The immersed boundary method is a methodology for dealing with boundary conditions at fluid–fluid and fluid–solid interfaces. The immersed boundary method has been attracting growing attention in the recent years due to its simplicity in mesh processing. Great effort has been made to develop its new features and promote its applications in new areas. This review is focused on assessing the immersed boundary method fundamentals and the latest progresses especially the strategies to address the challenges and the applications of the immersed boundary method. Various numerical examples are also presented for demonstrating the capability of the immersed boundary method, including blood flow and blood cells, flapping flag, flow around a hoverfly, turbulence flow over a wavy boundary, shock wave-induced vibration, and acoustic waves scattered by a cylinder and a sphere. The major challenges and several open issues in this field are highlighted.
PeskinCS. Flow patterns around heart valves: a numerical method. J Comput Phys1972; 10: 252–271.
2.
TezduyarTEBehrMLiouJ. A new strategy for finite element computations involving moving boundaries and interfaces–The deforming-spatial-domain/space-time procedure: I. The concept and the preliminary numerical tests. Comput Meth Appl Mech Eng1992; 94: 339–351.
3.
WangSYTianFBJiaLB, et al.The secondary vortex street in the wake of two tandem circular cylinders at low Reynolds number. Phys Rev E2010; 81: 036305–036305.
4.
TianFBZhuLFokPW, et al.Simulation of a pulsatile non-Newtonian flow past a stenosed 2D artery with atherosclerosis. Comput Biol Med2013; 43: 1098–1113.
5.
TianFB. FSI modeling with the DSD/SST method for the fluid and finite difference method for the structure. Comput Mech2014; 54: 581–589.
6.
TianFBWangYYoungJ, et al.An FSI solution technique based on the DSD/SST method and its applications. Math Model Meth Appl Sci2015; 25: 2257–2285.
7.
PeskinCS. The immersed boundary method. Acta Numerica2002; 11: 479–517.
8.
MittalRIaccarinoG. Immersed boundary method. Annu Rev Fluid Mech2005; 37: 239–261.
9.
HuangWXShinSJSungHJ. Simulation of flexible filaments in a uniform flow by the immersed boundary method. J Comput Phys2007; 226: 2206–2228.
10.
GeLSotiropoulosF. A numerical method for solving the 3D unsteady incompressible Navier–Stokes equations in curvilinear domains with complex immersed boundaries. J Comput Phys2007; 225: 1782–1809.
11.
TianFBLuoHZhuL, et al.An immersed boundary-lattice Boltzmann method for elastic boundaries with mass. J Comput Phys2011; 230: 7266–7283.
12.
HuangWXChangCBSungHJ. An improved penalty immersed boundary method for fluid–flexible body interaction. J Comput Phys2011; 230: 5061–5079.
13.
XuYQTianFBDengYL. An efficient red blood cell model in the frame of IB–LBM and its application. Int J Biomath2013; 6: 1250061–1250061.
TianFBDaiHLuoH, et al.Fluid–structure interaction involving large deformations: 3D simulations and applications to biological systems. J Comput Phys2014; 258: 451–469.
16.
YanCHuangWXCuiGX, et al.A ghost-cell immersed boundary method for large eddy simulation of flows in complex geometries. Int J Comput Fluid Dyn2015; 29: 12–25.
17.
TianFB. Deformation of a capsule in a power-law shear flow. Comput Math Methods Med2016; 2016: 7981386–7981386.
18.
LiRYXieCMHuangWX, et al.An efficient immersed boundary projection method for flow over complex/moving boundaries. Comput Fluids2016; 140: 122–135.
19.
HuWFLaiMCSeolY, et al.Vesicle electrohydrodynamic simulations by coupling immersed boundary and immersed interface method. J Comput Phys2016; 317: 66–81.
20.
WangWQYanYTianFB. A simple and efficient implicit direct forcing immersed boundary model for simulations of complex flow. Appl Math Model2017; 43: 287–305.
21.
WangLCurraoGMDHanF, et al.An immersed boundary method for fluid-structure interaction with compressible multiphase flows. J Comput Phys2017; 346: 131–151.
22.
HuZXHuangJHuangWX, et al.Second-order curved interface treatments of the lattice Boltzmann method for convection-diffusion equations with conjugate interfacial conditions. Comput Fluids2017; 144: 60–73.
23.
YoonYParkBHShimJ, et al.Numerical simulation of three-dimensional external gear pump using immersed solid method. Appl Therm Eng2017; 118: 539–550.
24.
XuLTianFBYoungJ, et al.A novel geometry-adaptive Cartesian grid based immersed boundary-lattice Boltzmann method for fluid-structure interactions at moderate and high Reynolds numbers. J Comput Phys2018; 375: 22–56.
25.
CuiZYangZJiangHZ, et al.A sharp-interface immersed boundary method for simulating incompressible flows with arbitrarily deforming smooth boundaries. Int J Comput Methods2018; 14: 1750080–1750080.
26.
HuangWXGuoW. An improved penalty immersed boundary method for multiphase flow simulation. Int J Numer Meth Fluids2018; 88: 447–462.
27.
ZhuLPeskinCS. Simulation of a flapping flexible filament in a flowing soap film by the immersed boundary method. J Comput Phys2002; 179: 452–468.
28.
GoldsteinDHandlerRSirovichL. Modeling a no-slip flow boundary with an external force field. J Comput Phys1993; 105: 354–366.
29.
KimYPeskinCS. Penalty immersed boundary method for an elastic boundary with mass. Phys Fluids2007; 19: 053103–053103.
30.
HuangWXSungHJ. An immersed boundary method for fluid–flexible structure interaction. Comput Meth Appl Mech Eng2009; 198: 2650–2661.
31.
BhardwajRMittalR. Benchmarking a coupled immersed-boundary–finite-element solver for large-scale flow-induced deformation. AIAA J2012; 50: 1638–1642.
32.
ConnellBSHYueDKP. Flapping dynamics of a flag in a uniform stream. J Fluid Mech2007; 581: 33–67.
BorazjaniIGeLSotiropoulosF. Curvilinear immersed boundary method for simulating fluid structure interaction with complex 3D rigid bodies. J Comput Phys2008; 227: 7587–7620.
35.
WangCEldredgeJD. Strongly coupled dynamics of fluids and rigid-body systems with the immersed boundary projection method. J Comput Phys2015; 295: 87–113.
36.
DegrooteJBatheKJVierendeelsJ. Performance of a new partitioned procedure versus a monolithic procedure in fluid–tructure interaction. Comput Struct2009; 87: 793–801.
37.
GozaAColoniusT. A strongly-coupled immersed-boundary formulation for thin elastic structures. J Comput Phys2017; 336: 401–411.
38.
GriffithBEHornungRDMcQueenDM, et al.An adaptive, formally second order accurate version of the immersed boundary method. J Comput Phys2007; 223: 10–49.
39.
Zheng X, Mittal R and Peng Y. A hierarchical nested grid approach for local refinement coupled with an immersed boundary method. In Choi H, Choi HG and Yoo JY (eds) Computational fluid dynamics. Berlin: Springer, 2008, pp.461–466.
40.
VanellaMRabenoldPBalarasE. A direct-forcing embedded-boundary method with adaptive mesh refinement for fluid–structure interaction problems. J Comput Phys2010; 229: 6427–6449.
41.
LiskaSColoniusT. A fast immersed boundary method for external incompressible viscous flows using lattice Green’s functions. J Comput Phys2017; 331: 257–279.
42.
WangLTianFB. Heat transfer in non-Newtonian flows by a hybrid immersed boundary–lattice Boltzmann and finite difference method. Appl Sci2018; 8: 559–559.
43.
Xu L, Wang L, Tian FB, et al. A geometry-adaptive immersed boundary–lattice Boltzmann method for modelling fluid–structure interaction problems. In Gutschmidt S, Hewett JN and Sellier M (eds) IUTAM symposium on recent advances in moving boundary problems in mechanics. IUTAM Bookseries 34, Switzerland AG: Springer Nature, 2019, pp.161–171.
44.
BorazjaniISotiropoulosF. Numerical investigation of the hydrodynamics of carangiform swimming in the transitional and inertial flow regimes. J Exp Biol2008; 211: 1541–1558.
45.
SuiYChewYTRoyP, et al.A hybrid immersed-boundary and multi-block lattice Boltzmann method for simulating fluid and moving-boundaries interactions. Int J Numer Meth Fluids2007; 53: 1727–1754.
46.
KrügerTVarnikFRaabeD. Efficient and accurate simulations of deformable particles immersed in a fluid using a combined immersed boundary lattice Boltzmann finite element method. Comput Math Appl2011; 61: 3485–3505.
47.
GongCFangZChenG. Numerical investigation of nonlinear fluid–structure interaction dynamic behaviors under a general immersed boundary-lattice Boltzmann-finite element method. Int J Modern Phys C2018; 29: 1850038–1850038.
48.
GhiasRMittalRDongH. A sharp interface immersed boundary method for compressible viscous flows. J Comput Phy2007; 225: 528–553.
49.
MittalRDongHBozkurttasM, et al.A versatile sharp interface immersed boundary method for incompressible flows with complex boundaries. J Comput Phys2008; 227: 4825–4852.
50.
SeoJHMittalR. A high-order immersed boundary method for acoustic wave scattering and low-Mach number flow-induced sound in complex geometries. J Comput Phys2011; 230: 1000–1019.
KimJKimDChoiH. An immersed-boundary finite-volume method for simulations of flow in complex geometries. J Comput Phys2001; 171: 132–150.
53.
HuangWXSungHJ. Improvement of mass source/sink for an immersed boundary method. Int J Numer Meth Fluids2007; 53: 1659–1671.
54.
SeoJHMittalR. A sharp-interface immersed boundary method with improved mass conservation and reduced spurious pressure oscillations. J Comput Phys2011; 230: 7347–7363.
55.
LuoHDaiHFerreira de SousaP, et al.On the numerical oscillation of the direct-forcing immersed-boundary method for moving boundaries. Comput Fluids2012; 56: 61–76.
56.
BaoYDonevAGriffithBE, et al.An immersed boundary method with divergence-free velocity interpolation and force spreading. J Comput Phys2017; 347: 183–206.
57.
TessiciniFIaccarinoGFaticaM, et al.Wall modeling for large-eddy simulation using an immersed boundary method. Annual Research Briefs, Center for Turbulence Research2002, pp. 181–187.
58.
KangSLightbodyAHillC, et al.High-resolution numerical simulation of turbulence in natural waterways. Adv Water Res2011; 34: 98–113.
59.
YangXSotiropoulosFConzemiusRJ, et al.Large-eddy simulation of turbulent flow past wind turbines/farms: the Virtual Wind Simulator (VWiS). Wind Energy2015; 18: 2025–2045.
60.
PeskinCMcQueenDMFluid dynamics of the heart and its valves. In: HGOthmerFRAdlerMALewis, et al.(eds). Case Studies in Mathematical Modeling: Ecology, Physiology, and Cell Biology, chapter 14, Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall, 1996, pp. 309–337.
61.
McQueen DM and Peskin CS. Heart simulation by an immersed boundary method with formal second-order accuracy and reduced numerical viscosity. In Aref H and Phillips JW (eds) Mechanics for a New Millennium. Dordrecht: Springer, pp.429–444.
62.
GriffithBE. Immersed boundary model of aortic heart valve dynamics with physiological driving and loading conditions. Int J Numer Meth Biomed Eng2012; 28: 317–345.
63.
DasiLPGeLSimonHA, et al.Vorticity dynamics of a bileaflet mechanical heart valve in an axisymmetric aorta. Phys Fluids2007; 19: 067105–067105.
64.
BorazjaniIGeLSotiropoulosF. High-resolution fluid–structure interaction simulations of flow through a bi-leaflet mechanical heart valve in an anatomic aorta. Annals Biomed Eng2010; 38: 326–344.
65.
HedayatMAsgharzadehHBorazjaniI. Platelet activation of mechanical versus bioprosthetic heart valves during systole. J Biomech2017; 56: 111–116.
66.
SeoJHBakhshaeeHGarreauG, et al.A method for the computational modeling of the physics of heart murmurs. J Comput Phys2017; 336: 546–568.
67.
ChenYLuoH. A computational study of the three-dimensional fluidstructure interaction of aortic valve. J Fluids Struct2018; 80: 332–349.
68.
ZhuCSeoJHMittalR. Computational modelling and analysis of haemodynamics in a simple model of aorticstenosis. J Fluid Mech2018; 851: 23–49.
69.
FogelsonALPeskinCS. A fast numerical method for solving the three-dimensional Stokes’ equations in the presence of suspended particles. J Comput Phys1988; 79: 50–69.
70.
SuiYChewYTRoyP, et al.A hybrid method to study flow-induced deformation of three-dimensional capsules. J Comput Phys2008; 227: 6351–6371.
71.
ChangCHuangWXLeeK, et al.Optical levitation of a non-spherical particle in a loosely focused Gaussian beam. Opt Express2012; 20: 24068–24084.
72.
ChangCHuangWXSungH. Lateral migration of an elastic capsule by optical force in a uniform flow. Phys Rev E2012; 86: 066306–066306.
73.
XuYQTianFBLiHJ, et al.Red blood cell partitioning and blood flux redistribution in microvascular bifurcation. Theor Appl Mech Lett2012; 2: 024001–024001.
74.
HuangWXChangCBSungHJ. Three-dimensional simulation of elastic capsules in shear flow by the penalty immersed boundary method. J Comput Phys2012; 231: 3340–3364.
75.
XuYQTangXYTianFB, et al.IB–LBM simulation of the haemocyte dynamics in a stenotic capillary. Comput Method Biomec2014; 17: 978–985.
76.
MaJXuYTianFB, et al.IB–LBM study on cell sorting by pinched flow fractionation. Biomed Mater Eng2014; 24: 2547–2554.
77.
WeiQXuYQTianFB, et al.IB–LBM simulation on blood cell sorting with a micro-fence structure. Biomed Mater Eng2014; 24: 475–481.
78.
KrügerTKaouiBHartingJ. Interplay of inertia and deformability on rheological properties of a suspension of capsules. J Fluid Mech2014; 751: 725–745.
79.
ChangCHuangWXLeeK, et al.Optical separation of ellipsoidal particles in a uniform flow. Phys Fluids2014; 26: 062001–062001.
80.
ChangCHuangWXSungH. Cross-type optical separation of elastic oblate capsules in a uniform flow. J Appl Phys2015; 117: 034701–034701.
81.
WeiQXuYQTangXY, et al.An IB-LBM study of continuous cell sorting in deterministic lateral displacement arrays. Acta Mechanica Sinica2016; 32: 1023–1030.
82.
WangZSuiYSalsacAV, et al.Motion of a spherical capsule in branched tube flow with finite inertia. J Fluid Mech2016; 806: 603–626.
83.
WangZSuiYSalsacAV, et al.Path selection of a spherical capsule in a microfluidic branched channel: towards the design of an enrichment device. J Fluid Mech2018; 849: 136–162.
84.
MaJXuLTianFB, et al.Dynamic characteristics of a deformable capsule in a simple shear flow. Phys Rev E2019; 99: 023101–023101.
85.
DillonRHFauciLJOmotoC, et al.Fluid dynamic models of flagellar and ciliary beating. Annu N Y Acad Sci2007; 1101: 494–505.
86.
JayathilakePGTanZLeDV, et al.Three-dimensional numerical simulations of human pulmonary cilia in the periciliary liquid layer by the immersed boundary method. Comput Fluids2012; 67: 130–137.
87.
HanJPeskinCS. Spontaneous oscillation and fluid–structure interaction of cilia. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA2018; 115: 4417–4422.
88.
FauciLJPeskinCS. A computational model of aquatic animal locomotion. J Comput Phys1988; 77: 85–108.
89.
QinFHHuangWXSungHJ. Simulation of small swimmer motions driven by tail/flagellum beating. Comput Fluids2012; 55: 109–117.
90.
LushiEPeskinCS. Modeling and simulation of active suspensions containing large numbers of interacting micro-swimmers. Comput Struct2013; 122: 239–248.
91.
Tian FB, Young J and Lai JCS. An immersed boundary-lattice Boltzmann method for swimming sperms. In: The 20th Australasian Fluid Mechanics Conference, Perth, Australia, p. 436.
92.
PandeJMerchantLKrügerT, et al.Setting the pace of microswimmers: when increasing viscosity speeds up self-propulsion. New J Phys2017; 19: 053024–053024.
93.
PandeJMerchantLKrügerT, et al.Effect of body deformability on microswimming. Soft Matter2017; 13: 3984–3993.
94.
KimBParkSGHuangWX, et al.An autonomous flexible propulsor in a quiescent flow. Int J Heat Fluid Flow2017; 68: 151–157.
95.
ZhuLPeskinCS. Interaction of two flapping filaments in a flowing soap film. Phys Fluids2003; 15: 1954–1960.
96.
ZhuL. Viscous flow past an elastic fibre tethered at its center point: vortex shedding. J Fluid Mech2007; 587: 217–234.
97.
HuangWXSungHJ. Three-dimensional simulation of a flapping flag in a uniform flow. J Fluid Mech2010; 653: 301–336.
98.
KimSHuangWXSungH. Constructive and destructive interaction modes between two tandem flexible flags in viscous flow. J Fluid Mech2010; 661: 511–521.
99.
TianFBLuoHZhuL, et al.Interaction between a flexible filament and a downstream rigid body. Phys Rev E2010; 82: 026301–026301.
100.
TianFBLuoHZhuL, et al.Coupling modes of three filaments in side-by-side arrangement. Phys Fluids2011; 23: 111903–111903.
101.
TianFBLuXYLuoH. Onset of instability of a flag in uniform flow. Theor Appl Mech Lett2012; 2: 022005–022005.
102.
KimBHuangWXShinS, et al.Flexible ring flapping in a uniform flow. J Fluid Mech2012; 707: 129–149.
103.
GaoHTQinFHHuangWX, et al.Multiple modes of filament flapping in a uniform flow. Chin Phys Lett2012; 29: 094702–094702.
104.
TianFB. Role of mass on the stability of flag/flags in uniform flow. Appl Phys Lett2013; 103: 034101–034101.
105.
UddinEHuangWXSungH. Interaction modes of multiple flexible flags in a uniform flow. J Fluid Mech2013; 729: 563–583.
106.
LeeJHuangWXSungH. Flapping dynamics of a flexible flag in a uniform flow. Fluid Dyn Res2014; 46: 055517–055517.
107.
UddinEHuangWXSungH. Actively flapping tandem flexible flags in a viscous flow. J Fluid Mech2015; 780: 120–142.
108.
WangLTianFB. Numerical simulation of flow over a parallel cantilevered flag in the vicinity of a rigid wall. Phys Rev E2019.
109.
BorazjaniISotiropoulosF. On the role of form and kinematics on the hydrodynamics of self-propelled body/caudal fin swimming. J Exp Biol2010; 213: 89–107.
110.
DongHBozkurttasMMittalR, et al.Computational modelling and analysis of the hydrodynamics of a highly deformable fish pectoral fin. J Fluid Mech2010; 645: 345–373.
111.
TianFBLuoHSongJ, et al.Force production and asymmetric deformation of a flexible flapping wing in forward flight. J Fluids Struct2013; 36: 149–161.
112.
ZhengLHedrickTLMittalR. A multi-fidelity modelling approach for evaluation and optimization of wing stroke aerodynamics in flapping flight. J Fluid Mech2013; 721: 118–154.
113.
ParkSChangCHuangWX, et al.Simulation of swimming oblate jellyfish with a paddling based locomotion. J Fluid Mech2014; 748: 731–755.
114.
ParkSKimBLeeJ, et al.Dynamics of prolate jellyfish with a jet-based locomotion. J Fluids Struct2015; 57: 331–343.
115.
ShahzadATianFBYoungJ, et al.Effects of wing shape, aspect ratio and deviation angle on aerodynamic performance of flapping wings in hover. Phys Fluids2016; 28: 111901–111901.
116.
BottomRGIIBorazjaniIBlevinsEL, et al.Hydrodynamics of swimming in stingrays: numerical simulations and the role of the leading-edge vortex. J Fluid Mech2016; 788: 407–443.
117.
HuangWXAlbenS. Fluid-structure interactions with applications to biology. Acta Mechanica Sinica2016; 32: 977–979.
118.
LiCDongH. Wing kinematics measurement and aerodynamics of a dragonfly in turning flight. Bioinsp Biomim2017; 12: 026001–026001.
119.
ShahzadATianFBYoungJ, et al.Effects of flexibility on the hovering performance of flapping wings with different shapes and aspect ratios. J Fluids Struct2018; 81: 69–96.
120.
ShahzadATianFBYoungJ, et al.Effects of hawkmoth-like flexibility on the aerodynamic performance of flapping wings with different shapes and aspect ratios. Phys Fluids2018; 30: 091902–091902.
121.
TianFBTobingSYoungJ, et al.Aerodynamic characteristics of hoverflies during hovering flight. Comput Fluids Epub ahead of print 6 October 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.compfluid.2018.10.008.
122.
SongJZhongYLuoH, et al.Hydrodynamics of larval fish quick turning: a computational study. Inst Mech Eng C J Mech Eng Sci2018; 232: 2515–2523.
123.
XinZWuC. Vorticity dynamics and control of the turning locomotion of 3D bionic fish. Inst Mech Eng C J Mech Eng Sci2018; 232: 2524–2535.
124.
XuYQWangMYLiuQY, et al.External force-induced focus pattern of a flexible filament in a viscous fluid. Appl Math Model2018; 53: 369–383.
125.
XuYQJiangYQWuJ, et al.Benchmark numerical solutions for two-dimensional fluid–structure interaction involving large displacements with the deforming-spatial-domain/stabilized space–time and immersed boundary–lattice Boltzmann methods. Inst Mech Eng C J Mech Eng Sci2018; 232: 2500–2514.
126.
TianFBYoungJLaiJCS. Improving power-extraction efficiency of a flapping plate: from passive deformation to active control. J Fluids Struct2014; 51: 384–392.
127.
WuJWuJTianFB, et al.How a flexible tail improve the power extraction efficiency of a semi-activated flapping foil system: a numerical study. J Fluids Struct2015; 54: 886–899.
128.
WuJShuCZhaoN, et al.Numerical study on the power extraction performance of a flapping foil with a flexible tail. Phys Fluids2015; 27: 013602–013602.
129.
ShoeleKMittalR. Energy harvesting by flow-induced flutter in a simple model of an inverted piezoelectric flag. J Fluid Mech2016; 790: 582–606.
130.
LiuZLaiJCSYoungJ, et al.Discrete vortex method with flow separation corrections for flapping-foil power generators. AIAA J2017; 55: 410–418.
131.
LiuZTianFBYoungJ, et al.Flapping foil power generator performance enhanced with a spring-connected tail. Phys Fluids2017; 29: 123601–123601.
132.
WangWQYanYTianFB. Numerical study on hydrodynamics for a non-sinusoidal forced oscillating hydrofoil based on an immersed boundary method. Ocean Eng2018; 147: 606–620.
133.
LiWWangWQYanY, et al.Effects of pitching motion profile on energy harvesting performance of a semi-active flapping foil using immersed boundary method. Ocean Eng2018; 163: 94–106.
134.
LiuZBhattacharjeeKSTianFB, et al.Kinematic optimization of a flapping foil power generator using a multi-fidelity evolutionary algorithm. Renew Energy2019; 132: 543–557.
135.
de TullioMDDe PalmaPIaccarinoG, et al.An immersed boundary method for compressible flows using local grid refinement. J Comput Phys2007; 225: 2098–2117.
136.
BailoorSAnnangiASeoJH, et al.Fluid–structure interaction solver for compressible flows with applications to blast loading on thin elastic structures. Appl Math Model2017; 52: 470–492.
137.
SchlandererSCWeymouthGDSandbergRD. The boundary data immersion method for compressible flows with application to aeroacoustics. J Comput Phys2017; 333: 440–461.
138.
ParkSKimBChangC, et al.Enhancement of heat transfer by a self-oscillating inverted flag in a Poiseuille channel flow. Int J Heat Mass Tran2016; 96: 362–370.
139.
RenWShuCYangW. An efficient immersed boundary method for thermal flow problems with heat flux boundary conditions. Int J Heat Mass Transfer2013; 64: 694–705.
140.
YuXRegenauer-LiebKTianFB. A hybrid immersed boundary-lattice Boltzmann/finite difference method for coupled dynamics of fluid flow, advection, diffusion and adsorption in fractured and porous media. Comput Geosci InAPS Meeting Abstracts 2018.
141.
GrigoriadisDGESarrisIEKassinosSC. MHD flow past a circular cylinder using the immersed boundary method. Comput Fluids2010; 39: 345–358.
DengHBXuYQChenDD, et al.On numerical modeling of animal swimming and flight. Comput Mech2013; 52: 1221–1242.
144.
YangXZhangXLiZ, et al.A smoothing technique for discrete delta functions with application to immersed boundary method in moving boundary simulations. J Comput Phys2009; 228: 7821–7836.
145.
HuangWXChangCBSungHJ. An improved penalty immersed boundary method for fluid–flexible body interaction. J Comput Phys2011; 230: 5061–5079.
146.
LeDVWhiteJPeraireJ, et al.An implicit immersed boundary method for three-dimensional fluid–membrane interactions. J Comput Phys2009; 228: 8427–8445.
147.
ZhangJChildressSLibchaberA, et al.Flexible filaments in a flowing soap film as a model for one-dimensional flags in a two-dimensional wind. Nature2000; 408: 835–839.
148.
ShinSJHuangWXSungHJ. Assessment of regularized delta functions and feedback forcing schemes for an immersed boundary method. Int J Numer Meth Fluids2008; 58: 263–286.
149.
VanellaMBalarasE. A moving-least-squares reconstruction for embedded-boundary formulations. J Comput Phys2009; 228: 6617–6628.
150.
YakhotAGrinbergLNikitinN. Simulating pulsatile flows through a pipe orifice by an immersed-boundary method. J Fluids Eng2005; 126: 911–918.
151.
SuSWLaiMCLinCA. An immersed boundary technique for simulating complex flows with rigid boundary. Comput Fluids2007; 36: 313–324.
152.
WuJShuC. Implicit velocity correction-based immersed boundary-lattice Boltzmann method and its applications. J Comput Phys2009; 228: 1963–1979.
153.
WangZFanJLuoK. Combined multi-direct forcing and immersed boundary method for simulating flows with moving particles. Int J Multiphase Flow2008; 34: 283–302.
154.
WangSZhangX. An immersed boundary method based on discrete stream function formulation for two- and three-dimensional incompressible flows. J Comput Phys2011; 230: 3479–3499.
155.
JiCMunjizaAWilliamsJJR. A novel iterative direct-forcing immersed boundary method and its finite volume applications. J Comput Phys2012; 231: 1797–1821.
156.
NicolaouLJungSZakiT. A robust direct-forcing immersed boundary method with enhanced stability for moving body problems in curvilinear coordinates. Comput Fluids2015; 119: 101–114.
157.
LauEMHuangWXXuCX. Progression of heavy plates from stable falling to tumbling flight. J Fluid Mech2018; 850: 1009–1031.
158.
ShinSChangCSungH. Simulation of a valveless pump with an elastic tube. Int J Heat Fluid Flow2012; 38: 13–23.
159.
CaldereraAKangSSotiropoulosF. Level set immersed boundary method for coupled simulation of air/water interaction with complex floating structures. J Comput Phys2014; 277: 201–227.
160.
BringleyTTPeskinCS. Validation of a simple method for representing spheres and slender bodies in an immersed boundary method for stokes flow on an unbounded domain. J Comput Phys2008; 227: 5397–5425.
161.
StockieJM. Modelling and simulation of porous immersed boundaries. Comput Struct2009; 87: 701–709.
162.
ShoeleKZhuQ. Flow-induced vibrations of a deformable ring. J Fluid Mech2010; 650: 343–362.
163.
LeVequeRJLiZ. The immersed interface method for elliptic equations with discontinuous coefficients and singular sources. SIAM J Numer Anal1994; 31: 1019–1044.
164.
XuSWangZJ. An immersed interface method for simulating the interaction of a fluid with moving boundaries. J Comput Phys2006; 216: 454–493.
165.
XuS. A boundary condition capturing immersed interface method for 3D rigid objects in a flow. J Comput Phys2011; 230: 7176–7190.
166.
LaiMCPeskinCS. An immersed boundary method with formal second-order accuracy and reduced numerical viscosity. J Comput Phys2000; 160: 705–719.
167.
TairaKColoniusT. The immersed boundary method: a projection approach. J Comput Phys2007; 225: 2118–2137.
PerotJ. An analysis of the fractional step method. J Comput Phys1993; 108: 51–58.
170.
ColoniusTTairaK. A fast immersed boundary method using a nullspace approach and multi-domain far-field boundary conditions. Comput Meth Appl Mech Eng2008; 197: 2131–2146.
171.
LiRYXieCMHuangWX, et al.An efficient immersed boundary projection method for flow over complex/moving boundaries. Comput Fluids2016; 140: 122–135.
172.
ParkHPanXLeeC, et al.A pre-conditioned implicit direct forcing based immersed boundary method for incompressible viscous flows. J Comput Phys2016; 314: 774–799.
173.
LcisUTairaKBagheriS. A stable fluid-structure-interaction solver for low-density rigid bodies using the immersed boundary projection method. J Comput Phys2016; 305: 300–318.
174.
PanXKimKLeeC, et al.A decoupled monolithic projection method for natural convection problems. J Comput Phys2016; 314: 160–166.
175.
PanXKimKLeeC, et al.Fully decoupled monolithic projection method for natural convection problems. J Comput Phys2017; 334: 582–606.
176.
FadlunEAVerziccoROrlandiP, et al.Combined immersed-boundary finite-difference methods for three-dimensional complex flow simulations. J Comput Phys2003; 161: 35–60.
177.
UdaykumarHSMittalRRampunggoonP, et al.A sharp interface Cartesian grid method for simulating flows with complex moving boundaries. J Comput Phys2001; 174: 345–380.
178.
TsengYHFerzigerJH. A ghost-cell immersed boundary method for flow in complex geometry. J Comput Phys2003; 192: 593–623.
179.
YangJMBalarasE. An embedded-boundary formulation for large-eddy simulation of turbulent flows interacting with moving boundaries. J Comput Phys2006; 215: 12–40.
180.
YinBLuoH. Effect of wing inertia on hovering performance of flexible flapping wings. Phys Fluids2010; 22: 111902–111902.
181.
DaiHLuoHDoyleJF. Dynamic pitching of an elastic rectangular wing in hovering motion. J Fluid Mech2012; 693: 473–499.
182.
WilliamsHARFauciLJGaverDPIII. Evaluation of interfacial fluid dynamical stresses using the immersed boundary method. Discrete Continuous Dyn Syst Ser B2009; 11: 519–540.
183.
LeeJKimJChoiH, et al.Sources of spurious force oscillations from an immersed boundary method for moving-body problems. J Comput Phys2011; 230: 2677–2695.
184.
KimDChoiH. Immersed boundary method for flow around an arbitrarily moving body. J Comput Phys2006; 212: 662–680.
185.
LeeJDY. An implicit ghost-cell immersed boundary method for simulations of moving body problems with control of spurious force oscillations. J Comput Phys2013; 233: 295–314.
186.
JeonSChoiH. Boundary treatment for the unsteady surface velocity in an immersed boundary method. J Mech Sci Technol2009; 23: 2502–2506.
187.
TezduyarTESatheSKeedyR, et al.Space–time finite element techniques for computation of fluid–structure interactions. Comput Meth Appl Mech Eng2006; 195: 2002–2027.
188.
KimWLeeIChoiH. A weak-coupling immersed boundary method for fluid–structure interaction with low density ratio of solid to fluid. J Comput Phys2018; 359: 296–311.
189.
ChoiHMoinP. Grid-point requirements for large eddy simulation: Chapman’s estimates revisited. Phys Fluids2012; 24: 011702–011702.
190.
Schlichting H and Gersten K. Fundamentals of Boundary–Layer theory, chapter 2. In: Schlichting H and Gersten K (eds) Boundary-Layer Theory. Berlin: Springer, 2017, pp.29–49.
191.
JaimanRKJiaoXGeubellePH, et al.Conservative load transfer along curved fluid–solid interface with non-matching meshes. J Comput Phys2006; 218: 372–397.
192.
PosaABalarasE. A numerical investigation of the wake of an axisymmetric body with appendages. J Fluid Mech2016; 792: 470–498.
193.
OuroPStoesserT. An immersed boundary-based large-eddy simulation approach to predict the performance of vertical axis tidal turbines. Comput Fluids2017; 152: 74–87.
194.
PiomelliU. Wall-layer models for large-eddy simulations. Prog in Aerosp Sci2008; 44: 437–446.
195.
ChesterSMeneveauCParlangeM. Modeling turbulent flow over fractal trees with renormalized numerical simulation. J Comput Phys2007; 225: 427–448.
196.
RomanFArmenioVFröhlichJ. A simple wall-layer model for large eddy simulation with immersed boundary methods. Phys Fluids2009; 21: 101701–101701.
197.
WangSShiBLiY, et al.A large eddy simulation of flows around an underwater vehicle model using an immersed boundary method. Theor Appl Mech Lett2016; 6: 302–305.
198.
LiuYCuiGWangZ, et al.A composite model for complex building street configuration in a large eddy simulation of local urban atmospheric environment. Sci China Phys Mech Astron2011; 54: 716–723.
199.
PeskinCS. Numerical analysis of blood flow in the heart. J Comput Phys1977; 25: 220–252.
200.
Iaccarino G and Ham F. LES on Cartesian grids with anisotropic refinement. In: Kassinos SC, Langer CA, Iaccarino G, et al. (eds) Complex Effects in Large Eddy Simulations. Berlin: Springer, pp.213–233.
201.
MacNeicePOlsonKMMobarryC, et al.PARAMESH: a parallel adaptive mesh refinement community toolkit. Comput Phys Comm2000; 126: 330–354.
202.
BungartzHJMehlMNeckelT, et al.The PDE framework Peano applied to fluid dynamics: an efficient implementation of a parallel multiscale fluid dynamics solver on octree-like adaptive Cartesian grids. Comput Mech2010; 46: 103–114.
203.
YuZFanLS. An interaction potential based lattice Boltzmann method with adaptive mesh refinement (AMR) for two-phase flow simulation. J Comput Phys2009; 228: 6456–6478.
204.
NeumannPNeckelT. A dynamic mesh refinement technique for lattice Boltzmann simulations on octree-like grids. Comput Mech2013; 51: 1–17.
205.
WuJShuC. A solution–adaptive lattice Boltzmann method for two–dimensional incompressible viscous flows. J Comput Phys2011; 230: 2246–2269.
206.
GuzikSMWeisgraberTHColellaP, et al.Interpolation methods and the accuracy of lattice–Boltzmann mesh refinement. J Comput Phys2014; 259: 461–487.
207.
GuoXYaoJZhongC, et al.A hybrid adaptive–gridding immersed–boundary lattice Boltzmann method for viscous flow simulations. Appl Math Comput2015; 267: 529–553.
208.
AngelidisDChawdharySSotiropoulosF. Unstructured Cartesian refinement with sharp interface immersed boundary method for 3D unsteady incompressible flows. J Comput Phys2016; 325: 272–300.
209.
de Tullio M, De Palma P, Iaccarino G, et al. Immersed boundary technique for compressible flow simulations on semi-structured grids. In: Deconinck H and Dick E (eds) Computational fluid dynamics. Berlin: Springer, 2006, pp.365–370.
210.
LiuQVasilyevOV. A Brinkman penalization method for compressible flows in complex geometries. J Comput Physics2007; 227: 946–966.
211.
QiuYLShuCWuJ, et al.A boundary condition-enforced immersed boundary method for compressible viscous flows. Comput Fluids2016; 136: 104–113.
212.
WeymouthGDYueDKP. Boundary data immersion method for Cartesian-grid simulations of fluid-body interaction problems. J Comput Phys2011; 230: 6233–6247.
213.
GiordanoJJourdanGBurtschellY, et al.Shock wave impacts on deforming panel, an application of fluid-structure interaction. Shock Waves2005; 14: 103–110.
214.
DeiterdingRWoodS. Parallel adaptive fluidstructure interaction simulation of explosions impacting on building structures. Comput Fluids2013; 88: 719–729.
215.
Wang L, Tian FB and Lai JCS. An immersed boundary method for fluid-structure-acoustics interactions involving large deformations and complex geometries. J Comput Phys. Epub ahead of print 1 Febuary 2014. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2013.10.047.
216.
WangLTianFB. Recent progress of immersed boundary method and its applications in compressible fluid flow. Sci Sin Phys Mech Astron2018; 48: 094703–094703.
217.
WuJZMaHYZhouMD. Vorticity and vortex dynamics, Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2006.
218.
RajaniBNKandasamyAMajumdarS. Numerical simulation of laminar flow past a circular cylinder. Appl Math Model2009; 33: 1228–1247.
219.
TezduyarTEBehrMMittalS, et al.A new strategy for finite element computations involving moving boundaries and interfaces–The deforming-spatial-domain/space-time procedure: II. Computation of free-surface flows, two-liquid flows, and flows with drifting cylinders. Comput Meth Appl Mech Eng1992; 94: 353–371.
220.
TezduyarTE. Stabilized finite element formulations for incompressible flow computations. Adv Appl Mech1992; 28: 1–44.
221.
TezduyarTE. Computation of moving boundaries and interfaces and stabilization parameters. Int J Numer Meth Fluids2003; 43: 555–575.
222.
TianFBXuYQTangXY, et al.Study on a self-propelled fish swimming in viscous fluid by a finite element method. J Mech Med Biol2013; 13: 1340012–1340012.
223.
TianFBBhartiRPXuYQ. Deforming-spatial-domain/stabilized space-time (DSD/SST) method in computation of non-Newtonian fluid flow and heat transfer with moving boundaries. Comput Mech2014; 53: 257–271.
224.
TianFB. A numerical study of linear and nonlinear kinematic models in fish swimming with the DSD/SST method. Comput Mech2015; 55: 469–477.
225.
StewartWJTianFBAkanyetiO, et al.Refusing rainbow trout selectively exploit flows behind tandem cylinders. J Exp Biol2016; 219: 2182–2191.
226.
TianFBWangWWuJ, et al.Swimming performance and vorticity structures of a mother–calf pair of fish. Comput Fluids2016; 124: 1–11.
227.
LeeIChoiH. A discrete-forcing immersed boundary method for the fluid–structure interaction of an elastic slender body. J Comput Phys2015; 280: 529–546.
228.
de TullioMDPascazioG. A moving-least-squares immersed boundary method for simulating the fluid–structure interaction of elastic bodies with arbitrary thickness. J Comput Phys2016; 325: 201–225.
229.
DorschnerBChikatamarlaSSKarlinIV. Fluid–structure interaction with the entropic lattice Boltzmann method. Phys Rev E2018; 97: 023305–023305.
230.
SpalartP. Detached-eddy simulation. Annu Rev Fluid Mech2009; 41: 181–202.
231.
ChenSXiaZPeiS, et al.Reynolds-stress-constrained large-eddy simulation of wall-bounded turbulent flows. J Fluid Mech2012; 703: 1–28.
232.
HirtCNicholsB. Volume of fluid (VOF) method for the dynamics of free boundaries. J Comput Phys1981; 39: 201–225.
233.
OsherSFedkiwR. Level set methods and dynamic implicit surfaces, Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media, 2006.
234.
AntanovskiiLK. A phase field model of capillarity. Phys Fluids1995; 7: 747–753.
235.
ShaoJShuCChewY. Development of an immersed boundary-phase field-lattice Boltzmann method for Neumann boundary condition to study contact line dynamics. J Comput Phys2013; 234: 8–32.
236.
ShenLChanES. Numerical simulation of fluidstructure interaction using a combined volume of fluid and immersed boundary method. Ocean Eng2008; 35: 939–952.
PathakARaessiM. A 3D, fully Eulerian, VOF-based solver to study the interaction between two fluids and moving rigid bodies using the fictitious domain method. J Comput Phys2016; 311: 87–113.
239.
BihsHKamathAChellaM, et al.A new level set numerical wave tank with improved density interpolation for complex wave hydrodynamics. Comput Fluids2016; 140: 191–208.
240.
WiensJKStockieJM. An efficient parallel immersed boundary algorithm using a pseudo-compressible fluid solver. J Comput Phys2015; 281: 917–941.
