Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Hypodescent is the phenomenon of categorizing biracial individuals asymmetrically (e.g., viewing Black-White biracial individuals as Black instead of White). We propose that hypodescent is explained by domain-general attentional biases toward dangerous and distinctive components in conceptual representation. This cognitive mechanism derives its empirical support from several research traditions, especially from research on how people evaluate generic statements. Here, we demonstrate how liquid mixtures are categorized in ways characteristic of hypodescent. Mixtures that contain equal amounts of two liquids are categorized as whichever liquid is more dangerous or distinctive (Study 1). Dangerous and distinctive components are prioritized even when they are less than 50% of the mixture (Study 2). The relative dangerousness or distinctiveness of liquids (Study 3) or racial groups (Study 4) predicts the strength and direction of this asymmetry. We discuss how conceptual prominence relates to previous theories of hypodescent.

Keywords

social cognition social categories hypodescent race categorization open data open materials

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

American Community Survey. (2015). Selected social characteristics in the United States: 2011-2015 American Community Survey 5-year estimates. Suitland, MD: U.S. Census Bureau.

Bloom

(1996). Intention, history, and artifact concepts. Cognition, 60, 1–29.

Castano

Yzerbyt

Bourguignon

Seron

(2002). Who may enter? The impact of in-group identification on in-group/out-group categorization. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 315–322.

Cimpian

Brandone

A. C.

Gelman

S. A.

(2010). Generic statements require little evidence for acceptance but have powerful implications. Cognitive Science, 34, 1452–1482.

Cimpian

Gelman

S. A.

Brandone

A. C.

(2010). Theory-based considerations influence the interpretation of generic sentences. Language and Cognitive Processes, 25, 261–276.

Cree

G. S.

McNorgan

McRae

(2006). Distinctive features hold a privileged status in the computation of word meaning: Implications for theories of semantic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32, 643–658.

Davis

F. J.

(1991). Who is Black? One nation’s definition. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.

Fang

C. Y.

Sidanius

Pratto

(1998). Romance across the social status continuum: Interracial marriage and the ideological asymmetry effect. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 29, 290–305.

Gelman

S. A.

Bloom

(2007). Developmental changes in the understanding of generics. Cognition, 105, 166–183.

10.

Halberstadt

Sherman

S. J.

Sherman

J. W.

(2011). Why Barack Obama is Black: A cognitive account of hypodescent. Psychological Science, 22, 29–33.

11.

Hickman

C. B.

(1997). The devil and the one drop rule: Racial categories, African Americans, and the U.S. census. Michigan Law Review, 95, 1161–1265.

12.

A. K.

Roberts

S. O.

Gelman

S. A.

(2015). Essentialism and racial bias jointly contribute to the categorization of multiracial individuals. Psychological Science, 26, 1639–1645.

13.

A. K.

Sidanius

Levin

D. T.

Banaji

M. R.

(2011). Evidence for hypodescent and racial hierarchy in the categorization and perception of biracial individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 492–506.

14.

Kahn

A. K.

Sidanius

Pratto

(2009). The space between us and them: Perceptions of status differences. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 12, 591–604.

15.

Keil

F. C.

(1992). Concepts, kinds, and cognitive development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

16.

Kruschke

J. K.

(1992). ALCOVE: An exemplar-based connectionist model of category learning. Psychological Review, 99, 22–44.

17.

Kruschke

J. K.

(2003). Attention in learning. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12, 171–175.

18.

Leslie

S.-J.

(2008). Generics: Cognition and acquisition. The Philosophical Review, 117, 1–47.

19.

LoBue

(2009). More than just another face in the crowd: Superior detection of threatening facial expressions in children and adults. Developmental Science, 12, 305–313.

20.

Morning

(2009). Toward a sociology of racial conceptualization for the 21st century. Social Forces, 87, 1167–1192.

21.

Nosofsky

R. M.

(1986). Attention, similarity, and the identification-categorization relationship. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 115, 39–61.

22.

Öhman

Lundqvist

Esteves

(2001). The face in the crowd revisited: a threat advantage with schematic stimuli. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 381–396.

23.

Peery

Bodenhausen

G. V.

(2008). Black + White = Black: Hypodescent in reflexive categorization of racially ambiguous faces. Psychological Science, 19, 973–977.

24.

Rips

L. J.

(1989). Similarity, typicality, and categorization. In Vosniadou

Ortony

(Eds.), Similarity and analogical reasoning (pp. 21–59). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

25.

Roberts

S. O.

Gelman

S. A.

(2015). Do children see in Black and White? Children’s and adults’ categorizations of multiracial individuals. Child Development, 86, 1830–1847.

26.

Rozin

Royzman

E. B.

(2001). Negativity bias, negativity dominance, and contagion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5, 296–320.

27.

Sidanius

Pratto

(1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

28.

Smith

S. L.

Choueiti

Pieper

Gillig

Lee

DeLuca

(2015). Inequality in 700 popular films: Examining portrayals of gender, race, & LGBT status from 2007 to 2014. Media, Diversity, & Social Change Initiative, USC Annenberg School for Communication and Journalism. Retrieved from http://assets.uscannenberg.org/docs/inequality_in_700_popular_films_8215_final_for_posting.pdf

29.

Steele

R. R.

Parker

M. T.

Lickel

(2015). Bias within because of threat from outside: The effects of an external call for terrorism on anti-Muslim attitudes in the United States. Social Psychological & Personality Science, 6, 193–200.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.49 MB

0.10 MB

Asymmetric Mixtures: Common Conceptual Priorities for Social and Chemical Kinds

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material