Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Non-small-cell lung cancer takes up the majority of lung carcinoma-caused deaths. It is reported that targeting PD-1/PD-L1, a well-known immune evasion checkpoint, can eradicate tumor. Checkpoint inhibitors, such as monoclonal antibodies, are actively employed in cancer treatment. Thus, this review aimed to assess the therapeutic and toxic effects of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in treatment of NSCLC. So far, 6 monoclonal antibodies blocking PD-1/PD-L1 interaction are identified and used in clinical trials and randomized controlled trials for NSCLC therapy. These antibody-based therapies for NSCLC were collected by using search engine PubMed, and articles about the assessment of adverse events were collected by using Google search. Route of administration and dosage are critical parameters for efficient immunotherapy. Although antibodies can improve overall survival and are expected to be target-specific, they can cause systemic adverse effects in the host. Targeting certain biomarkers can limit the toxicity of adverse effects of the antibody-mediated therapy. Clinical experts with knowledge of adverse effects (AEs) of checkpoint inhibitors can help manage and reduce mortalities associated with antibody-based therapy of NSCLC.

Keywords

NSCLC PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitors monoclonal antibodies toxicity

Introduction

Lung cancer is the foremost reason for deaths related to cancer in the United States. According to statistics of the year 2019, the death toll related to cancers of respiratory system will exceed one-tenth of a million. There are several new treatment regimens endorsed by NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) for the management of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC)¹. Cancer cells are identified by the immune system, especially T-cells for control or elimination depending on receptors that strengthen the antitumor efficacy². Such cells take part in multiple mechanisms to prevent this immune attack. PD-1 pathway is one mechanism for immune escape in several mouse tumor models. Manipulating such mechanism can allow the immune system to eliminate tumor³.

Over the past two decades, monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) have emerged as successful therapeutic agents for cancer in a multibillion-dollar market^4,5. Recently, Relatlimab, Omburtamab, Etigilimab, Enoblituzumab and Tiragolumab are actively employed mAbs as immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) at clinical level⁶. Programmed cell death protein (PD-1), a 288 amino acid, is a surface molecule often designated as a membrane protein that is expressed on immune cells including dendritic cells. Programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1), a major PD-1 ligand and 40-kDa type 1 transmembrane protein, is often expressed in several types of malignant tumors and is related to survival and tumor progression^7,8. PD-1 can interact with PD-L1 and result in the release of signals that can regulate T-cell mediated immunity⁹. This interaction ensures that immune system is activated at the proper timing and thereby the chances of chronic inflammation are reduced¹⁰. Cancer cells express proteins including PD-1 on their surface to trick the immune cells and evade their detection, and this action can stop a cytolytic activity¹¹. An increase in PD-1 expression is considered as a hallmark for exhaustion of T-cells¹². Notably, according to a meta-analysis based on randomized controlled trials, higher PD-L1 level in NSCLC cells is related to better efficacy of treatment by PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors¹³.

Blockade of PD-1/PD-L1 pathway can cause limited toxicity compared to CTLA-4 blockade¹⁴. Blockade using monoclonal antibodies is a recently well-studied immune checkpoint inhibition and is used as a therapy for a variety of diseases including cancers of multiple origins¹⁵. This blockade of PD-1 using antibodies is now applied to treat patients with recurrence of cancer¹⁶. Although therapeutic targeting of PD-1/PD-L1 axis using ICIs can be more efficient than conventional chemotherapy, it can cause immune system related adverse effects (irAEs) predominantly in the digestive system, and these effects can be systemic. Drug resistance emerged with the blockade by ICIs is considered as a consequence of the progress of tumor neoantigens and the increase in immune checkpoint proteins that are not related to PD-1/PD-L1 axis^17
–19.

Therefore, present review focuses on therapeutic roles and toxicity of ICIs targeting the PD-1/PD-L1 axis for clinical management of NSCLC. Clinical trials and randomized controlled trials of past decade were searched from PubMed for therapy and toxicity of ICIs in management of NSCLC.

PD-1/PD-L1 Axis As A Target for Therapy of NSCLC

The blockade of PD-1 and PD-L1 ligation can relieve the dysfunction, exhaustion, and tolerance of T-cells, so it has been proved to be a successful way to fight against cancer²⁰. Yet, the antibodies may or may not have similarity in their binding sites on PD-1²¹. Relapse in disease can occur in patients with primary or acquired resistance to the antibody-based monotherapy and new approaches are employed recently to avoid or overcome the resistance to such therapy²². Genetic polymorphisms in PD-1 loci can increase the chances of developing several autoimmune disorders. PD-1/PD-L1 expression may vary with specific types of tumor so PD-1/PD-L1 can act as prognostic or diagnostic markers in several cancers. Therefore, several biomarkers such as elevated lymphocytes and eosinophils, low levels of circulating tumor DNA, and lactate dehydrogenase can help predict the responses to ICIs. Tumor mutational burden related to genes such as Polybromo-1 can also serve the purpose^23,24.

Emerging Roles of Monoclonal Antibodies at the Nanoscale

As is known, mAbs are roughly 10 nm in size and possess unique properties. Dynamic light-scattering is used to analyze antibody formulations at the nanoscale. To serve therapeutic purposes, their affinity should be 1 nM or less for a specific antigen. They are absorbed via lymphatic system depending on convection and diffusion. These are plausible mechanisms for the uptake of mAbs^25
–27. Glass and silica microparticles can adsorb mAbs via surface layering of 4-nm thickness²⁸. Nanoparticles conjugated with antibodies are effectively delivered to their targeted site because of the size around 50 nm²⁹. Administration of antibody-coated nanoparticles through subcutaneous route at fixed and optimized doses can improve targeted delivery and prevent irAEs^30,31. Supportive of the fore-mentioned information, PD-L1 antibodies are conjugated onto copolymer nanoparticular surface and loaded with chemotherapeutic drugs to achieve targeted therapy and inhibition of PD-L1 expression in cancer cells³². Lipids, polymers and metal-based nanoparticles with an ideal size of 200 nm have been used in specific-targeting of lung cancer cells³³.

Role of Biomarker Validation

Biomarkers can improve the specific targeting of tumor associated antigens and decrease systemic toxicity³⁴. Tumor mutational burden, tissue polypeptide-specific antigen, and immunohistochemistry assays are valuable tools in biomarker validation for early detection of cancer^35

–38. PD-L1 testing based on immunohistochemical platforms such as Dako and Ventana are used with four FDA approved antibodies for binding with precise epitope of PD-L1. Antibodies such as 22C3, 28–8, SP263 and SP142 are used to identify patients who can respond to immunotherapy for PD-L1 positive NSCLC^39,40. Elevated expressions of PD-L1 is optimum for treatment using ICIs¹³. At a safe dose, combinatorial therapy of mAbs with other drugs can increase the OS of patients with NSCLC. Statuses of other oncogenes such as EGFR, ALK, KRAS, MET, ROS1, BRAF, and NTRK are critical in identification of specific ICIs for NSCLC^41,42. Host microbiomes are tested and used as alternative biomarkers for NSCLC⁴³. Also, several biomarkers are discovered to predict or influence the toxicity of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor-based therapy. For example, cytokines such as IL1Rα, IL-1α/β, IL-2, IL12p70, IL-13, GM-CSF, G-CSF, fractalkine, and IFN-α2 are proved as biomarkers highly expressed in patients having severe irAEs during ICI treatment⁴⁴. TIM3 is proved to hinder anti-cancer immunity and regulate resistance to PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors⁴⁵. The TLR3-specific adjuvant alleviates resistance to therapy using PD-L1 antibody without toxicity⁴⁶. Targeting gut microbiota is reported to enhance efficiency and decrease toxicity of current therapy depending on various agents including anti-PD-L1⁴⁷.

Clinical and Randomized Controlled trials for NSCLC Therapy using ICIs Targeting the PD-1/PD-L1 Axis

Atezolizumab, avelumab, durvalumab, cemiplimab, nivolumab, and pembrolizumab are fully humanized IgG₁ and IgG₄ antibodies that target the PD-1/PD-L1 axis in combinatorial first-line treatment of NSCLC. They can elicit anti-tumor effects through mechanisms involving adaptive and innate immunity^48

–53. The search was performed in PubMed using the filter of 2010 to 2020 for clinical trials and randomized controlled trials in treatment of NSCLC targeting the PD-1/PD-L1 axis. A total of 8 trials were identified as a result of the search. We summarized the characters, applications and toxicities of 5 antibodies from the 8 researches in Table 1. The results indicated that the median overall survival (OS) was improved in Phase 2 and 3 trials using atezolizumab by more than 4 months versus docetaxel; increasing OS was coupled with higher PD-L1 level in NSCLC patients, and the adverse event profile for atezolizumab was more favorable than docetaxel ^54,55. In an open-label Phase 3 trial, avelumab improved the median OS by one month in comparison with docetaxel, which was insignificant; high PD-L1 expression in NSCLC patients was related to longer OS; and the ratio of treatment-related adverse event in patients receiving avelumab treatment was generally lower than those receiving docetaxel⁵⁶. There was no report for durvalumab and cemiplimab according to the search. Yet, trials at various phases are ongoing for the treatment of NSCLC using cemiplimab⁵⁷. Nivolumab had an OS of more than 40% after one year in a Phase 2, single-arm trial in NSCLC patients; the treatment-related immune-mediated adverse events after nivolumab treatment were neither frequent nor severe and the toxicity of nivolumab was weaker than toxic chemotherapy⁵⁸. In combination with other chemotherapeutic interventions at Phase I level, nivolumab treatment resulted in OS of 12.2 and 17.4 months; combined use of other drugs did not lead to higher risk of nivolumab-related immune-mediated adverse events and these adverse events are generally manageable^59,60. Pembrolizumab in combination with ipilimumab improved the OS compared to standard chemotherapy⁶¹. The median OS was more than 10 months, but the combined use of pembrolizumab and ipilimumab may lead to a higher risk of adverse events⁶².

Table 1.

Characters, application and toxicities of antibodies against PD-1/PD-L1 summarized based on 8 clinical trials.

Antibodies	Descriptions
Atezolizumab	Characters	Humanized IgG1 monoclonal anti-PD-L1 Blocks the interaction of PD-L1/PD-1 and PD-L1/B7.1 and leads to anti-tumor T-cell activity restoration and strengthened T-cell priming.
	Application	Patients: n = 142 (Phase 2 trial); n = 609 (Phase 3 trial) Dose: 1200 mg fixed dose every 3 weeks on day 1 of each 3-week cycle
	Toxicity	Phase 2 trial: Median OS: 12,6 months Patients with AEs: 96% Common AEs: Pneumonia, increased aspartate aminotransferase, increased aspartate aminotransferase, increased alanine aminotransferase, pneumonitis, colitis and hepatitis. Phase 3 trial: Median OS: 18.9 months Patients with AEs: 94% Common AEs: Fatigue, nausea, decreased appetite, and asthenia.
Avelumab	Characters	Human anti-PD-L1 IgG1 antibody Tolerable safety profile and durable anti-tumor activity.
	Application	Patients: n = 396 Dose: 10 mg/kg for intravenous injection over 1 h every 2 weeks a time
	Toxicity	Median OS: 11.4 months Patients with treatment-related AEs: 64% Common AEs: Infusion-related reaction, decreased appetite, increased lipase.
Cemiplimab	Characters	Human monoclonal antibody to PD-1 Exhibits antitumor activity with safety in phase 1 trial of malignancies at advanced stage, including NSCLC.
	Application	Patients: n = 230 Dose: unclear dose for Q3 W (up to 108 weeks)
	Toxicity	No report yet.
Nivolumab	Characters	Fully human, IgG4 immune checkpoint inhibitor antibody Binds to PD-1 on the activated immune cells and leads to disruption of PD-1/PD-L1/2 interaction, so as to attenuate inhibitory signals and enhance the host anti-tumor response.
	Application	Patients: n = 117 Dose: 3 mg/kg via intravenous infusion 2 weeks a time (1 cycle until the occurrence of unacceptable toxic effects or disease progression) Patients: n = 292 Dose: 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks Patients: n = 21 Dose: from 3 mg/kg to a flat 240 mg
	Toxicity	Median OS: 8·2 months (n = 117) Patients with grade 3–4 treatment-related AEs: 17% Common AEs: Fatigue, pneumonitis, and diarrhoea. Median OS: 12.2 months (n = 292) Common AEs: Cough, decreased appetite, constipation, pruritis, fatigue, and musculoskeletal pain. Median OS: 17.4 months (n = 21) Common AEs: Injection-site reactions, flu-like symptoms, fever, fatigue, chills, nausea, and pain.
Pembrolizumab	Characters	Humanized monoclonal antibody against PD-1. Blocks the PD-1/PD-L1/2 interaction and leads to antitumor immune response reactivation.
	Application	Patients: n = 30 Dose: a fixed dose of 200 mg three weeks a time ((Q3 W), 21 days) for 2 cycles Patients: n = 51 Dose: 10 mg/kg (n = 6) or 2mg/kg (n = 45) three weeks a time (Q3 W) for up to 2 years
	Toxicity	Median OS: 10.9 months (n = 51) Treatment-related AEs: 64% Immune-mediated AEs and infusion reactions: 42% Common AEs: Fatigue, hypothyroidism, decreased appetite, diarrhea, and pruritus.

References: 54-61.

Systemic Toxicity of ICIs

The Immune-Related Adverse Events (irAEs) of ICIs increase at higher doses⁶³. Inhibitors of PD-1/PD-L1 axis can cause systemic toxicities. PD-1 interacts with its alternate ligand PD-L2 when its expression is elevated in certain organs. This can result in resistance, survival or growth of tumor cells by T-cell inactivation, leading to an increase in toxicity (Fig. 1). The irAEs of ICIs include colitis, diarrhoea, hormonal imbalances, hypothyroidism, diabetes, acute injury to kidneys, pneumonitis, and myocarditis. Hepatic, pulmonary, and dermatological reactions such as pruritus and rashes are also evident^{18,64,65,66

–70}.

Figure 1.

Pictorial representation of resistance, survival or growth among tumor cells as a result of T-cell inactivation leading to irAEs. Left: Blocking PD-1/PD-L1 by PD-1 or PD-L1 mAbs caused T-cell activation and suppressed tumor cell growth or survival; blocking PD-1/PD-L2 by PD-L2 mAbs repressed tumor cell drug resistance. Right: PD-1 on T-cell bound to PD-L1 on tumor cell to suppress T-cell activation and facilitate tumor cell growth or survival; PD-1 on T-cell bound to PD-L2 on tumor cell to facilitate tumor drug resistance.

Atezolizumab can induce systemic toxicities comparable to other PD-1 inhibitors such as avelumab and durvalumab by interacting with PD-L1, but is different from the irAEs of conventional chemotherapy. This can avoid interaction of PD-1 with PD-L1. 20 mg/kg is the tolerable dose in clinical trials involving atezolizumab and avelumab intended for NSCLC therapy at Phase I^50,71

–74. Nivolumab at 3 mg/kg was the optimum dose in combination with ipilimumab (1 mg/kg) for treatment of NSCLC⁷⁵. The 2-year OS for this antibody (5∼10 mg/kg) did range between 25∼62% based on the combinatorial agent used^76,77. Pembrolizumab can cause thyroid dysfunction and even fatal pneumonitis in NSCLC patients^78,79.

Toxicity of ICIs on Different Systems of the Human Body

Fatigue of all grades is one of the common irAEs induced by ICIs⁸⁰. Macules and papules are skin-related irAEs of grade 1 and 2. Vitiligo-like depigmentation is related to grade 3 or 4 symptoms⁸¹. With incidence lower than 1%, AEs of ICIs associated with cardiovascular system are myocarditis, pericarditis, cardiac fibrosis, cardiac arrest, arrhythmias, heart failure, large pericardial effusion, tamponade and Takotsubo syndrome. Electrocardiogram, troponin monitoring and diagnosis of myocarditis are baseline tools to detect abnormalities related to heart^82
–84. Disorders of the coagulation-fibrinolysis system can occur⁸⁵. Grade 1 to 4 diarrhoea and colitis are lower GI-based irAEs. ICIs can induce upper GI tract toxicity, resulting in decline of appetite and nausea^86,87. Esophagitis, gastritis, duodenitis, and jejunitis are other upper GI tract-associated irAEs⁸⁸. Thyroid dysfunction and hypophysitis are the major toxicities associated with the endocrine system, although the effects can be systemic⁸⁹. Pneumonitis is a late grade irAE in NSCLC patients⁹⁰. Other pulmonary events such as dyspnoea, hypoxia and lung opacities were also observed⁹¹. Polyneuropathy, myasthenia gravis, Bell’s palsy and encephalopathy are neurological irAEs⁹². Loss of skeletal muscle mass and proteinuria are other irAEs of ICIs for NSCLC (Fig. 2). These irAEs are enlisted in Table 2.

Figure 2.

Systemic toxicity of Immune-Related Adverse Events (irAEs). Toxicity to multiple human organ systems caused by inhibitors for PD-1 block are presented and several of them are reported to be the toxicity of mAbs reviewed in this article.

Table 2.

Systemic Toxicity of ICIs.

Organ systems	Adverse effects
Integumentary system	Grade 1 and 2 macules and papules. Grade 3 or 4 related vitiligo-like depigmentation
Cardiovascular system	Disorders of the coagulation-fibrinolysis, myocarditis, pericarditis, cardiac fibrosis, cardiac arrest, arrhythmias, heart failure, large pericardial effusion, tamponade and Takotsubo syndrome
Digestive system	Diarrhoea, colitis, decline of appetite and nausea, esophagitis, gastritis, duodenitis, and jejunitis
Endocrine system	Thyroid dysfunction and hypophysitis
Respiratory system	Pneumonitis, dyspnoea, hypoxia and lung opacities
Nervous system	Polyneuropathy, myasthenia gravis, Bell’s palsy and encephalopathy
Skeletal system	Loss of skeletal muscle mass
Other adverse effects	Fatigue and proteinuria

References: 76-90

The toxicities associated with immunotherapy may be autoimmune (on target, off-tumor toxicity) or cytokine-associated. The mechanisms related to such toxicities may vary from the reactions similar to immune system-related allergies to the auto-immune reactions, such as reactions observed in chemotherapy or the entry of T-cells into central nervous system. There are several tests that individually identify the irAEs specific for each organ by detecting the specific antigens on toxicity-induced organs using specific antibodies. Steroids and other immunosuppressive agents are used for management of such irAEs^93,94.

Challenges and Future Directions for Therapy of NSCLC using Checkpoint Inhibitors

Resistance of NSCLC cells to available drugs can limit the therapeutic potential of a drug and therefore requires proper management to control progression⁹⁵. Immune escape and evasion in NSCLC patients play a critical role in cancer progression⁹⁶. Amplification of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes after collection from the patient, growth at laboratory scale and giving back can boost the immune system^97,98. Clinicians are aware that the management of irAEs of ICIs can follow guidelines for cancer care and the challenges imposed⁹⁹. Early detection is critical to the management of increase in systemic toxicity and mortality¹⁰⁰.

Peptide antagonists for PD-1 and its ligand PD-L1 are emerging alternatives for cancer therapy and a few examples have been elucidated^101,102. A novel peptide RK-10 identified from RCSB protein data bank has been known to detect PD-L1 in several circulating and tumor cells and tissues of patients suffering from various cancers¹⁰³. T-cell therapy allowing the same cells to secrete certain peptide fragments may improve both safety and anti-tumor efficacy as such peptides can stay localized to tumor cells¹⁰⁴. Non-blocking antibodies for PD-1 possess anti-tumor effect similar to that of anti-PD-1 monotherapy using blocking antibodies¹⁰⁵. An interesting study suggests that on-target lifespan of anti-PD-1 antibodies is much shorter than usually expected on the tumor-infiltrating T-cells. According to the authors, second generation antibodies can be a fascinating approach for they have much more specific Fc regions that possess extended binding to such T-cells¹⁰⁶.

Analyzing the composition of gut microbiota is a key point in determining the therapeutic efficacy of antibodies against PD-1/PD-L1. Fecal microbiome could improve sensitivity of anti-PD-L1 therapy which differs between melanoma patients who respond to therapy and who do not. Such patients had unique microbiome, and enhanced immunity was observed in mice transplanted with fecus of patients who responded to checkpoint blockade immunotherapy¹⁰⁷.

Therefore, novel therapeutic regimens with specific targeting capacity are mandatory for prolonging the survival among NSCLC patients¹⁰⁸.

Conclusions

NSCLC can be treated efficiently by targeting the PD-1/PD-L1 axis using checkpoint inhibitors such as monoclonal antibodies. Atezolizumab, avelumab, durvalumab, cemiplimab, nivolumab, and pembrolizumab are fully humanized antibodies used in clinical trials and randomized controlled trials for NSCLC therapy. Treatment modalities are critical parameters in targeted therapy. Identification of biomarkers and targeted therapy can help in limiting the toxicity of adverse effects of antibody-mediated therapy. Further research in identifying checkpoint inhibitors can help eradicate cancers of various origins.

Supplemental Material

Supplemental Material, sj-docx-1-cll-10.1177_09636897211041587 - Therapeutic and Systemic Adverse Events of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Targeting the PD-1/PD-L1 axis for Clinical Management of NSCLC

Supplemental Material, sj-docx-1-cll-10.1177_09636897211041587 for Therapeutic and Systemic Adverse Events of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Targeting the PD-1/PD-L1 axis for Clinical Management of NSCLC by Jing Chen, Yaser Alduais and Baoan Chen in Cell Transplantation

Footnotes

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding

The authors disclosed receipt of the following financial statement for research, authorship and/or publication of thiu article: The work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.81903091), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No.2242020R20006) and the Jiangsu Planned Projects for Postdoctoral Research Funds.

ORCID iD

Baoan Chen

Supplemental Material

Supplemental material for this article is available online.

References

Ettinger

Wood

Aggarwal

Aisner

Akerley

Bauman

Bharat

Bruno

Chang

Chirieac

D’Amico

, et al. NCCN Guidelines insights: non-small cell lung cancer, Version 1.2020. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2019;17(12):1464–1472.

Callahan

Wolchok

. At the bedside: CTLA-4- and PD-1-blocking antibodies in cancer immunotherapy. J Leukoc Biol. 2013;94(1):41–53.

Dotti

. Blocking PD-1 in cancer immunotherapy. Blood. 2009;114(8):1457–1458.

Scott

Allison

Wolchok

. Monoclonal antibodies in cancer therapy. Cancer Immun. 2012;12:14.

Rajewsky

. The advent and rise of monoclonal antibodies. Nature. 2019;575(7781):47–49.

Qin

Luo

. Novel immune checkpoint targets: moving beyond PD-1 and CTLA-4. Mol Cancer. 2019;18(1):155.

Yamane

Isozaki

Takeyama

Ochi

Kudo

Honda

Yamagishi

Kubo

Kiura

Takigawa

. Programmed cell death protein 1 and programmed death-ligand 1 are expressed on the surface of some small-cell lung cancer lines. Am J Cancer Res. 2015;5(4):1553–1557.

Escors

Gato-Cañas

Zuazo

Arasanz

García-Granda

Vera

Kochan

. The intracellular signalosome of PD-L1 in cancer cells. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2018;3:26.

Jin

Ahmed

Okazaki

. Role of PD-1 in regulating T-cell immunity. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 2011;350:17–37.

10.

Bose

. Immune checkpoints, their control by immunotherapy and ovarian cancer. Contemp Oncol (Pozn). 2017;21(3):189–196.

11.

Carotta

Targeting

Cells for anticancer immunotherapy: clinical and preclinical approaches. Front Immunol. 2016;7:152.

12.

Kareva

. Chapter 6 -cancer as a systemic disease that requires a systemic approach. In: Kareva

, ed. Understanding Cancer from a Systems Biology Point of View: Academic Press; 2018. p 79–90.

13.

Wan

Chen

Zhan

Zhao

Zhang

Liu

Afzal

Dermime

Hochwald

Hofman

, et al. The association of PD-L1 expression with the efficacy of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy and survival of non-small cell lung cancer patients: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2019;8(4):413–428.

14.

Yang

Jing

Shi

Management of adverse events in cancer patients treated with PD-1/PD-L1 blockade: focus on Asian populations. Front Pharmacol. 2019;10:726.

15.

Rosenblatt

Avigan

. Targeting the PD-1/PD-L1 axis in multiple myeloma: a dream or a reality™ Blood. 2017;129(3):275–279.

16.

Smith

Chiu

Parikh

Yahalom

Younes

Chapter 75

Hodgkin lymphoma: clinical manifestations, staging, and therapy. In: Hoffman

Benz

Silberstein

Heslop

Weitz

Anastasi

Salama

Abutalib

, editors. Hematology (Seventh Edition): Elsevier; 2018. p 1212–1229.

17.

Ahmed

Checkpoint inhibitors: What gastroenterologists need to know. World J Gastroenterol. 2018;24(48):5433–5438.

18.

Bajwa

Cheema

Khan

Amirpour

Paul

Chaughtai

Patel

Bramson

Gupta

Levitt

, et al. Adverse effects of immune checkpoint inhibitors (programmed death-1 inhibitors and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein-4 inhibitors): results of a retrospective study. J Clin Med Res. 2019;11(4):225–236.

19.

Meyers

Bryan

Banerji

Morris

. Targeting the PD-1/PD-L1 axis for the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer. Curr Oncol. 2018;25(4):e324–e334.

20.

Xu-Monette

Zhang

Young

. PD-1/PD-L1 blockade: have we found the key to unleash the antitumor immune response™ Front Immunol. 2017;8:1597.

21.

Xu-Monette

Zhou

Young

. PD-1 expression and clinical PD-1 blockade in B-cell lymphomas. Blood. 2018;131(1):68–83.

22.

Nowicki

Hu-Lieskovan

Ribas

. Mechanisms of resistance to PD-1 and PD-L1 blockade. Cancer J. 2018;24(1):47–53.

23.

Seidel

Otsuka

Kabashima

Anti-PD-1 and Anti-CTLA-4 therapies in cancer: mechanisms of action, efficacy, and limitations. Front Oncol. 2018;8:86.

24.

Lavacchi

Pellegrini

Palmieri

Doni

Mela

Di Maida

Amedei

Pillozzi

Carini

Antonuzzo

. Immune checkpoint inhibitors in the treatment of renal cancer: current state and future perspective. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(13):4691.

25.

Thomas

Balthasar

. Understanding inter-individual variability in monoclonal antibody disposition. Antibodies (Basel). 2019;8(4):56.

26.

Hwang

Liu

Lee

Tsai

. Development of therapeutic antibodies for the treatment of diseases. J Biomed Sci. 2020;27(1):1.

27.

Razinkov

Treuheit

Becker

. Accelerated formulation development of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and mAb-based modalities: review of methods and tools. J Biomol Screen. 2015;20(4):468–483.

28.

Le Basle

Chennell

Tokhadze

Astier

Sautou

Physicochemical stability of monoclonal antibodies: a review. J Pharm Sci. 2020;109(1):169–190.

29.

Villanueva-Flores

Castro-Lugo

Ramírez

Palomares

. Understanding cellular interactions with nanomaterials: towards a rational design of medical nanodevices. Nanotechnology. 2020;31(13):132002.

30.

Awwad

Angkawinitwong

. Overview of antibody drug delivery. Pharmaceutics. 2018;10(3):83.

31.

Oltolina

Colangelo

Miletto

Clemente

Miola

Verné

Prat

Follenzi

. Tumor targeting by monoclonal antibody functionalized magnetic nanoparticles. Nanomaterials (Basel). 2019;9(11):1575.

32.

Cui

Huang

Zhang

Zhu

Sun

Cao

Ding

Wang

Gao

Zhang

. PD-L1 monoclonal antibody-conjugated nanoparticles enhance drug delivery level and chemotherapy efficacy in gastric cancer cells. Int J Nanomedicine. 2019;14:17–32.

33.

Babu

Templeton

Munshi

Ramesh

Nanoparticle-based drug delivery for therapy of lung cancer: progress and challenges. J Nanomater. 2013;2013:863951.

34.

Liu

. Cancer biomarkers for targeted therapy. Biomark Res. 2019;7:25.

35.

Lim

Hong

Kim

. Immunotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer: current landscape and future perspectives. Immune Netw. 2020;20(1):e10.

36.

Howat

Lewis

Jones

Kampf

Pontén

van der Loos

Gray

Womack

Warford

. Antibody validation of immunohistochemistry for biomarker discovery: recommendations of a consortium of academic and pharmaceutical based histopathology researchers. Methods. 2014;70(1):34–38.

37.

Klempner

Fabrizio

Bane

Reinhart

Peoples

Ali

Sokol

Frampton

Schrock

Anhorn

Reddy

Tumor mutational burden as a predictive biomarker for response to immune checkpoint inhibitors: a review of current evidence. Oncologist. 2020;25(1):e147–e159.

38.

Rodriguez-Pascual

Ayuso-Sacido

Belda-Iniesta

Resistance

. Drug resistance in cancer immunotherapy: new strategies to improve checkpoint inhibitor therapies. Cancer Drug Resist. 2019;2:980–993.

39.

Ancevski Hunter

Socinski

Villaruz

. PD-L1 testing in guiding patient selection for PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor therapy in lung cancer. Mol Diagn Ther. 2018;22(1):1–10.

40.

Ionescu

Downes

Christofides

Tsao

. Harmonization of PD-L1 testing in oncology: a Canadian pathology perspective. Curr Oncol. 2018;25(3):e209–e216.

41.

Elkrief

Joubert

Florescu

Tehfe

Blais

Routy

. Therapeutic landscape of metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer in Canada in 2020. Curr Oncol. 2020;27(1):52–60.

42.

Sui

Wang

Liu

Yang

Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy for non-small-cell lung cancer: toward personalized medicine and combination strategies. J Immunol Res. 2018;2018:6984948.

43.

Teixidó

Vilariño

Reyes

Reguart

. PD-L1 expression testing in non-small cell lung cancer. Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2018;10:1758835918763493.

44.

Lim

Lee

Gide

Menzies

Guminski

Carlino

Breen

Yang

JYH

Ghazanfar

Kefford

Scolyer

, et al. Circulating cytokines predict immune-related toxicity in melanoma patients receiving anti-PD-1-based immunotherapy. Clin Cancer Res. 2019;25(5):1557–1563.

45.

Harding

Moreno

Bang

Hong

Patnaik

Trigo

Szpurka

Yamamoto

Doi

Calderon

, et al. Blocking TIM-3 in treatment-refractory advanced solid tumors: a phase Ia/b study of LY3321367 with or without an Anti-PD-L1 antibody. Clin Cancer Res. 2021;27(8):2168–2178.

46.

Takeda

Kataoka

Yamagishi

Ogawa

Seya

Matsumoto

. A TLR3-specific adjuvant relieves innate resistance to PD-L1 blockade without cytokine toxicity in tumor vaccine immunotherapy. Cell Rep. 2017;19(9):1874–1887.

47.

Alexander

Wilson

Teare

Marchesi

Nicholson

Kinross

. Gut microbiota modulation of chemotherapy efficacy and toxicity. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017;14(6):356–365.

48.

Yuan

Huang

Chen

. The emerging treatment landscape of targeted therapy in non-small-cell lung cancer. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2019;4:61.

49.

Chen

Xia

Wang

Zhang

Wang

Fang

Zhang

Dong

, et al. Long noncoding RNA SBF2-AS1 Is critical for tumorigenesis of early-stage lung adenocarcinoma. Mol Ther Nucleic Acids. 2019;16:543–553.

50.

Akinleye

Rasool

. Immune checkpoint inhibitors of PD-L1 as cancer therapeutics. J Hematol Oncol. 2019;12(1):92.

51.

Mezquita

Planchard

. Durvalumab for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer. Expert Rev Respir Med. 2018;12(8):627–639.

52.

Chen

. Immune checkpoint inhibitors for nonsmall cell lung cancer treatment. J Chin Med Assoc. 2017;80(1):7–14.

53.

Sezer

Gogishvili

Bentsion

Kilickap

Lowczak

Gumus

Gladkov

Clingan

Sriuranpong

Rizvi

Lee

, et al. P2.01-01 cemiplimab, a human pd-1 monoclonal antibody, versus chemotherapy in first-line treatment of advanced NSCLC with PD-L1 ≥50%. J Thoracic Oncology. 2019;14(10):S638.

54.

Fehrenbacher

Spira

Ballinger

Kowanetz

Vansteenkiste

Mazieres

Park

Smith

Artal-Cortes

Lewanski

Braiteh

, et al. Atezolizumab versus docetaxel for patients with previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer (POPLAR): a multicentre, open-label, phase 2 randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2016;387(10030):1837–1846.

55.

Rittmeyer

Barlesi

Waterkamp

Park

Ciardiello

von Pawel

Gadgeel

Hida

Kowalski

Dols

Cortinovis

, et al. Atezolizumab versus docetaxel in patients with previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer (OAK): a phase 3, open-label, multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2017;389(10066):255–265.

56.

Barlesi

Vansteenkiste

Spigel

Ishii

Garassino

de Marinis

Özgüroğlu

Szczesna

Polychronis

Uslu

Krzakowski

, et al. Avelumab versus docetaxel in patients with platinum-treated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (JAVELIN Lung 200): an open-label, randomised, phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol. 2018;19(11):1468–1479.

57.

Rizvi

Lee

Curtis

Caldwell

Gao

Rietschel

P3.04-25 EMPOWER-Lung 3: a phase 3 study of Cemiplimab, Ipilimumab and Chemotherapy in advanced NSCLC with PD-L1 <50%. J Thoracic Oncology. 2018;13(10):S931.

58.

Rizvi

Mazières

Planchard

Stinchcombe

Antonia

Horn

Lena

Minenza

Mennecier

Otterson

, et al. Activity and safety of nivolumab, an anti-PD-1 immune checkpoint inhibitor, for patients with advanced, refractory squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (CheckMate 063): a phase 2, single-arm trial. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16(3):257–265.

59.

Kazandjian

Suzman

Blumenthal

Mushti

Libeg

Keegan

Pazdur

. FDA approval summary: nivolumab for the treatment of metastatic non-small cell lung cancer with progression on or after platinum-based chemotherapy. Oncologist. 2016;21(5):634–642.

60.

Wrangle

Velcheti

Patel

Garrett-Mayer

Hill

Ravenel

Miller

Farhad

Anderton

Lindsey

Taffaro-Neskey

, et al. ALT-803, an IL-15 superagonist, in combination with nivolumab in patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer: a non-randomised, open-label, phase 1b trial. Lancet Oncol. 2018;19(5):694–704.

61.

Eichhorn

Klotz

Bischoff

Thomas

Lasitschka

Winter

Hoffmann

Eichhorn

. Neoadjuvant anti-programmed death-1 immunotherapy by Pembrolizumab in resectable nodal positive stage II/IIIa non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC): the NEOMUN trial. BMC Cancer. 2019;19(1):413.

62.

Gubens

Sequist

Stevenson

Powell

Villaruz

Gadgeel

Langer

Patnaik

Borghaei

Jalal

Fiore

, et al. Pembrolizumab in combination with ipilimumab as second-line or later therapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: KEYNOTE-021 cohorts D and H. Lung Cancer. 2019;130:59–66.

63.

Puzanov

Diab

Abdallah

Bingham

3rd Brogdon

Dadu

Hamad

Kim

Lacouture

LeBoeuf

Lenihan

, et al. Managing toxicities associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: consensus recommendations from the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) Toxicity Management Working Group. J Immunother Cancer. 2017;5(1):95.

64.

Abu-Sbeih

Ali

Wang

. Immune-checkpoint inhibitors induced diarrhea and colitis: a review of incidence, pathogenesis and management. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2020;36(1):25–32.

65.

Kuo

Davis

Rodriguez

Vela

Heigh

Salomao

Gurudu

. Severe diarrhea in the setting of immune checkpoint inhibitors. Case Rep Gastroenterol. 2018;12(3):704–708.

66.

Miyawaki

Kenmotsu

. [Pneumonitis Induced by Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors]. Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 2018;45(7):1021–1026.

67.

Patel

Pacha

. Skin reactions to immune checkpoint inhibitors. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2018;995:117–129.

68.

Sibaud

Dermatologic reactions to immune checkpoint inhibitors: skin toxicities and immunotherapy. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2018;19(3):345–361.

69.

Shankar

Naidoo

. PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitor toxicities in non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Dis. 2018;10(Suppl 33):S4034–S4037.

70.

Qin

Cao

Chen

Song

Han

Guo

Yang

Yan

, et al. Long Noncoding RNA p53-stabilizing and activating RNA promotes p53 signaling by inhibiting heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein K deSUMOylation and suppresses hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology. 2020;71(1):112–129.

71.

Rozali

Hato

Robinson

Lake

Lesterhuis

. Programmed death ligand 2 in cancer-induced immune suppression. Clin Dev Immunol. 2012;2012:656340.

72.

Akamine

Toyokawa

Tagawa

Seto

. Atezolizumab in non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Dis. 2018;10(Suppl 26):S3155–S3159.

73.

Spagnuolo

Gridelli

. ″Comparison of the toxicity profile of PD-1 versus PD-L1 inhibitors in non-small cell lung cancer″: is there a substantial difference or not™ J Thorac Dis. 2018;10(Suppl 33):S4065–S4068.

74.

Gil-Bazo

. Avelumab-a new programmed death-ligand 1 inhibitor against advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2017;6(Suppl 1):S35–S38.

75.

Rotte

. Combination of CTLA-4 and PD-1 blockers for treatment of cancer. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2019;38(1):255.

76.

Hellmann

Rizvi

Goldman

Gettinger

Borghaei

Brahmer

Ready

Gerber

Chow

Juergens

Shepherd

, et al. Nivolumab plus ipilimumab as first-line treatment for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (CheckMate 012): results of an open-label, phase 1, multicohort study. Lancet Oncol. 2017;18(1):31–41.

77.

Rizvi

Hellmann

Brahmer

Juergens

Borghaei

Gettinger

Chow

Gerber

Laurie

Goldman

Shepherd

, et al. Nivolumab in combination with platinum-based doublet chemotherapy for first-line treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34(25):2969–2979.

78.

Grigg

Rizvi

. PD-L1 biomarker testing for non-small cell lung cancer: truth or fiction™ J Immunother Cancer. 2016;4:48.

79.

Möller

Turzer

Schütte

Seliger

Riemann

. Blood immune cell biomarkers in patient with lung cancer undergoing treatment with checkpoint blockade. J Immunother. 2020;43(2):57–66.

80.

Cortellini

Vitale

De Galitiis

Di Pietro

Berardi

Torniai

De Tursi

Grassadonia

Di Marino

Santini

Zeppola

, et al. Early fatigue in cancer patients receiving PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitors: an insight from clinical practice. J Transl Med. 2019;17(1):376.

81.

Kamińska-Winciorek

Cybulska-Stopa

Lugowska

Ziobro

Rutkowski

. Principles of prophylactic and therapeutic management of skin toxicity during treatment with checkpoint inhibitors. Postepy Dermatol Alergol. 2019;36(4):382–391.

82.

Kennedy

Salama

AKS

. A review of immune-mediated adverse events in melanoma. Oncol Ther. 2019;7(2):101–120.

83.

Chen

Huang

Chien-Chia Wu

Chang

Chen

Chuang

Chu

. Cardiovascular toxicity of immune checkpoint inhibitors in cancer patients: a review when cardiology meets immuno-oncology. J Formos Med Assoc. 2020;119(10):1461–1475.

84.

Varricchi

Marone

Mercurio

Galdiero

Bonaduce

Tocchetti

. Immune checkpoint inhibitors and cardiac toxicity: an emerging issue. Curr Med Chem. 2018;25(11):1327–1339.

85.

Sato

Imamura

Sakata

Ikeda

Horio

Iyama

Akaike

Hamada

Jodai

Nakashima

Ishizuka

, et al. Disorder of coagulation-fibrinolysis system: an emerging toxicity of Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 monoclonal antibodies. J Clin Med. 2019;8(6): 762.

86.

Wei

Luo

Risk of gastrointestinal toxicities with PD-1 inhibitors in cancer patients: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017;96(48): e8931.

87.

Wang

Shen

. Management of gastrointestinal adverse events induced by immune-checkpoint inhibitors. Chronic Dis Transl Med. 2018;4(1):1–7.

88.

Onuki

Morita

Sakamoto

Nagai

Sata

Hagiwara

. Severe upper gastrointestinal disorders in pembrolizumab-treated non-small cell lung cancer patient. Respirol Case Rep. 2018;6(6):e00334.

89.

Ferrari

Fallahi

Elia

Ragusa

Ruffilli

Patrizio

Galdiero

Baldini

Ulisse

Marone

Antonelli

. Autoimmune endocrine dysfunctions associated with cancer immunotherapies. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(10):2560.

90.

Remon

Mezquita

Corral

Vilariño

Reguart

. Immune-related adverse events with immune checkpoint inhibitors in thoracic malignancies: focusing on non-small cell lung cancer patients. J Thorac Dis. 2018;10(Suppl 13):S1516–s1533.

91.

Zugazagoitia

Molina-Pinelo

Lopez-Rios

Paz-Ares

. Biological therapies in nonsmall cell lung cancer. Eur Respir J. 2017;49(3): 1601520.

92.

Mirabile

Brioschi

Ducceschi

Piva

Lazzari

Bulotta

Viganò

Petrella

Gianni

Gregorc

. PD-1 Inhibitors-related neurological toxicities in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer: A literature review. Cancers (Basel). 2019;11(3):296.

93.

Michot

Bigenwald

Champiat

Collins

Carbonnel

Postel-Vinay

Berdelou

Varga

Bahleda

Hollebecque

Massard

, et al. Immune-related adverse events with immune checkpoint blockade: A comprehensive review. Eur J Cancer. 2016;54:139–148.

94.

Lee

Gardner

Porter

Louis

Ahmed

Jensen

Grupp

Mackall

. Current concepts in the diagnosis and management of cytokine release syndrome. Blood. 2014;124(2):188–195.

95.

Tsui

DWY

Murtaza

Wong

ASC

Rueda

Smith

Chandrananda

Soo

Lim

Goh

Caldas

Forshew

, et al. Dynamics of multiple resistance mechanisms in plasma DNA during EGFR-targeted therapies in non-small cell lung cancer. EMBO Mol Med. 2018;10(6):e7945.

96.

Sacher

Gandhi

. PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors in advanced non-small cell lung cancer—promising agents and evolving questions. Oncology & Hematology Review (US). 2015;11(1):36.

97.

Lee

Kim

Sim

Heo

Song

Park

Bang

Park

Lee

, et al. Expansion of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and their potential for application as adoptive cell transfer therapy in human breast cancer. Oncotarget. 2017;8(69):113345–113359.

98.

García-Martínez

Gil

Benito

González-Billalabeitia

Conesa

García García

García-Garre

Vicente

Ayala de la Peña

. Tumor-infiltrating immune cell profiles and their change after neoadjuvant chemotherapy predict response and prognosis of breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. 2014;16(6):488.

99.

Trinh

Gowani

La-Beck

. Management of immune-related adverse events associated with immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy: a minireview of current clinical guidelines. Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs. 2019;6(2):154–160.

100.

Fessas

Possamai

Clark

Daniels

Gudd

Mullish

Alexander

Pinato

. Immunotoxicity from checkpoint inhibitor therapy: clinical features and underlying mechanisms. Immunology. 2020;159(2):167–177.

101.

Zhang

Zhou

Ding

Jin

Cui

Zhu

. Peptide blocking of PD-1/PD-L1 interaction for cancer immunotherapy. Cancer Immunol Res. 2018;6(2):178–188.

102.

Chang

Liu

Zhou

Chen

Pan

Zhou

, et al. Blocking of the PD-1/PD-L1 interaction by a D-Peptide antagonist for cancer immunotherapy. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2015;54(40):11760–11764.

103.

Caldwell

Jr Johnson

Balaji

Hammer

Kannan

. Identification and validation of a PD-L1 binding peptide for determination of PDL1 expression in tumors. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):13682.

104.

Rafiq

Yeku

Jackson

Purdon

van Leeuwen

Drakes

Song

Miele

Wang

Yan

, et al. Targeted delivery of a PD-1-blocking scFv by CAR-T cells enhances anti-tumor efficacy in vivo. Nat Biotechnol. 2018;36(9):847–856.

105.

Craig

Juan-Luis

L-V

Victor

Celine

Alex

Navina

Thibaut

Line

E-L

Madeleine

Khalid

Raphael

, et al. Novel anti-PD-1 antibodies not acting through PD-1/pdl-1 blockade that enhance tumor clearance. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36(15_suppl):e15118–e15118.

106.

Arlauckas

Garris

Kohler

Kitaoka

Cuccarese

Yang

Miller

Carlson

Freeman

Anthony

Weissleder

, et al. In vivo imaging reveals a tumor-associated macrophage-mediated resistance pathway in anti-PD-1 therapy. Sci Transl Med. 2017;9(389):eaal3604.

107.

Gopalakrishnan

Spencer

Nezi

Reuben

Andrews

Karpinets

Prieto

Vicente

Hoffman

Wei

Cogdill

, et al. Gut microbiome modulates response to anti-PD-1 immunotherapy in melanoma patients. Science. 2018;359(6371):97–103.

108.

Zhang

Leighl

Zhong

. Emerging therapies for non-small cell lung cancer. J Hematol Oncol. 2019;12(1):45.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.02 MB