Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Humans and nonhuman animals share an approximate number system (ANS) that permits estimation and rough calculation of quantities without symbols. Recent studies show a correlation between the acuity of the ANS and performance in symbolic math throughout development and into adulthood, which suggests that the ANS may serve as a cognitive foundation for the uniquely human capacity for symbolic math. Such a proposition leads to the untested prediction that training aimed at improving ANS performance will transfer to improvement in symbolic-math ability. In the two experiments reported here, we showed that ANS training on approximate addition and subtraction of arrays of dots selectively improved symbolic addition and subtraction. This finding strongly supports the hypothesis that complex math skills are fundamentally linked to rudimentary preverbal quantitative abilities and provides the first direct evidence that the ANS and symbolic math may be causally related. It also raises the possibility that interventions aimed at the ANS could benefit children and adults who struggle with math.

Keywords

number comprehension mathematical ability

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Barth

La Mont

Lipton

Dehaene

Kanwisher

Spelke

(2006). Non-symbolic arithmetic in adults and young children. Cognition, 98, 199–222.

Barth

La Mont

Lipton

Spelke

E. S.

(2005). Abstract number and arithmetic in preschool children. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 102, 14116–14121.

Cantlon

J. F.

Brannon

E. M.

(2007). Basic math in monkeys and college students. PLoS Biology, 5(12), e328. Retrieved from http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pbio.0050328

Dehaene

(1992). Varieties of numerical abilities. Cognition, 44, 1–42.

Dehaene

(1999). The number sense: How the mind creates mathematics. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

DeWind

N. K.

Brannon

E. M.

(2012). Malleability of the approximate number system: Effects of feedback and training. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6, 68. Retrieved from http://www.frontiersin.org/human_neuroscience/10.3389/fnhum.2012.00068

Feigenson

Dehaene

Spelke

(2004). Core systems of number. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 307–314.

Gallistel

C. R.

Gelman

(1992). Preverbal and verbal counting and computation. Cognition, 44, 43–74.

Gallistel

C. R.

Gelman

(2000). Non-verbal numerical cognition: From reals to integers. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 59–65.

10.

Gilmore

C. K.

McCarthy

S. E.

Spelke

E. S.

(2010). Non-symbolic arithmetic abilities and mathematics achievement in the first year of formal schooling. Cognition, 115, 394–406.

11.

Halberda

Feigenson

(2008). Developmental change in the acuity of the “number sense”: The approximate number system in 3-, 4-, 5-, and 6-year-olds and adults. Developmental Psychology, 44, 1457–1465.

12.

Halberda

Wilmer

J. B.

Naiman

D. Q.

Germine

(2012). Number sense across the lifespan as revealed by a massive Internet-based sample. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 109, 11116–11120.

13.

Halberda

Mazzocco

M. M. M.

Feigenson

(2008). Individual differences in non-verbal number acuity correlate with maths achievement. Nature, 455, 665–668.

14.

Jolles

D. D.

Crone

E. A.

(2012). Training the developing brain: A neurocognitive perspective. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6, 76. Retrieved from http://www.frontiersin.org/Human_Neuroscience/10.3389/fnhum.2012.00076

15.

Knops

Viarouge

Dehaene

(2009). Dynamic representations underlying symbolic and nonsymbolic calculation: Evidence from the operational momentum effect. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 71, 803–821.

16.

Kucian

Grond

Rotzer

Henzi

Schonmann

Plangger

. . . von Aster

(2011). Mental number line training in children with developmental dyscalculia. NeuroImage, 57, 782–795.

17.

Libertus

M. E.

Brannon

E. M.

(2010). Stable individual differences in number discrimination in infancy. Developmental Science, 13, 900–906.

18.

Lyons

I. M.

Beilock

S. L.

(2011). Numerical ordering ability mediates the relation between number-sense and arithmetic competence. Cognition, 121, 256–261.

19.

Mazzocco

M. M. M.

Feigenson

Halberda

(2011a). Impaired acuity of the approximate number system underlies mathematical learning disability (dyscalculia). Child Development, 82, 1224–1237.

20.

Mazzocco

M. M. M.

Feigenson

Halberda

(2011b). Preschoolers’ precision of the approximate number system predicts later school mathematics performance. PLoS ONE, 6(9), e23749. Retrieved from http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0023749

21.

McCrink

Dehaene

Dehaene-Lambertz

(2007). Moving along the number line: Operational momentum in nonsymbolic arithmetic. Perception & Psychophysics, 69, 1324–1333.

22.

Morrison

A. B.

Chein

J. M.

(2011). Does working memory training work? The promise and challenges of enhancing cognition by training working memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18, 46–60.

23.

Nieder

(2009). Prefrontal cortex and the evolution of symbolic reference. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 19, 99–108.

24.

Piazza

(2010). Neurocognitive start-up tools for symbolic number representations. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14, 542–551.

25.

Piazza

Facoetti

Trussardi

A. N.

Berteletti

Conte

Lucangeli

. . . Zorzi

(2010). Developmental trajectory of number acuity reveals a severe impairment in developmental dyscalculia. Cognition, 116, 33–41.

26.

Raghubar

K. P.

Barnes

M. A.

Hecht

S. A.

(2010). Working memory and mathematics: A review of developmental, individual difference, and cognitive approaches. Learning and Individual Differences, 20, 110–122.

27.

Räsänen

Salminen

Wilson

A. J.

Aunio

Dehaene

(2009). Computer-assisted intervention for children with low numeracy skills. Cognitive Development, 24, 450–472.

28.

Shipstead

Redick

T. S.

Engle

R. W.

(2012). Is working memory training effective? Psychological Bulletin, 138, 628–654.

29.

Wilson

A. J.

Revkin

S. K.

Cohen

Dehaene

(2006). An open trial assessment of “The Number Race”, an adaptive computer game for remediation of dyscalculia. Behavioral and Brain Functions, 2, 20. http://www.behavioralandbrainfunctions.com/content/2/1/20

30.

Wynn

(1998). Psychological foundations of number: Numerical competence in human infants. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2, 296–303.

31.

Spelke

E. S.

(2000). Large number discrimination in 6-month-old infants. Cognition, 74, B1–B11.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.43 MB

Training the Approximate Number System Improves Math Proficiency

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material