This article focuses on growth, one of the important aspects of firm behaviour, in Iran’s manufacturing sector with regard to large firms and small and medium enterprises (SMEs). It attempts to analyze the factors that have had an effect on the firms’ growth in this period and tries to show the differences between SMEs and large firms in pattern of growth by using generalized method of moment (GMM) estimator for 137 sub-sectors (4-digit International Standard of Industrial Classification of All Economic Activities [ISIC] code) during 1995–2002. The evidences suggest that some elements such as growth in previous year, minimum efficient scale, total factor productivity, export, capital–labour ratio, import, technology usage, sunk cost and age have effect on firms’ growth in both SMEs and large firms. In Iran manufacturing sector, some specific variables such as oil and ownership are important for growth of firms. Moreover, the result implies that the pattern of growth for SMEs and large firms is different.
AgarwalR. (1997). Survival of firms over the product life cycle. Southern Economic Journal, 63(3), 571–584.
2.
AgarwalR. (1998). Evolutionary trends of industry variables. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 16(4), 511–526.
3.
AgarwalR.AudretschD. (1999). The two views of small firms in industry dynamics: A reconciliation. Economics Letters, 62, 245–251.
4.
AgarwalR.AudretschD. (2001). Does start-up size matter? The impact of technology and product life-cycle on firm survival. Journal of Industrial Economics, 49(1), 21–44.
5.
AgarwalR.GortM. (1996). The evolution of markets and entry, exit and survival of firms. Review of Economics and Statistics, 78(3), 489–498.
6.
ArellanoM.BondS. (1991). Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Review of Economic Studies, 58(2), April, 277–297.
7.
ArellanoM.BoverO. (1995). Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models. Journal of Econometrics, 68, 29–51.
8.
ArrighettiA. (1993). Entry, growth and survival of manufacturing firms. Small Business Economics, 6(2), 127–137.
9.
AudretschD.B. (1991). New firm survival and the technological regime. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 73(3), 441–450.
10.
AudretschD.B. (1995). Innovation and industry evolution. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
11.
AudretschD.B.MahmoodT. (1994). The rate of hazard confronting new firms and plants in U.S. manufacturing. Review of Industrial Organization, 9(1), 41–56.
12.
AudretschD.B.MahmoodT. (1995). New firm survival: New results using a hazard function. The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, 77(1), February, 97–103.
13.
AudretschD.B.SantarelliE.VivarelliM. (1999). Start-up size and industrial dynamics: Some evidence from Italian manufacturing. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 17(7), 965–983.
14.
BaileyM.N.BartelsmanE.HaltiwangerJ. (1994). Downsizing and productivity growth: Myth or reality? Mimeo (unpublished).
15.
BaileyM.N.HultenC.CampbellD. (1992). Productivity dynamics in manufacturing plants. In Brookings papers: Microeconomics (pp. 187–249). Washington, DC: Brookings Institute.
16.
BainJ. (1956). Barriers to new competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
17.
BaldwinJ.R. (1995). The dynamics of industrial competition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18.
BaldwinJ.R.RafiquzzamanM. (1995). Selection versus evolutionary adaptation: Learning and post-entry performance. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 13(4), 501–522.
19.
BoeriT.BellmanL. (1995). Post-entry behaviour and the cycle: Evidence from Germany. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 13(4), 483–500.
20.
BlundellR.BondS. (1998). Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics, 87(1), August, 115–143.
21.
ClarkDon P.StanleyD.L. (1999). Determinants of intra-industry trade between developing countries and the United States. Journal of Economic Development, 24(2), 79–94.
22.
Del MonteA.PapagniE. (2003). R&D and the growth of firms: Empirical analysis of a panel of Italian firms. Research Policy, 32(6), June, 1003–1014.
23.
DixitA. (1989). Entry and exit decisions under uncertainty. Journal of Political Economy, 97(3), 620–638.
24.
DomsM.DunneT.RobertsM.J. (1995). The role of technology use in the survival and growth of manufacturing plants. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 13(4), 523–542.
25.
DunneT.RobertsM.J.SamuelsonL. (1988). Patterns of firm entry and exit in U.S. Manufacturing industries. RAND Journal of Economics, 19(4), Winter, 495–515.
26.
DunneT.RobertsM.J.SamuelsonL. (1989). The growth and failure of US manufacturing plants. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 104(4), 671–698.
27.
GeroskiP. (1991). Market dynamics, and entry. Oxford: Blackwell.
28.
GeroskiP. (1995). What do we know about entry?International Journal of Industrial Organization, 13(4), 421–440.
29.
GibratR. (1931). Les Inégalités économiques. Paris, France.
30.
GortM.KlepperS. (1982). Time paths in the diffusion of product innovations. Economic Journal, 92(367), 630–653.
31.
HannanMichael T.CarrollG.R. (1992). Dynamics of organizational populations. New York: Oxford University Press.
32.
HannanMichael T.CarrollG.R.DobrevS.D.HanJ.TorresJ.C. (1998). Organizational mortality in European and American automobile industries, Part I: Revising age dependence. European Sociological Review, 14(3), 279–302.
33.
HopenhaynH.A. (1992). Entry, exit, and firm dynamics in long run equilibrium. Econometrica, 60(5), 1127–1150.
34.
IjiriY.SimonH. (1977). Skew distributions and the sizes of business firms. New York: North-Holland.
35.
JovanovicB. (1982). Selection and evolution of industry. Econometrica, 50(3), 649–670.
36.
KlepperS. (1996). Entry, exit, growth, and innovation over the product life cycle. American Economic Review, 86(4), 562–583.
37.
LiuL.TyboutJ. (1993). Industrial evolution and productivity growth in Colombia and Chile: Dead ends and new departures. In de MeloJ.TyboutJ. (Eds), Industrial competition, production and their relations to trade regimes. Washington, DC: World Bank.
38.
MansfieldE. (1962). Entry, Gibrat’s law, and the growth of firms. American Economic Review, 52(5), 1023–1051.
39.
MataJ.PortugalP. (1994). Life duration of new firms. Journal of Industrial Economics, 42(3), 227–246.
40.
MataJ.PortugalP. (2004). Patterns of entry, post-entry growth and survival: A comparison between domestic and foreign owned firms. Small Business Economics, 22(3–4), 283–298.
41.
MataJ.PortugalP.GuimaraesP. (1995). The survival of new plants: Start-up conditions and post-entry evolution. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 13(4), December, 607–627.
42.
NickellS. (1981). Correcting biases in dynamic models with fixed effects. Econometrica, 49, 1417–1426.
43.
OlleyG.S.PakesA. (1992). The dynamics of productivity in the telecommunications equipment industry. Working Paper No. 92-2, Center for Economic Studies.
44.
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). (2004). Science and technology statistical compendium. Meeting of the OECD Committee for Scientific and Technological Policy at Ministerial Level, 29–30 January.
45.
OzlerS.TaymazE. (2004). Does foreign ownership matter for survival and growth? Dynamic of competition and FDI. ERCWorking Papers 0406, Economic Research Centre, Middle East Technical University.
46.
PeérezS.E.CastillejoJ.A. (2006). The resource-based theory of the firm and firm survival. Small Business Economics, 30(3), 231–249.
47.
PiergiovanniR.SantarelliE.KlompL.ThruikA.R. (2002). Gibrat’s law and the firm size firm growth relationship in Italian Services. Small Business Economics, 7, 221–230.
48.
PorterM.E. (2001). Strategy and the internet. Harvard Business Review, 79(3), 63–78.
49.
TushmanM.RomanelliE. (1985). Organizational evolution: A metamorphosis model of convergence and re-orientation. In CummingsL.L.StawBarry M. (Eds), Research in organizational behavior (pp. 171–222). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
50.
WagnerJ. (1994). The post-entry performance of new firms in German manufacturing industries. Journal of Industrial Economics, 42(2), 141–154.
