Over the last three decades, a growing number of countries have experienced a transition from authoritarianism to democracy, and the new governments have been increasingly expected to address past human rights violations. While the academic literature on the impact of human rights prosecution is relatively well developed, the literature on the causes of such prosecution is still sparse. Why do states pursue criminal prosecutions against former state officials on the charge of human rights violations? This article answers this question by testing three key theories: the balance of power between old and new elites, transnational advocacy networks, and the diffusion theory. I conduct a cross-national study of 71 countries that were in a state of democratic transitions between 1980 and 2006, using a new dataset on domestic human rights prosecutions. I find strong evidence to support the transnational advocacy networks and diffusion explanations. First, active domestic and international human rights advocacy for individual criminal accountability is a key factor guaranteeing persistent and frequent human rights prosecutions. My study further shows that domestic advocacy plays a crucial role in criminal prosecutions of high-profile state officials while international pressure is more effective in promoting prosecutions of low-profile officials. Second, the diffusion theory is also supported since the occurrence of human rights prosecution in neighboring countries is a relevant factor. Interestingly, transitional countries are most sensitive to trials occurring in culturally or linguistically similar countries and this supports the constructivist norm diffusion theory, which focuses on the role of identity and communication in the diffusion process. However, I find that the power balance explanation, which has been the prevailing explanation, is valid only for the immediate use of human rights prosecutions.
AcuñaCarlos HSmulovitzCatalina (1997) Guarding the guardians in Argentina: Some lessons about the risks and benefits of empowering the courts. In: James McAdamsA (ed.) Transitional Justice and the Rule of Law in New Democracies. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 93–122.
2.
BackerDavid (2003) Civil society and transitional justice: Possibilities, patterns and prospects. Journal of Human Rights2(3): 297–313.
3.
BackerDavid (2009) Cross-national comparative analysis. In: ChapmanAudrey RMerweHugo Van derBaxterVictoria (eds) Assessing the Impact of Transitional Justice: Challenges for Empirical Research. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace, 23–90.
4.
BallPatrick (2000) State terror, constitutional traditions, and national human rights movement: A cross-national quantitative comparison. In: GuidryJohn AKennedyMichael DZaldMayer N (eds) Globalizations and Social Movements: Culture, Power, and the Transnational Public Sphere. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 54–75.
5.
BassGary J (2000) Stay the Hand of Vengeance: The Politics of War Crimes Tribunals. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
6.
Bassiouni M Cherif, ed. (2002) Post-Conflict Justice. Ardsley, NY: Transnational.
7.
Box-SteffensmeierJanet MBoefSuzanna De (2006) Repeated events survival models: The conditional frailty model. Statistics in Medicine25(20): 3518–3533.
8.
Box-SteffensmeierJanet MJonesBradford S (2004) Event History Modeling: A Guide for Social Scientists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9.
BuergenthalThomas (1994) The United Nations Truth Commission for El Salvador. Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law27(3): 497–544.
10.
DancyGeoffPoeSteven C (2006) What comes before truth? The political determinants of truth commission onset. International Studies Association Annual Convention, San Diego, CA, 22–25 March (http://citation.allacademic.com/meta/p_mla_apa_research_citation/0/9/9/3/2/p99320_index.html).
11.
DancyGeoffKimHun JoonWiebelhaus-BrahmEric (2010) The turn to truth: Trends in truth commission experimentation. Journal of Human Rights9(1): 45–64.
12.
De Greiff Pablo ed. (2006) The Handbook of Reparations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
13.
ElsterJon (2004) Closing the Books: Transitional Justice in Historical Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14.
ElsterJon, ed. (2006) Retribution and Reparation in the Transition to Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15.
FinnemoreMartha (1996) National Interests in International Society. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
16.
FinnemoreMarthaSikkinkKathryn (1998) International norm dynamics and political change. International Organization52(4): 887–917.
17.
FreemanDavid A (2010) Statistical Models and Causal Inference: A Dialogue with the Social Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18.
FreemanMark (2006) Truth Commissions and Procedural Fairness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
19.
GleditschKristianWardMichael (2006) Diffusion and the international context of democratization. International Organization60(4): 911–933.
20.
GoldsmithJack LandmanKrasnerStephen D (2003) The pitfalls of idealism. Daedalus132(1): 47–63.
21.
GrodskyBrian K (2010) The Costs of Justice: How New Leaders Respond to Previous Rights Abuses. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
22.
GuestIain (1995) On Trial: The United Nations, War Crimes, and the Former Yugoslavia. Washington, DC: Refugee Policy Group.
23.
GutmannAmyThompsonDennis (2000) The moral foundations of truth commissions. In: RotbergRobert IThompsonDennis (eds) Truth v. Justice: The Morality of Truth Commissions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 22–44.
24.
HathawayOona A (2007) Why countries commit to human rights treaties. Journal of Conflict Resolution51(4): 588–621.
25.
HaynerPriscilla B (2002) Unspeakable Truth: Facing the Challenge of Truth Commission. New York: Routledge.
26.
HaynerPriscilla B (2004) Responding to a painful past. In: BleekerMoSissonJonathan (eds) Dealing with the Past. Bern: Swisspeace, 45–52.
27.
HerzJohn H, ed. (1982) From Dictatorship to Democracy: Coping with the Legacies of Authoritarianism and Totalitarianism. Westport, CT: Greenwood.
28.
HuntingtonSamuel P (1991) The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press.
29.
HuyseLuc (1995) Justice after transition: On the choices successor elites make in dealing with the past. Law and Social Inquiry20(1): 51–78.
30.
KatzensteinPeter J, ed. (1996) The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics. New York: Columbia University Press.
31.
KaufmannChaim DPapeRobert A (1999) Explaining costly international moral action: Britain's sixty-year campaign against the Atlantic slave trade. International Organization53(4): 631–668.
32.
KeckMargaret ESikkinkKathryn (1998) Activists beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
33.
KimHun Joon (2008) Expansion of Transitional Justice Measures: A Comparative Analysis of Its Causes. Minneapolis, MN: Department of Political Science, University of Minnesota.
34.
KimHun Joon (in press) South Korea. In: NedelskyNadyaStanLavinia (eds) Encyclopedia of Transitional Justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
35.
KimHun JoonSikkinkKathryn (2010) Explaining the deterrence effect of human rights prosecutions for transitional countries. International Studies Quarterly54(4): 939–963.
36.
KritzNeil J (2004) Dealing with the legacy of past abuses. In: BleekerMoSissonJonathan (eds) Dealing with the Past. Bern: Swisspeace, 15–32.
37.
LutzEllen LReigerCaitlin, eds (2008) Prosecuting Heads of State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
38.
LutzEllenSikkinkKathryn (2001) The justice cascade: The evolution and impact of foreign human rights trials in Latin America. Chicago Journal of International Law2(1): 1–34.
39.
MallinderLouise (2008) Amnesty, Human Rights and Political Transitions: Bridging the Peace and Justice Divide. Oxford: Hart.
40.
MansfieldEdwardSnyderJack (2002) Democratic transition, institutional strength, and war. International Organization56(2): 297–337.
41.
MendezJuan E (1997) In defense of transitional justice. In: James McAdamsA (ed.) Transitional Justice and the Rule of Law in New Democracies. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1–26.
42.
MinowMartha (1998) Between Vengeance and Forgiveness: Facing History after Genocide and Mass Violence. Boston, MA: Beacon.
43.
MoravcsikAndrew (2000) The origins of human rights regimes: Democratic delegation in postwar Europe. International Organization54(2): 217–252.
44.
MosleyLaynaUnoSaika (2007) Racing to the bottom or climbing to the top? Economic globalization and collective labor rights. Comparative Political Studies40(8): 923–948.
45.
MostBenjamin AStarrHarvey (1980) Diffusion, reinforcement, geopolitics, and the spread of war. American Political Science Review74(4): 932–946.
46.
NinoCarlos S (1996) Radical Evil on Trial. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
47.
O'DonnellGuillermo ASchmitterPhilippe C, eds (1986) Transition from Authoritarian Rule. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
48.
OlsenTricia DPayneLeigh AReiterAndrew G (2010) Transitional Justice in Balance: Comparing Processes, Weighing Efficacy. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace Press.
49.
OrentlicherDiane F (1995) Settling accounts: The duty to prosecute human rights violations of a prior regime. Yale Law Journal100(8): 2537–2615.
50.
Pion-BerlinDavid (1994) To prosecute or to pardon? Human rights decisions in the Latin American southern cone. Human Rights Quarterly16(1): 105–130.
51.
PoeSteven CTateNealKeithLinda Camp (1999) Repression of the human rights to personal integrity revised. International Studies Quarterly43(2): 291–313.
52.
RamosHowardRonJamesThomsOskar NT (2007) Shaping the northern media's human rights coverage, 1986–2000. Journal of Peace Research44(4): 385–406.
53.
Roht-ArriazaNaomi (2002) Civil society in processes of accountability. In: Cherif BassiouniM (ed.) Post-Conflict Justice. Ardsley, NY: Transnational.
54.
Roht-ArriazaNaomi (2005) The Pinochet Effect: Transnational Justice in the Age of Human Rights. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
55.
Roht-ArriazaNaomiMariezcurrenaJavier, eds (2006) Transitional Justice in the Twenty-First Century: Beyond Truth versus Justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
56.
RoperSteven DBarriaLilian A (2009) Why do states commission the truth? Political considerations in the establishment of African truth and reconciliation commissions. Human Rights Review10: 373–391.
57.
RotbergRobert IThompsonDennis, eds (2000) Truth v. Justice: The Morality of Truth Commissions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
58.
SarkinJeremy (1999) The necessity and challenges of establishing a truth and reconciliation commission in Rwanda. Human Rights Quarterly21(3): 767–823.
59.
SikkinkKathrynWallingCarrie B (2007) The justice cascade and the impact of human rights trials in Latin America. Journal of Peace Research44(4): 427–445.
60.
SimmonsBeth A (2008) International Human Rights: Law, Politics, and Accountability. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
61.
SimmonsBeth AElkinsZachary (2004) The globalization of liberalization: Policy diffusion in the international politcal economy. American Political Science Review98(1): 171–189.
62.
SimmonsBeth ADobbinFrankGarrettGeoffrey (2006) Introduction: The international diffusion of liberalism. International Organization60(4): 781–810.
63.
SkaarElin (1999) Truth commissions, trials – or nothing? Policy options in democratic transitions. Third World Quarterly20(6): 1109–1128.
64.
SnyderJackVinjamuriLeslie (2003) Trial and errors: Principle and pragmatism in strategies of international justice. International Security28(3): 5–44.
65.
SriramChandra Lekha (2003) Revolutions in accountability: New approaches to past abuses. American University International Law Review19(2): 310–429.
66.
StarrHarvey (1991) Democratic dominoes: Diffusion approaches to the spread of democracy in the international system. Journal of Conflict Resolution35(2): 356–381.
67.
StrangDavid (1991) Adding social structure to diffusion models: An event history framework. Sociological Methods & Research19(3): 324–353.
68.
SuboticJelena (2009) Hijacked Justice: Dealing with the Past in the Balkans. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
69.
TeitelRuti G (2003) Transitional justice genealogy. Harvard Human Rights Journal16: 69–94.
70.
UN Security Council (2004) Reports of the secretary-general on the rule of law and transitional justice in conflict and post-conflict societies (S/2004/616) (http://daccess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N04/395/29/PDF/N0439529.pdf?OpenElement).
71.
Wiebelhaus-BrahmEric (2010) Truth Commissions and Transitional Societies: The Impact on Human Rights and Democracy. New York: Routledge.
72.
ZalaquettJosé (1992) Balancing ethical imperatives and political constraints: The dilemmas of new democracies confronting past human rights violations. Hastings Law Journal43(6): 1425–1438.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
