A technique for the aeroelastic solution of parachute decelerators is presented in this work. The methodology uses empirical aerodynamics, based on a filling-time inflation model and Ludtke's area law, coupled to two explicit structural solution approaches. A mass-spring-damper technique allows solving the deployment of the system (when the grid is highly distorted) efficiently, and a finite element model is used for the accurate calculation of the structural loads and stresses during parachute opening and steady flight. The coupling strategy is staggered and the models share the same mesh. The methodology is intended for practical calculations of deceleration systems, and provides useful performance and structural data minimizing model complexity and computational cost. The suitability of the proposed technique is assessed by comparisons with reference test drop data.
Ewing EG, Bixby HW and Knacke TW. Recovery systems design guide. Irving Industries Inc., Report AFFDL-TR-78-151, 1978.
2.
Knacke TW. Parachute recovery systems design manual. Naval Weapons Center, Report AD-A247-666, 1991.
3.
Mudrak J. Development of a parachute deployment model for airdrop simulations. In: Interservice/industry training, simulation, and education conference (I/ITSEC), Orlando, FL, 28 November–2 December 2016, paper no. 16133.
4.
Moore J and Morris A. A hybrid parachute simulation environment for the Orion parachute development project. In: 21st AIAA aerodynamic decelerator systems technology conference and seminar, Dublin, Ireland, May 2011.
5.
Potvin J and Ray E. Extrapolating the trends of test drop data with opening shock factor calculations: the case of the Orion main and drogue parachutes inflating to 1st reefed stage. In: 24th AIAA aerodynamic decelerator systems technology conference, Denver, Colorado, 5–9 June 2017.
6.
Maydew RC, Peterson CW and Orlik-Rueckemann KJ. Design and testing of high-performance parachutes (la conception et les essais des parachutes a hautes performances). Advisory Group for Aerospace Research and Development (AGARD), Report AGARD-AG-319, 1991.
7.
StricklandJHHiguchiH. Parachute aerodynamics: an assessment of prediction capability. J Aircraft1996; 33: 241–252.
8.
CaoYNieSWuZ. Numerical simulation of parachute inflation: a methodological review. Proc I MechE, Part G: J Aerospace Engineering2017. 233: 736–766.
9.
AccorsiMLeonardJBenneyR, et al.Structural modeling of parachute dynamics. AIAA J2000; 38: 139–146.
10.
BenneyRSteinKR. Computational fluid-structure interaction model for parachute inflation. J Aircraft1996; 33: 730–736.
11.
KimJDLiYLiX. Simulation of parachute FSI using the front tracking method. J Fluids Struct2013; 37: 100–119.
12.
ShiQReasorDGaoZ, et al.On the verification and validation of a spring fabric for modeling parachute inflation. J Fluids Struct2015; 58: 20–39.
13.
CaoYWuZSongQ, et al.Numerical simulation of fluid-structure interaction in the opening process of conical parachute. Aeronaut J2009; 113: 191–200.
14.
Tutt B. Fluid structure interaction parachute benchmark models in LS-DYNA®. In: AIAA aerodynamic decelerator systems (ADS) conference, Daytona Beach, Florida, 25–28 March 2013.
15.
Shirayama S and Kuwahara K. Computation of flow past a parachute by a three-dimensional vortex method. In: 24th aerospace sciences meeting, Reno, Nevada, 6–9 June 1986.
16.
Sarpkaya T. Methods of analysis for flow around parachute canopies. In: 11th aerodynamic decelerator systems technology conference, Aerodynamic Decelerator Systems Technology Conferences, San Diego, CA, 9–11 April 1991.
17.
Behr VL, Hailey CE, Peterson CW, et al. An overview of the development of a vortex based inflation code for parachute simulation (VIPAR). Sandia National Laboratories Report SAND99-1259C, 1999.
18.
Strickland JH, Homicz GF, Gossler AA, et al. On the development of a gridless inflation code for parachute simulations. In: 16th AIAA aerodynamic decelerator systems technology conference and seminar, Boston, MA, USA, 2001.
19.
Johari H and Desabrais K. A coupled fluid-structure parachute inflation model. In: 17th AIAA aerodynamic decelerator systems technology conference and seminar, AIAA paper 2003-2146, Monterey, CA, 19–22 May 2003.
20.
Ibos C, Lacroix C, Chuzet L, et al. SINPA, a full 3D fluid-structure software package for parachute simulation. In: 14th aerodynamic decelerator systems technology conference, San Francisco, CA, 3–5 June 1997.
21.
AqueletNTuttB. A new fluid structure coupling application to parachute modelling. Eur J Comput Mech2007; 16: 521–536.
22.
TezduyarTE, et al.A new strategy for finite element computations involving moving boundaries and interfaces-the deforming-spatial-domain/space-time procedure: II. Computation of free-surface flows, two-liquid flows, and flows with drifting cylinders. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng1992; 94: 353–371.
23.
TezduyarTEBehrMLiouJ. A new strategy for finite element computations involving moving boundaries and interfaces: the deforming-spatial-domain/space time procedure: I. The concept and the preliminary numerical tests. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng1992; 94: 339–351.
24.
KalroVTezduyarT. A parallel 3D computational method for fluid–structure interactions in parachute systems. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng2000; 190: 321–332.
TakizawaKTezduyarTKolesarR. FSI modeling of the Orion spacecraft drogue parachutes. Comput Mech2015; 55: 1167–1179.
27.
KimYPeskinCS. 3-D parachute simulation by the immersed boundary method. Comput Fluids2009; 38: 1080–1090.
28.
GuruswamyGP. Time-accurate coupling of three-degree-of-freedom parachute system with Navier-Stokes equations. J Spacecraft Rockets2017; 54: 1278–1283.
29.
Tutt BA and Taylor AP. The use of LS-DYNA to simulate the inflation of a parachute canopy. In: 18th AIAA aerodynamic decelerator systems technology conference and seminar, AIAA paper 2005-1608, Munich, Germany, 23–26 May 2005.
30.
Tutt B, et al. Development of parachute simulation techniques in LS-DYNA. In: 11th international LS-DYNA users conference, Detroit, USA, 2010.
31.
Coquet Y, et al. Improvements in fluid structure interaction simulations of parachutes using LS-Dyna®. In: 21st AIAA aerodynamic decelerator systems technology conference and seminar, Dublin, Ireland, AIAA paper 2011-2590, 2011.
32.
Ludtke W. A technique for the calculation of the opening-shock forces for several types of solid cloth parachutes. In: 4th aerodynamic deceleration systems conference, Aerodynamic Decelerator Systems Technology Conferences, AIAA paper 73-477, Palm Springs, CA, 21–23 May 1973.
33.
FloresROrtegaEOnateE. Simple and efficient numerical tools for the analysis of parachutes. Eng Comput2014, pp. 31.
34.
Ortega E and Flores R. PARACHUTES. A computer program for calculating ram-air parachutes. Theory document. Barcelona, Spain: CIMNE publication, 2015.
35.
Provot X. Deformation constraints in a mass-spring model to describe rigid cloth behaviour. Graphics Interface, 1995, pp.147–155.
36.
De la Torre D, Ortega E and Flores R. PARACHUTES. A computer program for calculating ram-air parachutes. User's manual. Barcelona, Spain: CIMNE publication, 2015.
37.
Li X. Verification and validation of the spring model parachute air delivery system in subsonic flow. State University of New York at Stony Brook Research Foundation, 2015.
38.
Cicolani L and Kanning G. A comprehensive estimate of the static aerodynamic forces and moments of the 8- by 8- by 20-Foot cargo container. NASA Technical Memorandum 89433, 1987.
39.
Ludtke WP. Observations on the inflation time and inflation distance of parachutes. Naval Surface Warfare Center Silver Spring MD. Report No. NSWC-TR-88-292, 1988.
40.
Hoerner SF. Fluid-dynamic drag: practical information on aerodynamic drag and hydrodynamic resistance. Midland Park, NJ: Hoerner, 1965.
41.
Scheubel FN. Notes on the opening shock of a parachute. USAF Memorandum Report F-51-10-8507, 1946.
42.
FrenchKE. Inflation of parachute. AIAA J1963; 1: 2615–2617.
43.
Barndard G. The effect of extreme altitude on parachute filling distance. In: Aerospace design conference, AIAA paper 93-1207, Irvine, CA, 16–19 February 1993.
44.
MohagheghFJahannamaMR. Decisive roll of filling time on classification of parachute types. J Aircraft2008; 45: 267–275.
45.
PotvinJ. Universality considerations for graphing parachute opening shock factor versus mass ratio. J Aircraft2007; 44: 528–538.
46.
Peek G and Potvin J. OSCALC-opening shock calculator version 1.01. User's Manual. Parks College Parachute Research Group, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, MO, USA, 2006.
47.
Berndt RD and DeWeese J. Filling time prediction approach for solid cloth type parachute canopies. In: Aerodynamic deceleration systems conference, USA, 7–9 September 1966.
48.
Potvin J, Papke J, Brighton E, et al. A new inflation model for low-porosity hemispherical parachutes: validation and implementation in PIMS V3.0. In: 18th AIAA aerodynamic decelerator systems conference and seminar, Munich, Germany, AIAA paper 2005-1687, 2005.
49.
FrenchKE. Initial phase of parachute inflation. J Aircraft1969; 6: 376–378.
50.
HeinrichHGSaariDP. Parachute opening shock calculations with experimentally established input functions. J Aircraft1978; 15: 100–105.
51.
Ludtke WP. Notes on a generic parachute opening force analysis. Naval Surface Weapons Center, Report NSWC TR 86-142, 1986.
52.
Heinrich HG and Saari DP. Study of parachute forces and canopy pressure distribution measured in a subsonic wind tunnel under infinite mass conditions. Minnesota University, Minneapolis, Report AFFDL-TR-71-175, 1972.
53.
Melzig HD and Schmidt PK. Pressure distribution during parachute opening. Phase I: infinite mass operating case. Air Force Flight Dynamics Laboratory. Report AFFDL-TR-66-10, 1966.
54.
Potvin J, Peek G, Brocato B, et al. Deceleration dynamics of unreefed cruciform and flat circular parachutes during and after inflation. In: 16th AIAA aerodynamic decelerator systems technology conference and seminar, Boston, MA, USA, AIAA paper 2001-2028, 2001.
55.
Doherr K. Extended parachute opening shock estimation method. In: 17th AIAA aerodynamic decelerator systems technology conference and seminar, Monterey, CA, USA, AIAA paper 2003-2173, 2003.
56.
Cockrell DJ. The aerodynamics of parachutes. AGARD-AG-295, 1987.
57.
HeinrichHGNoreenRA. Analysis of parachute opening dynamics with supporting wind-tunnel experiments. J Aircraft1970; 7: 341–347.
58.
Kidane B. Parachute drag area using added mass as related to canopy geometry. In: 20th AIAA aerodynamic decelerator systems technology conference and seminar, AIAA paper 2009-2942, Seattle, Washington 4–7 May 2009.
59.
HeinrichHG. A linearised theory of parachute opening dynamics. Aeronaut J1972; 76: 723–731.
60.
KlimasPC. Fluid mass associated with an axisymmetric parachute canopy. J Aircraft1977; 14: 577–580.
61.
GuglieriG. Parachute-payload system flight dynamics and trajectory simulation. Int J Aerosp Eng 2012, vol. 2012, article id 182907, p.17.
62.
Lee C. Experimental investigation of full-scale and model parachute opening. In: 8th aerodynamic decelerator and balloon technology conference, AIAA paper 84-0820, Hyannis, MA, 2–4 April 1984.
63.
Berndt RJ and DeWeese JH. The opening force of solid cloth, personnel type parachutes. In: 3rd aerodynamic deceleration systems conference, AIAA paper 70-1167, Dayton, OH, 14–16 September 1970.
Lingard J. A semi-empirical theory to predict the load-time history of an inflating parachute. In: 8th aerodynamic decelerator and balloon technology conference, AIAA paper 84-0814, Hyannis, MA, 2–4 April 1984.
