Online Participation and Self-presentation in Social Networking Sites: A Study of Selective Users of India

Abstract

The study explores users’ online presentation and participation in social networking sites (SNSs). The major purpose is to find out as to how people participate in online media and ensure their presence in the context of ‘we’ and ‘they’ in SNSs. By adopting purposive sampling method, a total of 150 respondents have been selected in the age group of 15–22 and data has been collected by using both qualitative and quantitative techniques. In this study, attempts have also been made to assess as to how people consider their presence in different online groups and SNSs. In order to measure online users’ participation in SNSs, their motivation to use SNSs and their tendency to present themselves in SNSs, different categories, emerged from the research, have been deliberated upon. Questions concerning reasons for online users to participate in defined online activities and ensure their presence by presenting themselves in different groups have also been considered.

Keywords

Self physical space virtual space social networking sites (SNSs)online social groups

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Blumstein

Philip

(2001). The production of selves in personal relationships. In Branaman

Ann

(ed.), Self and society (pp. 183–197). Massachusetts: Blackwell Publishers INC.

Christensen

Levinson

(2003). Encyclopedia of community: From the village to the virtual world. UK: SAGE.

Cooley

Charles Horton

. (1909). Social organization. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.

Gergen

(1991). The saturated self: Dilemmas of identity in contemporary life. New York: Basic.

Goffman

Erving

. (1961). Asylums: Essays on the social situation of mental patients and other inmates. New York: Doubleday.

Goffman

Erving

(2001). The presentation of self in everyday life. In Branaman

Ann

(Ed.), Self and society (pp. 175–182). Massachusetts: Blackwell Publishers INC.

Henri

Pudelko

(2003). Understanding and analysing activity and learning in virtual communities. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 19(4), 474–487.

Kohn

Melvin

Slomczynski

K. M.

(2001). Social structure and self-direction: A comparative analysis of the United States and Poland. In Ann

Branaman,

(ed.), Self and Society (pp. 210–218). Massachusetts: Blackwell Publishers Inc.

Matzat

(2010). Reducing problems of sociability in online communities: Integrating online communication with offline interaction. American Behavioral Scientist, 53(8), 1170–1193.

10.

Mead

G. H.

(1934). Mind, self, and society. Morris

Charles W.

(ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

11.

Morris

(1979). Conceiving the self. New York: Basic Books.

12.

Riesman

(1961). The lonely crowd: A study of the changing American character. New Haven: Yale University Press.

13.

Risman

Barbara J.

(2001). Intimate relationship from a microstructural perspective: Men who mother. In Ann

Branaman,

(ed.), Self and society (pp. 198–209). Massachusetts: Blackwell Publishers Inc.

14.

Rosenberg

(1979). Conceiving the self. USA: Basic Books.

15.

Turner

(1976). The real self: From institution to impulse. American Journal of Sociology, 81, 989–1016.

16.

Walker

(2000). It’s difficult to hide it: The presentation of self on Internet home pages. Qualitative Sociology, 23(1).

17.

Wellman

(1997). An electronic Group is virtually a social network (g. f. D. library, Trans.). In Kiesler

(ed.), Culture of the Internet (pp. 179–205). Mahawah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.