Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This Special Issue foregrounds a need for critical reflection on the assumptions, biases, goals and effectiveness of the subdiscipline `theoretical and philosophical psychology.' Pivotal to the Issue is a contrast developed between criticism of and critical engagement with `mainstream' psychology. Contributions address a range of evaluative themes relating to theoretical and philosophical psychology's identity, representative breadth, impact, instrumentality, accuracy, fairness and flexibility. Themes include reflection on changes in the mainstream and on theoretical psychology's response. The aim is to offer a variety of perspectives rather than to seek definitive answers to any questions relating to the evaluative themes. Thus both pessimistic and optimistic accounts are given of the potential of theoretical and philosophical psychology to engage mainstream psychology critically. An additional organizing principle of the Issue is the representative inclusion of traditional branches of psychological research: cognitive, clinical, developmental, neuroscience, personality and social psychology. Within this structure, reflections on the status and efficacy of theoretical and philosophical psychology are both prospective and retrospective. Through its range of essays the Issue strives to make clear that `engagement with' is not equivalent to alliance or compliance, and that the relation of theoretical and philosophical psychology to the psychological community at large is a matter for continual and regular reappraisal.

Keywords

engagement with fairness flexibility historical context identity question mainstream reflexivity representative breadth

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

APA Presidential Task Force on Evidence-Based Practice. (2006). Evidence-based practice in psychotherapy. American Psychologist, 61, 271—285.

Bacon, F. (1994). Novum organum (P. Urbach & J. Gibson, Trans.). Chicago, IL: Open Court. (Original work published 1620.)

Barsalou, L.W. (2005). Abstraction as dynamic interpretation in perceptual symbol systems. In L. Gershkoff-Stowe & D. Rakison (Eds.), Building object categories (pp. 389—431). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Danziger, K. (1990). Constructing the subject: Historical origins of psychological research. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Gergen, K., & Zielke, B. (Eds.). (2006). Theory in action [Special Section]. Theory & Psychology, 16, 299—415.

Giorgi, A. (1970). Psychology as a human science. New York: Harper & Row.

Good, J.M.M. (2007). The affordances for social psychology of the ecological approach to social knowing. Theory & Psychology, 17, 265—295.

Harré, R. (1998). The singular self: An introduction to the psychology of personhood. London: Sage.

Harré, R. , & Moghaddam, F. (Eds.). (2003). The self and others: Positioning individuals and groups in personal, political, and cultural contexts. Westport, CT: Praeger.

10.

Jost, L.J. , & Jost, J.T. (2007). Why Marx left philosophy for social science. Theory & Psychology, 17, 297—322.

11.

Koch, S. (1992). The nature and limits of psychological knowledge: Lessons of a century qua `science'. In S. Koch & D.E. Leary (Eds.), A century of psychology as science (pp. 75—99). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

12.

Koch, S. , & Leary, D.E. (Eds.). (1992). A century of psychology as science. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

13.

Lamiell, J.T. (2007). On sustaining critical discourse with mainstream personality investigators: Problems and prospects. Theory & Psychology, 17, 169—185.

14.

Machamer, P. , & Sytsma, J. (2007). Neuroscience and theoretical psychology: What's to worry about? Theory & Psychology, 17, 199—216.

15.

Osbeck, L.M. , Malone, K.R. , & Nersessian, N.J. (2007). Dissenters in the sanctuary: Evolving frameworks in `mainstream' cognitive science. Theory & Psychology, 17, 243—264.

16.

Rabinowitz, V. , & Weseen, S. (2001). Power, politics, and the qualitative/quantitative debates in psychology. In D. Tolman & M. Brydon-Miller (Eds.), From subjects to subjectivities (pp. 12—28). New York : New York University Press.

17.

Robinson, D.N. (2007). Theoretical psychology: What is it and who needs it? Theory & Psychology, 17, 187—198.

18.

Slife, B. , Wiggins, B. , Bradford, J. , & Graham, J. (2005). Avoiding an EST monopoly: Toward a pluralism of philosophies and methods. Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy , 35, 83—97.

19.

Sloman, S.A. , & Lagnado, D.A. (2005). The problem of induction. In K. Holyoak & R. Morrison (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of thinking and reasoning (pp. 95—116). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

20.

Solomon, R.C. (2006). Philosophy as the queen of the sciences; emotion research as her bastard child. In P. Ver Lange (Ed.), Bridging social psychology: Benefits of transdisciplinary approaches (pp. 207—211). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

21.

Steinhauser, K. , Christakis, N. , Clipp, E. , McNeilly, M. , McIntyre, L. , & Tulsky, J. (2000). Factors considered important at the end of life by patients, family, physicians, and other care providers. Journal of the American Medical Association, 284, 2476—2482.

22.

Tissaw, M.A. (2007). Making sense of neonatal imitation. Theory & Psychology, 17, 217—242.

23.

Weinfurt, K. , Friedman, J. , Alsbrook, J. , Dinan, M. , Hall, M. , & Sugarman, J. (2006). Views of potential research participants on financial conflicts of interest: Barriers and opportunities for effective disclosure . Journal of General Internal Medicine, 21, 901—906.

24.

Westerman, M.A. , & Steen, E.M. (2007). Going beyond the internal—external dichotomy in clinical psychology: The theory of interpersonal defense as an example of a participatory model. Theory & Psychology, 17, 323—351.

On Critical Engagement with the Mainstream

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References