We propose that hypodescent—the assignment of mixed-race individuals to a minority group—is an emergent feature of basic cognitive processes of learning and categorization. According to attention theory, minority groups are learned by attending to the features that distinguish them from previously learned majority groups. Selective attention creates a strong association between minority groups and their distinctive features, producing a tendency to see individuals who possess a mixture of majority- and minority-group traits as minority-group members. Two experiments on face categorization, using both naturally occurring and manipulated minority groups, support this view, suggesting that hypodescent need not be the product of racist or political motivations, but can be sufficiently explained by an individual’s learning history.
AdlerN.E.EpelE.S.CastellazzoG.IckovicsJ.R. (2000). Relationship of subjective and objective social status with psychological and physiological functioning: Preliminary data in healthy white women. Health Psychology, 19, 586–592.
2.
BanksR.R.EberhardtJ.L. (1998). Social psychological processes and the legal bases of racial categorization. In EberhardtJ.L.FiskeS.T. (Eds.), Confronting racism: The problem and the response (pp. 54–75). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
3.
BlascovichJ.WyerN.A.SwartL.A.KiblerJ.L. (1997). Racism and racial categorization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 1364–1372.
4.
CastanoE.YzerbytV.BourguignonD.SeronE. (2002). Who may enter? The impact of in-group identification on in-group/out-group categorization. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 315–322.
5.
GreenwaldA.G.NosekB.A.BanajiM.R. (2003). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 197–216.
6.
HickmanC.B. (1997). The devil and the one drop rule: Racial categories, African Americans, and the U.S. census. Michigan Law Review, 95, 1161–1265.
7.
KruschkeJ.K. (1992). ALCOVE: An exemplar-based connectionist model of category learning. Psychological Review, 99, 22–44.
8.
KruschkeJ.K. (1996). Base rates in category learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 3–26.
9.
KruschkeJ.K. (2003). Attention in learning. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12, 171–175.
10.
LeyensJ.-P.YzerbytY. (1992). The ingroup overexclusion effect: Impact of valence and confirmation on stereotypical information search. European Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 549–569.
11.
NosofskyR.M. (1986). Attention, similarity, and the identification-categorization relationship. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 115, 39–57.
12.
ObamaB. (2004). Dreams from my father: A story of race and inheritance. New York, NY: Three Rivers Press.
13.
PeeryD.BodenhausenG. (2008). Black + White = Black: Hypodescent in reflexive categorization of racially ambiguous faces. Psychological Science, 19, 973–977.
14.
RhodesG.SumichA.ByattG. (1999). Are average facial configurations attractive only because of their symmetry?Psychological Science, 10, 52–58.
15.
ShermanJ.W.KruschkeJ.K.ShermanS.J.PercyE.J.PetrocelliJ.V.ConreyF.R. (2009). Attentional processes in stereotype formation: A common model for category accentuation and illusory correlation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 305–323.
