Essentialism and Racial Bias Jointly Contribute to the Categorization of Multiracial Individuals

Abstract

Categorizations of multiracial individuals provide insight into the psychological mechanisms driving social stratification, but few studies have explored the interplay of cognitive and motivational underpinnings of these categorizations. In the present study, we integrated research on racial essentialism (i.e., the belief that race demarcates unobservable and immutable properties) and negativity bias (i.e., the tendency to weigh negative entities more heavily than positive entities) to explain why people might exhibit biases in the categorization of multiracial individuals. As theorized, racial essentialism, both dispositional (Study 1) and experimentally induced (Study 2), led to the categorization of Black-White multiracial individuals as Black, but only among individuals evaluating Black people more negatively than White people. These findings demonstrate how fundamental cognitive and motivational biases interact to influence the categorization of multiracial individuals.

Keywords

multiracial person perception essentialism negativity bias hypodescent social categorization

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bar-Anan

Nosek

B. A.

(2014). A comparative investigation of seven indirect attitude measures. Behavior Research Methods, 46, 668–688.

Bastian

Haslam

(2006). Psychological essentialism and stereotype endorsement. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 228–235.

Chao

M. M.

Hong

Chiu

(2013). Essentializing race: Its implications on racial categorization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104, 619–634.

Chen

J. M.

Hamilton

D. L.

(2012). Natural ambiguities: Racial categorization of multiracial individuals. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 152–164.

Chen

J. M.

Moons

W. G.

Gaither

S. E.

Hamilton

D. L.

Sherman

J. W.

(2014). Motivation to control prejudice predicts categorization of multiracials. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40, 590–603.

Chen

J. M.

Ratliff

(2015). Implicit attitude generalization from Black to Black-White biracial group members. Social Psychological & Personality Science, 6, 544–550.

Davis

F. J.

(1991). Who is Black? One nation’s definition. In Plous

(Ed.), Understanding prejudice and discrimination (pp. 49–62). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

Dennett

D. C.

(1995). Darwin’s dangerous idea: Evolution and the meanings of life. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.

Gelman

S. A.

(2003). The essential child: Origins of essentialism in everyday thought. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

10.

Halberstadt

Sherman

S. J.

Sherman

J. W.

(2011). Why Barack Obama is Black: A cognitive account of hypodescent. Psychological Science, 22, 29–33.

11.

Haslam

Rothschild

Ernst

(2000). Essentialist beliefs about social categories. British Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 113–127.

12.

A. K.

Sidanius

Cuddy

A. J. C.

Banaji

M. R.

(2013). Status boundary enforcement and the categorization of Black-White multiracials. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 940–943.

13.

A. K.

Sidanius

Levin

D. T.

Banaji

M. R.

(2011). Evidence for hypodescent and racial hierarchy in the categorization and perception of multiracial individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 492–506.

14.

Kahn

A. K.

Sidanius

Pratto

(2009). The space between us and them: Perceptions of status differences. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 12, 591–604.

15.

Kahneman

Tversky

(1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. The Econometric Society, 47, 263–292.

16.

Kinzler

K. D.

Dautel

J. B.

(2012). Children’s essentialist reasoning about language and race. Developmental Science, 15, 131–138.

17.

Krosch

A. R.

Amodio

D. M.

(2014). Economic scarcity alters the perception of race. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 111, 9079–9084.

18.

Krosch

A. R.

Berntsen

Amodio

D. M.

Jost

J. T.

Van Bavel

J. J.

(2013). On the ideology of hypodescent: Political conservatism predicts categorization of racially ambiguous faces as Black. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 1196–1203.

19.

Kteily

Cotterill

Sidanius

Sheehy-Skeffington

Bergh

(2014). “Not one of us”: Predictors and consequences of denying ingroup characteristics to ambiguous targets. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40, 1231–1247.

20.

Peery

Bodenhausen

G. V.

(2008). Black + White = Black: Hypodescent in reflexive categorization of racially ambiguous faces. Psychological Science, 19, 973–977.

21.

Prentice

D. A.

Miller

D. T.

(2007). Psychological essentialism of human categories. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16, 202–206.

22.

Rhodes

Gelman

S. A.

(2009). Five-year-olds’ beliefs about the discreteness of category boundaries for animals and artifacts. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 920–924.

23.

Rhodes

Gelman

S. A.

Karuza

J. C.

(2014). Preschool ontology: The role of beliefs about category boundaries in early categorization. Journal of Cognition and Development, 15, 78–93.

24.

Roberts

S. O.

Gelman

S. A.

(in press). Do children see in black and white? Children’s and adults’ categorizations of multiracial individuals. Child Development.

25.

Rodeheffer

C. D.

Hill

S. E.

Lord

C. G.

(2012). Does this recession make me look Black? The effect of resource scarcity on the categorization of multiracial faces. Psychological Science, 23, 1476–1478.

26.

Rozin

Royzman

E. B.

(2001). Negativity bias, negativity dominance, and contagion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5, 296–320.

27.

Sidanius

Levin

Pratto

(1996). Consensual social dominance orientation and its correlates within the hierarchical structure of American society. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 20, 385–408.

28.

Sidanius

Pratto

(1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

29.

Taylor

S. E.

(1991). Asymmetrical effects of positive and negative events: The mobilization-minimization hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 110, 67–85.

30.

Williams

M. J.

Eberhardt

J. L.

(2008). Biological conceptions of race and the motivation to cross racial boundaries. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 1033–1047.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.06 MB