This paper discusses an application of air curtain for reduction of virus-laden droplets transmission from an infected host to other passengers in a small aircraft cabin. The study is restricted to respiratory droplets emitted during coughing. Discrete Particle Method introduced for violent respiratory events (VRE) captured in detail the movement of coughing puff inside the cabin and allowed to study the interaction of droplets with the air curtain’s stream and the surrounding air. The results show that the application of the air curtain inhibits the transmission process of small droplets (diameters ranging from 10 to 40 μm). The air curtain supplied with a limited air mass flow cannot alter the multiphase puff dynamics, but it can be utilized to deflect the virus droplets with lower momentum away from the neighboring passenger. Improved removal efficiency of virus-laden droplets has been achieved owing to the application of the air curtain together with supplementary suction surfaces introduced on the front seat backrest. The virus (SARS-CoV-2) transmission process was also analyzed by means of mass concentration of CO2 exhaled by the infected host, used as a contamination tracker. This part of the work aims at assessment of an applicability of CO2 tracer gas in analysis of virus transmission. Results show that CO2 tracer gas can only be employed for the study of small size droplets dispersion (diameter less or equal to 40 μm).
Wilder-SmithA. The severe acute respiratory syndrome: impact on travel and tourism. Travel Med Infect Dis2006; 4(2): 53–60.
2.
OlsenSJChangH-LCheungTY-Y, et al.Transmission of the severe acute respiratory syndrome on aircraft. N Engl J Med2003; 349(25): 2416–2422.
3.
ZhangYZhangAWangJ. Exploring the roles of high-speed train, air and coach services in the spread of COVID-19 in China. Transp Policy2020; 94: 34–42.
4.
SunXWandeltSZhengC, et al.COVID-19 pandemic and air transportation: successfully navigating the paper hurricane. J Air Transp Manag2021; 94: 102062. DOI: 10.1016/j.jairtraman.2021.102062
5.
GuptaJKLinC-HChenQ. Flow dynamics and characterization of a cough. Indoor Air[Internet]. 2009; 19(6): 517–525. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0668.2009.00619.x
6.
ElmaghrabyHAChiangYWAliabadiAA. Ventilation strategies and air quality management in passenger aircraft cabins: a review of experimental approaches and numerical simulations. Sci Technol Built Environ[Internet]. 2018; 24(2): 160–175. DOI: 10.1080/23744731.2017.1387463
7.
WangCLiuJLiJ, et al.Turbulence characterization of instantaneous airflow in an aisle of an aircraft cabin mockup. Build Environ2017; 116: 207–217.
8.
YanYLiXYangL, et al.Evaluation of cough-jet effects on the transport characteristics of respiratory-induced contaminants in airline passengers’ local environments. Build Environ2020; 183: 107206.
9.
YangLLiXYanY, et al.Effects of cough-jet on airflow and contaminant transport in an airliner cabin section. J Comput Multiph Flows[Internet]. 2018; 10(2): 72–82. [cited 2022 Feb 13]. DOI: 10.1177/1757482X17746920
YanYLiXShangY, et al.Evaluation of airborne disease infection risks in an airliner cabin using the lagrangian-based Wells-Riley approach. Build Environ2017; 121: 79–92.
12.
LiJCaoXLiuJ, et al.Global airflow field distribution in a cabin mock-up measured via large-scale 2D-PIV. Build Environ2015; 93(P2): 234–244.
13.
LiFLiuJRenJ, et al.Predicting contaminant dispersion using modified turbulent Schmidt numbers from different vortex structures. Build Environ2018; 130: 120–127.
14.
LiFLiuJRenJ, et al.Numerical investigation of airborne contaminant transport under different vortex structures in the aircraft cabin. Int J Heat Mass Transf2016; 96: 287–295.
15.
ChenCLiuWLiF, et al.A hybrid model for investigating transient particle transport in enclosed environments. Build Environ2013; 62: 45–54.
16.
XieXLiYChwangATY, et al.How far droplets can move in indoor environments - revisiting the wells evaporation-falling curve. Indoor Air[Internet]. 2007; 17(3): 211–225. [cited 2021 Dec 13]. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0668.2007.00469.x
17.
YouRZhangYZhaoX, et al.An innovative personalized displacement ventilation system for airliner cabins. Build Environ2018; 137: 41–50.
18.
YouRLinCWeiD, et al.Evaluating the commercial airliner cabin environment with different air distribution systems. Indoor Air[Internet]. 2019; 29(5): 840–853. [cited 2020 Dec 3]. DOI: 10.1111/ina.12578
19.
MaierJMarggraf-MicheelCDehneT, et al.Thermal comfort of different displacement ventilation systems in an aircraft passenger cabin. Build Environ2017; 111: 256–264.
20.
MaierJMarggraf-MicheelCZinnF, et al.Ceiling-based cabin displacement ventilation in an aircraft passenger cabin: analysis of thermal comfort. Build Environ2018; 146: 29–36.
21.
LiJCaoXLiuJ, et al.PIV measurement of human thermal convection flow in a simplified vehicle cabin. Build Environ2018; 144: 305–315.
22.
PangLLiPBaiL, et al.Optimization of air distribution mode coupled interior design for civil aircraft cabin. Build Environ2018; 134: 131–145.
23.
ShiZChenJYouR, et al.Modeling of gasper-induced jet flow and its impact on cabin air quality. Energy Build2016; 127: 700–713.
24.
TangZCuiXGuoY, et al.Near fields of gasper jet flows with wedged nozzle in aircraft cabin environment. Build Environ2017; 125: 99–110.
25.
YouRChenJShiZ, et al.Experimental and numerical study of airflow distribution in an aircraft cabin mock-up with a gasper on. J Build Perform Simul[Internet]. 2016; 9(5): 555–566. DOI: 10.1080/19401493.2015.1126762
26.
YouRLiuWChenJ, et al.Predicting airflow distribution and contaminant transport in aircraft cabins with a simplified gasper model. J Build Perform Simul2016; 9(6): 699–708.
27.
LiJLiuJDaiS, et al.PIV experimental research on gasper jets interacting with the main ventilation in an aircraft cabin. Build Environ2018; 138: 149–159.
28.
YouRChenJLinCH, et al.Investigating the impact of gaspers on cabin air quality in commercial airliners with a hybrid turbulence model. Build Environ2017; 111: 110–122.
MelikovAIvanovaTStefanovaG. Seat headrest-incorporated personalized ventilation: thermal comfort and inhaled air quality. Build Environ2012; 47(1): 100–108.
31.
ZítekPVyhlídalTSimeunovićG, et al.Novel personalized and humidified air supply for airliner passengers. Build Environ2010; 45(11): 2345–2353.
32.
ZítekPVyhlídalTSimeunovićG, et al.CFD model aided design of personalized air supply for aircraft cabin seat. In: Proceedings of the 6th Vienna Conference on Mathematical Modelling, Vienna, February 11-13,2009, pp. 2236–2245.
33.
ZhangTTLiPWangS. A personal air distribution system with air terminals embedded in chair armrests on commercial airplanes. Build Environ2012; 47(1): 89–99.
34.
Ahmed MborehaCJianhongSYanW, et al.Investigation of thermal comfort on innovative personalized ventilation systems for aircraft cabins: a numerical study with computational fluid dynamics. Therm Sci Eng Prog2021; 26: 101081.
35.
AirShieldT. A commercially viable solution to social distancing for air travel. White Paper, 2020.
SalmanzadehMAhmadiGRahnamaM. Transport and deposition of evaporating droplets in a ventilated environment. Part Sci Technol2012; 30(1): 17–31.
38.
FanXZhangXWeerasuriyaAU, et al.Numerical investigation of the effects of environmental conditions, droplet size, and social distancing on droplet transmission in a street canyon. Build Environ[Internet]. 2022; 221: 109261. DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.109261.
39.
ToKKWTsangOTYYipCCY, et al.Consistent detection of 2019 novel coronavirus in saliva. Clin Infect Dis2020; 71(15): 841–843.
40.
KubackiSDickE. Simulation of plane impinging jets with k-ω based hybrid RANS/LES models. Int J Heat Fluid Flow2010; 31(5): 862–878.
41.
YuLXBejiTMaragkosG, et al.Assessment of numerical simulation capabilities of the fire dynamics simulator (FDS 6) for planar air curtain flows. Fire Technol[Internet]. 2018; 54(3): 583–612. DOI: 10.1007/s10694-018-0701-7
42.
NamerIÖtügenMV. Velocity measurements in a plane turbulent air jet at moderate Reynolds numbers. Exp Fluids[Internet]. 1988; 6(6): 387–399. [cited 2022 Feb 7]. DOI: 10.1007/BF00196484
43.
TsubokuraMKobayashiTTaniguchiN, et al.A numerical study on the eddy structures of impinging jets excited at the inlet. Int J Heat Fluid Flow2003; 24(4): 500–511.
44.
ASHRAE (American society of heating refrigerating and air-conditioning engineers). 2009 ASHRAE handbook — fundamentals. Washington, D.C: ASHRAE, 2009, p. 599.
45.
International Organization for Standardization. ISO 7730:2005 ergonomics of the thermal environment: analytical determination and interpretation of thermal comfort using calculation of the PMV and PPD indices and local thermal comfort criteria. [Internet]. Geneva, Switzerland: ISO, 2005, pp. 1–52. Available from:https://books.google.pl/books?id=p3YcoAEACAAJ
46.
ASHRAE (American society of heating refrigerating and air-conditioning engineers). Chapter 13 - aircraft. In: 2019 ASHRAE handbook—HVAC applications. Washington, D.C: ASHRAE, 2019, pp. 1–16.
47.
SozerEBrehmCKirisCC. Gradient calculation methods on arbitrary polyhedral unstructured meshes for cell-centered CFD solvers. In: 52nd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting - AIAA Science and Technology Forum and Exposition. [Internet]. Virginia, USA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Inc., 2014. [cited 2022 Dec 16]. DOI: 10.2514/6.2014-1440
48.
MenterFR. Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications. AIAA J[Internet]. 1994; 32(8): 1598–1605. [cited 2018 Feb 14]. DOI: 10.2514/3.12149
49.
MenterFR. Review of the shear-stress transport turbulence model experience from an industrial perspective. Int J Comut Fluid Dyn2009; 23(4): 305–316.
50.
ChurchillSW. A reinterpretation of the turbulent Prandtl number. Ind Eng Chem Res2002; 41(25): 6393–6401.
Srinivasan VenkatesanLRainaA. CFD study of different aircraft cabin ventilation systems on thermal comfort and airborne contaminant transport: a study on passenger thermal comfort and indoor cabin air quality. MSc Thesis. Sweden: Linköping University, 2020.
53.
DaoHTKimK. Behavior of cough droplets emitted from Covid-19 patient in hospital isolation room with different ventilation configurations. Build Environ[Internet]. 2022; 209: 108649. DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.108649
54.
YangXOuCYangH, et al.Transmission of pathogen-laden expiratory droplets in a coach bus. J Hazard Mater2020; 397: 122609.
55.
YanYLiXTuJ. Thermal effect of human body on cough droplets evaporation and dispersion in an enclosed space. Build Environ[Internet]. 2019; 148: 96–106. DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.10.039
56.
SunSLiJHanJ. How human thermal plume influences near-human transport of respiratory droplets and airborne particles: a review. Environ Chem Lett2021; 19(3): 1971–1982. DOI: 10.1007/s10311-020-01178-4
57.
KhatoonSKimMH. Human thermal comfort and heat removal efficiency for ventilation variants in passenger cars. Energies[Internet]. 2017; 10(11): 1710. [cited 2022 Jun 1]. Available from:http://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/10/11/1710
58.
ChuiEHRaithbyGD. Computation of radiant heat transfer on a nonorthogonal mesh using the finite-volume method. Numer Heat Transf Part B Fundam[Internet]. 1993; 23(3): 269–288. DOI: 10.1080/10407799308914901
59.
RaithbyGDChuiEH. A finite-volume method for predicting a radiant heat transfer in enclosures with participating media. J Heat Transfer[Internet]. 1990; 112(2): 415–423. DOI: 10.1115/1.2910394
SheikhnejadYAghamolaeiRFallahpourM, et al.Airborne and aerosol pathogen transmission modeling of respiratory events in buildings: an overview of computational fluid dynamics. Sustainable Cities and Soc2022; 79: 103704, Elsevier BV
PozorskiJ. Models of turbulent flows and particle dynamics. In: CISM International Centre for Mechanical Sciences, Courses and Lectures. [Internet]. Berlin, Germany: Springer International Publishing, 2017, pp. 97–150. [cited 2022 Dec 16]. Available from:https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-41567-3_3
64.
AhmadiW. Study of turbulent dispersion modelling effectson dispersed multiphase flows properties. [Internet]. Darmstadt, Germany: Technische Universität Darmstadt, 2013. [cited 2022 Dec 16]. Available from:https://tuprints.ulb.tu-darmstadt.de/3610/
LiAAhmadiG. Dispersion and deposition of spherical particles from point sources in a turbulent channel flow. Aerosol Sci Technol1992; 16(4): 209–226.
67.
WeiJLiY. Enhanced spread of expiratory droplets by turbulence in a cough jet. Build Environ[Internet]. 2015; 93(P2): 86–96. DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2015.06.018
68.
LiXShangYYanY, et al.Modelling of evaporation of cough droplets in inhomogeneous humidity fields using the multi-component eulerian-lagrangian approach. Build Environ[Internet]. 2018; 128: 68–76. DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2017.11.025
69.
AmjadimaneshHNorouziMJohnsonMS, et al.The effect of body position while coughing on the airborne transmission of pathogens. Phy Fluids2022; 34: 041902.
70.
NicasMNazaroffWWHubbardA. Toward understanding the risk of secondary airborne infection: emission of respirable pathogens. J Occup Environ Hyg2005; 2(3): 143–154.
71.
FengGZhangYLanX. Numerical study of the respiratory aerosols transportation in ventilated classroom. Appl Mech Mater2012; 204–208: 4298–4304.
72.
ThatipartiDSGhiaUMeadKR. Computational fluid dynamics study on the influence of an alternate ventilation configuration on the possible flow path of infectious cough aerosols in a mock airborne infection isolation room. Sci Technol Built Environ2017; 23(2): 355–366.
73.
HöppeP. Temperatures of expired air under varying climatic conditions. Int J Biometeorol[Internet]. 1981; 25(2): 127–132. DOI: 10.1007/bf02184460
74.
DboukTDrikakisD. On coughing and airborne droplet transmission to humans. Phys Fluids[Internet]. 2020; 32(5): 053310. DOI: 10.1063/5.0011960
75.
XieXLiYSunH, et al.Exhaled droplets due to talking and coughing. J R Soc Interface2009; 6(Suppl 6): 703–714.
76.
ZhuSWKatoSYangJH. Study on transport characteristics of saliva droplets produced by coughing in a calm indoor environment. Build Environ2006; 41(12): 1691–1702.
77.
PendarMRPáscoaJC. Numerical modeling of the distribution of virus carrying saliva droplets during sneeze and cough. Phys Fluids[Internet]. 2020; 32(8): 083305. DOI: 10.1063/5.0018432
78.
BlockenB. Towards aerodynamically equivalent COVID-19 1 5 m social distancing for walking and running Questions and Answers. [Internet]. 2020. [cited 2020 Dec 3]. Available from:https://youtu.be/Sig5Q7rMFfY.
79.
FengLYaoSSunH, et al.TR-PIV measurement of exhaled flow using a breathing thermal manikin. Build Environ[Internet]. 2015; 94: 683–693. [cited 2022 Feb 7].
80.
JaramilloJEPérez-SegarraCDRodriguezI, et al.Numerical study of plane and round impinging jets using RANS models. Numer Heat Transf Part B Fundam[Internet]. 2008; 54(3): 213–237. [cited 2022 May 30]. DOI: 10.1080/10407790802289938
81.
KhayrullinaAvan HooffTBlockenB, et al.Validation of steady RANS modelling of isothermal plane turbulent impinging jets at moderate reynolds numbers. Eur J Mech B/Fluids[Internet]. 2019; 75: 228–243. DOI: 10.1016/j.euromechflu.2018.10.003
ZhangMShresthaPLiuX, et al.Computational fluid dynamics simulation of SARS-CoV-2 aerosol dispersion inside a grocery store. Build Environ2022; 209: 108652.
84.
ZhangHZhangWZhangW, et al.Multi-vent module-based adaptive ventilation to reduce cross-contamination among indoor occupants. Build Environ2022; 212: 108836.
85.
ShiZChenQ. Experimental and computational investigation of wall-mounted displacement induction ventilation system. Energy Build2021; 241: 110937.
86.
QuanMWangYZhouY, et al.Effect of swirl ventilation on contaminant removal in a cylindrical confined space. Build Environ2021; 205: 108277.
87.
BasuS. Computational characterization of inhaled droplet transport to the nasopharynx. Sci Rep[Internet]. 2021; 11(1): 6652. Available from:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33758241/
