The International Criminal Court’s interventions have prompted debate about the wisdom of criminally prosecuting combatants while attempting to build peace in conflict-ridden societies. Previous research fails to distinguish between different types of trials. Using a large-N dataset of three types of criminal trials undertaken during internal conflict – domestic security trials of rebels, domestic human rights trials of state agents, and international war crimes trials of both – this article tests a theory of the compellent effect of criminal prosecution on conflict termination. We find that, even when accounting for endogeneity, rebel trials are associated with a higher probability of conflict termination, while trials of state agents are weakly associated with conflict persistence. We argue that the former compel the opposition to discontinue fighting, while the latter signal to rebels a lack of government resolve. We also find that the effect of international trials, which at times appear weakly associated with conflict termination, is endogenous to international intervention more generally.
AkhavanPayam (2001) Beyond impunity: Can international criminal justice prevent future atrocities?American Journal of International Law95(1): 7–31.
2.
AkhavanPayam (2005) The Lord’s Resistance Army case: Uganda’s submission of the first state referral to the International Criminal Court. American Journal of International Law99(2): 403–421.
3.
AkhavanPayam (2009) Are international criminal tribunals a disincentive to peace? Reconciling judicial romanticism with political realism. Human Rights Quarterly31(3): 624–654.
4.
AndersonThomas P (1988) Politics in Central America. Westport, CT: Praeger.
5.
AronRaymond (1981) Peace and War: A Theory of International Relations. New York: Doubleday.
6.
BassGary (2000) Stay the Hand of Vengeance. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
7.
BassiouniM Cherif (1996) Searching for peace and achieving justice: The need for accountability. Law and Contemporary Problems59(4): 9–28.
8.
BinningsbøHelga MalminLoyleCyanne EGatesScottElsterJon (2012) Armed conflict and post-conflict justice 1946–2006, a dataset. Journal of Peace Research49(5): 731–740.
9.
BoscoDavid (2014) Rough Justice: The International Criminal Court’s Battle to Fix the World, One Prosecution at a Time. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
10.
BranchAdam (2007) Uganda’s civil war and the politics of ICC intervention. Ethics and International Affairs21(2): 179–198.
11.
BroacheMichael (2015) Beyond deterrence: The ICC effect in the DRC. Open Democracy19 February (www.opendemocracy.com).
12.
Bueno deMesquita, Ethan & Eric Dickson (2007) The propaganda of the deed: Terrorism, counterterrorism, and mobilization. American Political Science Review51(2): 364–381.
13.
BurgoyneMichael L (2010) The allure of quick victory: Lessons from Peru’s fight against Sendero Luminoso. Military Review (September–October): 68–73.
14.
CarterDavid BSignorinoCurtis S (2010) Back to the future: Modeling time dependence in binary data. Political Analysis18(3): 271–292.
ConradJustinGreeneDevin (2015) Corruption, differentiation, and the severity of terrorist attacks. Journal of Politics77(2): 546–561.
17.
Cronin-FurmanKate (2013) Managing expectations: International criminal trials and the prospects for deterrence of mass atrocity. International Journal of Transitional Justice7(3): 434–454.
18.
CunninghamDavid EGleditschKristian SkredeSalehyanIdean (2009) It takes two: A dyadic analysis of civil war duration and outcome. Journal of Conflict Resolution53(4): 570–597.
19.
DancyGeoffMichelVerónica (2016) Human rights enforcement from below: Private actors and prosecutorial momentum in Latin America and Europe. International Studies Quarterly60(1): 176–188.
20.
DeRouenKarlBercovitchJacobPospiesznaPaulina (2011) Introducing the Civil War Mediation dataset. Journal of Peace Research48(5): 663–672.
21.
DrumblMark (2007) Atrocity, Punishment, and International Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
22.
ElsterJon (2004) Closing the Books: Transitional Justice in Historical Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23.
Escriba-FolchAbelWrightJoseph (2015) Human rights prosecutions and autocratic survival. International Organization69(2): 343–373.
24.
FarissChristopher J (2014) Respect for human rights has improved over time: Modeling the changing standard of accountability. American Political Science Review108(2): 297–318.
25.
FearonJames (2004) Why do some wars last so much longer than others?Journal of Peace Research41(3): 275–301.
26.
GartnerScott (2011) Signs of trouble: Regional organization mediation and civil war agreement durability. Journal of Politics73(2): 380–390.
27.
GleditschNils PetterWallensteenPeterErikssonMikaelSollonbergMargaretaStrandHåvard (2002) Armed Conflict 1946–2001: A new dataset. Journal of Peace Research39(5): 615–637.
GreigJ MichaelMeernikJames D (2014) To prosecute or not to prosecute: Civil war mediation and international criminal justice. International Negotiation19(2): 257–284.
30.
GrodskyBrian K (2010) The Costs of Justice: How New Leaders Respond to Previous Rights Abuses. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
31.
HaddenTom (2004) Punishment, amnesty, and truth: Legal and political approaches. In: GuelkeAdrian (ed.) Democracy and Ethnic Conflict. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 196–217.
32.
HilbinkLisa (2012) The origins of positive judicial independence. World Politics64(4): 587–621.
33.
HoefflerAnke (2014) Can international interventions secure the peace?International Area Studies Review17(1): 75–94.
34.
HuntingtonSamuel (1991) The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press.
JoHyeran (2015) Compliant Rebels: Rebel Groups and International Law in World Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
37.
JoHyeranSimmonsBeth (2016) Can the international criminal court deter atrocity?International Organization70(3): 443–475.
38.
JohnstonPatrick B (2012) Does decapitation work? Assessing the effectiveness of leadership targeting in counterinsurgency campaigns. International Security36(4): 47–79.
39.
JordanJenna (2009) When heads roll: Assessing the effectiveness of leadership decapitation. Security Studies18(4): 719–755.
40.
KaulChris (2012) In Colombia, 6 sentenced in ‘false positives’ death scheme. Los Angeles Times, 14 June.
41.
KimHunjoonSikkinkKathryn (2010) Explaining the deterrence effect of human rights prosecutions. International Studies Quarterly54(4): 939–963.
42.
KissingerHenry A (2001) The pitfalls of universal jurisdiction. Foreign Affairs80(4): 86–96.
43.
KreutzJoakim (2010) How and when armed conflicts end: Introducing the UCDP conflict termination dataset. Journal of Peace Research47(2): 243–250.
LinzerDrew AStatonJeffrey K (2015) A global measure of judicial independence, 1948–2012. Journal of Law and Courts3(2): 223–256.
46.
LongWilliam JBreckePeter (2003) War and Reconciliation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
47.
LoyleCyanne EDavenportChristian (2016) Transitional justice: Subverting justice in transition and postconflict societies. Journal of Human Rights15(1): 126–149.
48.
LyallJason (2010) Do democracies make inferior counterinsurgents? Reassessing democracy’s impact on war outcomes and duration. International Organization64(1): 167–192.
49.
MamdaniMahmood (2015) Beyond Nuremberg: The historical significance of the post-apartheid transition in South Africa. Politics and Society43(1): 61–88.
50.
MarshallMonty GJaggersKeithGurrTed Robert (2013) Polity IV Project: Political Regime Characteristics and Transitions, 1800–2010: Data User’s Guide [15 November 2015] (http://www.systemicpeace.org/polity/polity4.htm).
51.
MasonT DavidKraneDale A (1989) The political economy of death squads: Toward a theory of the impact of state-sanctioned terror. International Studies Quarterly33(2): 175–198.
52.
MeernikJames DNicholsAngelaKingKimi L (2010) The impact of international tribunals on peace and human rights after civil war. International Studies Perspectives11(4): 309–334.
53.
NalepaMonikaPowellEmilia Justyna (2015) The role of domestic opposition and international justice regimes in peaceful transitions in power. Journal of Conflict Resolution60(7): 1191–1218.
54.
NettelfieldLara J (2010) Courting Democracy in Bosnia and Herzegovina: The Hague Tribunal’s Impact in a Postwar State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
55.
OlsenTricia DPayneLeigh AReiterAndrew G (2010) Transitional Justice in Balance: Comparing Processes, Weighing Efficacy. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace.
56.
OrentlicherDiane F (2010) That Someone Guilty Be Punished: The Impact of the ICTY in Bosnia. New York: Open Society Institute.
57.
OsielMark (1997) Mass Atrocity, Collective Memory, and the Law. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
58.
PapeRobert A (2005) Dying to Win: The Strategic Logic of Suicide Terrorism. New York: Random House.
59.
PettersonTheréseWallensteenPeter (2015) Armed Conflicts, 1946–2014. Journal of Peace Research52(4): 536–550.
60.
PowellRobert (2006) War as a commitment problem. International Organization60(1): 169–203.
61.
PriceBryan C (2012) Targeting top terrorists: How leadership decapitation contributes to counterterrorism. International Security36(4): 9–46.
62.
ProrokAlyssa (2016) Leader incentives and civil war outcomes. American Journal of Political Science60(1): 70–84.
63.
ReiterAndrew GOlsenTricia DPayneLeigh A (2012) Transitional justice and civil war: Exploring new pathways, challenging old guideposts. Transitional Justice Review1(1): 136–169.
64.
RidingAlan (1977) Bishops in Nicaragua say troops kill civilians in fighting leftists. New York Times, 2 March.
65.
RodmanKenneth ABoothPetie (2013) Manipulated commitments: The International Criminal Court in Uganda. Human Rights Quarterly35(2): 271–303.
66.
SandsPhilippe (2011) The ICC arrest warrant will make Colonel Gaddafi dig in his heels. Guardian, 4 May.
67.
SchabasWilliam A (2008) ‘Complementarity in practice’: Some uncomplimentary thoughts. Criminal Law Forum19(1): 5–33.
68.
SchefferDavid (2012) All the Missing Souls: A Personal History of the War Crimes Tribunals. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
69.
SchellingThomas C (1966) Arms and Influence. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
70.
ShadidAnthony (2011) At Mubarak trial, stark image of humbled power. New York Times, 3 August.
71.
SikkinkKathryn (2011) The Justice Cascade: How Human Rights Prosecutions are Changing World Politics. New York: WW Norton.
72.
SmithAlastairStamAllan C (2004) Bargaining and the nature of war. Journal of Conflict Resolution48(6): 783–813.
73.
SmulovitzCatalina (2002) The discovery of law: Political consequences in the Argentine case. In: DezalayYvesGarthBryant G (eds) Global Prescriptions: The Production, Exportation, and Importation of a New Legal Orthodoxy. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 249–275.
74.
SnyderJackVinjamuriLeslie (2003/04) Trials and errors: Principle and pragmatism in strategies of international justice. International Security28(3): 5–44.
75.
SubotićJelena (2009) Hijacked Justice: Dealing with the Past in the Balkans. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
76.
ThomsOskar NTRonJames (2007) Do human rights violations cause internal conflict?Human Rights Quarterly29(3): 674–705.
77.
TiernayMichael (2015) Killing Kony: Leadership change and civil war termination. Journal of Conflict Resolution59(2): 175–206.
78.
TurnerCatherine (2008) Delivering lasting peace, democracy and human rights in times of transition: The role of international law. International Journal of Transitional Justice2: 126–151.
79.
VinjamuriLeslieSnyderJack (2015) Law and politics in transitional justice. Annual Review of Political Science18: 303–327.
80.
WeinsteinHarvey MStoverEric (eds) (2004) My Neighbor, My Enemy: Justice and Community in the Aftermath of Mass Atrocity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
