Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

A growth-mindset intervention teaches the belief that intellectual abilities can be developed. Where does the intervention work best? Prior research examined school-level moderators using data from the National Study of Learning Mindsets (NSLM), which delivered a short growth-mindset intervention during the first year of high school. In the present research, we used data from the NSLM to examine moderation by teachers’ mindsets and answer a new question: Can students independently implement their growth mindsets in virtually any classroom culture, or must students’ growth mindsets be supported by their teacher’s own growth mindsets (i.e., the mindset-plus-supportive-context hypothesis)? The present analysis (9,167 student records matched with 223 math teachers) supported the latter hypothesis. This result stood up to potentially confounding teacher factors and to a conservative Bayesian analysis. Thus, sustaining growth-mindset effects may require contextual supports that allow the proffered beliefs to take root and flourish.

Keywords

wise interventions growth mindset motivation adolescence affordances implicit theories open data open materials preregistered

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aronson

J. M.

Fried

C. B.

Good

(2002). Reducing the effects of stereotype threat on African American college students by shaping theories of intelligence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38(2), 113–125. https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.2001.1491

Bailey

D. H.

Duncan

G. J.

Cunha

Foorman

B. R.

Yeager

D. S.

(2020). Persistence and fade-out of educational-intervention effects: Mechanisms and potential solutions. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 21(2), 55–97. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100620915848

Blackwell

L. S.

Trzesniewski

K. H.

Dweck

C. S.

(2007). Implicit theories of intelligence predict achievement across an adolescent transition: A longitudinal study and an intervention. Child Development, 78(1), 246–263. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.00995.x

Bloom

H. S.

Raudenbush

S. W.

Weiss

M. J.

Porter

(2017). Using multisite experiments to study cross-site variation in treatment effects: A hybrid approach with fixed intercepts and a random treatment coefficient. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 10(4), 817–842. https://doi.org/10.1080/19345747.2016.1264518

Boulay

B. A.

Goodson

Olsen

McCormick

Darrow

C. V.

Frye

M. B.

Gan

K. N.

Harvill

E. L.

Sarna

(2018). The investing in innovation fund: Summary of 67 evaluations (No. NCEE 2018-4013). National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.

Brady

S. T.

Cohen

G. L.

Jarvis

S. N.

Walton

G. M.

(2020). A brief social-belonging intervention in college improves adult outcomes for black Americans. Science Advances, 6(18), Article eaay3689. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aay3689

Bronfenbrenner

(1977). Toward an experimental ecology of human development. American Psychologist, 32(7), 513–531. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.32.7.513

Bryan

C. J.

Tipton

Yeager

D. S.

(2021). Behavioural science is unlikely to change the world without a heterogeneity revolution. Nature Human Behaviour, 5, 980–989. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-021-01143-3

Canning

E. A.

Muenks

Green

D. J.

Murphy

M. C.

(2019). STEM faculty who believe ability is fixed have larger racial achievement gaps and inspire less student motivation in their classes. Science Advances, 5(2), Article eaau4734. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aau4734

10.

Carroll

J. M.

Muller

Grodsky

Warren

J. R.

(2017). Tracking health inequalities from high school to midlife. Social Forces, 96(2), 591–628. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/sox065

11.

Chetty

Friedman

J. N.

Rockoff

J. E.

(2014). Measuring the impacts of teachers I: Evaluating bias in teacher value-added estimates. American Economic Review, 104(9), 2593–2632. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.104.9.2593

12.

Cronbach

L. J.

(1957). The two disciplines of scientific psychology. American Psychologist, 12(11), 671–684.

13.

Dweck

C. S.

Yeager

D. S.

(2019). Mindsets: A view from two eras. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 14(3), 481–496. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691618804166

14.

Easton

J. Q.

Johnson

Sartain

(2017). The predictive power of ninth-grade GPA. UChicago Consortium on School Research. https://consortium.uchicago.edu/publications/predictive-power-ninth-grade-gpa

15.

Gelman

Loken

(2014). The statistical crisis in science. American Scientist, 102(6), 460–465. https://doi.org/10.1511/2014.111.460

16.

Gibson

J. J.

(1977). The theory of affordances. In Shaw

Bransford

(Eds.), Perceiving, acting, and knowing (pp. 67–82). Erlbaum.

17.

Gopalan

Tipton

(2018). Is the National Study of Learning Mindsets nationally-representative? PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/dvmr7

18.

Hahn

P. R.

Murray

J. S.

Carvalho

C. M.

(2020). Bayesian regression tree models for causal inference: Regularization, confounding, and heterogeneous effects. Bayesian Analysis, 15(3), 965–1056. https://doi.org/10.1214/19-BA1195

19.

Haimovitz

Dweck

C. S.

(2017). The origins of children’s growth and fixed mindsets: New research and a new proposal. Child Development, 88(6), 1849–1859. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12955

20.

Harackiewicz

J. M.

Priniski

S. J.

(2018). Improving student outcomes in higher education: The science of targeted intervention. Annual Review of Psychology, 69, 409–435. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-122216-011725

21.

Hembree

(1990). The nature, effects, and relief of mathematics anxiety. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 21(1), 33–46. https://doi.org/10.2307/749455

22.

Hill

C. J.

Bloom

H. S.

Black

A. R.

Lipsey

M. W.

(2008). Empirical benchmarks for interpreting effect sizes in research. Child Development Perspectives, 2(3), 172–177. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-8606.2008.00061.x

23.

Jackson

C. K.

(2018). What do test scores miss? The importance of teacher effects on non–test score outcomes. Journal of Political Economy, 126(5), 2072–2107. https://doi.org/10.1086/699018

24.

Kraft

M. A.

(2019). Teacher effects on complex cognitive skills and social-emotional competencies. Journal of Human Resources, 54(1), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.3368/jhr.54.1.0916.8265R3

25.

Kraft

M. A.

(2020). Interpreting effect sizes of education interventions. Educational Researcher, 49(4), 241–253. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X20912798

26.

Lazarus

R. S.

(1993). From psychological stress to the emotions: A history of changing outlooks. Annual Review of Psychology, 44(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.44.020193.000245

27.

Leslie

S.-J.

Cimpian

Meyer

Freeland

(2015). Expectations of brilliance underlie gender distributions across academic disciplines. Science, 347(6219), 262–265. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1261375

28.

Lewin

(1952). Field theory in social science: Selected theoretical papers ( Cartwright

, Ed.). Tavistock.

29.

McShane

B. B.

Tackett

J. L.

Böckenholt

Gelman

(2019). Large-scale replication projects in contemporary psychological research. The American Statistician, 73(Suppl. 1), 99–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2018.1505655

30.

Miller

D. I.

(2019). When do growth mindset interventions work? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 23(11), 910–912. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2019.08.005

31.

Muenks

Canning

E. A.

LaCosse

Green

D. J.

Zirkel

Garcia

J. A.

Murphy

M. C.

(2020). Does my professor think my ability can change? Students’ perceptions of their STEM professors’ mindset beliefs predict their psychological vulnerability, engagement, and performance in class. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 149(11), 2119–2144. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000763

32.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2021). Sky’s the limit: Growth mindset, students, and schools in PISA. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/pisa/growth-mindset.pdf

33.

Pattison

Grodsky

Muller

(2013). Is the sky falling? Grade inflation and the signaling power of grades. Educational Researcher, 42(5), 259–265. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X13481382

34.

Paunesku

Walton

G. M.

Romero

Smith

E. N.

Yeager

D. S.

Dweck

C. S.

(2015). Mind-set interventions are a scalable treatment for academic underachievement. Psychological Science, 26(6), 784–793. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797615571017

35.

Rattan

Good

Dweck

C. S.

(2012). “It’s ok—Not everyone can be good at math”: Instructors with an entity theory comfort (and demotivate) students. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(3), 731–737. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2011.12.012

36.

StataCorp. (2017). Stata statistical software (Version 15.1) [Computer software]. StataCorp.

37.

Tipton

Yeager

D. S.

Iachan

Schneider

(2019). Designing probability samples to study treatment effect heterogeneity. In Lavrakas

P. J.

(Ed.), Experimental methods in survey research: Techniques that combine random sampling with random assignment (pp. 435–456). Wiley.

38.

Walton

G. M.

Wilson

T. D.

(2018). Wise interventions: Psychological remedies for social and personal problems. Psychological Review, 125(5), 617–655. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000115

39.

Walton

G. M.

Yeager

D. S.

(2020). Seed and soil: Psychological affordances in contexts help to explain where wise interventions succeed or fail. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 29(3), 219–226. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721420904453

40.

Woody

Carvalho

C. M.

Murray

J. S.

(2020). Model interpretation through lower-dimensional posterior summarization. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 30(1), 144–161. https://doi.org/10.1080/10618600.2020.1796684

41.

Yamamoto

Bryan

C. J.

Yeager

D. S.

(2019). Causal mediation and effect modification: A unified framework. Manuscript in preparation.

42.

Yeager

D. S.

(2019). The National Study of Learning Mindsets, [United States], 2015-2016 (ICPSR 37353) [Data set]. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR37353.v1

43.

Yeager

D. S.

Dweck

C. S.

(2020). What can be learned from growth mindset controversies? American Psychologist, 75(9), 1269–1284. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000794

44.

Yeager

D. S.

Hanselman

Walton

G. M.

Murray

J. S.

Crosnoe

Muller

Tipton

Schneider

Hulleman

C. S.

Hinojosa

C. P.

Paunesku

Romero

Flint

Roberts

Trott

Iachan

Buontempo

Yang

S. M.

Carvalho

C. M.

. . . Dweck

C. S.

(2019). A national experiment reveals where a growth mindset improves achievement. Nature, 573(7774), 364–369. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1466-y

45.

Yeager

D. S.

Romero

Paunesku

Hulleman

C. S.

Schneider

Hinojosa

Lee

H. Y.

O’Brien

Flint

Roberts

Trott

Greene

Walton

G. M.

Dweck

C. S.

(2016). Using design thinking to improve psychological interventions: The case of the growth mindset during the transition to high school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108(3), 374–391. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000098

46.

Zhu

Garcia

Alonzo

(2019). An independent evaluation of the growth mindset intervention. MDRC. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED594493.pdf

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

12.24 MB

Teacher Mindsets Help Explain Where a Growth-Mindset Intervention Does and Doesn’t Work

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material