How do human rights organizations (HROs) shape transitional justice policy in countries emerging from conflict? We investigate this question in the context of peace processes, a vital stage when many key post-conflict policies are determined. Using granular data on the content of peace agreements, we show that the robust presence of HROs significantly increases the likelihood of provisions promising criminal accountability for wartime abuses. Yet this association is conditional on prior ratification of international human rights instruments and the existence of impartial third parties in the peace process—background factors that lower barriers to effective HRO advocacy. These findings reveal a novel pathway through which HROs secure transitional justice on the national agenda after conflict.
AcharyaA (2004) How ideas spread: Whose norms matter? norm localization and institutional change in Asian regionalism. International Organization58(2): 239–275.
2.
AnderliniSN (2007) Women Building Peace: What They Do, Why it Matters. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.
3.
AndersonMJ (2016) Windows of Opportunity: How Women Seize Peace Negotiations for Political Change. New York: Oxford University Press.
4.
AusderanJ (2014) How naming and shaming affects human rights perceptions in the shamed country. Journal of Peace Research51(1): 81–95.
5.
BackerDCarrollD (2000) NGOs and constructive engagement: Promoting civil society, good governance and the rule of law. International Politics38: 1–25.
6.
BakinerO (2019) The comprehensive system of truth, justice, reparation, and non-repetition: Precedents and prospects. In: MeernikJDDeMerittJHRUribe-LópezM (eds) As War Ends: What Colombia Can Tell Us about the Sustainability of Peace and Transitional Justice. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 230–248.
7.
BeardsleyKLoN (2013) Democratic communities and third-party conflict management. Conflict Management and Peace Science30(1): 76–93.
8.
BeardsleyKCunninghamDEWhitePB (2019) Mediation, peacekeeping, and the severity of civil war. Journal of Conflict Resolution63(7): 1682–1709.
9.
BellCBadanjakS (2019) Introducing PA-X: A new peace agreement database and dataset. Journal of Peace Research56(3): 452–466.
10.
BellCKeenanJ (2004) Human rights nongovernmental organizations and the problems of transition. Human Rights Quarterly26(2): 330–374.
11.
BellCO’RourkeC (2007) The people’s peace? Peace agreements, civil society, and participatory democracy. International Political Science Review28(3): 293–324.
12.
BellCBadanjakSBeaujouanJ, et al. (2021) PA-X Peace Agreements Database and Dataset, 5th ed. The University of Edinburgh. https://www.peaceagreements.org/.
13.
BraithwaiteJMLichtAA (2019) The effect of civil society organizations and democratization aid on civil war onset. Journal of Conflict Resolution64(6): 1095–1120.
BrannonEBestR (2022) Here for the right reasons: The selection of women as peace delegates. International Studies Review24(1): viac005.
16.
BrodyR (2015) Hissène Habré Trial Shows Power of Victims’ and Civil Society’s Agency. International Center for Transitional Justice. https://www.ictj.org/news/reed-brody-hiss%C3%A8ne-habr%C3%A9-trial-shows-power-victims%E2%80%99-and-civil-society%E2%80%99s-agency.
17.
BurkeEDSKlotJBuntingI (2001) Engendering Peace: Reflections on the Burundi Peace Process. Nairobi, Kenya: UNIFEM.
18.
CAFOB-UNIFEM (2007) Rapport alternatif sur la mise en application de la Convention sur l’Elimination de toutes les Formes de Discriminations à l’égard de la Femme. https://tbinternet.ohchr.org/Treaties/CEDAW/Shared%20Documents/BDI/INT_CEDAW_NGO_BDI_40_8091_E.pdf.
19.
ChenowethEStephanMJ (2011) Why Civil Resistance Works: The Strategic Logic of Nonviolent Conflict. New York: Columbia University Press.
20.
Chicago Tribune (1998) The struggle for the truth. May 4. https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/ct-xpm-1998-05-04-9805040003-story.html.
ConradCRRitterEH (2013) Treaties, tenure, and torture: The conflicting domestic effects of international law. The Journal of Politics75(2): 397–409.
23.
CorbettaR (2014) Between indifference and coercion: Third-party intervention techniques in ongoing disputes. Conflict Management and Peace Science32(1): 3–27.
24.
CoxJM (2020) Negotiating justice: Ceasefires, peace agreements, and post-conflict justice. Journal of Peace Research57(3): 466–481.
25.
Cronin-FurmanK (2020) Human rights half measures: Avoiding accountability in postwar Sri Lanka. World Politics72(1): 121–163.
26.
DaleyP (2007) The Burundi peace negotiations: An African experience of peace-making. Review of African Political Economy34(112): 333–352.
27.
DancyGMichelV (2016) Human rights enforcement from below: Private actors and prosecutorial momentum in Latin America and Europe. International Studies Quarterly60(1): 173–188.
28.
DancyGWiebelhaus-BrahmE (2018) The impact of criminal prosecutions during intrastate conflict. Journal of Peace Research55(1): 47–61.
29.
DayalAKChristienA (2020) Women’s participation in informal peace processes. Global Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations26(1): 69–98.
30.
DruckmanDWagnerL (2019) Justice matters: Peace negotiations, stable agreements, and durable peace. Journal of Conflict Resolution63(2): 287–316.
31.
FarissCJ (2014) Respect for human rights has improved over time: Modeling the changing standard of accountability. American Political Science Review108(2): 297–318.
32.
FavrettoK (2009) Should peacemakers take sides? Major power mediation, coercion, and bias. American Political Science Review103(2): 248–263.
33.
FinnemoreMSikkinkK (1998) International norm dynamics and political change. International Organization52(4): 887–917.
34.
FortnaVP (2003) Scraps of paper? Agreements and the durability of peace. International Organization57(2): 337–372.
35.
GentSEShannonM (2011) Bias and the effectiveness of third-party conflict management mechanisms. Conflict Management and Peace Science28(2): 124–144.
36.
Government of Colombia and FARC (2016) Final agreement to end the armed conflict and build a stable and lasting peace. Available at: https://www.peaceagreements.org/viewmasterdocument/1845.
37.
GreigMJDiehlPF (2012) International Mediation. Cambridge: Polity.
38.
GrodskyBK (2010) The Costs of Justice: How New Leaders Respond to Previous Rights Abuses. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
39.
Hafner-BurtonETsutsuiK (2005) Human rights in a globalizing world: The paradox of empty promises. American Journal of Sociology110(5): 1373–1411.
40.
Hafner-BurtonEMTsutsuiK (2007) Justice lost! The failure of international human rights law to matter where needed most. Journal of Peace Research44(4): 407–425.
41.
HartzellCAHoddieM (2019) Power sharing and the rule of law in the aftermath of civil war. International Studies Quarterly63(3): 641–653.
42.
HathawayOA (2002) Do human rights treaties make a difference?The Yale Law Journal111(8): 1935–2042.
43.
HillDW (2010) Estimating the effects of human rights treaties on state behavior. The Journal of Politics72(4): 1161–1174.
44.
HowlandT (2008) How el rescate, a small nongovernmental organization, contributed to the transformation of the human rights situation in El Salvador. Human Rights Quarterly30(3): 703–757.
45.
HughesMMTrippAM (2015) Civil war and trajectories of change in women’s political representation in Africa, 1985–2010. Social Forces93(4): 1513–1540.
46.
JarstadAKSiskTD (2008) From war to Democracy: Dilemmas of Peacebuilding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
47.
JoH (2015) Compliant Rebels: Rebel Groups and International Law in World Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
48.
JoshiMQuinnJM (2017) Implementing the peace: The aggregate implementation of comprehensive peace agreements and peace duration after intrastate armed conflict. British Journal of Political Science47(4): 869–892.
49.
JoshiMQuinnJMReganPM (2015) Annualized implementation data on comprehensive intrastate peace accords, 1989–2012. Journal of Peace Research52(4): 551–562.
50.
KathmanJD (2013) United Nations peacekeeping personnel commitments, 1990–2011. Conflict Management and Peace Science30(5): 532–549.
51.
KeckMESikkinkK (1998) Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
52.
KimHJ (2012) Structural determinants of human rights prosecutions after democratic transition. Journal of Peace Research49(2): 305–320.
53.
KimNKHongMH (2019) Politics of pursuing justice in the aftermath of civil conflict. Journal of Conflict Resolution63(5): 1165–1192.
54.
KitagawaRBellSR (2022) The logic of transitional justice and state repression: The effects of human rights prosecutions in post-conflict states. Journal of Conflict Resolution. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220027211066616.
55.
KrauseJKrauseWBränforsP (2018) Women’s participation in peace negotiations and the durability of peace. International Interactions44(6): 985–1016.
56.
LaplanteLTheidonK (2006) Transitional justice in times of conflict: Colombia’s Ley de Justicia y Paz. Michigan Journal of International Law28(1): 49–108.
57.
LinekarJ (2018) Women in Peace and Transition Processes: Burundi (1996–2014). Graduate Institute Geneva Inclusive Peace & Transition Initiative. https://www.inclusivepeace.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/case-study-women-burundi-1996-2014-en.pdf.
58.
LinzerDAStatonJK (2015) A global measure of judicial independence, 1948–2012. Journal of Law and Courts3(2): 223–256.
59.
LoyleCEAppelBJ (2017) Conflict recurrence and postconflict justice: Addressing motivations and opportunities for sustainable peace. International Studies Quarterly61(3): 690–703.
60.
LoyleCEBinningsbøHM (2018) Justice during armed conflict: A new dataset on government and rebel strategies. Journal of Conflict Resolution62(2): 442–466.
61.
LutzELSikkinkK (2001) The justice cascade: The evolution and impact of foreign human rights trials in Latin America. Chicago Journal of International Law2, pp. 1–34.
62.
ManeyGMIbrahimIHigginsGI, et al. (2006) The past’s promise: Lessons from peace processes in northern Ireland and the Middle EastJournal of Peace Research43(2): 181–200.
63.
MarshallMGGurrTRJaggersK (2018) Polity IV annual time-series. https://www.systemicpeace.org/inscrdata.html.
64.
MatanockAM (2020) How international actors help enforce domestic deals. Annual Review of Political Science23(1): 357–383.
65.
MeyerCOSangarEMichaelsE (2018) How do non-governmental organizations influence media coverage of conflict? The case of the Syrian conflict, 2011–2014. Media, War & Conflict11(1): 149–171.
66.
MurdieABhasinT (2010) Aiding and abetting: Human rights ingos and domestic protestJournal of Conflict Resolution55(2): 163–191.
67.
MurdieAPeksenD (2014) The impact of human rights INGO shaming on humanitarian interventions. Journal of Politics76(1): 215–228.
68.
MurdieAMDavisDR (2012) Shaming and blaming: Using events data to assess the impact of human rights INGOs. International Studies Quarterly56(1): 1–16.
69.
NalepaM (2009) Skeletons in the Closet: Transitional Justice in Post-Communist Europe. New York: Cambridge University Press.
70.
NdikumanaVSebudandiC (2012) A la conquête de la parole: La participation des femmes dans la transition démocratique au Burundi. International Alert.
71.
NeumayerEPlümperT (2010) Making spatial analysis operational: Commands for generating spatial-effect variables in monadic and dyadic data. The Stata Journal10(4): 585–605. https://www.international-alert.org/fr/publications/a-la-conquete-de-la-parole/.
72.
NilssonD (2012) Anchoring the peace: Civil society actors in peace accords and durable peace. International Interactions38(2): 243–266.
73.
NilssonM (2018) Civil society actors in peace negotiations in Central America. Journal of Civil Society14(2): 135–152.
74.
NylanderDSandbergRTvedtI (2018) Designing peace: The Colombian peace process. https://noref.no/Publications/Regions/latin-america/Designing-peace-the-Colombian-peace-process.
75.
OrjuelaC (2003) Building peace in Sri Lanka: A role for civil society?Journal of Peace Research40(2): 195–212.
76.
PaffenholzT (2014) Civil society and peace negotiations: Beyond the inclusion–exclusion dichotomy. Negotiation Journal30(1): 69–91.
77.
PowellEJStatonJK (2009) Domestic judicial institutions and human rights treaty violation. International Studies Quarterly53(1): 149–174.
78.
ReidL (2021) Peace agreements and women’s political rights following civil war. Journal of Peace Research58(6): 1224–1238.
79.
RitterEHWolfordS (2012) Bargaining and the effectiveness of international criminal regimes. Journal of Theoretical Politics24(2): 149–171.
80.
RobinsS (2011) Towards victim-centred transitional justice: Understanding the needs of families of the disappeared in postconflict Nepal. International Journal of Transitional Justice5(1): 75–98.
81.
Rojas-OrozcoC (2021) International Law and Transition to Peace in Colombia Assessing jus Post Bellum in Practice. Leiden: Brill.
82.
RutzenD (2015) Authoritarianism goes global (II): Civil society under assault. Journal of Democracy26(4): 28–39.
83.
SajjadT (2013) Transitional Justice in South Asia: A Study of Afghanistan and Nepal. New York: Routledge.
84.
Shair-RosenfieldSWoodRM (2017) Governing well after war: How improving female representation prolongs post-conflict peace. The Journal of Politics79(3): 995–1009.
85.
SikkinkK (2010) The Justice Cascade: How Human Rights Prosecutions are Changing World Politics. New York: WW Norton & Company.
86.
SimmonsBA (2000) International law and state behavior: Commitment and compliance in international monetary affairs. The American Political Science Review94(4): 819–835.
87.
SimmonsBA (2008) Mobilizing for Human Rights: International law in Domestic Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
88.
SimmonsBACreamerCD (2019) Do self-reporting regimes matter? Evidence from the Convention Against Torture. International Studies Quarterly63(4): 1051–1064.
89.
SmithA (2013) The expectations and role of international and national civil society and the scsl. In: JallohCC (ed.) The Sierra Leone Special Court and its Legacy: The Impact for Africa and International Criminal Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 46–59.
90.
SmithJWiestD (2005) The uneven geography of global civil society: National and global influences on transnational association. Social Forces84(2): 621–652.
91.
SmithJWiestD (2012) Transnational social movement organization dataset, 1953–2003. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. https://www.icpsr.umich.edu/web/ICPSR/studies/33863.
92.
SmithJWiestDHughesM (2020) Transnational Social Movement Organization Dataset, V1.Harvard Dataverse. https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/NRUBSV.
93.
SommererTTallbergJ (2017) Transnational access to international organizations 1950–2010: A new data set. International Studies Perspectives18(3): 247–266.
94.
SubotićJ (2009) Hijacked Justice: Dealing with the Past in the Balkans. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
95.
SutilJC (1997) ‘No victorious army has ever been prosecuted …’ The unsettled story of transitional justice in Chile. In: McAdamsJA (ed.) Transitional Justice and the Rule of Law in New Democracies. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, pp. 131–149.
96.
TallbergJDellmuthLMAgnéH, et al. (2018) NGO influence in international organizations: Information, access and exchange. British Journal of Political Science48(1): 213–238.
97.
Tomz M, Wittenberg J and King G (2003) Clarify: Software for interpreting and presenting statistical results. Journal of Statistical Software 8(1): 1–30.
98.
United Nations (2008) Rule-of-Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Maximizing the Legacy of Hybrid Courts. Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights. https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/Documents/Publications/HybridCourts.pdf.
99.
United Nations (2010) Guidance note of the Secretary-General: United Nations approach to transtional justice. https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/682111.
von SteinJ (2017) Exploring the universe of UN human rights agreements. Journal of Conflict Resolution62(4): 871–899.
102.
WalterBF (1997) The critical barrier to civil war settlement. International Organization51(3): 335–364.
103.
Wanis-St JohnAKewD (2008) Civil society and peace negotiations: Confronting exclusion. International Negotiation13(1): 11–36.
104.
WebsterKChenCBeardsleyK (2019) Conflict, peace, and the evolution of women’s empowerment. International Organization73(2): 255–289.
105.
WoodEJ (2008) The social processes of civil war: The wartime transformation of social networks. Annual Review of Political Science11(1): 539–561.
106.
ZankerF (2014) Legitimate representation: Civil society actors in peace negotiations revisited. International Negotiation19(1): 62–88.
107.
ZvobgoK (2020) Demanding truth: The global transitional justice network and the creation of truth commissions. International Studies Quarterly64(3): 609–625.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
