Whether high-level properties of stimuli rendered invisible by interocular competition can influence perception and behavior remains controversial. We studied whether suppressed and invisible symbolic and nonsymbolic numerical stimuli can elicit priming. First, we established that participants were objectively unable to discriminate numerical prime stimuli when interocular suppression rendered them invisible. Next, we asked participants to enumerate a visible target set of items after being exposed to a suppressed, invisible (nonsymbolic or symbolic) prime set. Both symbolic and nonsymbolic unconsciously perceived numerical primes induced robust priming effects that were specific to the numerical distance between the target and prime. Comparison with a no-prime condition revealed that primes larger than targets interfered with target enumeration and primes the same as or smaller than targets facilitated target enumeration. Taken together, our findings provide clear evidence for high-level processing of stimuli rendered invisible through interocular suppression.
AlmeidaJ.MahonB.Z.NakayamaK.CaramazzaA. (2008). Unconscious processing dissociates along categorical lines. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 105, 15214–15218.
2.
AnsariD. (2007). Does the parietal cortex distinguish between “10,” “ten,” and ten dots?Neuron, 53, 165–167.
CappellettiM.CipolottiL. (2006). Unconscious processing of Arabic numerals in unilateral neglect. Neuropsychologia, 44, 1999–2006.
8.
CastelliF.GlaserD.E.ButterworthB. (2006). Discrete and analogue quantity processing in the parietal lobe: A functional MRI study. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 103, 4693–4698.
CohenL.DehaeneS.NaccacheL.LehéricyS.Dehaene-LambertzG.HénaffM.-A.MichelF. (2000). The visual word form area: Spatial and temporal characterization of an initial stage of reading in normal subjects and posterior split-brain patients. Brain, 123, 291–307.
11.
CrickF.KochC. (1995). Are we aware of neural activity in primary visual cortex?Nature, 375, 121–123.
12.
DehaeneS.NaccacheL. (2006). Can one suppress subliminal words?Neuron, 52, 397–399.
13.
DehaeneS.PiazzaM.PinelP.CohenL. (2003). Three parietal circuits for number processing. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 20, 487–506.
14.
FangF.HeS. (2005). Cortical responses to invisible objects in the human dorsal and ventral pathways. Nature Neuroscience, 8, 1380–1385.
15.
GoodaleM.A.MilnerA.D. (1992). Separate visual pathways for perception and action. Trends in Neurosciences, 15, 20–25.
16.
Grill-SpectorK.KourtziZ.KanwisherN. (2001). The lateral occipital complex and its role in object recognition. Vision Research, 41, 1409–1422.
17.
HubbardE.M.PiazzaM.PinelP.DehaeneS. (2005). Interactions between number and space in parietal cortex. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 6, 435–448.
18.
JiangY.CostelloP.HeS. (2007). Processing of invisible stimuli: Advantage of upright faces and recognizable words in overcoming interocular suppression. Psychological Science, 18, 349–355.
19.
KaanE. (2005). Direction effects in number word comparison: An event-related potential study. NeuroReport, 16, 1853–1856.
20.
KimC.Y.BlakeR. (2005). Psychophysical magic: Rendering the visible ‘invisible.’Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 381–388.
21.
KoechlinE.NaccacheL.BlockE.DehaeneS. (1999). Primed numbers: Exploring the modularity of numerical representations with masked and unmasked semantic priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 1882–1905.
22.
MarcelA.J. (1983). Conscious and unconscious perception: An approach to the relations between phenomenal experience and perceptual processes. Cognitive Psychology, 15, 238–300.
PaulsenD.J.NevilleH.J. (2008). The processing of non-symbolic numerical magnitudes as indexed by ERPs. Neuropsychologia, 46, 2532–2544.
25.
PiazzaM.GiacominiE.Le BihanD.DehaeneS. (2003). Single-trial classification of parallel pre-attentive and serial attentive processes using functional magnetic resonance imaging. Proceedings of the Royal Society: B, 270, 1237–1245.
26.
PiazzaM.MechelliA.ButterworthB.PriceC.J. (2002). Are subitizing and counting implemented as separate or functionally overlapping processes?NeuroImage, 15, 435–446.
27.
ReynvoetB.BrysbaertM. (1999). Single-digit and two-digit Arabic numerals address the same semantic number line. Cognition, 72, 191–201.
28.
ReynvoetB.BrysbaertM. (2004). Cross-notation number priming investigated at different stimulus onset asynchronies in parity and naming tasks. Experimental Psychology, 51, 81–90.
29.
ReynvoetB.BrysbaertM.FiasW. (2002). Semantic priming in number naming. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A, 55, 1127–1139.
30.
RoggemanC.VergutsT.FiasW. (2007). Priming reveals differential coding of symbolic and non-symbolic quantities. Cognition, 105, 380–394.
31.
SackurJ.NaccacheL.Pradat-DiehlP.AzouviP.MazevetD.KatzR.. (2008). Semantic processing of neglected numbers. Cortex, 44, 673–682.
TsuchiyaN.KochC.GilroyL.A.BlakeR. (2006). Depth of interocular suppression associated with continuous flash suppression, flash suppression, and binocular rivalry. Journal of Vision, 6(10), Article 6. Retrieved December 8, 2009, from http://journalofvision.org/6/10/6/
34.
TurconiE.CampbellJ.I.SeronX. (2006). Numerical order and quantity processing in number comparison. Cognition, 98, 273–285.
35.
Van OpstalF.GeversW.De MoorW.VergutsT. (2008). Dissecting the symbolic distance effect: Comparison and priming effects in numerical and nonnumerical orders. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 419–425.
36.
VergutsT.FiasW. (2004). Representation of number in animals and humans: A neural model. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16, 1493–1504.
37.
VuilleumierP.O.RafalR.D. (2000). A systematic study of visual extinction: Between- and within-field deficits of attention in hemispatial neglect. Brain, 123, 1263–1279.
38.
ZimbaL.D.BlakeR. (1983). Binocular rivalry and semantic processing: Out of sight, out of mind. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 9, 807–815.
39.
ZorziM.ButterworthB. (1999). A computational model of number comparison. In HahnM.StonessS.C. (Eds.), Proceedings of the twenty first annual meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 772–786). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
40.
ZorziM.StoianovI.UmiltaC. (2005). Computational modelling of numerical cognition. In CampbellJ.I.D. (Ed.), Handbook of mathematical cognition (pp. 67–84). Hove, England: Psychology Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
