We demonstrate a link between preschoolers’ quantitative competencies and their school-entry knowledge of the relations among numbers (number-system knowledge). The quantitative competencies of 141 children (69 boys) were assessed at the beginning of preschool and throughout the next 2 years of preschool, as was their mathematics and reading achievement at the end of kindergarten and their number-system knowledge at the beginning of first grade. A combination of Bayes analyses and standard regressions revealed that the age at which the children had the conceptual insight that number words represent specific quantities (cardinal value) was strongly related to their later number-system knowledge and was more consistently related to broader mathematics than to reading achievement, controlling for intelligence, executive function, and parental education levels. The key implication is that it is not simply knowledge of cardinal value but the age of acquisition of this principle that is central to later mathematical development and school readiness.
BaileyD. H.DuncanG. J.WattsT.ClementsD.SaramaJ. (in press). Risky business: Correlation and causation in longitudinal studies of skill development. American Psychologist.
2.
BeckD. M.SchaeferC.PangK.CarlsonS. M. (2011). Executive function in preschool children: Test-retest reliability. Journal of Cognition and Development, 12, 169–193. doi:10.1080/15248372.2011.563485
3.
BlairC.RazzaR. P. (2007). Relating effortful control, executive function, and false belief understanding to emerging math and literacy ability in kindergarten. Child Development, 78, 647–663. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01019.x
4.
CareyS. (2004). Bootstrapping and the origins of concepts. Daedalus, 133(1), 59–68. doi:10.1162/001152604772746701
5.
CheungP.RubensonM.BarnerD. (2017). To infinity and beyond: Children generalize the successor function to all possible numbers years after learning to count. Cognitive Psychology, 92, 22–36. doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2016.11.002
6.
ChuF. W.vanMarleK.GearyD. C. (2015). Early numerical foundations of young children’s mathematical development. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 132, 205–212. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2015.01.006
7.
CottonS. M.KielyP. M.CrewtherD. P.ThomsonB.LaycockR.CrewtherS. G. (2005). A normative and reliability study for the Raven’s Coloured Progressive Matrices for primary school aged children from Victoria, Australia. Personality and Individual Differences, 39, 647–659. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2005.02.015
8.
De SmedtB.NoëlM. P.GilmoreC.AnsariD. (2013). How do symbolic and non-symbolic numerical magnitude processing skills relate to individual differences in children’s mathematical skills? A review of evidence from brain and behavior. Trends in Neuroscience and Education, 2, 48–55. doi:10.1016/j.tine.2013.06.001
9.
DuncanG. J.DowsettC. J.ClaessensA.MagnusonK.HustonA. C.KlebanovP., . . . SextonH. (2007). School readiness and later achievement. Developmental Psychology, 43, 1428–1446. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.44.1.217
10.
FazioL. K.BaileyD. H.ThompsonC. A.SieglerR. S. (2014). Relations of different types of numerical magnitude representations to each other and to mathematics achievement. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 123, 53–72. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2014.01.013
11.
FeigensonL.DehaeneS.SpelkeE. (2004). Core systems of number. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 307–314. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2004.05.002
12.
FeigensonL.LibertusM. E.HalberdaJ. (2013). Links between the intuitive sense of number and formal mathematics ability. Child Development Perspectives, 7, 74–79. doi:10.1111/cdep.12019
13.
GallistelC. R. (2009). The importance of proving the null. Psychological Review, 116, 439–453. doi:10.1037/a0015251
14.
GallistelC. R.GelmanR. (1992). Preverbal and verbal counting and computation. Cognition, 44, 43–74. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(92)90050-R
15.
GearyD. C. (1994). Children’s mathematical development: Research and practical applications. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
16.
GearyD. C. (2011). Cognitive predictors of individual differences in achievement growth in mathematics: A five-year longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 47, 1539–1552. doi:10.1037/a0025510
17.
GearyD. C.HoardM. K.NugentL.BaileyH. D. (2013). Adolescents’ functional numeracy is predicted by their school entry number system knowledge. PLOS ONE, 8(1), Article e54651. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0054651
18.
GearyD. C.vanMarleK. (2016). Young children’s core symbolic and non-symbolic quantitative knowledge in the prediction of later mathematics achievement. Developmental Psychology, 52, 2130–2144. doi:10.1037/dev0000214
19.
GelmanR.GallistelC. R. (1978). The child’s understanding of number. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
20.
GinsburgH. P.BaroodyA. J. (2003). Test of Early Mathematics Ability (3rd ed.). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
21.
HollowayI. D.AnsariD. (2009). Mapping numerical magnitudes onto symbols: The numerical distance effect and individual differences in children’s mathematics achievement. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 103, 17–29. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2008.04.001
22.
InglisM.GilmoreC. (2014). Indexing the approximate number system. Acta Psychologica, 145, 147–155. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.11.009
23.
InvernizziM.SullivanA.MeierJ.SwankL. (2004). PreK teacher’s manual: Phonological Awareness Literacy Screening. Charlottesville, VA: University of Virginia.
24.
Le CorreM.CareyS. (2007). One, two, three, four, nothing more: An investigation of the conceptual sources of the verbal counting principles. Cognition, 105, 395–438. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2006.10.005
25.
MoreyR. D.RouderJ. N. (2015). Package ‘BayesFactor’ (Version 0.9.12-2) [Computer software]. Retrieved from https://www.r-project.org
26.
RafteryA. E. (1995). Bayesian model selection in social research. Sociological Methodology, 25, 111–163. doi:10.2307/271063
R Core Team. (2016). R: A language and environment for statistical computing (Version 3.2.5) [Computer software]. Retrieved from https://www.r-project.org
29.
RouderJ. N.MoreyR. D. (2012). Default Bayes factors for model selection in regression. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 47, 877–903. doi:10.1080/00273171.2012.734737
30.
SarneckaB. W.CareyS. (2008). How counting represents number: What children must learn and when they learn it. Cognition, 108, 662–674. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2008.05.007
31.
SAS Institute. (2014). Statistical analysis system 9.2 [Computer software]. Cary, NC: Author.
32.
SieglerR. S. (1987). The perils of averaging data over strategies: An example from children’s addition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 116, 250–264. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.116.3.250
33.
SieglerR. S.BoothJ. L. (2004). Development of numerical estimation in young children. Child Development, 75, 428–444. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2004.00684.x
34.
SieglerR. S.BraithwaiteD. W. (2017). Numerical development. Annual Review of Psychology, 68, 187–213. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-010416-044101
35.
StarrA.LibertusM. E.BrannonE. M. (2013). Number sense in infancy predicts mathematical abilities in childhood. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 110, 18116–18120. doi:10.1073/pnas.1302751110
36.
vanMarleK.ChuF. W.LiY.GearyD. C. (2014). Acuity of the approximate number system and preschoolers’ quantitative development. Developmental Science, 17, 492–505. doi:10.1111/desc.12143
37.
vanMarleK.ChuF. W.MouY.SeokJ. H.RouderJ.GearyD. C. (2016). Attaching meaning to the number words: Contributions of the object tracking and approximate number systems. Developmental Science. Advance online publication. doi:10.1111/desc.12495
38.
WechslerD. (2001). Wechsler Individual Achievement Test – Abbreviated II. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corp.
39.
WechslerD. (2002). Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence – third edition. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corp.
40.
WynnK. (1990). Children’s understanding of counting. Cognition, 36, 155–193. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(90)90003-3
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
