This paper explores methodologically and theoretically how to understand variations in the temporal performances of showering as a practice-as-entity. Time-based data on domestic hot water consumption in 134 Danish households show distinctly different patterns, where some households exhibit highest consumption in the morning and others in the evening. This temporal pattern of showering is analysed based on an innovative combination of statistical cluster analysis and qualitative interviews. Focus is on the timing of showering related to sequences of other everyday practices, and to the rules, meanings and dispositions guiding this practice. From a sustainability perspective, the consumption of water and energy entailed by showering is problematic, and with increasingly intermittent renewable energy production, the timing of showering also becomes an issue. The study demonstrates that the time of showering is closely related to sequences of different practices, that dispositions and socio-demographics influence the order of sequences, and that meanings of showering may vary accordingly. However, there are also common meanings and rules related to showering across these variations, which contribute to the formation of showering as a practice-as-entity.
BourdieuP (1986) Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. 1 ed.
London: Routledge.
2.
BrowneALPullingerMMeddW, et al. (2014)
Patterns of practice: A reflection on the development of quantitative/mixed methodologies capturing everyday life related to water consumption in the UK.International Journal of Social Research Methodology17: 27–43.
3.
ChristensenTHGram-HanssenKFriisF (2013) Households in the smart grid: Existing knowledge and new approaches. In: The 2nd Nordic conference on consumer research 2012, Centre for Consumer Science, University of Gothenburg 30 May–1 June 2012.
4.
ChristensenTHRøpkeI (2010) Can practice theory inspire studies of ICTs in everyday life? In: BräuchlerBPostillJ (eds) Theorising Media and Practice. Oxford and New York :
Berghahn, pp. 235–256.
5.
Do CarmoCMRChristensenTH (2016)
Cluster analysis of residential heat load profiles and the role of technical and household characteristics.Energy and Buildings125: 171–180.
6.
FlyvbjergB (2006)
Five misunderstandings about case-study research.Qualitative Inquiry12: 219–245.
7.
FriisFChristensenTH (2016)
The challenge of time shifting energy demand practices: Insights from Denmark.Energy Research & Social Science19: 124–133.
8.
FuentesEArceLSalomJ (2018)
A review of domestic hot water consumption profiles for application in systems and buildings energy performance analysis.Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews81: 1530–1547.
Gram-HanssenK (2011)
Understanding change and continuity in residential energy consumption.Journal of Consumer Culture11: 61–78.
11.
Gram-HanssenK (2014)
New needs for better understanding of household’s energy consumption – Behaviour, lifestyle or practices?Architectural Engineering & Design Management10: 91–107.
12.
Gram-HanssenK (2015) Housing in a sustainable consumption perspective. In: RThøgersen (ed.) Handbook of Research on Sustainable Consumption. Cheltenham UK and Northampton, USA:
Edward Elgar Publishing Inc.
13.
HandMShoveESouthertonD (2005) Explaining showering: A discussion of the material, conventional, and temporal dimensions of practice. Available at: www.socresonline.org.uk.zorac.aub.aau.dk/10/2/hand.html (accessed 27 May 2014).
14.
HansenAR (2016)
The social structure of heat consumption in Denmark: New interpretations from quantitative analysis.Energy Research & Social Science11: 109–118.
15.
HansenARGram-HanssenKKnudsenHN (2018)
How building design and technologies influence heat-related habits.Building Research & Information46: 83–98.
16.
HitchingsRBrowneAJackT (2018)
Should there be more showers at the summer music festival? Studying the contextual dependence of resource consuming conventions and lessons for sustainable tourism.Journal of Sustainable Tourism26: 496–514.
17.
JacobsenMH (2016) Social bases of material consumption: The relationship between social groups and possession of household appliances in Denmark. Journal of Consumer Culture. doi: 10.1177/1469540516684190.
18.
KuijerLWatsonM (2017)
‘That’s when we started using the living room’: Lessons from a local history of domestic heating in the United Kingdom.Energy Research & Social Science28: 77–85.
19.
PalmJEllegårdKHellgrenM (2018)
A cluster analysis of energy-consuming activities in everyday life.Building Research and Information46: 99–113.
20.
PantzarMShoveE (2010)
Temporal rhythms as outcomes of social practices. Ethnologia Europaes40: 19–29.
21.
Pérez-LombardLOrtizJPoutC (2008)
A review on buildings energy consumption information.Energy and Buildings40: 394–398.
22.
RamosSDuarteJMDuarteFJ, et al. (2015)
A data-mining-based methodology to support MV electricity customers’ characterization.Energy and Buildings91: 16–25.
23.
ReckwitzA (2002)
Toward a theory of social practices a development in culturalist theorizing.European Journal of Social Theory5: 243–263.
24.
RøpkeI (2009)
Theories of practice – New inspiration for ecological economic studies on consumption.Ecological Economics68: 2490–2497.
25.
RøpkeIChristensenTHJensenJO (2010)
Information and communication technologies – A new round of household electrification.Energy Policy, Energy Security – Concepts and Indicators with Regular Papers38: 1764–1773.
26.
SchatzkiTR (1996) Social Practices: A Wittgensteinian Approach to Human Activity and the Social.
Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
27.
SchatzkiTR (2002) The Site of the Social: A Philosophical Account of the Constitution of Social Life and Change.
University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
28.
ShoveE (2003) Comfort, Cleanliness and Convenience: The Social Organization of Normality.
Oxford:
Berg.
29.
ShoveE (2009) Everyday practices and the production and consumption of time. In: ShoveETrentmannFWilkR (eds) Time, Consumption and Everyday Life. Practice, Materiality and Culture.
Oxford and New York:
Berg, pp.17–31.
30.
ShoveEPantzarMWatsonM (2012) The Dynamics of Social Practice Everyday Life and How it Changes.
London:
SAGE.
31.
ShoveETrentmannFWilkR (2009) Time, Consumption and Everyday Life. Practice, Materiality and Culture.
Oxford and New York:
Berg.
32.
SouthertonD (2003)
‘Squeezing Time’: Allocating practices, coordinating networks and scheduling society. Time & Society12: 5–25.
33.
SouthertonD (2006)
Analysing the temporal organization of daily life: Social constraints, practices and their allocation.Sociology40: 435–454.
34.
SouthertonD (2013)
Habits, routines and temporalities of consumption: From individual behaviours to the reproduction of everyday practices.Time & Society22: 335–355.
35.
SouthertonDOlsenWWardeA, et al. (2012)
Practices and trajectories: A comparative analysis of reading in France, Norway, the Netherlands, the UK and the USA.Journal of Consumer Culture12: 237–262. doi: 10.1177/1469540512456920.
36.
SouthertonDTomlinsonM (2005)
“Pressed for time” – The differential impacts of a “time squeeze.”Sociological Review53: 215–239.
37.
StrengersY (2011)
Beyond demand management: Co-managing energy and water practices with Australian households.Policy Studies32: 35–58.
38.
WalkerG (2014)
The dynamics of energy demand: Change, rhythm and synchronicity.Energy Research & Social Science1: 49–55.
39.
WardeA (2014)
After taste: Culture, consumption and theories of practice.Journal of Consumer Culture14: 279–303.
40.
WatsonM (2012)
How theories of practice can inform transition to a decarbonised transport system.Journal of Transport Geography24: 488–496.
