This article presents a case study of student-initiated use of Facebook Groups in doing a team project for an online journalism course. Drawing upon the concept of affinity space and a theoretical taxonomy of asynchronous online discussion, the present study triangulates classroom observation, semi-structured student interviews, and microanalysis of posting activities of a student-initiated Facebook group. The findings suggest a shift of attention from instructor-centered course design to student-initiated use of social networking sites for learning online journalism. Instructors are invited to position themselves as facilitators and to take an intersubjective stance when designing computer-assisted learning activities.
AndersonJ. Q.BoylesJ. L.RainieL. (2012). The future impact of the Internet on higher education: Experts expect more-efficient collaborative environments and new grading schemes; they worry about massive online courses, the shift away from on-campus life. Pew Research Center’s Internet & American Life Project. Retrieved from http://pewinternet.org/~/media/Files/Reports/2012/PIP_Future_of_Higher_Ed.pdf
2.
BoydD. M.EllisonN. B. (2008). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13, 210-230. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00393.x
3.
GantC.HadleyP. D. (2014). Microblogging for class: An analysis of affective, cognitive, personal integrative, and social integrative gratifications. Journalism & Mass Communication Educator, 69, 17-31. doi:10.1177/1077695813513768
4.
GeeJ. P. (2003). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. New York, NY: Palgrave.
5.
GeeJ. P. (2004). Situated language and learning: A critique of traditional schooling. London, England: Routledge.
6.
GibbsW.SimpsonL. D.BernasR. S. (2008). An analysis of temporal norms in online discussions. International Journal of Instructional Media, 35, 63-75.
7.
HäkkinenP.HämäläinenR. (2012). Shared and personal learning spaces: Challenges for pedagogical design. Internet and Higher Education, 15, 231-236. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.09.001
8.
KnowltonD. S. (2005). Taxonomy of learning through asynchronous discussion. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 16, 155-177.
9.
LammersJ. C.CurwoodJ. S. (2012). Toward an affinity space methodology: Considerations for literacy research. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 11, 44-58.
10.
MancaS.RanieriM. (2013). Is it a tool suitable for learning? A critical review of the literature on Facebook as a technology-enhanced learning environment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29, 487-504. doi:10.1111/jcal.12007
11.
PetersV.HewittJ. (2010). An investigation of student practices in asynchronous computer conferencing courses. Computers in Education, 54, 951-961. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.09.030
12.
PimmerC.LinxenS.GröhbielU. (2012). Facebook as a learning tool? A case study on appropriation of social network sites from mobile phones in developing countries. British Journal of Education Technology, 43, 726-738. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2012.01351.x
13.
RoblyerM. D.McDanielM.WebbM.HermanJ.WittyJ. V. (2010). Findings on Facebook in higher education: A comparison of college faculty and student uses and perceptions of social networking sites. The Internet and Higher Education, 13, 134-140.
14.
SingerJ. B. (2008). Posting for points: Edublogs in the JMC curriculum. Journalism & Mass Communication Educator, 63, 10-27.
15.
StakeR. E. (1995). The art of case study research. London, England: SAGE.
16.
Van den BeemtA.AkkermanS.SimonsR.-J. (2011). Considering young people’s motives for interactive media use. Educational Research Review, 6, 55-66. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2010.03.002
17.
WiseA. F.PereraN.HsiaoY.-T.SpeerJ.MarboutiF. (2012). Microanalytic case studies of individual participation patterns in an asynchronous online discussion in an undergraduate blended course. Internet and Higher Education, 15, 108-117. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.11.007
18.
YinR. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.). London, England: SAGE.
