MST (Movimento Sem Terra/Landless People’s Movement) is the largest rural movement of Latin America. Since the late 1990s, it has taken part in the diffusion of expertise about biodiversity conservation. Using an ethnographic approach, this paper investigates sources and roles of trust within this process. How does trust work when experts and laypeople belong to the same movement? The paper uses and critically discusses the works of Brian Wynne and the Actor Network Theory. It describes the particular ways in which the building of trust takes place within the intimate networks of MST. As ecological expertise becomes a central element within MST’s project of liberation, the sources of trust are both affective and effective. Interests, social recognition and identity are intertwined. In the conclusion, I propose the concept of activist trust.
Agrawal, A. ( 2005) Environmentality: Technologies of Government and the Making of Subjects. London: Duke University Press.
2.
Akrich, M., Callon, M. and Latour, B. ( 2002) "The Key Success in Innovation, Parts I and II ," International Journal of Innovation Management6(2): 187-206, 207-25.
3.
Alonso, A., Costa, V. and Maciel, D. ( 2005) "The Formation of the Brazilian Environmental Movement " URL: www.edis.org
4.
Beck, U. ( 1996) The Reinvention of Politics: Rethinking Modernity in the Global Social Order. Cambridge: Polity Press.
5.
Callon, M. ( 1999a) "Some Elements of Sociology of Translation: Domestication of the Scallops and the Fishermen of Saint Brieuc Bay," in M. Biagioli (ed.) The Science Studies Reader , pp. 67-83. London and New York: Routledge .
6.
Callon, M. ( 1999b) "The Role of Lay People in the Production and Dissemination of Scientific Knowledge," Science, Technology and Society4(1): 81-94.
7.
Callon, M. and Licoppe, C. ( 2000) "La Confiance et ses Regimes: quelques Lecons Tirées de l’Historie des Sciences," in R. Laufer and M. Orillard (eds) La confiance en question, pp. 133-54. Paris: L’Harmattan.
8.
Carolan, M.R. ( 2006a) "Ecological Representation in Deliberation: The Contribution of Tactile Spaces," Environmental Politics15(3): 345-61.
9.
Carolan, M.R. ( 2006b) "Social Change and the Adoption and Adaptation of Knowledge Claims: Whose Truth do You Trust in Regard to Sustainable Agriculture? ," Agriculture and Human Values23(3): 325-39.
10.
Collins, H.M. ( 1988) "Public Experiments and Displays of Virtuosity: The Core-Set Revisited," Social Studies of Science18: 725-48.
11.
Dear, P. ( 2004) "Mysteries of State, Mysteries of Nature: Authority, Knowledge and Expertise in the Seventeenth Century," in S. Jasanoff (ed.) States of Knowledge: The Co-Production of Science and the Social Order, pp. 206-25. London : Routledge.
12.
Delgado, A. ( 2005) "La Antropología en el Debate sobre los Derechos de Protección intellectual del Conocimiento sobre la Vida ," in D. Florido del Corral and J.P. Fernandez (eds) Áreas Protegidas, Poblaciones Locales y Sustentabilidad, pp. 243-56. Sevilla: el Monte.
13.
Edelman, M. ( 2001) "Social Movements: Changing Paradigms and Forms of Politics ," Annual Review of Anthropology30: 285-317.
14.
Eden, S., Donalson, A. and Walker, G. ( 2006) "Green Groups and Grey Areas: Scientific Boundary-Boundary Work, Nongovernmental Organizations, and Environmental Knowledge," Environment and Planning38: 1061-76.
15.
Escobar, A. ( 1998) "Whose Nature, Whose Knowledge? Biodiversity, Conservation, and the Political Ecology of Social Movements," Journal of Political Ecology5: 53-82.
16.
Escobar, A. ( 1999) "After Nature: Steps to an Antiessentialist Political Ecology," Current Anthropology40: 1-30.
17.
Forsyth, T. ( 2004) "Social Movements and Environmental Democratization in Thailand," in S. Jasanoff and M.L. Martello (eds) Earthly Politics: Local and Global Environmental Governance, pp. 195-217. Cambridge, MA : MIT Press.
18.
Francis, C., Lieblein, G., Gliessman, S., Breland, T.A., Creamer, N. and Hardwood, R. ( 2003) "Agroecology: The Ecology of Food Systems," Journal of Sustainable Agriculture22(3): 99-118.
19.
Fujimura, J.H. ( 1992) "Crafting Science: Standardized Packages, Boundary Objects and ‘Translation’," in A. Pickering (ed.) Science, Practice and Culture, pp. 168-211. Chicago : University of Chicago Press.
20.
Giddens, A. ( 1990) The Consequences of Modernity. Stanford : Stanford University Press.
21.
Granovetter, M. ( 1973) "The Strength of Weak Ties," American Journal of Sociology78(6): 1360-80.
22.
Gutteling, J., Hanssen, N., van der Veer, N. and Seydel, E. ( 2006) "Trust in Governance and the Acceptance of Genetically Modified Food in the Netherlands,"Public Understanding of Science15: 103-12.
23.
Habers, H. ( 2004) "Trust in Politics, Science and Technology: Breaching the Modernist Constitution," in F. Ankersmit and H. te Velde (eds) Trust: Cement of Democracy, pp. 145-73. Paris: Peeters.
24.
Harriss, J. ( 2003) "Widening the Radius of Trust: Ethnographic Explorations of Trust and Indian Business," Royal Anthropological Institute9: 755-73.
25.
Irwin, A. and Michael, M. ( 2003) Science, Social Theory and Public Knowledge. Philadelphia: Open University Press.
26.
Jasanoff, S. (ed.) (2004) States of Knowledge: The Co-Production of Science and Social Order. London: Routledge.
27.
Jasanoff, S. ( 2005) Designs on Nature: Science and Democracy in Europe and the United States. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
28.
Jasanoff, S. and Martello, M.L. (eds) (2004) Earthly Politics: Local and Global Environmental Governance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
29.
Lash, S. ( 1994) "Reflexivity and its Doubles: Structures, Aesthetics and Politics," in U. Beck, A. Giddens and S. Lash (eds) Reflexive Modernization: Politics, Tradition and Aesthetics in the Modern Social Order, pp. 110-74. Cambridge: Polity Press.
30.
Latour, B. ( 1987) Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
31.
Latour, B. ( 1993) The Pasteurization of France. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
32.
Latour, B. and Woolgar, S. ( 1979) Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts. London: SAGE.
33.
Law, J. and Hassard, J. (eds) (1999) Actor Network Theory and After . Oxford: Blackwell.
34.
Leach, M. and Scoones, I. ( 2007) "Mobilizing Citizens: Social Movements and the Politics of Knowledge," Working paper 276. Brighton: Institute of Development Studies, University of Sussex.
35.
Leach, M., Scoones, I. and Wynne, B. (eds) ( 2005) Science and Citizens: Globalization and the Challenge of Engagement. London: Zed Books .
36.
Lidskog, R. and Sundqvist, R. ( 2004) "From Consensus to Credibility: New Challenges for Policy-relevant Science," Innovation12(3): 204-26.
37.
Luke, T. ( 1999) "Training Eco-Managerialists: Academic Environmental Studies as a Power/Knowledge Formation," in F. Fischer and M. Hajer (eds) Living with Nature: Environmental Discourse as Cultural Politics , pp. 103- 20. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
38.
Martins de Carvalho, H. ( 2003) Sementes Patrimônio do Povo a Serviço da Humanidade. São Paulo: Expressão popular.
39.
Masseli, M. ( 1997) Extensão Rural Entre os Sem-Terra. São Paulo: UNIMEP.
40.
Miller, C. and Edwards, P. (eds) (2001) Changing the Atmosphere: Expert Knowledge and Environmental Governance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
41.
MST (2005) Sementes Património dos Povos a Serviço da Humanidade. Pontocom: São Paulo.
42.
Novaes, R. ( 1997) De Corpo e Alma. Catolicismo, Classes Sociais e Conflitos no Campo. Rio de Janeiro: Graphia Editoria.
43.
Nowotny, H., Scott, P. and Gibbons, M. ( 2001) Rethinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in the Age of Uncertainty. London: Polity Press .
44.
Poortinga, W. and Pidgeon, N.F. ( 2003) "Exploring the Dimensionality of Trust in Risk Regulation ," Risk Analysis23(5): 961-72.
45.
Porter, T. ( 1995) Trust in Numbers: The Pursuit of Objectivity in Science and Public Life. New York: Princeton University Press.
46.
Shapin, S. ( 1994) Social History of Truth: Civility and Science in Seventeenth-Century . Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
47.
Shapin, S. and Schaffer, S. ( 1985) Leviathan and the Air Pump: Boyle, Hobbes and the Experimental Life. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
48.
Siegrist, M., Cvetkovich, G. and Roth, C. ( 2000) "Salient Value Similarity, Social Trust, and Risk/Benefit Perception" Risk Analysis20(3): 353-62.
49.
Stedile, J.P. and Fernandes, B.M. ( 2003) Brava Gente, la Trayectoria del MST y la Lucha por la Tierra en Brasil. Buenos Aires: Barbarroja.
50.
Strathern, M. ( 2002) "Externalities in Comparative Guise," Economy and Society2(31): 250-67.
51.
Szerszynski, B. ( 1999) "Risk and Trust, the Performative Dimension," Environmental Values8: 239-52.
52.
Velho, G. and Kuschmir, K. (eds) (1996) "Mediação e Metamorfose ," Mana: Estudos de Antropologia Social2(1): 97-107.
53.
Velho, G. and Kuschmir, K. (eds) (2001) Entre Mundos. Mediação, Cultura e Política. Río de Janeiro: Aeroplano editora.
54.
Vía Campesina-Brazil (2003) Subsídios para Implementar a Campanha das Sementes. São Paulo: Vía Campesina .
55.
Wright, A. and Wolford, W. ( 2003) To Inherit the Earth: The Landless Movement and the Struggle for a New Brazil. Oakland: Food First Books.
56.
Wynne, B. ( 1991) "Knowledges in Context," Science, Technology and Human Values16(1): 111-21.
57.
Wynne, B. ( 1992) "Misunderstood Misunderstandings: Social Identities and Public Uptake of Science," Public Understanding of Science1: 281-304.
58.
Wynne, B. ( 1995) "Public Understanding of Science," in S. Jasanoff, G. Markle, J. Peterson and T. Pinch (eds) Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, pp. 361-88. London: SAGE.
59.
Wynne, B. ( 1996) "May the Sheep Safely Graze? A Reflexive View of the Expert-Lay Knowledge Divide," in S. Lash, B. Szerszynski and B. Wynne (eds) Risk, Environment and Modernity: Towards a New Ecology, pp. 44-84. London: SAGE.
60.
Wynne, B. ( 2005) "Reflexing Complexity: Post-Genomic Knowledge and Reductionist Returns in Public Science," Theory, Culture and Society22(5): 67-94.
61.
Ziman, J. ( 2002) Real Science: What It Is, and What It Means. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
