To enhance the mechanical performance and energy density (ED) of the Battery Pack System (BPS), this study proposes a multi-objective optimization (MOO) method that automates cell array layout design. Using cell arrangement parameters as design variables, the approach optimizes ED, crush deformation (Def), root mean square equivalent stress (RMSES), and energy absorption rate (REA). A surrogate model based on Support Vector Regression (SVR) is established and combined with an improved Reference Vector Guided Evolutionary Algorithm (RVEA) to generate the Pareto front. The optimal solution is selected via the Entropy Weight-VIKOR method. Results show a 4.063% increase in ED, along with reductions of 8.131% in RMSES, 21.646% in Def, and 10.204% in REA. This method offers an innovative strategy for lightweight and safety-oriented BPS design with strong practical applicability.
AndwariAMPesiridisARajooS, et al. A review of battery electric vehicle technology and readiness levels. Renew Sustain Energy Rev2017; 78: 414–430.
2.
Victor ChomboPLaoonualYWongwisesS. Lessons from the Electric Vehicle Crashworthiness Leading to Battery Fire. Energies. 2021; 14(16): 4802.
3.
SinzWBreitfußCTomaschE, et al. Integration of a crashworthy battery in a fully electric city bus. Int J Crashworth2012; 17(1): 105–118.
4.
TrattnigGLeitgebW.Battery modelling for crash safety simulation. Virtual Vehicle Research Center, 2014, pp. 19–35.
5.
LauterCTrösterTReuterC.Hybrid structures consisting of sheet metal and fibre reinforced plastics for structural automotive applications. University of Paderborn, 2013, pp. 149–174.
6.
LuWXiao-KaiCQing-HaiZ.Muti-objective topology optimization of an electric vehicle’s traction battery enclosure. Energy Proc2016; 88: 874–880.
7.
KukrejaJNguyenTSiegmundT, et al. Crash analysis of a conceptual electric vehicle with a damage tolerant battery pack. Extreme Mech Lett2016; 9(3): 371–378.
8.
PanYJXiongYWuL, et al. Lightweight design of an automotive battery-pack enclosure via advanced high-strength steels and size optimization. Int J Autom Technol2021; 22(5): 1279–1290.
9.
XiongYPanYWuL, et al. Effective weight-reduction- and crashworthiness-analysis of a vehicle’s battery-pack system via orthogonal experimental design and response surface methodology. Eng Fail Anal2021; 128: 105635.
10.
PanYJXiongYDaiW, et al. Crush and crash analysis of an automotive battery-pack enclosure for lightweight design. Int J Crashworth2022; 27(2): 500–509.
11.
ZhangXXiongYPanY, et al. Crushing stress and vibration fatigue-life optimization of a battery-pack system. Struct Multidisc Optim2023; 66(3): 48.
12.
LiuBZhangJZhangC, et al. Mechanical integrity of 18650 lithium-ion battery module: packing density and packing mode. Eng Fail Anal2018; 91: 315–326.
13.
ChenPXiaYZhouQ.Safety Comparison of Geometric Configurations of Electric Vehicle Battery under Side Pole Impact. Ohio State University, 2022.
14.
ChenPXiaYZhouQ, et al. Staggered layout of battery cells for mitigating damage in side pole collisions of electric vehicles. eTransportation2023; 16: 100238.
15.
JinCSunYYaoJ, et al. No thermal runaway propagation optimization design of battery arrangement for cell-to-chassis technology. eTransportation2022; 14: 100199.
16.
ChenPXiaYZhouQ.Inclined battery cells for mitigating damage in undercarriage collision. Int J Crashworth2024; 29(3): 508–520.
17.
ShuiLChenFYGargA, et al. Design optimization of battery pack enclosure for electric vehicle. Struct Multidisc Optim2018; 58(1): 331–347.
18.
WangHWangZHFanYW, et al. Multi-objective lightweight design of automotive battery pack box for crashworthiness. Int J Crashworth2024; 29(2): 292–307.
19.
PatelJRRathodMK. Influence of battery cell spacing on thermal performance of phase change material filled lithium-ion battery pack. Energy2024; 291: 130389.
20.
ChengRJinYOlhoferM, et al. A reference vector guided evolutionary algorithm for many-objective optimization. IEEE Tran Evol Comput2016; 20(5): 773–791.
21.
YaoWTieshanCJieZ, et al. Dynamic tensile mechanical properties and fracture analysis of 3003 aluminum alloy. Light Alloy Fabric Technol2021; 49(11): 32–38.
22.
ChungSHTancogne-DejeanTZhuJ, et al. Failure in lithium-ion batteries under transverse indentation loading. J Power Sources2018; 389: 148–159.
23.
KimYMKimYH.Numerical analysis of notch effect on fatigue behavior of short fiber reinforced plastics using multi-scale material modeling. Int J Autom Technol2021; 22(3): 701–711.
WangLFuDLiQ. Samples selection based on SVR for prediction of steel mechanical property. In: Proceedings - 2012 international conference on intelligent systems design and engineering applications, ISDEA 2012, Sanya, Hainan China, 6–7 January 2012.
26.
LiLZhangZHeZ.Research on condition trend prediction of mechanical equipment based on support vector machine. J Xi’an Jiaotong Univ2004; 38(3): 230-3+8.
27.
XiangGKaixinRGuanghuiL. Research on drilling frictional resistance prediction technology based on SVR. In; ACM International Conference Proceeding Series 2017, Mountain View, CA, USA, 23–27 October 2017.
28.
YangCXFengXT.Application of support vector regression in rock and soil engineering. J Northeastern Univ2006; 27(5): 563–566.
29.
AkibaTSanoSYanaseT, et al. Optuna: a next-generation hyperparameter optimization framework. In: Proceedings of the 25th ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery & data mining, Anchorage, AK, USA, 4–8 August 2019. Association for Computing Machinery, pp. 2623–2631.
30.
DasIDennisJE.Normal-boundary intersection: a new method for generating the pareto surface in nonlinear multicriteria optimization problems. SIAM J Optim1998; 8(3): 631–657.
31.
CoelloCACSierraMR. A study of the parallelization of a coevolutionary multi-objective evolutionary algorithm. Lect Note Comput Sci2004; 2972(1): 688–697.
32.
IshibuchiHMasudaHTanigakiY, et al. Modified distance calculation in generational distance and inverted generational distance. In: Gaspar-CunhaAHenggeler AntunesCCoelloC (eds) Evolutionary Multi-Criterion Optimization. EMO 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 9019. Springer.
33.
ZitzlerEThieleL.Multiobjective optimization using evolutionary algorithms -A comparative case study. Lect Notes Comput Sci1998; 1498(1): 292–301.
34.
IshibuchiHImadaRSetoguchiY, et al. How to specify a reference point in hypervolume calculation for fair performance comparison. Evol Comput2018; 26(3): 411–440.
35.
BlankJDebK. A running performance metric and termination criterion for evaluating evolutionary multi- and many-objective optimization algorithms. In: 2020 IEEE congress on evolutionary computation (CEC) 2020, Glasgow, UK, 19–24 July 2020.
36.
SinghTSinghVRanakotiL, et al. Optimization on tribological properties of natural fiber reinforced brake friction composite materials: effect of objective and subjective weighting methods. Polym Test2023; 117: 107873.
