Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Purpose: The current investigation was carried out to evaluate the efficacy of myricetin in ethanol-induced liver toxicity in Wistar rats.

Research Design: Twenty-four rats were randomly divided into four groups with six animals per group. Group-I animals were administered with vehicle (distilled water), Group II, III, and IV were treated orally with sequential (per week) increase in the dose of ethanol (5, 8, 10, and 12 g/kg b wt per week in each group) for 28 days. Myricetin was treated orally to Group-III and IV animals at the respective doses of 25 mg/kg b wt. and 50 mg/kg b wt.

Results: Our results showed that myricetin prevented hepatotoxicity by modulating the production of free radicals, ethanol metabolizing enzymes, and inflammatory markers in vivo. Myricetin also helped maintain lipid membrane integrity, oxidant-antioxidant status, and histoarchitecture. Ethanol administration caused elevation in XO, ADH, and CYP2E1 in hepatic tissue, which significantly normalized with myricetin administration. After ethanol administration, there was a steep increase in the hepatotoxicity biomarkers, including ALT, MDA, and AST. The level of cytotoxicity marker LDH also increased after ethanol administration; myricetin administration decreased the level of all these markers. Moreover, myricetin treatment also reduced ethanol-induced inflammatory markers such as NF-κB and IL-6.

Conclusion: Findings from the current study demonstrate that myricetin administration prevents alcohol-induced hepatic injury by influencing the metabolism of ethanol, inhibiting oxidative stress, maintaining lipid profile, and suppressing inflammatory markers.

Keywords

myricetin oxidative stress hepatotoxicity ethanol inflammation

Introduction

Alcohol (ethanol or ethyl alcohol), a commonly consumed recreational beverage in most parts of the world, is a hepato-toxicant and a dependence-producing psychotropic substance.¹ Almost 50% population of the world consumes alcohol, and alcoholism increases a grave threat to public health as it leads to numerous physiological dysfunctions and pathological disorders that include hepatic, gastrointestinal, nervous, and cardiovascular injuries. Globally, alcohol consumption is as a major cause of advanced diseases, disability, and death which may result from liver damage.² The liver is an essential organ that performs various key metabolic activities to detoxify and depose several xenobiotics.^3,4 Ethanol is a xenobiotic metabolized primarily in the liver and therefore is the main target organ for damage done by ethanol. Exorbitant or chronic use of ethanol is responsible for developing a wide range of alcohol-induced liver diseases characterized by fatty liver, hyperlipidemia, inflammation of the liver, fibrosis, hepatic cirrhosis, malignant hepatoma, and liver failure.^5,6 Ethanol in the liver is first processed to acetaldehyde through a complex process of catabolic pathway and then into acetate involving the enzymes such as acetaldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH) and alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH).⁷ In hepatic cells, acetaldehyde, and acetate can form additional products with essential macro-molecules, for instance, proteins and DNA, thereby resulting in defective structure and debilitated liver functions. Moreover, the microsomal cytochrome P450 system (CYP2E1) of the liver also involved in its metabolism contributes to the induction of alcoholic toxicit.⁸

A study of the literature reveals that ethanol-induced oxidative stress contributes towards the etiology of alcohol-associated hepatic ailments by increasing the proinflammatory cytokine and chemokine expression, causing an increase in macrophage and neutrophil infiltration at the site of injury resulting in inflammation, necrosis, and apoptosis of hepatocytes.^9,10 Long-term ethanol exposure activates the microsomal cytochrome P450 system and potentiates CYP2E1 activity, which plays an essential part in reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation. These ROS molecules damage constituents of cells and disturb the balance between the generation of oxidants and their clearance through anti-oxidant protection system leading to oxidative stress and induction of lipid peroxidation.^11–14 The oxidation of mitochondrial proteins, lipids, and proteins triggers necrosis and apoptosis of hepatocytes enhancing disease progression and liver damage.¹⁵ In addition, several inflammatory cascades are triggered by oxidative stress, secondary to tissue damage, leading to massive cytokines production. Nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-κB), a transcription factor and its related pathways act as a central player in the proinflammatory cascade.¹⁶ The alcohol-induced liver disease triggers enhanced NF-κB signaling that in turn stimulates the expression of various other cytokines resulting in the inflammatory response.^17,18 Kupffer cell stimulation induced by ethanol promotes the expression of a range of proinflammatory cytokines for instance tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interleukin-1β (IL-1β), and interleukin-6 (IL-6) which are implicated in ethanol-induced liver injury.^19,20 TNF-α, the most important mediator of the mammalian proinflammatory response, has been documented to bring about apoptosis of hepatocytes and hepatic injury via cathepsin B-mediated pathway.²¹ Furthermore, IL-6 results in significant kupffer cell injuries through its reduced products, ADH, and ALDH activities due to chronic and excessive consumption of ethanol, resulting in severe liver cell damage.²²

Currently, naturally occurring compounds have gained tremendous research interest to mitigate and prevent diseases in humans. Flavonoids are natural compounds having widely distributed throughout the plant kingdom as secondary metabolites. One of the most extensively studied and well-recognized compounds is a plant-derived bioactive flavonol, myricetin that, has immense nutraceutical value. The flavonoid myricetin (3, 5, 7-trihydroxy-two-(3, 4, 5-trihydroxyphenyl) -4H-chrome-4-1, also known as arbutin, is a phenolic compound that is present abundantly in various fruits, berries, tea, nuts, red wine, vegetables, and various medicinal herbs.^23,24 Myricetin performs many critical biochemical and pharmacological functions, including potent anti-oxidant, anti-hypertensive, analgesic, antitumor, epigenetic modulation, antidiabetic, and anti-allergic anti-microbial, anti-inflammatory, and cardio/neuroprotective effects.^25,26 In addition, myricetin has the ability to control major cellular enzymatic functions. In foods containing oils and fats, myricetin is routinely used as a preservative to extend their shelf life, owing to its ability to prevent the oxidation of lipids. Numerous research studies to date have reported that myricetin plays a beneficial part in the protection against some degenerative diseases through scavenging free radicals, chelating metal ions, and enhancing endogenous defense system.²⁷ Myricetin exhibits its antioxidant function through oxidation of three classes of hydroxyl groups (3^′, 4^′, 5^′-position) bonded to its B ring, via interactions with various enzymes and receptors.²⁸ Myricetin has been reported to attenuate lipopolysaccharide (LPS) mediated cardiac injury through inhibition of the NF-κB pathway and inflammatory cytokines.²⁹ A large number of researchers have reported that compounds with antioxidant potential have a beneficial impact on ethanol-induced toxicity. Therefore, maintenance of hepatic antioxidant potential is believed to prevent the toxic effect of ethanol intake.^30-35

Materials and Methods

Chemicals

Bovine serum albumin (BSA), ethylene diamine tetraacetate (EDTA), 1-chloro-2,4-dinitrobenzene (CDNB), diosmin, flavine adenine dinucleotide (FAD), reduced glutathione (GSH), oxidized glutathione (GSSG), thiobarbituric acid (TBA), xanthine, 2,6-dicholorophenolindophenol, and ascorbic acid were obtained from Sigma Aldrich, USA. All chemicals used in this study were of the highest available quality.

Experimental procedure

The current study assessed the effectiveness of myricetin in protecting ethanol-induced hepatic injuries. The total number of rats procured and included in the study was twenty four. These rats were arbitrarily categorized into four groups with six animals per group. Group-I animals were administered with vehicle (distilled water) and this group was labeled as control Group I. Group II, III and IV were treated orally with sequential (per week) increase in dose of ethanol (5, 8, 10, and 12 g/kg b wt per week in each group) for 28 days. The sequential increase in dose/concentration of ethanol overcomes the tolerance produced by ethanol consumed at same dose. Oral myricetin treatment was given to Group-III and IV animals at the respective doses of 25 mg/kg b wt. and 50 mg/kg b wt, one hour before ethanol administration. Animals were sacrificed after 28 days of ethanol administration through cervical displacement after being subjected to mild anesthetic treatment. The heart was punctured and the blood samples were collected for investigating different serological parameters. Samples of hepatic tissue were simultaneously obtained to study different biochemical parameters.

Preparation of post-mitochondrial supernatant, cytosolic, and microsomal fractions

The livers were taken out and subjected to ice-cold saline (0.85% sodium chloride) washing. Liver tissue homogenates (10%) were obtained in a buffer solution (10 mM Tris-HCl, 250 mM sucrose, pH 7.4), and nuclear debris was separated by centrifugation in Eltek refrigerated centrifuge for 10 min at 3000 rpm. The obtained aliquot was subjected to centrifugation for 20 min at 12,000 rpm to get PMS that served as the source of various enzymes. Ultra-centrifugation was carried out in the resulting supernatant for 1 h at 34,000 rpm to acquire a cytosolic fraction for assessing ADH activity - The obtained residue was washed with homogenizing buffer to attain microsomal fraction for CYP 2E1 activity. The whole process was done at 4°C.

Activity assessment of Catalase enzyme

Claiborne's method³⁶ was used to measure the activity of the catalase enzyme.

Assessment of lipid peroxidation

The lipid peroxidation (LPO) assay was performed by Wright et al. method.³⁷

Assessment of Glutathione (GSH)

The assessment of GSH was done with the protocol given by Jollow et al.³⁸

Activity assessment of Glutathione peroxidase (GPx)

GPx activity was evaluated using the method described by Mohandas et al.³⁹

Activity assessment of GR

Carlberg and Mannervik’s method⁴⁰ was used to determine the activity of GR.

Activity assessment of superoxide dismutase (SOD)

To measure the activity of SOD, the method given by Marklund & Marklund⁴¹ was used.

The activity of CYP 2E1

The method of Reinke and Moyer⁴² for estimating p-nitrophenol hydroxylation was used to analyze CPY2E1’s catalytic activity.

Activity assessment of ADH

Bonnichsen and Brink's method⁴³ was used to calculate the activity of ADH.

Activity assessment of serum ALT and AST

Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) activities were assessed by Reitman and Frankel’s method.⁴⁴

Activity assessment of lactate dehydrogenase

Korenberg's procedure⁴⁵ was used to determine the activity of serum lactate dehydrogenase.

Activity assessment of xanthine oxidase (XO)

The method given by Corte and Stirpe,⁴⁶ was employed in assessing the activity of XO.

Estimation of lipids

Commercially available kits (Cogent, Span diagnostics Ltd, India) were used to measure triglycerides (TGs), high density lipoproteins (HDL), low density lipoproteins (LDL), and total cholesterol (TC). The analysis was performed as per the guidelines offered by the manufacturer.⁴⁷

Estimation of Nitrites

Assay for estimation of nitrite was done by the method of Green et al.,⁴⁸

Assessment of level of cytokines and transcription factor (TNF-α, IL-6, and NF-κB)

The cytokine/ transcription factor levels (TNF-α, IL-6, and NF-κB) were estimated with an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kit (eBioscience, Inc., San Diego, USA). The sample preparation was done in phosphate buffer saline (1xPBS, pH, 7.4) that contained a protease inhibitor cocktail. ELISA Plate Reader was used to perform the analysis as directed by the manufacturer.

Protein Estimation

Lowry et al. method⁴⁹ was used to measure the protein content in each sample with BSA taken as standard.

Results

Myricetin-induced effects on ethanol metabolizing enzymes

In ethanol-treated mice, the induction of CYP2E1 was substantially higher than in control animals (p<0.001). Myricetin treatment at both dosages drastically re-established CYP2E1 levels (p<0.05, p<0.01), respectively (Figure 1(a)). In comparison to the control group, the liver tissue of the ethanol-treated group revealed a considerable (p<0.001) rise in ADH activity. The ethanol-induced activity of ADH was significantly reduced by myricetin at both dosages (p<0.05, p<0.05) (Figure 1(b)).

Figure 1.

Myricetin mitigates ethanol metabolizing enzyme CYP 2E1 and ADH activity in the liver. (a) Ethanol administration has been found to elevate CYP 2E1 activity group II, (***p<0.001). Myricetin administration at both the doses significantly restores the ethanolinduced CYP 2E1 activity in group III (#p<0.05) group IV (##p<0.01). Each value represents mean ± SEM. n=6. (b) Ethanol administration in group-II caused a significant increase in ADH activity (***p<0.001) compared to control group-I. Treatment with myricetin markedly restored ADH activity in group-III (#p<0.05) and group-IV (#p<0.05) as compared to group-II. Each value represents mean ± SEM. n=6.

Myricetin-induced effects on TC and TGs

The estimation of TC and TGs was done using a commercially available kit. Compared to the ethanol-treated group, low TC and TG levels were found in the control group (p<0.001, p<0.001). When compared to the ethanol-treated group, myricetin treatment at both dosages resulted in lower levels of TC (p<0.05, p<0.001), and TG (p<0.01, p<0.001) (Table 1).

Table 1.

Result of treatment of myricetin on serum lipid profile in ethanol administered rats

Treatment regimen per group	TC (mg/dl)	HDL (mg/dl)	LDL (mg/dl)	TG (mg/dl)
Group I	234.6 ± 17.2	61.10 ± 7.26	09.68 ± 1.01	124.6 ± 11.6
Group II	377.9 ± 21.4^^^*	32.55 ± 2.64^^^*	19.42 ± 2.56^^	156.9 ± 13.5^^^*
Group III	323.9 ± 22.6^#	45.37 ± 3.64^#^#	15.81 ± 1.11^#^#	139.7 ± 14.9^#^#
Group IV	249.1 ± 19.9^#^#^#	52.21 ± 4.64^#^#^#	11.63 ± 0.96^#^#^#	131.4 ± 14.7^#^#^#

Results represent mean ± SE of six animals per group. Results obtained are significantly different from Control group (^*^*^*p < 0.001). Results obtained are significantly different from ethanol treated group (^#p < 0.05), (^#^#p < 0.01) and (^#^#^#p < 0001). Group I: Control, Group II: Ethanol only, Group III: Ethanol + Myricetin 25 mg/kg/b wt, Group IV: Ethanol + Myricetin 50 mg/kg/b wt. TC: Total Cholesterol; HDL: High density lipoproteins; LDL: Low density lipoproteins, TG: Triglycerides

Myricetin-induced effects on the activity of XO and lipid peroxidation (hepatic-membrane damage)

The activity of hepatic XO was drastically elevated in the ethanol-inoculated group (p<0.001) than in the control group. Both of the doses of myricetin observed significant recovery in the XO activity (p<0.01, p<0.001) (Figure 2(a)). The production of MDA was quantified for assessment of hepatic oxidative damage in ethanol-inoculated Wistar rats. Compared to the control group, a substantial increase in ethanol-induced MDA production (p<0.001) was found in the ethanol-treated group. Our findings show that myricetin treatment significantly reinstated the integrity of the membrane, as depicted by a decrease in hepatic MDA levels (p<0.01, p<0.001) (Figure 2(b)).

Figure 2.

Effect of myricetin and ethanol administration on XO activity and MDA levels in the liver. (a) Ethanol administration has been found to elevate XO activity significantly (group II, (***p<0.001). Myricetin administration at both doses significantly restores the ethanol-induce XO activity in group III (##p<0.01) group IV (###p<0.001). (b). Ethanol administration in group II caused a significant increase (***p<0.001) in MDA levels compared to control group-I. Treatment with myricetin significantly decreased MDA levels in group-III (##p<0.01) and group-IV (###p<0.001) as compared to group-II. Each value represents mean ± SEM. n=6.

Myricetin-induced restoration of hepatic antioxidant activities

The levels of liver antioxidants including GR, GSH, SOD, catalase, and GPx were shown to decrease considerably after treatment with ethanol than the matching control group (p<0.001). Myricetin administration caused an increase in levels of GR (p<0.05), GSH (p>0.05), SOD level (p<0.05), catalase (p<0.01), and GPx (p<0.05). Higher myricetin dose more efficiently reinstated antioxidant enzyme levels viz. GR (p<0.001), GSH (p<0.001), and SOD (p<0.001), catalase (p<0.01), and GPx (0.001) (Table 2). Ethanol treatment markedly hampered GST activity (p<0.001), our finding showed that administration of myricetin significantly reinstated GST activity at both doses (p<0.01, p<0.001) (Table 2). The above results suggest that myricetin has antioxidant properties that counteract ethanol-induced hepatic oxidative stress.

Table 2.

Results of treatment of myricetin on antioxidant enzymes like GSH, GST, GR, XO, SOD, catalase and GPX on Ethanol induced redox imbalance.

Treatment regimen	GSH (nmol GSH/g tissue)	GST (nmol CDNB conjugate formed/min/mg protein)	GR (nm NADPH Oxidized/min/mg protein)	GPX (nmol NADPH Oxidized/min/ mg protein)	Catalase (nmol H2O2 consumed/min/mg protein)	GPSOD (IU/L)
Group I	15.34 ± 0.99	786.3 ± 47.8	164.8 ± 37.2	234.5 ± 18.5	49.66 ± 4.62	172.4 ± 15.3
Group II	9.62 ± 0.54^^^*	401.2 ± 33.1^^^*	101.7 ± 10.6^^^*	163.1 ± 30.2^^^*	26.09 ± 3.85^^^*	93.55 ± 11.7^^^*
Group III	11.31 ± 0.80^ns	533.4 ± 32.1^#	125.4 ± 13.9^#	195.1 ± 19.4^#	33.82 ± 2.79^#^#	33.82 ± 2.79^#^#
Group V	13.25 ± 1.81^#^#^#	677.9 ± 44.9^#^#^#	151.4 ± 18.2^#^#^#	218.6 ± 17.4^#^#^#	42.33 ± 3.86^#^#	163.8 ± 13.6^#^#^#

Results represent mean ± SE of six animals per group. Results obtained are significantly different from Control group (^*^*^*p < 0.001) Results obtained are significantly different from ethanol treated group (^#p < 0.05), (^#^#p < 0.01) and (^#^#^#p < 0001). Group I: Control, Group II: Ethanol only, Group III: Ethanol + Myricetin 25 mg/kg/b wt, Group IV: Ethanol + Myricetin 50 mg/kg/b wt

Myricetin-alleviated hepato-toxicity induced by ethanol

In groups treated with ethanol, a remarkable elevation was seen in serum levels of hepato-toxicity markers including ALT, LDH, and AST (P<0.001) than the control group (Figure 3(a)–(c)). Myricetin treatment significantly normalized all of the serum toxicity indicators, that is, ALT (p<0.05, p<0.001) (Figure 3(a)), LDH (p<0.01, p<0.001) (Figure 3(b)), and AST (p<0.05, p<0.001) (Figure 3(c)).

Figure 3.

Effect of myricetin and ethanol administration on liver toxicity marker ALT, LDH, and AST. (a) Ethanol administration in group-II caused a significant increase (***p<0.001) in the liver toxicity marker ALT level compared to control group-I. Treatment with myricetin significantly decreased level of ALT in group- III (#p<0.05) and group-IV (###p<0.001) as compared to group-II. Each value represents mean ± SEM. n=6. (b) Ethanol administration led to the cellular toxicity and resulted in the increase of LDH in group-II (***p<0.001) as compared to group I. Treatment with myricetin significantly decreased cytotoxicity in group III (##p<0.01) and group IV (###p<0.001) as compared to group-II. Each value represents mean ± SEM. n=6. (c) Ethanol administration in group-II caused a significant increase (***p<0.001) in the level of liver toxicity marker AST compared to control group-I. Treatment with myricetin significantly decreased the level of AST in group-III (#p<0.05) and group-IV (###p<0.001) as compared to group-II. Each value represents mean ± SEM. n=6.

Myricetin restored inflammatory biomarkers (NF-κB, IL-6, and TNF-α)

The levels of inflammatory biomarkers (NF-κB, IL-6, and TNF-α) in the serum of ethanol administered to rats were considerably (p<0.001) elevated than the control group. At both treatment doses, myricetin remarkably restored NF-κB level (p<0.05, p<0.001) (Figure 4(a)), TNFα level (p<0.01, p<0.001) (Figure 4(b)), and IL6 (p<0.05, p<0.001) (Figure 4(c)).

Figure 4.

Effect of myricetin and ethanol administration on some cytokines NF-κB levels. (a) Ethanol administration in group-II caused significant increase (***p<0.001) in NF-κB levels as compared to control group-I. Treatment with myricetin significantly decreased NF-κB levels in group-III (#p<0.05) and group-IV (###p<0.001) as compared to group-II. (b) Ethanol administration in group-II caused significant increase (***p<0.001) in TNF-α levels as compared to control group-I. Treatment with myricetin significantly decreased TNF-α levels in group-III (##p<0.01) and group-IV (###p<0.001) as compared to group-II. (c) Ethanol administration in group-II caused significant increase (***p<0.001) in IL-6 levels as compared to control group-I. Treatment with myricetin significantly decreased IL-6 levels in group-III (#p<0.05) and group-IV (###p<0.001) as compared to group-II. Each value represents mean ± SEM. n=6.

Myricetin reduced nitrite levels induced by ethanol

The groups administered with ethanol demonstrated a substantial rise in the levels of nitrites (p<0.001) in comparison to the control group (Figure 5). Both treatment doses of myricetin effectively restored the normal levels of nitrites (p<0.01, p<0.001) (Figure 5).

Figure 5.

Effect of myricetin and ethanol administration on nitrite levels. In ethanol administered group-II, the nitrite levels were significantly increased (***p<0.001) as compared to control group-I. Treatment with myricetin significantly attenuated nitrite levels in group III (#p<0.05) and group IV (##p<0.01) as compared to group-II. Each value represents mean ± SEM. n=6.

Myricetin prevented the pathological changes in hepatic tissue

The microscopic analysis of liver tissue slices from various treatment groups demonstrated evident alterations in comparison to liver tissue of the control group (Figure 6). Rats treated with ethanol exhibited a marked vacuolar degeneration and prominent necrosis around the central vein. Furthermore, as demonstrated by inflammatory cell infiltration, ethanol elicited an inflammatory reaction in the hepatic tissue around the central vein. On the other hand, both treatment doses of myricetin were shown to protect the hepatic histology from changes induced by ethanol (Figure 6).

Figure 6.

Effect of myricetin on ethanol induced histological changes in liver tissue of rats: Liver section of rat control group (group I) showing normal architecture. Ethanol-treated group showing inflammatory response around central vein with vacuolar degeneration and necrosis. Myricetin administration at both the doses (group-II and group-III) reveals lesser vacuolar degeneration and decreased inflammatory response around the central vein.

Discussion

Alcohol-associated disorders at present are one of the most taxing health problems linked to social and economic consequences. Alcohol consumption continues to persist as one of the most common and important reasons for chronic hepatic disorders across the globe.⁵⁰ Alcohol intake can disrupt the delicate equilibrium of the body’s pro and anti-oxidant mechanisms, resulting in oxidative stress. The generation of reactive oxygen metabolites, for instance hydroxyl radical (OH·), hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂), and superoxide (O₂^-·) in alcohol metabolism is the basic reason for alcohol-induced hepatic damage.⁵¹ ADH and CYP2E1 are the crucial enzymes that convert alcohol to cytotoxic acetaldehyde associated with dioxygen reduction into several ROS.⁵² Administration of myricetin significantly reduced the activities of these enzymes, thereby suppressing ROS-induced tissue damage caused by alcohol. Oxidation of alcohol by CYP2E1 and ADH also results in the production of NADH⁵³ which consequentially enhances the activity of XO.⁵⁴ The production of NADH is linked to the consumption of NADPH which subdues the GR-induced decrease of GSSG and consequently exhausts the content of GSH and other enzymes dependent on glutathione. GSSG suppresses cellular defense mechanisms and also enhances alcohol-associated oxidative stress and injury.⁵² Activation of XO leads to the generation of superoxide radicals using acetaldehyde as a substrate.⁵⁵ Myricetin administration significantly reduced XO activity and helped restore hepatic glutathione in ethanol-administered rats.

Additionally, antioxidant enzymes such as SOD and CAT have a prominent role in safeguarding cells from the damage caused by free radicals.^55-56 Administration of myricetin exhibited a marked increase in SOD and CAT activities in ethanol-administered rats. Furthermore, MDA is considered a biomarker for the evaluation of lipid peroxidation since it is generated by oxidation and degeneration of membrane lipids.⁵⁷ Therefore, the present study indicates the potential of myricetin as a hepatoprotective agent owing to its ability to maintain glutathione-dependent enzymatic systems and control free radical-mediated lipid peroxidation.

Alcohol stimulates the expression of inflammatory cytokines including, IL-6, IL-1β, and TNF-α. These cytokines further augment the generation of oxidants in the parenchyma of hepatic tissue and Kupffer cells resulting in their death due to necrosis.^57-59 In the current experiment, alcohol administration elevated inflammatory markers (TNF-α, IL-1β, NF-κB), leading to necrosis and injury of hepatic tissue. Moreover, myricetin administration was seen to attenuate these pro-inflammatory cytokines and markers of cell necrosis.⁶⁰ The present findings show that myricetin impedes the production of alcohol-mediated inflammatory cytokines, thereby preventing cytokine-mediated hepatic damage.

A significant correlation exists between cellular damage and enzyme secretion.⁶⁰ Levels of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), blood urea nitrogen (BUN), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), and creatinine in serum are the reliable indicators for assessing the hepatic function.⁶¹ Results of the current study show that chronic administration of alcohol leads to a rise in the indices of hepatic dysfunction (AST, LDH, ALT, creatinine, and BUN) which concur with the published references.^62,63 The rise in the activity of these serum biomarkers can be attributed to the escape of cytosolic enzymes into the circulation owing to damage of hepatic parenchyma, disruption in the enzyme synthesis machinery, and variation in membrane permeability.⁶⁴ Administration of myricetin led to restoration of ALT, AST, BUN, LDH, and creatinine levels in serum of ethanol-administered animals. This possibly occurs by maintaining the integrity of the hepato-cellular membranes, thereby indicating the potential hepatoprotective effect of myricetin.

Alcohol, on the one hand, stimulates biosynthesis while decreasing the catabolism of both cholesterol and fatty acids, leading to their buildup in the liver, consequently giving rise to hyperlipidemia. Alcohol increases the synthesis of cholesterol by increasing the activity of β-hydroxy- methyl-glutaryl CoA (HMG-CoA) reductase, the rate-determining enzyme of cholesterol biosynthesis.⁶⁵ Chronic alcohol administration also leads to microsomal induction that accelerates the oxidation of alcohol and enhances the production of triacylglycerols.^62,63,66 Myricetin administration reduces cholesterol as well as triglyceride levels. Reduced cholesterol levels may be attributed to reduced absorption from the intestine and increased catabolism or decreased synthesis. The diminished levels of triglycerides may be caused by reduced synthesis of free fatty acids, increased breakdown, or reduced glycerol formation.⁶⁵

Alcohol intake increases the level of nitric oxide (NO). It might lead to toxicity via peroxynitrite, a powerful oxidant that can cause tyrosine residue nitration and inactivation of numerous biologically imperative proteins and enzymes.^67,68 Following the previous studies, treatment with myricetin reduce nitrites in alcohol-administered rats.⁶⁹ Hence, myricetin treatment can potentially prevent reactive nitrogen species (RNS)-mediated damage to vital macromolecules (for instance, proteins, DNA, and lipids) of the hepatocytes which may occur due to alcohol consumption.

In summary, the current study depicts that alcohol causes hepatotoxicity due to generation of free radicals, disruption of redox potential, NF-κB stimulation, lipid peroxidation, and release of proinflammatory cytokines (TNF-α, IL-1β). These pathways lead to cellular necrosis and disruption of hepatic parenchyma. This study points to the therapeutic potential of myricetin in reducing alcohol-induced hepatic injury through modulation in the metabolism of alcohol, alleviation of oxidative stress, and suppression of inflammation. Hence myricetin may present a peculiar protective agent against alcohol-induced hepatic injury.

Footnotes

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge and extend their appreciation to the Researhers Supporting Project Number (RSP-2021/124) King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. The authors are thankful to the Faculty of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry, SKUAST-Kashmir, J&K, India, for providing the necessary facilities to complete a significant part of this project.

Declaration of conflicting interests

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding

The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This research was supported by the Researchers Supporting Project number (RSP-2021/124), King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

ORCID iDs

Sheikh Bilal Ahmad

Muneeb U. Rehman

References

Katyal

Saroch

Bharat

BAK

. Alcohol and periodontal health in adolescence. SRM J. Res. Dent Sci 2012; 3:257-263.

Global status report on alcohol and health. Geneva, Switzerland. WHO; 2004.

Kim

You

et al. Hepatoprotective effects of fermented Curcuma longa L. on carbon tetrachloride-induced oxidative stress in rats. Food Chem. 2014; 15:148-153.

Ahmad

Rehman

Fatima

et al. Antifibrotic effects of D-limonene (5(1-methyl-4- [1- methylethenyl]) cyclohexane) in CCl₄ induced liver toxicity in Wistar rats. Environ Toxicol. 2018; 33(3):361-369.

Farooq

Bataller

. Pathogenesis and management of alcoholic liver disease. Dig Dis 2017; 34: 347-355.

Stickel

Moreno

Hampe

. The genetics of alcohol dependence and alcohol-related liver disease. J Hepatol 2017; 66(1): 195-211.

Zakhari

Overview: how is alcohol metabolized in the body?

Alcohol Res Health 2006; 29: 245-55.

Cederbaum

. CYP2E1 and oxidative liver injury by alcohol. Free Radical Biol Med 2008; 44: 723-738.

Arteel

. Oxidants and antioxidants in alcohol-induced liver disease. Gastroenterol 2003; 124: 778-790.

10.

Gao

Bataller

. Alcoholic liver disease: Pathogenesis and new therapeutic targets. Gastroenterol 2011; 141: 1572-1585.

11.

Radosavljevic

Mladenovic

Vucevic

. The role of oxidative stress in alcoholic liver injury. Med. Pregl 2009; 62 (11–12): 547-553.

12.

Jin

Ande

Kumar

et al. Regulation of cytochrome P450 2e1 expression by ethanol: Role of oxidative stress-mediated pkc/jnk/sp1 pathway. Cell Death Disease 2013; 4(3): e554.

13.

Torok

. Dysregulation of redox pathways in liver fibrosis. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest Liver Physiol 2016; 311 (4): G667-G674.

14.

Park

Lee

Park

. et al. CCR5 deficiency exacerbates alcoholic fatty liver disease through pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines-induced hepatic inflammation. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2017; 32 (6): 1258-1264.

15.

Sid

Verrax

Calderon

. Role of oxidative stress in the pathogenesis of alcohol-induced liver disease. Free Radic Res 2013; 47: 894-904.

16.

Zhao

Jiang

et al. Protective effects of Lactobacillus plantarum C88 on chronic ethanol-induced liver injury in mice. J Funct Foods 2017; 35: 97-104.

17.

Parola

Robino

. Oxidative stress-related molecules and liver fibrosis. J Hepatol 2001; 35 (2): 297-306.

18.

Ilaiyarajan

Khanum

Amelioration of alcohol-induced hepatotoxicity and oxidative stress in rats by Acorus calamus. J Diet Suppl 2011; 8: 331-345.

19.

Wang

Gao

Zakhari

. Inflammation in alcoholic liver disease. Ann Rev Nutr 2012; 32: 343-368.

20.

Wang

Cederbaum

. Cytokines in alcoholic liver disease. Arch Toxicol 2012: 86, 1337-1348.

21.

Miller

Wang

Park

et al. Anti-inflammatory and anti-apoptotic roles of endothelial cell STAT3 in alcoholic liver injury. Alcoholism Clin Exp Res 2010; 34: 719-725.

22.

Carlson

Wands

de la Monte

. Rat strain differences in susceptibility to alcohol-induced chronic liver injury and hepatic insulin resistance. Gastroent Res Pract 2010; 16: Article ID 312790.

23.

Ross

Kasum

. Dietary Flavonoids: Bioavailability, Metabolic Effects, and Safety. Annu Rev Nutr 2002; 22: 19-34.

24.

Shih

Lee

. et al. Myricetin suppresses invasion and migration of human lung adenocarcinoma A549 cells: possible mediation by blocking the ERK signaling pathway. J Agric Food Chem 2009; 57 (9): 3490-9.

25.

Domitrovic

Rashed

Cvijanovic

et al. Myricitrin exhibits antioxidant, anti-inflammatory and antifibrotic activity in carbon tetrachloride-intoxicated mice. Chem Biol Interact 2015; 230: 21-9.

26.

Semwal

Combrinck

et al. Myricetin: A Dietary Molecule with Diverse Biological Activities. Nutrients 2016; 8(2): 90.

27.

Chen

. et al. Myricetin affords protection against peroxynitrite‐mediated DNA damage and hydroxyl radical formation. Food Chem Toxicol 2011; 49:2439‐2444.

28.

Chobot

Hadacek

Exploration of pro-oxidant and antioxidant activities of the flavonoid myricetin. Redox Rep 2011; 16:242-247.

29.

Zhang

Feng

Liao . et al. Myricetin attenuated LPS induced cardiac injury in vivo and in vitro. Phytother Res 2018; 32: 459-470.

30.

Kaur

Shalini

Bansal

. Influence of vitamin E on alcohol-induced changes in antioxidant defenses in mice liver. Toxicol Mech Methods 2010; 20(2): 82-89.

31.

Noorani

Kale

. Pretreatment of Albino Rats with Methanolic Fruit Extract of Randia Dumetorum (L.) Protects against Alcohol Induced Liver Damage. Korean J Physiol Pharmacol 2012; 6(2):125-30.

32.

Lee

Nam

Choi

. et al. The hepato-protective effect of eupatilin on an alcoholic liver disease model of rats. Korean J Physiol Pharmacol 2020;24(5):385-394.

33.

Tatiya

Surana

Sutar

. et al. Hepatoprotective effect of poly herbal formulation against various hepatotoxic agents in rats. Pharmacogn Res 2012; 4: 50-56.

34.

Takahashi

Satake

Yamashita

. Ecklonia cava polyphenol protects the liver against ethanol-induced injury in rats. Biochim Biophys Acta 2012; 1820: 978-988.

35.

Rabelo

ACS

de Pádua Lúcio

Araújo

. et al. Baccharis trimera protects against ethanol induced hepatotoxicity in vitro and in vivo. J. Ethnopharmacol 2017; 215(1018): 1-13.

36.

Claiborne

. Catalase activity. In: Greenwald

R.A

. (Ed.), CRC Handbook of Methods in Oxygen Radical Research. CRC Press, Boca Raton. 1985; pp. 283-284.

37.

Baumgartner

Baker

Hill

. et al. Novel interference in thiobarbituric acid assay for lipid peroxidation. Lipids. 1975; 10: 309-311.

38.

Jollow

Mitchell

Zampaglione

et al. Bromobenzene induced liver necrosis. Protective role of glutathione and evidence for 3,4-bromobenzene oxide as the hepatotoxic metabolite. Pharmacol 1974; 11: 151-169.

39.

Mohandas

Marshall

Duggin

. et al. Differential distribution of glutathione and glutathione related enzymes in rabbit kidney. Cancer Res 1984; 44: 5086-5091.

40.

Carlberg

Mannervik

Glutathione level in rat brain. Int J Biol Chem 1975; 250: 4480-4575.

41.

Marklund

. Involvement of the superoxide anion radical in the autoxidation of pyrogallol and a convenient assay for superoxide dismutase. Eur J Biochem 1974; 47: 469-474.

42.

Reinke

Moyer

. p-Nitrophenol hydroxylation. Drug Metab Dispos 1985; 13: 548–552.

43.

Bonnichsen

Brink

. Liver alcohol dehydrogenase. In Colowick

Kaplan

, (eds.) Methods in Enzymology, vol. 1, Academic Press, New York. 1955; pp. 495-500.

44.

Reitman

Frankel

. Colorimetric method for the determination of serum glutamic oxalacetic and glutamic pyruvic transaminases. Am J Clin Pathol 1957; 28(1): 56-63.

45.

Kornberg

. Colowick

Kaplan

. (eds). Lactic dehydrogenase of muscle. In Methods in Enzymology. New York: Academic Press. 1955; 441-443.

46.

Corte

Stirpe

. The regulation of rat liver xanthine oxidase. Involvement of thiol groups in the conversion of the enzyme activity from dehydrogenase (type D) into oxidase (type O) and purification of the enzyme. Biochem J 1972; 126(3): 739-745.

47.

Wright

Colby

Miles

. Cytosolic factors which affect microsomal lipid peroxidation in lung and liver. Arch Biochem Biophys 1981;206:296–304

48.

Green

Wagner

Glogowski

et al. Analysis of nitrate, nitrite, and [15N] nitrate in biological fluids. Anal Biochem 1982; 126:131–138

49.

Lowry

Rosebrough

Farr

et al. Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem 1951; 193(1): 265-275.

50.

Diehl

. Liver disease in alcohol abusers: clinical perspective. Alcohol 2002; 27:7-11.

51.

Zima

Fialová

Mestek

. Oxidative stress, metabolism of ethanol and alcohol-related diseases. 2001. J Biomed Sci 2001; 8(1):59-70.

52.

Edenberg

. The genetics of alcohol metabolism: role of alcohol dehydrogenase and aldehyde dehydrogenase variants. Alcohol Res Health 2007; 30(1): 5-13.

53.

Lieber

. New concepts of the pathogenesis of alcoholic liver disease lead to novel treatments. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 2004; 6: 60-5.

54.

Ghezzi

Role of glutathione in immunity and inflammation in the lung. Int J Gen Med 2011; 4: 105-113.

55.

Zakaryan

Aivazyan

Karagezyan

KG.

et al. Comparative analysis of the superoxide dismutase activity in tissues of higher vertebrates. Dokl Biochem Biophys 2002; 382: 13-15.

56.

Chelikani

Fita

Loewen

. Diversity of structures and properties among catalase. Cell Mol Life Sci 2004; 61: 192-208.

57.

Yigit

Sogut

Tataroglu

et al. Oxidative/antioxidative status, lymphocyte DNA damage, and urotensin-2 receptor level in patients with migraine attacks. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat 2018. 14, 367-374.

58.

Park

Ryu

Ahn

HI.

et al. The Anti-Inflammatory Effect of Trichilia martiana C. DC. in the Lipopolysaccharide-Stimulated Inflammatory Response in Macrophages and Airway Epithelial Cells and in LPS-Challenged Mice. J Microbiol Biotechnol 2020;30(11):1614-1625.

59.

Kwon

Nam

Choi

. et al. Hepatoprotective effect of sodium hydrosulfide on hepatic encephalopathy in rats. Korean J Physiol Pharmacol 2019 ;23(4):263-270.

60.

Dey

Chaskar

Bhatt

et al. Hepatoprotective Activity of BV-7310, a Proprietary Herbal Formulation of Phyllanthus niruri, Tephrosia purpurea, Boerhavia diffusa, and Andrographis paniculata, in Alcohol-Induced HepG2 Cells and Alcohol plus a Haloalkane, CCl₄, Induced Liver Damage in Rats. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 2020 25;6428906.

61.

Meng

Tang

Zhao

Liu

Cao

. et al. Hepatoprotective effects of Hovenia dulcis seeds against alcoholic liver injury and related mechanisms investigated via network pharmacology. World J Gastroenterol 2020;26(24):3432-3446.

62.

Tahir

Sultana

. Chrysin modulates ethanol metabolism in Wistar rats: a promising role against organ toxicities. Alcohol Alcohol 2011;46(4):383-92.

63.

Tahir

Rehman

Lateef

et al. Diosmin protects against ethanol-induced hepatic injury via alleviation of inflammation and regulation of TNF-α and NF-κB activation. Alcohol. 2013;47(2):131-9.

64.

Hoek

Pastorino

. Ethanol, oxidative stress and cytokine-induced liver cell injury. Alcohol 2002; 27: 63-8.

65.

James

Kandutsch

. Regulation of hepatic dolichol synthesis by beta-hydroxy-beta-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase. J Biol Chem 1980;255(18):8618-22.

66.

Koop

Klopfenstein

Iimuro

et al. Gadolinium chloride blocks alcohol-dependent liver toxicity in rats treated chronically with intragastric alcohol despite the induction of CYP2E1. Mol Pharmacol 1997;51(6):944-50.

67.

Chen

Lin

Sun

et al. Liver Regeneration Is Impaired in Mice with Acute Exposure to a Very Low Carbohydrate Diet. Dig Dis Sci 2017;62(5):1256-1264.

68.

Deng

Deitrich

. Ethanol metabolism and effects: nitric oxide and its interaction. Curr Clin Pharmacol. 2017; 2: 145-153.

69.

Rehman

Rather

. Myricetin Abrogates Cisplatin-Induced Oxidative Stress, Inflammatory Response, and Goblet Cell Disintegration in Colon of Wistar Rats. Plants (Basel). 2019;9(1):28.

Myricetin (3,3 ′,4 ′,5,5 ′,7-hexahydroxyflavone) prevents ethanol-induced biochemical and inflammatory damage in the liver of Wistar rats

Abstract

Keywords

Introduction

Materials and Methods

Chemicals

Experimental procedure

Preparation of post-mitochondrial supernatant, cytosolic, and microsomal fractions

Activity assessment of Catalase enzyme

Assessment of lipid peroxidation

Assessment of Glutathione (GSH)

Activity assessment of Glutathione peroxidase (GPx)

Activity assessment of GR

Activity assessment of superoxide dismutase (SOD)

The activity of CYP 2E1

Activity assessment of ADH

Activity assessment of serum ALT and AST

Activity assessment of lactate dehydrogenase

Activity assessment of xanthine oxidase (XO)

Estimation of lipids

Estimation of Nitrites

Assessment of level of cytokines and transcription factor (TNF-α, IL-6, and NF-κB)

Protein Estimation

Results

Myricetin-induced effects on ethanol metabolizing enzymes

Myricetin-induced effects on TC and TGs

Myricetin-induced effects on the activity of XO and lipid peroxidation (hepatic-membrane damage)

Myricetin-induced restoration of hepatic antioxidant activities

Myricetin-alleviated hepato-toxicity induced by ethanol

Myricetin restored inflammatory biomarkers (NF-κB, IL-6, and TNF-α)

Myricetin reduced nitrite levels induced by ethanol

Myricetin prevented the pathological changes in hepatic tissue

Discussion

Footnotes

Acknowledgements

Declaration of conflicting interests

Funding

ORCID iDs

References