What basic capacities lay the foundation for advanced numerical cognition? Are there basic nonsymbolic abilities that support the understanding of advanced numerical concepts, such as fractions? To date, most theories have posited that previously identified core numerical systems, such as the approximate number system (ANS), are ill-suited for learning fraction concepts. However, recent research in developmental psychology and neuroscience has revealed a ratio-processing system (RPS) that is sensitive to magnitudes of nonsymbolic ratios and may be ideally suited for supporting fraction concepts. We provide evidence for this hypothesis by showing that individual differences in RPS acuity predict performance on four measures of mathematical competence, including a university entrance exam in algebra. We suggest that the nonsymbolic RPS may support symbolic fraction understanding much as the ANS supports whole-number concepts. Thus, even abstract mathematical concepts, such as fractions, may be grounded not only in higher-order logic and language, but also in basic nonsymbolic processing abilities.
BarthH.StarrA.SullivanJ. (2009). Children’s mappings of large number words to numerosities. Cognitive Development, 24, 248–264. doi:10.1016/j.cogdev.2009.04.001
2.
CarpenterT. P. (1981). Results from the Second Mathematics Assessment of the National Assessment of Educational Progress. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
3.
DehaeneS. (2011). The number sense: How the mind creates mathematics (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
4.
DehaeneS.CohenL. (2007). Cultural recycling of cortical maps. Neuron, 56, 384–398. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2007.10.004
5.
De SmedtB.NoëlM.-P.GilmoreC.AnsariD. (2013). How do symbolic and non-symbolic numerical magnitude processing skills relate to individual differences in children’s mathematical skills? A review of evidence from brain and behavior. Trends in Neuroscience & Education, 2, 48–55. doi:10.1016/j.tine.2013.06.001
6.
DeWolfM.BassokM.HolyoakK. J. (2015). Conceptual structure and the procedural affordances of rational numbers: Relational reasoning with fractions and decimals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 144, 127–150. doi:10.1037/xge0000034
7.
DeWolfM.VosniadouS. (2015). The representation of fraction magnitudes and the whole number bias reconsidered. Learning and Instruction, 37, 39–49. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2014.07.002
8.
FazioL. K.BaileyD. H.ThompsonC. A.SieglerR. S. (2014). Relations of different types of numerical magnitude representations to each other and to mathematics achievement. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 123, 53–72. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2014.01.013
9.
FeigensonL.DehaeneS.SpelkeE. (2004). Core systems of number. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 307–314. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2004.05.002
10.
GallistelC. R.GelmanR. (2000). Non-verbal numerical cognition: From reals to integers. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 59–65. doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(99)01424-2
11.
GoldstoneR. L.LandyD. H.SonJ. Y. (2010). The education of perception. Topics in Cognitive Science, 2, 265–284. doi:10.1111/j.1756-8765.2009.01055.x
12.
HallettD.NunesT.BryantP.ThorpeC. M. (2012). Individual differences in conceptual and procedural fraction understanding: The role of abilities and school experience. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 113, 469–486. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2012.07.009
13.
HollandsJ. G.DyreB. P. (2000). Bias in proportion judgments: The cyclical power model. Psychological Review, 107, 500–524.
14.
JacobS. N.NiederA. (2009). Tuning to non-symbolic proportions in the human frontoparietal cortex. European Journal of Neuroscience, 30, 1432–1442. doi:10.1111/j.1460-9568.2009.06932.x
15.
JacobS. N.VallentinD.NiederA. (2012). Relating magnitudes: The brain’s code for proportions. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16, 157–166. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2012.02.002
16.
KellmanP. J.MasseyC. M.SonJ. Y. (2010). Perceptual learning modules in mathematics: Enhancing students’ pattern recognition, structure extraction, and fluency. Topics in Cognitive Science, 2, 285–305. doi:10.1111/j.1756-8765.2009.01053.x
17.
KierenT. E. (1976). On the mathematical, cognitive, and instructional foundations of rational numbers. In LeshR. A.BradbardD. A. (Eds.), Number and measurement: Papers from a research workshop (Vol. 7418491, pp. 101–144). Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED120027.pdf
18.
LewisM. R.MatthewsP. G.HubbardE. M. (2015). Neurocognitive architectures and the nonsymbolic foundations of fractions understanding. In BerchD. B.GearyD. C.KoepkeK. M. (Eds.), Development of mathematical cognition: Neural substrates and genetic influences (pp. 141–160). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
19.
LipkusI. M.SamsaG.RimerB. K. (2001). General performance on a numeracy scale among highly educated samples. Medical Decision Making, 21, 37–44. doi:10.1177/0272989X0102100105
20.
MatthewsP. G.ChesneyD. L. (2015). Fractions as percepts? Exploring cross-format distance effects for fractional magnitudes. Cognitive Psychology, 78, 28–56. doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2015.01.006
21.
McCrinkK.SpelkeE. S.DehaeneS.PicaP. (2013). Non-symbolic halving in an Amazonian indigene group. Developmental Science, 16, 451–462. doi:10.1111/desc.12037
22.
McCrinkK.WynnK. (2007). Ratio abstraction by 6-month-old infants. Psychological Science, 18, 740–745. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01969.x
23.
McCullochW. S. (1960). What is a number, that a man may know it, and a man, that he may know a number? General Semantics Bulletin, 26–27, 7–18.
NiY.ZhouY.-D. (2005). Teaching and learning fraction and rational numbers: The origins and implications of whole number bias. Educational Psychologist, 40, 27–52. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep4001_3
26.
NiederA. (2005). Counting on neurons: The neurobiology of numerical competence. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 6, 177–190.
27.
PiagetJ. (2013). The child’s conception of number. In Jean Piaget: Selected works (Vol. 2; GattegnoC.HodgsonF. M., Trans.). New York, NY: Routledge. (Original work published 1941)
28.
PiazzaM. (2010). Neurocognitive start-up tools for symbolic number representations. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14, 542–551. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2010.09.008
29.
PitkethlyA.HuntingR. (1996). A review of recent research in the area of initial fraction concepts. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 30, 5–38. doi:10.1007/BF00163751
30.
RipsL. J.BloomfieldA.AsmuthJ. (2008). From numerical concepts to concepts of number [Target article and commentaries]. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 31, 623–687. doi:10.1017/S0140525X08005566
31.
SchneiderM.SieglerR. S. (2010). Representations of the magnitudes of fractions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36, 1227–1238. doi:10.1037/a0018170
32.
SieglerR. S.DuncanG. J.Davis-KeanP. E.DuckworthK.ClaessensA.EngelM.. . . ChenM. (2012). Early predictors of high school mathematics achievement. Psychological Science, 23, 691–697. doi:10.1177/0956797612440101
33.
SieglerR. S.Lortie-ForguesH. (2014). An integrative theory of numerical development. Child Development Perspectives, 8, 144–150. doi:10.1111/cdep.12077
34.
SieglerR. S.PykeA. A. (2013). Developmental and individual differences in understanding of fractions. Developmental Psychology, 49, 1994–2004. doi:10.1037/a0031200
35.
SieglerR. S.ThompsonC. A.SchneiderM. (2011). An integrated theory of whole number and fractions development. Cognitive Psychology, 62, 273–296. doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2011.03.001
36.
Singer-FreemanK. E.GoswamiU. (2001). Does half a pizza equal half a box of chocolates? Proportional matching in an analogy task. Cognitive Development, 16, 811–829. doi:10.1016/S0885-2014(01)00066-1
37.
SpinilloA. G.BryantP. (1991). Children’s proportional judgments: The importance of “half.” Child Development, 62, 427–440. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.1991.tb01542.x
38.
SteffeL. P. (2001). A new hypothesis concerning children’s fractional knowledge. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 20, 267–307. doi:10.1016/S0732-3123(02)00075-5
39.
StevensS. S.GalanterE. H. (1957). Ratio scales and category scales for a dozen perceptual continua. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54, 377–411. doi:10.1037/h0043680
40.
VallentinD.NiederA. (2008). Behavioral and prefrontal representation of spatial proportions in the monkey. Current Biology, 18, 1420–1425. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2008.08.042
41.
WalshV. (2003). A theory of magnitude: Common cortical metrics of time, space and quantity. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 483–488. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2003.09.002
42.
WieseH. (2003). Numbers, language, and the human mind. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
43.
WynnK. (1995). Infants possess a system of numerical knowledge. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 4, 172–177.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
