This paper presents an active motion planning approach for a robotic manipulator operating in planetary surface exploration missions. A monocular camera is employed to examine the visually salient regions in an image, from which landforms of potential interests are extracted, and two key metrics are established to evaluate the information richness of the landforms. A next-best view manipulator motion planning is proposed, in which motions of the manipulator are actively planned to reach a better viewpoint to view the target landform, the safety of such operation is guaranteed by real-time estimating the relative distance using ORriented Brief (ORB)–simultaneous localization and mapping. The proposed active motion planning method is validated by an experimental trial, results from which demonstrate that it is able to safely acquire a better viewing of a just-detected planetary landform with full autonomy.
HandE. Philae probe makes bumpy touchdown on a comet. Science2014; 346(6212): 900–901.
2.
ZhangJDongCZhangH, et al.Modeling and experimental validation of sawing based lander anchoring and sampling methods for asteroid exploration. Adv Space Res2018; 61(9): 2426–2443.
3.
ParnessAFrostMThatteN, et al.Gravity-independent rock-climbing robot and a sample acquisition tool with microspine grippers. J Field Robot2013; 30(6): 897–915.
4.
BrooksCAIagnemmaK. Self-supervised terrain classification for planetary surface exploration rovers. J Field Robot2012; 29(3): 445–468.
5.
TianYYuMZhangY. A novel 3D feature detection and matching approach for autonomous planetary landing mission. Proc IMechE, Part G: J Aerospace Engineering2018, pp. 0954410018774696.
6.
GaoYChienS. Review on space robotics: toward top-level science through space exploration. Sci Robot. 2017; 2: eaan5074. DOI: 10.1126/scirobotics.aan5074.
7.
Polash MM, Tumpa SN, Saumik SS, et al. Explorer-0100: an autonomous next generation Mars rover. In: 2017 20th international conference of computer and information technology (ICCIT), 22 December 2017, pp.1–7. New York: IEEE.
8.
ElleryA. An engineering approach to the dynamic control of space robotic on-orbit servicers. Proc IMechE, Part G: J Aerospace Engineering2004; 218(2): 79–98.
9.
StarekJAAçıkmeşeBNesnasIA, et al.Spacecraft autonomy challenges for next-generation space missions. Advances in control system technology for aerospace applications, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 2016, pp. 1–48.
10.
BridgesJCGuestM. Planetary protection and Mars sample return. Proc IMechE, Part G: J Aerospace Engineering2011; 225(2): 239–246.
11.
Mur-ArtalRTardósJD. Orb-slam2: an open-source slam system for monocular, stereo, and RGB-D cameras. IEEE Trans Robot2017; 33(5): 1255–1262.
12.
Connolly C. The determination of next best views. In: 1985 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation. vol. 2, March 1985, pp.432–435. New York: IEEE.
13.
Walck G and Drouin M. Automatic observation for 3d reconstruction of unknown objects using visual serving. In: 2010 IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems (IROS), 18 October 2010, pp.2727–2732. New York: IEEE.
14.
Kriegel S, Bodenmüller T, Suppa M, et al. A surface-based next-best-view approach for automated 3D model completion of unknown objects. In: 2011 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation (ICRA), 9 May 2011, pp.4869–4874. New York: IEEE.
15.
Tsuda A, Kakiuchi Y, Nozawa S, et al. On-line next best grasp selection for in-hand object 3D modeling with dual-arm coordination. In: 2012 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation (ICRA), 14 May 2012, pp.1799–1804. New York: IEEE.
16.
Kriegel S, Brucker M, Marton ZC, et al. Combining object modeling and recognition for active scene exploration. In: 2013 IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems (IROS), 3 November 2013, pp.2384–2391. New York: IEEE.
17.
PattenTZillichMFitchR, et al.Viewpoint evaluation for online 3-D active object classification. IEEE Robot Automat Lett2016; 1(1): 73–81.
18.
Vasquez-Gomez JI, Sucar LE and Murrieta-Cid R. View planning for 3D object reconstruction with a mobile manipulator robot. In: 2014 IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems (IROS 2014), 14 September 2014, pp.4227–4233. New York: IEEE.
19.
MonicaRAleottiJ. Contour-based next-best view planning from point cloud segmentation of unknown objects. Autonom Robot2018; 42(2): 443–458.
20.
Zhai Y and Shah M. Visual attention detection in video sequences using spatiotemporal cues. In: Proceedings of the 14th ACM international conference on Multimedia, 23 October 2006, pp.815–824. New York: ACM.
Achanta R, Hemami S, Estrada F, et al. Frequency-tuned salient region detection. In: IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2009. CVPR 2009, 20 June 2009, pp.1597–1604. New York: IEEE.
23.
ChengMMMitraNJHuangX, et al.Global contrast based salient region detection. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell2015; 37(3): 569–582.
24.
Hou X and Zhang L. Saliency detection: a spectral residual approach. In: IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2007. CVPR'07, 17 June 2007, pp.1–8. New York: IEEE.
25.
Achanta R, Hemami S, Estrada F, et al. Frequency-tuned salient region detection. In: Conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, CVPR 2009, Miami, FL, USA, 20 June 2009, pp.1597–1604. New York: IEEE.
ParkHSchoepflinTKimY. Active contour model with gradient directional information: directional snake. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst Video Technol2001; 11(2): 252–256.
