Published research about brake shoe temperature assessments and the influences of temperature dependent brake Coefficient of friction (CoF) on train braking performance do not consider detailed train dynamics. This paper addresses this research gap by combining a brake shoe temperature model with a detailed Longitudinal Train Dynamics (LTD) model. A simplified one-dimensional (1D) Finite Element brake shoe temperature model was developed. Studies were conducted to assess brake shoe temperatures during cyclic air brakes and single-occurrence air brakes. Results show brake shoe temperatures at different positions of the train can be very different due to brake characteristics variations. During case studies, temperature dependent brake CoF increases train braking distances by 10.2 and 6.6% on down grade and flat tracks respectively. Emergency brake cases have the highest increases of brake distances by 11.3% on down grade tracks.
WuQColeCSpiryaginM, et al.Etc. Freight train air brake models. Int J Rail Transportation2021: 1–49, DOI: 10.1080/23248378.2021.2006808.
6.
PugiLMalvezziMAllottaB, et al.A parametric library for the simulation of Union Internationale des Chemins de Fer (UIC) pneumatic braking system. J Rail Rapid Transit2004; 218(2): 117–132.
7.
CantoneL. TrainDy: the new union internationale des chemins de fer software for freight train interoperability. J Rail Rapid Transit2011; 225(1): 57–70.
8.
WeiWHuYWuQ, et al.An air brake model for longitudinal train dynamics studies. Vehicle System Dyn2017; 55(4): 517–533.
9.
LeeNKangC. The effect of a variable disc pad friction coefficient for the mechanical brake system of a railway vehicle. PLoS ONE; 10(8): e0135459. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0135459.
10.
WangZHanJLiuX, et al.Temperature evolution of the train brake disc during high-speed braking. Adv Mech Eng2019; 11(1): 1–10.
11.
VakkalagaddaMSrivastavaDMishraA, et al.Performance analyses of brake blocks used by Indian Railways. Wear2015; 328–329: 64–76.
12.
OstermeyerG. On the dynamics of the friction coefficient. Wear Wear2003; 254: 852–858.
13.
EhretM. Identification of a dynamic friction model for railway disc brakes. J Rail Rapid Transit2021; 235(10): 1214–1224.
14.
EhretMHohmannEHeckmannA. On the modelling of the friction characteristics of railway vehicle brakes. Int J Rail Transportation: 1–19. DOI: 10.1080/23248378.2022.2029723.
15.
WasilewskiP. Frictional heating in railway brakes: a review of numerical models. Arch Comput Methods Eng2020; 27: 45–58.
16.
VernerssonT. Temperatures at railway tread braking. Part 1: modelling Proc Imeche. Part F: J. Rail and Rapid Transit2007; 221(2): 167–182. DOI: 10.1243/0954409JRRT57.
17.
VernerssonT. Temperatures at railway tread braking. Part 2: calibration and numerical examples Proc Imeche. Part F: J. Rail and Rapid Transit2007; 221(4): 429–441. DOI: 10.1243/09544097JRRT90.
18.
VernerssonTLundenR. Temperatures at railway tread braking. Part 3: wheel and block temperatures and the influence of rail chill Proc Imeche. Part F: J. Rail and Rapid Transit2007; 221(4): 443–454. DOI: 10.1243/09544097JRRT91.
19.
TeimourimaneshSVernerssonTLundenR. Modelling of temperatures during railway tread braking: influence of contact conditions and rail cooling effect. Proc Imeche F: J Rail Rapid Transit2014; 228(1): 93–109.
20.
TeimourimaneshSVernerssonTLundenR, et al.Tread braking of railway wheels – temperatures generated by a metro train. Proc Imeche F:J Rail Rapid Transit2014; 228(2): 210–221.
21.
BabuAPrasadN. Coupled field finite element analysis of railway block brakes proc imeche. Part F: J. Rail and Rapid Transit2009; 223(4): 345–352. DOI: 10.1243/09544097JRRT256.
22.
GhafelehbashiSTalaeeM. An analytical thermal model of a railway vehicle brake shoe. Proc Imeche F: J Rail Rapid Transit2021; 236: 375–385. DOI: 10.1177/09544097211022107.
23.
SomaAAimarMZampieriN. Simulation of the thermal behavior of cast iron brake block during braking maneuvers. Appl Sci2021; 11: 5010, DOI: 10.3390/app11115010.
24.
WuQLuoSColeC. Longitudinal dynamics and energy analysis for heavy haul trains. J Mod Transportation2014; 22(3): 127–136.
25.
WuQSpiryaginMColeC, et al.Etc. International benchmarking of longitudinal train dynamics simulators: results. Vehicle System Dyn2018; 56(3): 343–365.
26.
WuQColeCSpiryaginM. Assessing wagon pack sizes in longitudinal train dynamics simulations. Aust J Mech Eng2020; 18(3): 277–287.
27.
BossoNMagelliMRossi BartoliL, et al.The influence of resistant force equations and coupling system on long train dynamics simulations. Proc Inst Mech Eng F: J Rail Rapid Transit2022; 236(1): 35–47.
28.
AimarM. Study of an onboard wired-wireless health monitoring system equipped with power save algorithm for freight railway wagons. Torino, Italy: PhD thesisPolitecnico di Torino, 2018.
