185-212.
91.
Zajac, E.J., & Westphal, J.D.1995. Accounting for the explanations of CEO
compensation: Substance and symbolism. Administrative
Science Quarterly, 40:
283-308.
92.
Zhou, X.2000. CEO pay, firm size, and corporate performance:
Evidence from Canada. Canadian Journal of
Economics, 33:
213-251.
