Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Research has shown that hedonic-contrast effects are a ubiquitous and important phenomenon. In eight studies (N = 4,999) and four supplemental studies (N = 1,809), we found that hedonic-contrast effects were stronger for negative outcomes than for positive outcomes. This asymmetric-contrast effect held for both anticipated and experienced affect. The effect makes risks that include gains and losses more attractive in the presence of high reference points because contrast diminishes the hedonic impact of losses more than gains. We demonstrated that the effect occurs because people are generally more attentive to reference points when evaluating negative outcomes, so drawing attention to reference points eliminates the asymmetric-contrast effect.

Keywords

risk taking happiness decision making environmental effects prediction open data open materials preregistered

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Baumeister

R. F.

Bratslavsky

Finkenauer

Vohs

K. D.

(2001). Bad is stronger than good. Review of General Psychology, 5(4), 323–370. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.5.4.323

Blumenthal

J. A.

(2005). Law and the emotions: The problems of affective forecasting. Indiana Law Journal, 80(2), 155–238. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.497842

Buechel

E. C.

Zhang

Morewedge

C. K.

Vosgerau

(2014). More intense experiences, less intense forecasts: Why people overweight probability specifications in affective forecasts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106(1), 20–36. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034478

Carter

T. J.

Gilovich

(2010). The relative relativity of material and experiential purchases. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(1), 146–159. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017145

Christy

C. A.

Voigt

(1994). Bystander responses to public episodes of child abuse. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24(9), 824–847. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1994.tb00614.x

Claeys

Timmers

(1993). Some instantiations of the informational negativity effect: Positive-negative asymmetry in category breadth and in estimated meaning similarity of trait adjectives. European Journal of Social Psychology, 23(2), 111–129. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420230202

Cogan

Parker

Zellner

D. A.

(2013). Beauty beyond compare: Effects of context extremity and categorization on hedonic contrast. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 39(1), 16–22. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031020

Ditto

P. H.

Hawkins

N. A.

Pizarro

D. A.

(2005). Imagining the end of life: On the psychology of advance medical decision making. Motivation and Emotion, 29(4), 481–502. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-006-9017-x

Gilbert

D. T.

Ebert

J. E. J.

(2002). Decisions and revisions: The affective forecasting of changeable outcomes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(4), 503–514. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.82.4.503

10.

Gilbert

D. T.

Giesler

R. B.

Morris

K. A.

(1995). When comparisons arise. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(2), 227–236. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.69.2.227

11.

Gilovich

(1983). Biased evaluation and persistence in gambling. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44(6), 1110–1126. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.44.6.1110

12.

Halpern

Arnold

R. M.

(2008). Affective forecasting: An unrecognized challenge in making serious health decisions. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 23(10), 1708–1712. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-008-0719-5

13.

Harel

Kogut

(2015). Visceral needs and donation decisions: Do people identify with suffering or with relief? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 56, 24–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2014.08.005

14.

Huh

Y. E.

Vosgerau

Morewedge

C. K.

(2016). More similar but less satisfying: Comparing preferences for and the efficacy of within- and cross-category substitutes for food. Psychological Science, 27(6), 894–903. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797616640705

15.

Imai

Keele

Tingley

(2010). A general approach to causal mediation analysis. Psychological Methods, 15(4), 309–334. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020761

16.

Kahneman

Miller

D. T.

(1986). Norm theory: Comparing reality to its alternatives. Psychological Review, 93(2), 136–153. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.93.2.136

17.

Kahneman

Tversky

(1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263–292. https://doi.org/10.2307/1914185

18.

Litman

Robinson

Abberbock

(2017). TurkPrime.com: A versatile crowdsourcing data acquisition platform for the behavioral sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 49(2), 433–442. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-016-0727-z

19.

Marroquín

Nolen-Hoeksema

Miranda

(2013). Escaping the future: Affective forecasting in escapist fantasy and attempted suicide. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 32(4), 446–463. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.2013.32.4.446

20.

Mellers

B. A.

McGraw

A. P.

(2001). Anticipated emotions as guides to choice. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10(6), 210–214. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.00151

21.

Morewedge

C. K.

Zhu

Buechel

E. C.

(2019). Hedonic contrast effects are larger when comparisons are social. Journal of Consumer Research, 46(2), 286–306. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucy070

22.

Mussweiler

Rüter

Epstude

(2004). The man who wasn’t there: Subliminal social comparison standards influence self-evaluation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40(5), 689–696. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2004.01.004

23.

Nordgren

L. F.

McDonnell

M.-H. M.

Loewenstein

(2011). What constitutes torture? Psychological impediments to an objective evaluation of enhanced interrogation tactics. Psychological Science, 22(5), 689–694. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611405679

24.

Novemsky

Ratner

R. K.

(2003). The time course and impact of consumers’ erroneous beliefs about hedonic contrast effects. Journal of Consumer Research, 29(4), 507–516. https://doi.org/10.1086/346246

25.

Öhman

(2007). Has evolution primed humans to “beware the beast”? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 104(42), 16396–16397. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0707885104

26.

Petty

R. E.

Wegener

D. T.

(1993). Flexible correction processes in social judgment: Correcting for context-induced contrast. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 29(2), 137–165. https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.1993.1007

27.

Pratto

John

O. P.

(1991). Automatic vigilance: The attention-grabbing power of negative social information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61(3), 380–391. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.61.3.380

28.

Puig

V. A.

Szpunar

K. K.

(2017). The devil is in the details: Comparisons of episodic simulations of positive and negative future events. Emotion, 17(5), 867–873. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000294

29.

Raghunathan

Irwin

J. R.

(2001). Walking the hedonic product treadmill: Default contrast and mood-based assimilation in judgments of predicted happiness with a target product. Journal of Consumer Research, 28(3), 355–368. https://doi.org/10.1086/323727

30.

Read

Loewenstein

(1995). Diversification bias: Explaining the discrepancy in variety seeking between combined and separated choices. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 1(1), 34–49. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-898X.1.1.34

31.

Rota

L. M.

Zellner

D. A.

(2007). The categorization effect in hedonic contrast: Experts differ from novices. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 14(1), 179–183. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194047

32.

Rozin

Royzman

E. B.

(2001). Negativity bias, negativity dominance, and contagion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5(4), 296–320. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327957PSPR0504_2

33.

Snell

Gibbs

B. J.

Varey

(1995). Intuitive hedonics: Consumer beliefs about the dynamics of liking. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 4(1), 33–60. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327663jcp0401_02

34.

Taylor

S. E.

(1991). Asymmetrical effects of positive and negative events: The mobilization-minimization hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 110(1), 67–85. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.110.1.67

35.

Taylor

S. E.

Wood

J. V.

Lichtman

R. R.

(1983). It could be worse: Selective evaluation as a response to victimization. Journal of Social Issues, 39(2), 19–40. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1983.tb00139.x

36.

Wood

J. V.

Taylor

S. E.

Lichtman

R. R.

(1985). Social comparison in adjustment to breast cancer. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49(5), 1169–1183. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.49.5.1169

37.

Zellner

D. A.

Rohm

E. A.

Bassetti

T. L.

Parker

(2003). Compared to what? Effects of categorization on hedonic contrast. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 10(2), 468–473. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196508

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.04 MB

Asymmetric Hedonic Contrast: Pain Is More Contrast Dependent Than Pleasure

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material