Gender diversity signals inclusivity, but meta-analyses suggest that it does not boost individual or group performance. This research examined whether a social-psychological intervention can unlock the benefits of gender diversity on college physics students’ social and academic outcomes. Analyses of 124 introductory physics classrooms at a large research institution in the eastern United States (N = 3,605) indicated that in classrooms doing “business as usual,” cross-gender collaboration was infrequent, there was a substantial gender gap in physics classroom belonging, and classroom gender diversity had no effect on performance. The ecological-belonging intervention aimed to establish classroom norms that adversity in the course is normal and surmountable. In classrooms receiving the intervention, cross-gender interaction increased 51%, the gender gap in belonging was reduced by 47%, and higher classroom diversity was associated with higher course grades and 1-year grade point average for both men and women. Addressing contextual belongingness norms may help to unlock the benefits of diversity.
AikenL. S.WestS. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Sage Publications, Inc.
2.
BinningK. R.BrowmanA. S. (2020). Theoretical, ethical, and policy considerations for conducting social–psychological interventions to close educational achievement gaps. Social Issues and Policy Review, 14, 182–216.
3.
BinningK. R.CookJ. E.GreenawayV. P.GarciaJ.ApfelN.ShermanD. K.CohenG. L. (2021). Securing self-integrity over time: Self-affirmation disrupts a negative cycle between psychological threat and academic performance. Journal of Social Issues, 77, 801–823.
4.
BinningK. R.CookJ. E.GreenawayV. P.GarciaJ.ChenS.ApfelN.ShermanD. K.CohenG. L. (2019). Bolstering trust and reducing discipline incidents at a diverse middle school: How self-affirmation affects behavioral conduct during the transition to adolescence. Journal of School Psychology, 75, 74–88.
5.
BinningK. R.KaufmannN.McGreevyE. M.FotuhiO.ChenS.MarshmanE.KalenderZ. Y.LimeriL.BetancurL.SinghC. (2020). Changing social contexts to foster equity in college science courses: An ecological-belonging intervention. Psychological Science, 31, 1059–1070.
6.
BinningK. R.UnzuetaM. M. (2013). Perceiving ethnic diversity on campus: Group differences in attention to hierarchical representation. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 4, 500–507.
7.
BjorkquistR.BogdanA. M.CampbellN. L.ChesseyM.CochranG. L.CunninghamB.EsquivelJ. N.GladstoneL.GosnellN. M.GuruswamyS.HallinenK. M.HarrisC.JohnsonA.JohnsonJ. L.JonesC.JorgensonR. A.McCulloughL.McNeeseM. D.PresleyT. D.. . . SinghC. (2019). Women in physics in the United States: Reaching toward equity and inclusion. In AIP conference proceedings (Vol. 2109, No. 1, p. 050040). American Institute of Physics.
8.
BowmanN. A. (2011). Promoting participation in a diverse democracy: A meta-analysis of college diversity experiences and civic engagement. Review of Educational Research, 81, 29–68.
9.
BryanC. J.TiptonE.YeagerD. S. (2021). Behavioural science is unlikely to change the world without a heterogeneity revolution. Nature Human Behaviour, 5, 980–989.
10.
CanningE. A.LimeriL. B. (2023). Theoretical and methodological directions in mindset intervention research. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 17, Article e12758. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12758
11.
ChenS.BinningK. R.MankeK. J.BradyS. T.McGreevyE. M.BetancurL.LimeriL. B.KaufmannN. (2021). Am I a science person? A strong science identity bolsters minority students’ sense of belonging and performance in college. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 47, 593–606.
12.
CheryanS.ZieglerS. A.MontoyaA. K.JiangL. (2017). Why are some STEM fields more gender balanced than others?Psychological Bulletin, 143, 1–35.
13.
CialdiniR. B.WosinskaW.BarrettD. W.ButnerJ.Gornik-DuroseM. (1999). Compliance with a request in two cultures: The differential influence of social proof and commitment/consistency on collectivists and individualists. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 1242–1253.
14.
ClarkA. E.KashimaY. (2007). Stereotypes help people connect with others in the community: A situated functional analysis of the stereotype consistency bias in communication. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 1028–1039.
15.
CohenG. L.GarciaJ.ApfelN.MasterA. (2006). Reducing the racial achievement gap: A social-psychological intervention. Science, 313, 1307–1310.
16.
CohenG. L.ShermanD. K. (2014). The psychology of change: Self-affirmation and social psychological intervention. Annual Review of Psychology, 65, 333–371.
17.
CoopersmithJ.CookT. D.ZurovacJ.ChaplinD.ForrowL. V. (2022). Internal and external validity of the comparative interrupted time-series design: A meta-analysis. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 41, 252–277.
DoucetteD.ClarkR.SinghC. (2020). Hermione and the secretary: How gendered task division in introductory physics labs can disrupt equitable learning. European Journal of Physics, 41, Article 035702. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6404/ab7831
20.
EaglyA. H. (2016). When passionate advocates meet research on diversity, does the honest broker stand a chance?Journal of Social Issues, 72, 199–222.
21.
EasterbrookM. J.HaddenI. R. (2021). Tackling educational inequalities with social psychology: Identities, contexts, and interventions. Social Issues and Policy Review, 15, 180–236.
22.
FerrerR. A.CohenG. L. (2019). Reconceptualizing self-affirmation with the trigger and channel framework: Lessons from the health domain. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 23(3), 285–304.
23.
GreenawayV. P.TuretskyK. M. (2020). Socioecological diversity and inclusion: A framework for advancing diversity science. Current Opinion in Psychology, 32, 171–176.
HammarlundS. P.DavisC.BinningK. R.CotnerS. (2022). Context matters: How an ecological-belonging intervention can reduce inequities in STEM. BioScience, 72, 387–396.
27.
HarrisonD. A.KleinK. J. (2007). What’s the difference? Diversity constructs as separation, variety, or disparity in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 32, 1199–1228.
28.
HigginsE. T.RholesW. S. (1978). “Saying is believing”: Effects of message modification on memory and liking for the person described. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 14(4), 363–378.
29.
KalenderZ. Y.MarshmanE.SchunnC. D.Nokes-MalachT. J.SinghC. (2019a). Gendered patterns in the construction of physics identity from motivational factors. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 15, Article 020119. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.15.020119
30.
KalenderZ. Y.MarshmanE.SchunnC. D.Nokes-MalachT. J.SinghC. (2019b). Why female science, technology, engineering, and mathematics majors do not identify with physics: They do not think others see them that way. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 15, Article 020148. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.15.020148
31.
LeeH.YuS. L.KimM.KoenkaA. C. (2021). Concern or comfort with social comparisons matter in undergraduate physics courses: Joint consideration of situated expectancy-value theory, mindsets, and gender. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 67, Article 102023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2021.102023
32.
LeslieS. J.CimpianA.MeyerM.FreelandE. (2015). Expectations of brilliance underlie gender distributions across academic disciplines. Science, 347, 262–265.
33.
LiY.SinghC. (2021). Effect of gender, self-efficacy, and interest on perception of the learning environment and outcomes in calculus-based introductory physics courses. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 17, Article 010143. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.17.010143
34.
MaceiraH. M. (2017). Economic benefits of gender equality in the EU. Intereconomics, 52, 178–183.
35.
MaloyJ.KwapiszM. B.HughesB. E. (2022). Factors influencing retention of transgender and gender nonconforming students in undergraduate STEM majors. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 21, Article ar13. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.21-05-0136
36.
MannixE.NealeM. A. (2005). What differences make a difference? The promise and reality of diverse teams in organizations. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 6, 31–55.
37.
MarshmanE. M.KalenderZ. Y.Nokes-MalachT.SchunnC. D.SinghC. (2018). Female students with A’s have similar physics self-efficacy as male students with C’s in introductory courses: A cause for alarm?Physical Review Physics Education Research, 14, Article 020123. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.14.020123
38.
MarshmanE.KalenderZ. Y.SchunnC.Nokes-MalachT.SinghC. (2017). A longitudinal analysis of students’ motivational characteristics in introductory physics courses: Gender differences. Canadian Journal of Physics, 96, 391–405.
39.
MuragishiG. A.AguilarL.CarrP. B.WaltonG. M. (2023). Microinclusions: Treating women as respected work partners increases a sense of fit in technology companies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000430
40.
MurphyM. C.SteeleC. M.GrossJ. J. (2007). Signaling threat: How situational cues affect women in math, science, and engineering settings. Psychological Science, 18, 879–885.
41.
OkonofuaJ. A.HarrisL. T.WaltonG. M. (2022). Sidelining bias: A situationist approach to reduce the consequences of bias in real-world contexts. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 31(5), 395–404.
42.
PageS. E. (2007). Making the difference: Applying a logic of diversity. Academy of Management Perspectives, 21, 6–20.
43.
PettigrewT. F. (1998). Intergroup contact theory. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 65–85.
44.
PostC.ByronK. (2015). Women on boards and firm financial performance: A meta-analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 58, 1546–1571.
45.
PowersJ. T.CookJ. E.Purdie-VaughnsV.GarciaJ.ApfelN.CohenG. L. (2016). Changing environments by changing individuals: The emergent effects of psychological intervention. Psychological Science, 27, 150–160.
46.
QuinnK. N.KelleyM. M.McGillK. L.SmithE. M.WhippsZ.HolmesN. G. (2020). Group roles in unstructured labs show inequitable gender divide. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 16, Article 010129. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.16.010129
47.
SanchezK. L.KalksteinD. A.WaltonG. M. (2022). A threatening opportunity: The prospect of conversations about race-related experiences between Black and White friends. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 122(5), 853–872.
48.
SawtelleV.BreweE.KramerL. H. (2012). Exploring the relationship between self-efficacy and retention in introductory physics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49, 1096–1121.
49.
ShadishW. R.CookT. D.CampbellD. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Houghton Mifflin.
50.
SmithE. N.RozekC. S.MankeK. J.DweckC. S.WaltonG. M. (2021). Teacher- versus researcher-provided affirmation effects on students’ task engagement and positive perceptions of teachers. Journal of Social Issues, 77(3), 751–768.
51.
SpybrookJ.BloomH.CongdonR.HillC.MartinezA.RaudenbushS. (2011). Optimal design for longitudinal and multilevel research: Documentation for the “Optimal Design” software (through Version 3.0). Survey Research Center of the Institute of Social Research at University of Michigan.
52.
SteeleC. M. (1997). A threat in the air: How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance. American Psychologist, 52, 613–629.
53.
StoutJ. G.ItoT. A.FinkelsteinN. D.PollockS. J. (2013). How a gender gap in belonging contributes to the gender gap in physics participation. In AIP conference proceedings (Vol. 1513, No. 1, pp. 402–405). American Institute of Physics.
UnzuetaM. M.BinningK. R. (2012). Diversity is in the eye of the beholder: How concern for the in-group affects perceptions of racial diversity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 26–38.
56.
WaltonG. M.BradyS. T. (2020). The social-belonging intervention. In WaltonG. M.CrumA. J. (Eds.), Handbook of wise interventions: How social-psychological insights can help solve problems (pp. 36–62). Guilford Press.
57.
WaltonG. M.CohenG. L. (2007). A question of belonging: Race, social fit, and achievement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 82–96.
58.
WaltonG. M.LogelC.PeachJ. M.SpencerS. J.ZannaM. P. (2015). Two brief interventions to mitigate a “chilly climate” transform women’s experience, relationships, and achievement in engineering. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107, 468–485.
59.
WaltonG. M.MurphyM. C.LogelC.YeagerD. S.GoyerJ. P.BradyS. T.EmersonK. T. U.PauneskuD.FotuhiO.BlodornA.BoucherK. L.CarterR. E.GopalanM.HendersonA.KroeperK. M.Murdock-PerrieraL. A.ReevesS. L.AblorhT. T.AnsariS.. . . KrolN. (2023). Where and with whom does a brief social-belonging intervention promote progress in college?Science, 380, 499–505.
60.
WaltonG. M.YeagerD. S. (2020). Seed and soil: Psychological affordances in contexts help to explain where wise interventions succeed or fail. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 29, 219–226.
61.
WestC.ZimmermanD. H. (1987). Doing gender. Gender & Society, 1, 125–151.
62.
YeagerD. S.CarrollJ. M.BuontempoJ.CimpianA.WoodyS.CrosnoeR.MullerC.MurrayJ.MhatreP.KerstingN.HullemanC.KudymM.MurphyM.DuckworthA. L.WaltonG. M.DweckC. S. (2022). Teacher mindsets help explain where a growth-mindset intervention does and doesn’t work. Psychological Science, 33(1), 18–32.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
