In the context of rapid environmental change, research on adaptation politics highlights the role of power in socio-ecological change, offering insights on how authority, knowledge and subjectivity shape adaptation pathways. Less attention has been given to how authority emerges, subjectivities become politicized and transformative adaptation scales up. This paper addresses these limitations, drawing on a Deleuzian reading of subjectivity, prioritizing analytically immanent capacities and contradictory events. This framework is applied to the case of Pikine, an informal Dakar settlement, where intensifying floods in the 1990s were managed through drainage canal construction, authorized by the president. The paper links this decision to historical legacies and unexpected events, including floods, structural adjustments, the emergence of a coalition of youth organizations, and changing government authority. It invites policymakers to foster the self-organization capacity of emerging coalitions of vulnerable groups and to leverage the openings offered by moments of crisis.
Agence de Développement Municipal (ADM) (2012), “Étude du Plan Directeur de Drainage (PDD) des eaux pluviales de la région périurbaine de Dakar: Rapport n°3 – Annexe: Plan Directeur de Drainage Pluvial”, Programme de Gestion des Eaux Pluviales dans la Zone Périurbaine de Dakar (PROGEP), available at https://inondations-dakar.org/dataset/rapport-no-3-annexe-plan-directeur-de-drainage-pluvial-2012.
2.
Agence Nationale de la Statistique et de la Démographie (ANSD) (2023), “Rapport provisoire du Cinquième Recensement Général de la Population et de l’Habitat (RGPH-5)”, Agence Nationale de la Statistique et de la Démographie, Dakar, Sénégal.
3.
AgrawalA (2020), Environmentality: Technologies of Government and the Making of Subjects, Duke University Press, Durham, NC.
4.
AlthusserL (1971), Ideology and the State, in Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays, translated by BBrewster, Monthly Review Press, New York.
5.
AminAThriftN (2002), Cities: Reimagining the urban, Polity, Cambridge.
6.
AndersonB (2006), “Becoming and being hopeful: towards a theory of affect”, Environment and Planning DVol 24, No 5, pages 733–752.
7.
AndersonB (2012), “Affect and biopower: towards a politics of life”, Transactions of the Institute of British GeographersVol 37, No 1, pages 28–43.
8.
AndersonBAdeyP (2012), “Governing events and life: ‘emergency’ in UK civil contingencies”, Political GeographyVol 31, No 1, pages 24–33.
9.
AndrewL (2020), “The vulnerability of vital systems: how ‘critical infrastructure’ became a security problem”, in CaveltyM DSøby KristensenK (editors), Securing “the Homeland”, Routledge, Abingdon, pages 17–39.
10.
BaM (2016), “Dakar, du mouvement Set Setal à Y’en a marre (1989–2012)”, ItinérairesVol 1, pages 0–13.
11.
BennettJ (2001), The Enchantment of Modern Life: Attachments, Crossings, and Ethics, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
12.
BennettJ (2010), Vibrant Matter, Duke University Press, Durham, NC.
13.
BennettJCheahPOrlieM AGroszE (2010), New Materialisms: Ontology, Agency, and Politics, Duke University Press, Durham, NC.
14.
BogicA (2017), “Theory in perpetual motion and translation: assemblage and intersectionality in feminist studies”, Atlantis: Critical Studies in Gender, Culture & Social Justice/Études Critiques sur le Genre, la Culture, et la JusticeVol 38, No 1.
15.
BuchananI (2020), Assemblage Theory and Method: An Introduction and Guide, Bloomsbury Academic, London.
16.
BuchananIColebrookC (2018), Deleuze and Feminist Theory, Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh.
17.
BulkeleyH (2012), “Governance and the geography of authority: modalities of authorisation and the transnational governing of climate change”, Environment and Planning A: Economy and SpaceVol 44, No 10, pages 2428–2444.
18.
ButlerJ (1990), “Feminism and the subversion of identity”, in ButlerJ, Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity, Routledge, London, pages 1–25.
19.
ButlerJ (1997), The Psychic Life of Power: Theories in Subjection, Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA.
20.
CashoreB (2017), “Legitimacy and the privatization of environmental governance: how non-state market-driven (NSMD) governance systems gain rule-making authority”, in HaasPeter M (editor), International Environmental Governance, Routledge, Abingdon, pages 339–361.
21.
CisséOSèyeM (2016), “Flooding in the suburbs of Dakar: impacts on the assets and adaptation strategies of households or communities”, Environment and UrbanizationVol 28, No 1, pages 183–204.
22.
CloughP THJean (editors) (2007), The Affective Turn: Theorizing the Social, Duke University Press, Durham, NC.
23.
DawneyL (2011), “The motor of being: a response to Steve Pile’s ‘Emotions and affect in recent human geography’”, Transactions of the Institute of British GeographersVol 36, No 4, pages 599–602.
24.
DeanM (2010), Governmentality: Power and Rule in Modern Society, Sage, London.
25.
DeathC (2010), “Counter-conducts: A Foucauldian analytics of protest”, Social Movement StudiesVol 9, No 3, pages 235–251.
26.
DeLandaM A (2006), New Philosophy of Society: Assemblage Theory and Social Complexity, Bloomsbury Publishing, London.
27.
DeLandaM (2012), “Space: extensive and intensive, actual and virtual”, in BuchananILambertG (editors), Deleuze and Space, Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh, pages 80–87, available at doi:10.3366/edinburgh/9780748618743.003.0005.
28.
DeLandaM (2016), Assemblage Theory, Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh.
29.
DeleuzeG (1994), Difference and Repetition, Columbia University Press, New York.
30.
DeleuzeG (2004), Logic of Sense, Bloomsbury Publishing, London.
31.
DeleuzeGGuattariF (2009), Anti-Oedipus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia, Penguin, London.
32.
DemerittD (2002), “What is the ‘social construction of nature’? A typology and sympathetic critique”, Progress in Human GeographyVol 26, No 6, pages 767–790.
33.
de RuiterM CVan LoonA F (2022), “The challenges of dynamic vulnerability and how to assess it”, iScienceVol 25, No 8.
34.
DiméM (2017), “De bul faale à Y’en a marre: continuités et dissonances dans les dynamiques de contestation sociopolitique et d’affirmation citoyenne chez les jeunes au Sénégal”, Africa DevelopmentVol 42, No 2, pages 83–105.
35.
DiméM (2022), “Y’en a Marre: Catalyst for an indocility grammar in Senegal”, in SanchesE R (editor), Popular Protest, Political Opportunities, and Change in Africa, Routledge, Abingdon, pages 56–72.
36.
DiopM C (2013), Sénégal, 2000-2012: Les Institutions et Politiques Publiques à l’épreuve d’une Gouvernance Libérale, KARTHALA Editions, Paris.
37.
DioufM (1992), “Fresques murales et écriture de l’histoire. Le Set/Setal à Dakar”, Politique africaineVol 46, pages 41–45.
38.
DioufM (1996), “Urban youth and Senegalese politics: Dakar 1988–1994”, Public CultureVol 8, No 2, pages 225–249.
39.
DodmanDHaywardBPellingM, et al. (2022), “Cities, settlements and key infrastructure”, in PörtnerH-O, et al. (editors), Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pages 907–1040.
40.
DodmanDLeckHRuscaMColenbranderS (2017), “African urbanisation and urbanism: implications for risk accumulation and reduction”, International Journal of Disaster Risk ReductionVol 26, pages 7–15.
41.
DuffyMGallagherMWaittG (2019), “Emotional and affective geographies of sustainable community leadership: a visceral approach”, GeoforumVol 106, pages 378–384.
42.
EriksenSLindJ (2009), “Adaptation as a political process: adjusting to drought and conflict in Kenya’s drylands”, Environmental ManagementVol 43, pages 817–835.
43.
EriksenS HNightingaleA JEakinH (2015), “Reframing adaptation: the political nature of climate change adaptation”, Global Environmental ChangeVol 35, pages 523–533.
44.
FilippiM EBarcenaATrogrlićR Š, et al. (2023), “Interdisciplinarity in practice: reflections from early-career researchers developing a risk-informed decision support environment for tomorrow’s cities”, International Journal of Disaster Risk ReductionVol 85, 103481.
45.
FletcherR (2010), “Neoliberal environmentality: towards a poststructuralist political ecology of the conservation debate”, Conservation and SocietyVol 8, No 3, 171.
FoucaultM (1975), Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison, Vintage, New York.
48.
FoucaultM (1980), Power-Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings, 1972–1977, Pearson Education, Harlow.
49.
FoucaultM (1986), The History of Sexuality, Volume 3: The Care of the Self, translated by HurleyR, Pantheon Books, New York.
50.
FoucaultM (1991), “Governmentality”, in BurchellGGordonCMillerP (editors), The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pages 87–104.
51.
FoucaultM (2005), The Hermeneutics of the Subject: Lectures at the Collège de France 1981–1982. Vol 9, Macmillan, Basingstoke.
52.
FoucaultM (2009), Security, Territory, Population: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1977–78, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke.
53.
FredericksR C (2009), Doing the Dirty Work: The Cultural Politics of Garbage Collection in Dakar, Senegal, University of California, Berkeley.
54.
GibsonK (2001), “Regional subjection and becoming”, Environment and Planning D: Society and SpaceVol 19, No 6, pages 639–667.
GondaN (2016), “Climate change, ‘technology’ and gender: ‘adapting women’ to climate change with cooking stoves and water reservoirs”, Gender, Technology and DevelopmentVol 20, No 2, pages 149–168.
GroszE (2010), “Feminism, materialism, and freedom”, in CooleDFrostS (editors), New Materialisms: Ontology, Agency, and Politics, Duke University Press, Durham, NC, pages 139–157.
59.
GroszE (2011), Becoming Undone: Darwinian Reflections on Life, Politics, and Art, Duke University Press, Durham, NC.
60.
GroszE (2017), “A thousand tiny sexes: feminism and rhizomatics”, in BoundasC VOlkowskiD (editors), Gilles Deleuze and the Theater of Philosophy, Routledge, Abingdon, pages 187–210.
61.
GroveK (2012), “Preempting the next disaster: catastrophe insurance and the financialization of disaster management”, Security DialogueVol 43, No 2, pages 139–155.
62.
GroveK J (2013), “From emergency management to managing emergence: a genealogy of disaster management in Jamaica”, Annals of the Association of American GeographersVol 103, No 3, pages 570–588.
63.
GroveK (2014a), “Agency, affect, and the immunological politics of disaster resilience”, Environment and Planning D: Society and SpaceVol 32, No 2, pages 240–256.
64.
GroveK J (2014b), “Adaptation machines and the parasitic politics of life in Jamaican disaster resilience”, AntipodeVol 46, No 3, pages 611–628.
65.
GururaniS (2002), “Forests of pleasure and pain: gendered practices of labor and livelihood in the forests of the Kumaon Himalayas, India”, Gender, Place & CultureVol 9, No 3, pages 229–243.
66.
HaconMBarcenaAKadiriM (2024), “Low-carbon energy infrastructure: where affective relations co-evolve with governmentality projects”, Published online.
67.
HanlonT MRichmondA KShelziJMyersG (2019), “Cultural identity in the peri-urban African landscape: a case study from Pikine, Senegal”, African Geographical ReviewVol 38, No 2, pages 157–171.
68.
HarawayD (1988), “Situated knowledges: the science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective”, Feminist StudiesVol 14, No 3, pages 575–599.
69.
HardtM (2007), “Foreword: what affects are good for”, in Ticineto CloughPHalleyJ (editors), The Affective Turn, Duke University Press, Durham, NC, pages ix–xiv.
70.
HarrisL M (2006), “Irrigation, gender, and social geographies of the changing waterscapes of southeastern Anatolia”, Environment and Planning D: Society and SpaceVol 24, No 2, pages 187–213.
71.
HarrisonCPopkeJ (2011), “ ‘Because you got to have heat’: the networked assemblage of energy poverty in eastern North Carolina”, Annals of the Association of American GeographersVol 101, No 4, pages 949–961, available at https://doi.org/10.1080/00045608.2011.569659.
72.
HavardJ F (2001), “Ethos « bul faale » et nouvelles figures de la réussite au sénégal”, Politique africaineVol 82, No 2, 63.
73.
HulmeM (2009), Why We Disagree about Climate Change: Understanding Controversy, Inaction and Opportunity, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
74.
HungerfordHSmileyS LBlairTBeutlerSBowersNCadetE (2019), “Coping with floods in Pikine, Senegal: an exploration of household impacts and prevention efforts”, Urban ScienceVol 3, No 2, 54.
75.
JasanoffS (2004), “States of knowledge: the co-production of science and the social order”, Routledge, Abingdon.
76.
JonesH (2013), The Métis of Senegal: Urban Life and Politics in French West Africa, Indiana University Press, Bloomington.
77.
KaijserAKronsellA (2014), “Climate change through the lens of intersectionality”, Environmental PoliticsVol 23, No 3, pages 417–433.
78.
KatesR WTravisW RWilbanksT J (2012), “Transformational adaptation when incremental adaptations to climate change are insufficient”, Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesVol 109, No 19, pages 7156–7161.
79.
KevinGJonathanP (2015), “Assemblage thinking and participatory development: potentiality, ethics, biopolitics”, Geography CompassVol 9, No 1, pages 1–13.
80.
KleinR J THuqSDentonFDowningT ERichelsR GRobinsonJ BTothF L (2007), “Inter-relationships between adaptation and mitigation”, in ParryM LCanzianiO FPalutikofJ Pvan der LindenP JHansonC E (editors), Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pages 745–777.
81.
KrekulaCNikanderPWilińskaM (2018), “Multiple marginalizations based on age: gendered ageism and beyond”, in AyalonLTesch-RömerC (editors), Contemporary Perspectives on Ageism, Springer, Cham, pages 33–50.
82.
LaclauEMouffeC (1985), Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics, Verso, London.
83.
LansfordT (2017), Political Handbook of the World 2016–2017, CQ Press, Washington, DC.
84.
LegrosO (2003), “Le gouvernement des quartiers populaires. Production de l’espace et regulation politique dans les quartiers non regelementaires de Dakar (Senegal) et de Tunis (Tunisie)”, available at https://theses.fr/2003TOUR1502.
85.
LundC (2006), “Twilight institutions: public authority and local politics in Africa”, Development and ChangeVol 37, No 4, pages 685–705.
Manuel-NavarreteDPellingM (2015), “Subjectivity and the politics of transformation in response to development and environmental change”, Global Environmental ChangeVol 35, pages 558–569.
88.
MarinoERibotJ (2012), “Special issue introduction: Adding insult to injury: climate change and the inequities of climate intervention”, Global Environmental ChangeVol 22, No 2, pages 323–328.
89.
MarstonSPaulJIiJWoodwardKEscobarA (2007), “The ‘ontological turn’ in social theory. A commentary on ‘Human geography without scale’”, Transactions of the Institute of British GeographersVol 32, No 1, pages 106–111.
90.
MassumiB. (2002), Parables for the Virtual: Movement, Affect, Sensation, Duke University Press, Durham, NC.
91.
McFarlaneC (2009), “Translocal assemblages: space, power and social movements”, GeoforumVol 40, No 4, pages 561–567.
92.
McFarlaneC (2011a), “Assemblage and critical urbanism”, CityVol 15, No 2, pages 204–224.
93.
McFarlaneC (2011b), “The city as assemblage: dwelling and urban space”, Environment and Planning D: Society and SpaceVol 29, No 4, pages 649–671.
MitlinD (2001), “The formal and informal worlds of state and civil society: what do they offer to the urban poor?”, International Planning StudiesVol 6, No 4, pages 377–392.
97.
Muñoz-EricksonT AMillerC AMillerT R (2017), “How cities think: knowledge co-production for urban sustainability and resilience”, ForestsVol 8, No 6, 203.
98.
Murray LiT (2007), “Practices of assemblage and community forest management”, Economy and SocietyVol 36, No 2, pages 263–293.
99.
NelsonS (2014), “The new type of Senegalese under construction: Fadel Barro and Aliou Sané on Yenamarrism after Wade”, African Studies QuarterlyVol 14, No 3, pages 13–32.
100.
NewmanA (2020), “Honour, respectability and ‘noble’ work: descent and gender-based obstacles to the education and employment of young Haalpulaar women in northern Senegal”, Children’s GeographiesVol 18, No 6, pages 654–666.
101.
NiatiN BShahP P (2022), “Transhiphop pedagogy and epistemic disobedience in Senegal”, International Journal of Research & Method in EducationVol 45, No 3, pages 271–283.
102.
NietzscheF (2008), Thus Spoke Zarathustra: A Book for Everyone and Nobody, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
103.
NightingaleA (2006), “The nature of gender: work, gender, and environment”, Environment and Planning D: Society and SpaceVol 24, No 2, pages 165–185.
104.
NightingaleA J (2011), “Bounding difference: intersectionality and the material production of gender, caste, class and environment in Nepal”, GeoforumVol 42, No 2, pages 153–162.
105.
NightingaleA (2013), “Fishing for nature: the politics of subjectivity and emotion in Scottish inshore fisheries management”, Environment and Planning A: Economy and SpaceVol 45, No 10, pages 2362–2378.
106.
NightingaleA J (2017), “Power and politics in climate change adaptation efforts: struggles over authority and recognition in the context of political instability”, GeoforumVol 84, pages 11–20.
107.
NightingaleA J (2018), “The socioenvironmental state: political authority, subjects, and transformative socionatural change in an uncertain world”, Environment and Planning E: Nature and SpaceVol 1, No 4, pages 688–711.
108.
NightingaleA JOjhaH R (2013), “Rethinking power and authority: symbolic violence and subjectivity in Nepal’s Terai forests”, Development and ChangeVol 44, No 1, pages 29–51.
109.
NightingaleA JGondaNEriksenS H (2022), “Affective adaptation = effective transformation? Shifting the politics of climate change adaptation and transformation from the status quo”, Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate ChangeVol 13, No 1, e740.
110.
NuijtenMLorenzoD (2009), “Ruling by record: the meaning of rights, rules and registration in an Andean comunidad”, Development and ChangeVol 40, No 1, pages 81–103.
111.
O’BrienK (2009), “Do values subjectively define the limits to climate change adaptation?”, in AdgerW NLorenzoniIO’BrienK (editors), Adapting to Climate Change: Thresholds, Values, Governance, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pages 164–180.
112.
O’BrienKSygnaL (2013), “Responding to climate change: the three spheres of transformation”, in Proceedings of Transformation in a Changing Climate, University of Oslo, pages 16–23.
OsborneN (2015), “Intersectionality and kyriarchy: a framework for approaching power and social justice in planning and climate change adaptation”, Planning TheoryVol 14, No 2, pages 130–151.
115.
PellingMO’BrienKMatyasD (2015), “Adaptation and transformation”, Climatic ChangeVol 133, pages 113–127.
116.
PelusoN LLundC (2011), “New frontiers of land control: introduction”, Journal of Peasant StudiesVol 38, No 4, pages 667–681.
117.
PerryD L (2009), “Fathers, sons, and the state: discipline and punishment in a Wolof hinterland”, Cultural AnthropologyVol 24, No 1, pages 33–67.
118.
PileS (2010), “Emotions and affect in recent human geography”, Transactions of the Institute of British GeographersVol 35, No 1, pages 5–20.
119.
PörtnerH O, D CHRobertsAdams, et al. (editors) (2022), Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
120.
ProthmannS (2018), “Migration, masculinity and social class: insights from Pikine, Senegal”, International MigrationVol 56, No 4, pages 96–108.
121.
PuarJ K (2020), “‘I would rather be a cyborg than a goddess’: becoming-intersectional in assemblage theory”, in McCannCKimS-kErgunE (editors), Feminist Theory Reader, Routledge, Abingdon, pages 405–415.
122.
RenX (2018), “Governing the informal: housing policies over informal settlements in China, India, and Brazil”, Housing Policy DebateVol 28, No 1, pages 79–93.
RoffeJ (2017), “Deleuze’s concept of quasi-cause”, Deleuze StudiesVol 11, No 2, pages 278–294.
125.
RoyA (2009), “Why India cannot plan its cities: informality, insurgence and the idiom of urbanization”, Planning TheoryVol 8, No 1, pages 76–87.
126.
RuddickS (2010), “The politics of affect: Spinoza in the work of Negri and Deleuze”, Theory, Culture & SocietyVol 27, No 4, pages 21–45.
127.
SassenS (2008), Territory, Authority, Rights: From Medieval to Global Assemblages, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
128.
SchaerCThiamM DNygaardI (2017), “Flood management in urban Senegal: an actor-oriented perspective on national and transnational adaptation interventions”, Climate and DevelopmentVol 10, No 3, pages 1–16.
129.
SikorTLundC (2009), “Access and property: a question of power and authority”, Development and ChangeVol 40, No 1, pages 1–22.
130.
SinghN M (2013), “The affective labor of growing forests and the becoming of environmental subjects: rethinking environmentality in Odisha, India”, GeoforumVol 47, pages 189–198.
131.
SteinbergJ (2016), “Affect, desire, and judgement in Spinoza’s account of motivation”, British Journal for the History of PhilosophyVol 24, No 1, pages 67–87.
132.
SultanaF (2009), “Fluid lives: subjectivities, gender and water in rural Bangladesh”, Gender, Place and CultureVol 16, No 4, pages 427–444.
133.
ThienD (2005), “After or beyond feeling? A consideration of affect and emotion in geography”, AreaVol 37, No 4, pages 450–456.
ThriftNDewsburyJ D (2008), “Dead geographies – and how to make them live”, Environment and Planning DVol 18, No 4, pages 411–432.
136.
TouréI (2017), “Jeunesse, mobilisations sociales et citoyenneté en Afrique de l’Ouest: étude comparée des mouvements de contestation « Y’en a marre » au Sénégal et « Balai citoyen » au Burkina Faso”, Africa DevelopmentVol 42, No 2, pages 57–82.
VandekerckhoveNSuykensB (2008), “‘The liberation of Bodoland’: tea, forestry and tribal entrapment in Western Assam”, South Asia: Journal of South Asian StudiesVol 31, No 3, pages 450–471.
139.
VillalónL A (1995), Islamic Society and State Power in Senegal: Disciples and Citizens in Fatick, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
140.
WiseR M, IM SFazeySmith, et al. (2014), “Reconceptualising adaptation to climate change as part of pathways of change and response”, Global Environmental ChangeVol 28, pages 325–336.
