Measures towards post-conflict or post-authoritarian justice have historically relied on the merging of the concepts of silence, violence and impunity in order to create a single promise of justice. Scholars and practitioners in the field usually defend a trifold agenda of breaking the silence about violations of human rights, denouncing systematic violence in the past and fighting impunity as the only way of ensuring that violence never happens again. This trope was mobilized in Brazil in 2014, when the report of the country’s National Truth Commission (CNV) was released. However, in the Brazilian case, truth-seeking also produced its own form of ‘silence’. Whereas the CNV commendably denounced 377 perpetrators as the ‘demons’ responsible for implementing a state of terror during the last dictatorship (1964–1985), it also created a depoliticized and victimized idea of leftist militants as mere dreamers who fought for liberty and democracy in the past. By representing leftist militants as freedom fighters, the CNV silenced their fundamental ideas (and actions) regarding the concept of revolutionary violence and its radical programme of structural change. In this article, I provide an explanation that connects the CNV’s ‘silencing’ of this political project to the unreflective merging between the concepts of silence, violence and impunity in the literature. Via a narrative analysis of the CNV’s report and a critique of transitional justice debates, I argue that the silence on the political project of the radical left in Brazil echoes transitional justice’s silence about the complexities of violence in general.
ALN and MR-8 ([1969]1997) Manifesto da ALN e do MR-8 [Manifesto of ALN and MR-8]. In: FlamarionM (ed.) Versões e Ficções: O Sequestro da História [Versions and Fictions: Hijacking History]. São Paulo: Editora Fundação Perseu Abramo, 227–230.
2.
AndrieuK (2010) Civilizing peacebuilding: Transitional justice, civil society and the liberal paradigm. Security Dialogue41(5): 537–558.
3.
AoláinFN (2009) Women, security, and the patriarchy of internationalized transitional justice. Human Rights Quarterly31(4): 1055–1085.
4.
ArendtH (1970) On Violence. New York & London: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
5.
ArendtH (2003) Responsibility and Judgment. New York: Schocken.
6.
Arquidiocese de São Paulo (1985) Brasil: Nunca Mais [Brazil: Never Again]. Petrópolis: Vozes.
7.
ArthurP (2009) How ‘transitions’ reshaped human rights: A conceptual history of transitional justice. Human Rights Quarterly31(2): 321–367.
8.
AuchterJ (2013) Border monuments: Memory, counter-memory, and (b)ordering practices along the US–Mexico border. Review of International Studies39(2): 291–311.
9.
BalibarE (2002) Politics and the Other Scene. London & New York: Verso.
10.
BellCCampbellCAoláinF (2004) Justice discourses in transition. Social & Legal Studies13(3): 305–328.
11.
BellD (2006) Memory, Trauma and World Politics: Reflections on the Relationship Between Past and Present. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
12.
BjörkdahlASelimovicJM (2013) Gendered justice gaps in Bosnia-Herzegovina. Human Rights Review15(2): 201–218.
13.
CollinsR (2009) Violence: A Micro-Sociological Theory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
14.
Comissão Nacional da Verdade (CNV) (2014a) Relatório da Comissão Nacional da Verdade. Volume I [Report of the National Truth Commission. Volume I]. 10December. Available at: http://www.cnv.gov.br/images/pdf/relatorio/volume_1_digital.pdf (accessed 24 January 2017).
15.
Comissão Nacional da Verdade (CNV) (2014b) Relatório da Comissão Nacional da Verdade. Volume II – Textos Temáticos [Report of the National Truth Commission. Volume II – Thematic Texts]. 10December. Available at: http://www.cnv.gov.br/images/pdf/relatorio/volume_2_digital.pdf (accessed 24 January 2017).
16.
Comissão Nacional da Verdade (CNV) (2014c) Relatório da Comissão Nacional da Verdade. Volume III – Mortos e Desaparecidos Políticos [Report of the National Truth Commission. Volume III – Political Dead and Disappeared]. 10December. Available at: http://www.cnv.gov.br/images/pdf/relatorio/volume_3_digital.pdf (accessed 24 January 2017).
17.
Comissão Nacional da Verdade (CNV) (2014d) Primeiro Relatório Preliminar de Pesquisa: Totura em Quartéis [First Preliminary Research Report: Torture in Barracks]. 18February. Available at: http://www.cnv.gov.br/images/pdf/relatorio_versao_final18–02.pdf (accessed 24 January 2017).
18.
ConnertonP (1991) How Societies Remember. Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press.
19.
CrenzelE (2008) Argentina’s National Commission on the Disappearance of Persons: Contributions to transitional justice. International Journal of Transitional Justice2(2): 173–191.
20.
DallariP (2014) Verdade, memória e reconciliação [Truth, memory and reconciliation]. Folha de S.Paulo, 10December.
21.
D’AraujoMCastroCSoaresG (1994) Os Anos de Chumbo: A Memória Militar Sobre a Repressão [The Years of Lead: The Military Memory of Political Repression]. Rio de Janeiro: Relume-Dumará.
22.
DerridaJ (2001) Writing and Difference. London: Routledge.
23.
DexterH (2012) Terrorism and violence: Another violence is possible?Critical Studies on Terrorism5(1): 121–137.
24.
DouzinasC (2000) The End of Human Rights: Critical Legal Thought at the Turn of the Century. Portland, OR: Hart Publishing.
25.
Du ToitA (2000) The moral foundations of the South African TRC: Truth as acknowledgment and justice as recognition. In: RotbergRThompsonD (eds) Truth v. Justice: The Morality of Truth Commissions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 122–140.
26.
EastmondMSelimovicJ (2012) Silence as possibility in postwar everyday life. International Journal of Transitional Justice6(3): 502–524.
27.
EdkinsJ (2003) Trauma and the Memory of Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
28.
EvansM (2016) Structural violence, socioeconomic rights, and transformative justice. Journal of Human Rights15(1): 1–20.
29.
FanonF (2001) The Wretched of the Earth. London: Penguin.
30.
FanonF (2008) Black Skin, White Masks. London: Pluto.
31.
FicoC (2013) Violência, trauma e frustração no Brasil e na Argentina: O papel do historiador [Violence, trauma and frustration: The historian’s role]. Topoi: Revista de História14(17): 239–284.
32.
FletcherLWeinsteinH (2002) Violence and social repair: Rethinking the contribution of justice to reconciliation. Human Rights Quarterly24(3): 573–639.
33.
FoucaultM (2003) Society Must Be Defended: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1975–76. New York: Picador.
34.
FourlasGN (2015) No future without transition: A critique of liberal peace. International Journal of Transitional Justice9(1): 109–126.
35.
FrazerEHutchingsK (2008) On politics and violence: Arendt contra Fanon. Contemporary Political Theory7(1): 90–108.
36.
FrazerEHutchingsK (2011) Avowing violence: Foucault and Derrida on politics, discourse and meaning. Philosophy & Social Criticism37(1): 3–23.
37.
FrazerEHutchingsK (2014) Feminism and the critique of violence: Negotiating feminist political agency. Journal of Political Ideologies19(2): 143–163.
38.
GabeiraF (1981) O Que é Isso, Companheiro? [What’s Going On, Comrade?]. Rio de Janeiro: Codecri.
39.
GaltungJ (1969) Violence, peace, and peace research. Journal of Peace Research6(3): 167–191.
40.
GorenderJ (1987) Combate Nas Trevas – A Esquerda Brasileira: Das Ilusões Perdidas a Luta Armada [Combat in Darkness – The Brazilian Left: From Lost Illusions to the Armed Struggle]. São Paulo: Editora Ática.
41.
GreadyPRobinsS (2014) From transitional to transformative justice: A new agenda for practice. International Journal of Transitional Justice8(3): 1–23.
42.
GuevaraE (1999) Escritos Revolucionarios [Revolutionary Writings]. Madrid: La Catarata.
43.
HalbwachsM (1992) On Collective Memory. Chicago, IL & London: University of Chicago Press.
44.
HaynerP (2011) Unspeakable Truths: Transitional Justice and the Challenge of Truth Commissions. New York: Routledge.
45.
Heath-KellyC (2016) Death and Security: Memory and Mortality at the Bombsite. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
46.
HugginsM (2000) Legacies of authoritarianism: Brazilian torturers’ and murderers’ reformulation of memory. Latin American Perspectives27(2): 57–78.
47.
HumphreyM (2000) From terror to trauma: Commissioning truth for national reconciliation. Social Identities6(1): 7–27.
48.
HumphreyM (2002) The Politics of Atrocity and Reconciliation: From Terror to Trauma. London & New York: Routledge.
49.
HumphreyMValverdeE (2008) Human rights politics and injustice: Transitional justice in Argentina and South Africa. International Journal of Transitional Justice2(1): 83–105.
50.
HuysmansJ (2004) Minding exceptions: Politics of insecurity and liberal democracy. Contemporary Political Theory (3)3: 321–341.
51.
JabriV (2006) War, security and the liberal state. Security Dialogue37(1): 47–64.
52.
JabriV (2010) War, government, politics: A critical response to the hegemony of the liberal peace. In: RichmondO (ed.) Peacebuilding: Critical Developments and Approaches. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 41–58.
53.
JelinE (2003) State Repression and the Labors of Memory. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
54.
JelinE (2007) Public memorialization in perspective: Truth, justice and memory of past repression in the Southern Cone of South America. International Journal of Transitional Justice1(1): 138–156.
55.
JelinEAzcarateP (1991) Memoria y politica: Movimiento de derechos humanos y construccion democratica [Memory and politics: Human rights movements and democratic construction]. América Latina Hoy1: 29–38.
56.
KritzN (1995) The dilemmas of transitional justice. In: KritzN (ed.) Transitional Justice: How Emerging Democracies Reckon with Former Regimes, Volume 1. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace, xix–xxx.
57.
LacerdaT (2016) ‘Victim’: What is hidden behind this word?International Journal of Transitional Justice10(1): 179–188.
58.
LaplanteL (2008) Transitional justice and peace building: Diagnosing and addressing the socioeconomic roots of violence through a human rights framework. International Journal of Transitional Justice2(3): 331–355.
59.
LeebawB (2008) The irreconcilable goals of transitional justice. Human Rights Quarterly30(1): 95–118.
60.
LessaF (2011) No hay que tener los ojos en la nuca: The memory of violence in Uruguay, 1973–2010. In: LessaFDruliolleV (eds) The Memory of State Terrorism in the Southern Cone: Argentina, Chile and Uruguay. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 179–208.
61.
LessaFOlsenTDPayneLAPereiraGReiterAG (2014) Overcoming impunity: Pathways to accountability in Latin America. International Journal of Transitional Justice8(1): 75–98.
62.
McEvoyKMcConnachieK (2013) Victims and transitional justice: Voice, agency and blame. Social & Legal Studies22(4): 489–513.
63.
MälksooM (2015) ‘Memory must be defended’: Beyond the politics of mnemonical security. Security Dialogue46(3): 1–17.
64.
ManiR (2005) Balancing peace with justice in the aftermath of violent conflict. Development48(3): 25–43.
65.
MarighellaC (1982) Minimanual of the urban guerrilla. In: MallinJ (ed.) Terror and Urban Guerrillas: A Study of Tactics and Documents. Coral Cables, FL: University of Miami Press, 67–115.
66.
MeisterR (2012) After Evil: A Politics of Human Rights. New York: Columbia University Press.
67.
MillerZ (2013) (Re)distributing transition. The International Journal of Transitional Justice7(2): 370–380.
68.
MisztalB (2003) Theories of Social Remembering. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
69.
MoonC (2006) Narrating Political Reconciliation: South Africa’s Truth and Reconciliation Commission. Lanham, MD: Lexington.
70.
MooreM (1997) Placing Blame: A General Theory of the Criminal Law. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
71.
MutuaM (2002) Human Rights: A Political and Cultural Critique. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
72.
NagyR (2008) Transitional justice as global project: Critical reflections. Third World Quarterly29(2): 275–289.
73.
Obradovic-WochnikJ (2013) The ‘silent dilemma’ of transitional justice: Silencing and coming to terms with the past in Serbia. International Journal of Transitional Justice7(2): 328–347.
74.
OlickJK (1999) Collective memory: The two cultures. Sociological Theory17(3): 333–348.
75.
OrentlicherD (1991) Settling accounts: The duty to prosecute human rights violations of a prior regime. The Yale Law Journal100(8): 2537–2615.
ReisD (2010) Ditadura, anistia e reconciliação [Dictatorship, amnesty and reconciliation]. Estudos Históricos23(45): 171–186.
78.
ReisDFerreiraJ (1985) Imagens da Revolução: Documentos Políticos das Organizações Clandestinas de Esquerda dos Anos 1961–1971 [Images of Revolution: Political Documents of Leftist Clandestine Organizations from the Years 1961–1971]. Rio de Janeiro: Marco Zero.
79.
RidentiM (2005) O Fantasma Da Revolução Brasileira [The Ghost of the Brazilian Revolution]. São Paulo: Editora Unesp.
80.
Roht-ArriazaN (1998) Truth commissions and amnesties in Latin America: The second generation. American Society of International Law 92 (April): 313–316.
SadatL (2007) The effect of amnesties before domestic and international tribunals: Morality, law and politics. In: HughesEThakurRSchabasW (eds) Atrocities and International Accountability: Beyond Transitional Justice. Tokyo: United Nations University Press, 225–245.
83.
SantosCM (2015) Transitional justice from the margins: Legal mobilization and memory politics in Brazil. In: SchneiderNEsparzaM (eds) Legacies of State Violence and Transitional Justice in Latin America: A Janus-faced Paradigm?London: Lexington, 37–72.
84.
SchaapA (2005) Political Reconciliation. London: Routledge.
85.
SchabasWA (2003) Mens rea and the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia. New England Law Review37(4): 1015–1036.
86.
SchneiderN (2011) Breaking the ‘silence’ of the military regime: New politics of memory in Brazil. Bulletin of Latin American Research30(2): 198–212.
87.
SchneiderN (2014) Waiting for a meaningful state apology: Has Brazil apologized for authoritarian repression?Journal of Human Rights13(1): 69–84.
88.
SharpDN (2014) Emancipating transitional justice from the bonds of the paradigmatic transition. International Journal of Transitional Justice9(1): 150–169.
89.
SikkinkKMarchesiB (2015) Nothing but the truth: Brazil’s truth commission looks back. Foreign Affairs, 26February.
90.
Silva FilhoJ (2008) O anjo da história e a memória das vítimas: O caso da ditadura militar no Brasil [History’s angel and the memory of victims: The case of the Brazilian military dictatorship]. Veritas53(2): 150–178.
United Nations (1948) Convention on the prevention and punishment of the crime of genocide. General Assembly Resolution 260(III), A/RES/3/260, New York.
96.
United Nations (1992) Declaration on the protection of all persons from enforced disappearance. General Assembly Resolution 133, A/RES/47/133, New York.
97.
United Nations ([1984] 1996). Convention against torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment. In: Treaty Series: Treaties and International Agreements Registered or Filed and Recorded with the Secretariat of the United Nations. Vol. 1465. New York: United Nations, 85–209.
98.
United Nations (1997) The administration of justice and the human rights of detainees: Question of the impunity of perpetrators of human rights violations (civil and political). Commission on Human Rights Report 20, E/CN.4/Sub.2/1997/20, New York.
99.
United Nations (1998) Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court. United Nations Diplomatic Conference of Plenipotentiaries on the Establishment of an International Criminal Court. A/CONF.183/9*, Rome.
100.
United Nations (2004) The rule of law and transitional justice in conflict and post-conflict societies. Security Council Report 616, S/2004/616, New York.
