Enhancement of a horizontal axis wind turbine airfoil performance using single dielectric barrier discharge plasma actuator

Abstract

Wind turbines are of the most promising devices to cut down carbon emissions. However, some phenomena that adversely affect their performance are inevitable. The aim of the present paper is to investigate flow separation prevention exploiting leading edge (LE) single dielectric barrier discharge plasma actuator (SDBD-PA) on an airfoil belonging to a section of a locally developed wind turbine. The numerical results of the surface pressure distribution over the airfoil were compared with the experimental measurements carried out by the authors on the same blade section, and good agreement was found between numerical and experimental data for both plasma-OFF and plasma-ON cases. An in-depth parametric numerical investigation was then carried out to provide a better understanding of the flow behavior affected by the activation of PA over the same airfoil at post stall angle of attacks (AOAs). According to the results, the frequency and voltage of actuation, AOA, and free stream velocity are shown to have strong impacts on separation delay and actuation effectiveness. In Reynolds number of 2.85 × 10⁵, the maximum PA effectiveness takes place at 21° which is approximately 312%, 307%, and 256% corresponding to the PA location of LE, 0.02 chord, and 0.15 chord, respectively. Also, maximum velocity of the domain is increased three times of the free stream velocity on average for three investigated Reynolds numbers at the frequency and voltage of 12 kHz and 12 kV, respectively. Furthermore, the size of the wake area noticeably contracts due to the presence of the SDBD-PA. The results clearly indicate that the lift and drag coefficients as well as the lift-to-drag ratio fit a linear variation pattern with the frequency of actuation. The variation rate of the aforementioned parameters becomes steeper as the peak voltage of actuation increases. Highly nonlinear aerodynamic responses and significant interactions were demonstrated between the investigated parameters.

Keywords

Single dielectric barrier discharge plasma actuator flow separation performance wind turbine numerical result experimental measurement

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Wang

, et al.A methodological exploration for efficient prediction of airfoil response to gusts in wind engineering. Proc IMechE Part A: J Power and Energy 2019; 233: 738–750.

Sanei

Razaghi

. Numerical investigation of three turbulence simulation models for s809 wind turbine airfoil. Proc IMechE Part A: J Power and Energy 2018; 232: 1037–1048.

Wang

. Passive flow control of the corner separation in an annular compressor cascade with a micro-blade. Proc IMechE Part A: J Power and Energy 2019; 233: 293–308.

Galera

Martinez-Filgueira

, et al.A triangular vortex generator modeling on a DU97-W-300 airfoil by a source term model. Proc IMechE Part A: J Power and Energy 2019; 233: 635–645.

Gad-El-Hak

. Flow control, passive, active and reactive flow management, Cambridge, England: Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge, 2000.

Touchard

. Plasma actuators for aeronautics applications – state of the art review. IJPEST 2008; 2: 1–25.

, et al.Large eddy simulation of saw tooth plasma actuator for improving film cooling efficiency. Proc IMechE Part A: J Power and Energy 2019; 231: 357–370.

Mazaheri

Omidi

, et al.Simulation of DBD plasma actuator effect on aerodynamic performance improvement using a modified phenomenological model. Comput Fluids 2016; 140: 371–384.

Johnson

Baker

, et al.An overview of active load control techniques for wind turbines with an emphasis on microtabs. Wind Energ 2010; 13: 239–253.

10.

Matsuda

Tanaka

, et al.Plasma actuation effect on a MW class wind turbine. JGPP 2017; 9: 47–52.

11.

Enloe

McLaughlin

, et al.Mechanisms and responses of a single dielectric barrier plasma actuator: plasma morphology. AIAA J 2004; 42: 589–594.

12.

Enloe

McLaughlin

, et al.Mechanisms and responses of a single dielectric barrier plasma actuator: geometric effects. AIAA J 2004; 42: 595–604. .

13.

Durscher

Roy

. Evaluation of thrust measurement techniques for dielectric barrier discharge actuators. Exp Fluids 2012; 53: 1165–1176.

14.

Thomas

Corke

, et al.Optimization of dielectric barrier discharge plasma actuators for active aerodynamic flow control. AIAA J 2009; 47: 2169–2178.

15.

Seth

Traore

, et al.Parametric study of a DBD plasma actuation based on the Suzen-Huang model. J Electrostat 2018; 93: 1–9.

16.

Suzen YB, Huang PG, et al. Numerical simulations of plasma based flow control applications. In: 35th AIAA fluid dynamics conference and exhibit, Toronto, ON, Canada, 6-9 June 2005.

17.

Abdollahzadeh

Pascoa

, et al.Modified split-potential model for modeling the effect of DBD plasma actuators in high altitude flow control. Curr Appl Phys 2014; 14: 1160–1170.

18.

Ibrahim

Skote

. Effects of the scalar parameters in the Suzen-Huang model on plasma actuator characteristics. Int J Numer Method H 2013; 23: 1076–1103.

19.

Bouchmal A. Modeling of dielectric-barrier discharge actuator. Master's Thesis, Delft University of Technology, the Netherlands, 2011.

20.

Omidi

Mazaheri

. Improving the performance of a numerical model to simulate the EHD interaction effect induced by dielectric barrier discharge. Int J Heat Fluid Fl 2017; 67(Part A): 79–94.

21.

Post ML and Corke TC. Separation control using plasma actuators stationary & oscillating airfoils. In: 42nd AIAA aerospace science meeting and exhibit, Reno, NV, USA, 5-8 January 2004..

22.

Post

Corke

. Separation control of high angle of attack airfoil using plasma actuators. AIAA J 2004; 42: 2177–2184.

23.

Post

Corke

. Separation control using plasma actuators: dynamic stall vortex control on oscillating airfoil. AIAA J 2004; 44: 3125–3135.

24.

Walker

Segawa

. Mitigation of flow separation using DBD plasma actuators on airfoils: a tool for more efficient wind turbine operation. Renew Energy 2012; 42: 105–110.

25.

Abdollahzadeh

Pascoa

, et al.Comparison of DBD plasma actuators flow control authority in different modes of actuation. Aerosp Sci Technol 2018; 78: 183–196.

26.

Ebrahimi

Hajipour

. Flow separation control over an airfoil using dual excitation of DBD plasma actuators. Aerosp Sci Technol 2018; 79: 658–668.

27.

Zheng

Cui

, et al.A comparative study of alternating current and nanosecond plasma actuators in flow separation control. Int J Heat Mass Tran 2019; 135: 1097–1117.

28.

Moreau

Debien

, et al.Control of a turbulent flow separated at mid-chord along an airfoil with DBD plasma actuators. J Electrostat 2016; 83: 78–87.

29.

Ebrahimi

Hajipour

, et al.Experimental study of stall control over an airfoil with dual excitation of separated shear layer. Aerosp Sci Technol 2018; 82–83: 402–411.

30.

Masdari

Seyednia

, et al.An experimental loading study of a pitching wind turbine airfoil in near- and post-stall regions. JMST 2018; 32: 3699–3706.

31.

Palmeiro D. Modeling of dielectric barrier discharge plasma actuators for flow control simulations. Master's Thesis, University of Toronto, Canada, 2011.

32.

Menter

. Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications. AIAA J 1994; 32: 1598–1605.

33.

Ansys Inc. Ansys fluent, user’s guide, release 17.0. Canonsburg, PA: 15317, January 2016.

34.

Abe

Takizawa

, et al.Experimental study for momentum transfer in a dielectric barrier discharge plasma actuator. AIAA J 2008; 46: 2248–2256.

35.

Ribeiro

AFP

Awruch

, et al.An airfoil optimization technique for wind turbines. Appl Math Model 2012; 36: 4898–4907. .

36.

Burton

Sharpe

, et al.Wind energy handbook, West Sussex, England: John Wiley & Sons, 2001.

37.

Goundar

Ahmed

. Design of a horizontal axis tidal current turbine. Appl Energy 2013; 11: 161–174.