Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Inequality is widely believed to incite conflict, but the evidence is inconsistent. We argue that the spatial scale of competition—the extent to which individuals compete locally, with their interaction partners, or globally, with the entire population—can help settle the question. We built a mathematical model of the evolution of conflict under inequality and tested its predictions in an experimental game with 1,205 participants. We found that inequality increases conflict, destroys wealth, and engenders risk taking. Crucially, these effects are amplified by local competition. Thus, inequality is at its most damaging when it arises between close competitors. Indeed, at the extremes, the combined effects of inequality and the scale of competition are very large. More broadly, our findings suggest that disagreements in the literature may be the result of a mismatch between the scale at which inequality is measured and the scale at which conflict occurs.

Keywords

inequality scale of competition conflict relative deprivation tragedy of the commons risk taking open data open materials preregistered

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anderson

L. R.

Mellor

J. M.

Milyo

(2008). Inequality and public good provision: An experimental analysis. Journal of Socio-Economics, 37, 1010–1028.

Barclay

Benard

(2013). Who cries wolf, and when? Manipulation of perceived threats to preserve rank in cooperative groups. PLOS ONE, 8(9), Article e73863. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0073863

Barclay

Stoller

(2014). Local competition sparks concerns for fairness in the ultimatum game. Biology Letters, 10(5), Article 20140213. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2014.0213

Barker

J. L.

Barclay

(2016). Local competition increases people’s willingness to harm others. Evolution and Human Behavior, 37, 315–322.

Bartels

L. M.

(2010). Unequal democracy: The political economy of the new gilded age. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Betzig

(1986). Despotism and differential reproduction. New York, NY: Aldine Transaction.

Boix

(2003). Democracy and redistribution. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

Buckley

Croson

(2006). Income and wealth heterogeneity in the voluntary provision of linear public goods. Journal of Public Economics, 90, 935–955.

Burton-Chellew

M. N.

El Mouden

West

S. A.

(2016). Conditional cooperation and confusion in public-goods experiments. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 113, 1291–1296.

10.

Burton-Chellew

M. N.

May

R. M.

West

S. A.

(2013). Combined inequality in wealth and risk leads to disaster in the climate change game. Climatic Change, 120, 815–830.

11.

Cederman

L.-E.

Gleditsch

K. S.

Buhaug

(2013). Inequality, grievances, and civil war. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

12.

Collier

Hoeffler

(2004). Greed and grievance in civil war. Oxford Economic Papers, 56, 563–595.

13.

Côté

House

Willer

(2015). High economic inequality leads higher-income individuals to be less generous. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 112, 15838–15843.

14.

Crosby

(1976). A model of egoistical relative deprivation. Psychological Review, 83, 85–113.

15.

Cynamon

B. Z.

Fazzari

S. M.

(2016). Inequality, the Great Recession and slow recovery. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 40, 373–399.

16.

Daly

(2016). Killing the competition: Economic inequality and homicide. Piscataway, NJ: Transaction.

17.

Daly

Wilson

(2001). Risk-taking, intrasexual competition, and homicide. In French

J. A.

Kamil

A. C.

Leger

D. W.

(Eds.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation: Vol. 47. Evolutionary psychology and motivation (pp. 1–36). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

18.

Fearon

J. D.

Laitin

D. D.

(2003). Ethnicity, insurgency, and civil war. American Political Science Review, 97, 75–90.

19.

Frank

R. H.

(2012). The Darwin economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

20.

Hensel

P. R.

McLaughlin Mitchell

Sowers

T. E.

II . (2006). Conflict management of riparian disputes. Political Geography, 25, 383–411.

21.

Jayadev

(2013). Distribution and crisis: Reviewing some of the linkages. In Wolfson

M. H.

Epstein

G. A.

(Eds.), The handbook of the political economy of financial crises (pp. 95–112). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

22.

Krupp

D. B.

Taylor

P. D.

(2015). Social evolution in the shadow of asymmetrical relatedness. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 282, Article 20150142. doi:10.1098/rspb.2015.0142

23.

Kumhof

Rancière

Winant

(2015). Inequality, leverage, and crises. American Economic Review, 105, 1217–1245.

24.

Kümmerli

Burton-Chellew

M. N.

Ross-Gillespie

West

S. A.

(2010). Resistance to extreme strategies, rather than prosocial preferences, can explain human cooperation in public goods games. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 107, 10125–10130.

25.

Maynard Smith

. (1982). Evolution and the theory of games. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

26.

Mishra

(2014). Decision-making under risk: Integrating perspectives from biology, economics, and psychology. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 18, 280–307.

27.

Mishra

Son Hing

L. S.

Lalumière

M. L.

(2015). Inequality and risk-taking. Evolutionary Psychology, 13(3), Article 1474704915596295. doi:10.1177/1474704915596295

28.

Muller

E. N.

(1995). Economic determinants of democracy. American Sociological Review, 60, 966–982.

29.

Muller

E. N.

Seligson

M. A.

(1987). Inequality and insurgency. American Political Science Review, 81, 425–451.

30.

Neumayer

(2005). Inequality and violent crime: Evidence from data on robbery and violent theft. Journal of Peace Research, 42, 101–112.

31.

Østby

(2008). Polarization, horizontal inequalities and violent civil conflict. Journal of Peace Research, 45, 143–162.

32.

Payne

B. K.

Brown-Iannuzzi

J. L.

Hannay

J. W.

(2017). Economic inequality increases risk taking. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 114, 4643–4648.

33.

Piketty

Saez

(2003). Income inequality in the United States, 1913–1998. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118, 1–39.

34.

Pinker

(2011). The better angels of our nature: Why violence has declined. New York, NY: Penguin.

35.

Reardon

S. F.

Bischoff

(2011). Income inequality and income segregation. American Journal of Sociology, 116, 1092–1153.

36.

Rider

T. J.

Owsiak

A. P.

(2015). Border settlement, commitment problems, and the causes of contiguous rivalry. Journal of Peace Research, 52, 508–521.

37.

Taylor

P. D.

(1992). Altruism in viscous populations—An inclusive fitness model. Evolutionary Ecology, 6, 352–356.

38.

West

S. A.

Gardner

Shuker

D. M.

Reynolds

Burton-Chellow

Sykes

, . . . Griffin

A. S.

(2006). Cooperation and the scale of competition in humans. Current Biology, 16, 1103–1106.

39.

Wilkinson

R. G.

Pickett

(2009). The spirit level: Why greater equality makes societies stronger. New York, NY: Bloomsbury Press.

40.

Yamagishi

Hashimoto

Schug

(2008). Preferences versus strategies as explanations for culture-specific behavior. Psychological Science, 19, 579–584.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.78 MB

Local Competition Amplifies the Corrosive Effects of Inequality

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material