This study examined institutions and economic growth in sub-Saharan Africa from 1986 to 2013. Panel data were used for this analysis. Panel pooled ordinary least squares and dynamic generalized method of moment (GMM) models were employed in the estimation of the relationship between institutions and economic growth. This study found that institution has negative impact on economic growth in sub-Saharan Africa as it is positive and statistically significant in both pooled and dynamic GMM. This human capital and money supply also have positive impact on economic growth. Physical capital and interest rates, on the other hand, has negative impact on economic growth in sub-Saharan Africa.
AronJ. (2000). Growth and institutions: A review of the evidence. World Rank Research Observer, 15(1), 99–135.
2.
BarroR.J. (1996). Democracy and growth. Journal of Economic Growth, 1(1), 1–27.
3.
ChangH.J. (2010). Institutions and economic development: Theory, policy and history.Journal of Institutional Economics, 7 (4), 1–26.
4.
ClaqueC. (1997). Institutions and economic development: Growth and governance in less-developed and post-socialist countries (pp. 91–119). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
5.
ClagueC.KeeferP.KnackS.OlsonM. (1997). Institutions and Economic performance: properties right and contracts enforcement. In C. Clague (ed.), Institutions and Economic Development: Growth and Governance in Less-Developed and Post-Socialist Countries (pp. 67–90). Baltimore and London: John Hopkins University Press.
6.
Economic Research Forum. (2008). Institutions and Economic Development ERF 14th annual conference 28th-30th December 2007, Cairo, Egypt.
7.
GhuraD.HadjimichaelM.T. (1996). Growth in sub-Saharan Africa. IMF Staff Paper, 43(3), 605–635.
8.
GoldsmithA. (1998). Institutions and economic growth in Africa. African Economic.Policy Paper Discussion Paper No. 7.
9.
IhsanI.AnjumS. (2013). Impact of money supply (M2) on GDP of Pakistan. Global Journal of Management and Business Research Finance, 13 (6), version 1.0.
10.
ImK.S.PesaranM.H.ShinY. (2003). Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. Journal of Economics, 115(1), 53–74.
11.
InglehartR. (1994). The impact of culture of economic development: Theory, hypotheses and some empirical tests.Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.
12.
KhalilM.EllaboudyS.DenzauA. (2007). The institutions and economic development in the OECD. International Research Journal of Finance and Economics Issue, 12, 67–79.
13.
KnackS.KeeferP. (1995). Institutions and economic performance: cross-country tests using alternative institutional measures. Economics and Politics, 7(3), 207–227.
14.
KnackS.KeeferP.. (1997). Does social capital have an economic payoff? A cross-country investigation. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(4), 1251–1288.
15.
KnightM.LoayzaN.VillaneuraD. (1992). Testing the neoclassical theory of economic growth: A panel data approach. IMF Working Paper, 106.
16.
KnightM.LoayzaN.VillaneuraD.. (1993). Testing the neoclassical theory of economic growth (pp. 512–541). IMF Staff Paper No. 40.
17.
LaneP.R.TornellA. (1996). Power, growth, and the voracity effect. Journal of Economic Growth, 1(2), 213–241.
18.
LeeC.WongS.Y. (2005). Inflationary threshold effects in the relationship between financial development and economic growth: Evidence from Taiwan and Japan. Journal of Economic Development, 30(1), 49–68.
19.
LevinA.LinC.F.ChuC. (2002). Unit root test in panel data: Asymptotic and finite sample properties. Journal of Economics, 108(1), 1–25.
20.
MaddalaG.S.WuS. (1999). A comparative study of unit root tests with panel data and a new simple test. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 61(1), 631–652.
21.
MankiwN.G.RomerD.WeilD.N. (1992). A contribution to the empirics of economic growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107(2), 407–437.
22.
NorthD.C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. New York: Cambridge University Press.
23.
RodricD. Subramania. (2008). Why did Financial Globalization Dissapoint. IMF Staff Papers, 56(1).
24.
RodrikD. (2000). Institutions for high-quality growth. What they are: How to acquire them. Working paper No. 7540, NBER.
25.
RodrikD.. (2008). Second best institutions. America Economic Review, l98(2), 100–104.
26.
SarwarS.SiddiqiM.W.ButtA.R. (2013). Role of institutions and economic growth in Asian Countries. Developing Country Studies, 3(2), 80–91.
27.
TempleJ. (1999). The new growth evidence. Journal of Economic Literature, 37(1), 112–156.
