This study proposes a modular design method integrating the Design Structure Matrix (DSM) with interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy numbers and entropy weighting to reduce subjectivity and uncertainty in module partitioning. Key principles—including physical connectivity, functional relevance, recyclability, and morphological coordination—are quantitatively assessed to enhance decision-making reliability. A case study on intelligent cleaning vehicles shows that when morphological coordination is considered, consistent module divisions appear only at 2, 5, and 8 modules (33.3% consistency), emphasizing its significance in achieving stable and robust modular design.
RuschMSchögglJ-PBaumgartnerRJ.Application of digital technologies for sustainable product management in a circular economy: a review. Bus Strategy Environ2023; 32: 1159–1174.
2.
ZhangXZhangLFungKY, et al. Sustainable product design: a life-cycle approach. Chem Eng Sci2020; 217: 115508.
3.
GershensonJKPrasadGJAllamneniS.Modular product design: a life-cycle view. J Integr Des Process Sci1999; 3: 13–26.
4.
BonvoisinJHalstenbergFBuchertT, et al. A systematic literature review on modular product design. J Eng Des2016; 27(7): 488–514.
5.
StarkJ.Product lifecycle management (volume 1): 21st century paradigm for product realisation. Springer, 2022.
6.
FortiAWRamosCCMunizJ.Integration of design structure matrix and modular function deployment for mass customization and product modularization: a case study on heavy vehicles. Int J Adv Manuf Technol2023; 125: 1987–2002.
7.
WangXLuoB.Application of service modular design based on a fuzzy design structure matrix: a case study from the mining industry. Math Probl Eng. Epub ahead of print 16June2021. DOI: 10.1155/2021/5067092.
8.
HaoJGaoXLiuY, et al. Module division method of complex products for responding to user’s requirements. Alex Eng J2023; 82: 404–413.
9.
YouYLiuZLiuY, et al. K-means module division method of FDM3D printer-based function-behavior-structure mapping. Appl Sci2023; 13(13): 7453.
10.
TsengH-EChangC-CLeeS-C, et al. A multi-objective grouping genetic algorithm for modular design. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part B: J Eng Manuf2023; 237: 377–391.
11.
XiaoYXiaQCuiG, et al. A review of research on module division methods based on different perspectives. In: AtiquzzamanMYenNXuZ (eds) Big data analytics for cyber-physical system in smart city. Springer, 2021, pp.120–126.
12.
OstertagováEKováčJOstertagO, et al. Application of morphological analysis in the design of production systems. Procedia Eng2012; 48: 507–512.
13.
ChenZPanZMaQ, et al. An MAGDM method for design concept evaluation based on incomplete information. PLoS One2022; 17: e0277964.
14.
ChenZZhongPLiuM, et al. A novel integrated MADM method for design concept evaluation. Sci Rep2022; 12: 15885.
15.
ChenZ.An elderly-oriented design of HMI in autonomous driving cars based on rough set theory and backpropagation neural network. IEEE Access2024; 12: 26800–26818.
16.
KangX.Combining rough set theory and support vector regression to the sustainable form design of hybrid electric vehicle. J Clean Prod2021; 304: 127137.
17.
ZhouALiuHZhangS, et al. Evaluation and design method for product form aesthetics based on deep learning. IEEE Access2021; 9: 108992–109003.
18.
WangTZhouM.A method for product form design of integrating interactive genetic algorithm with the interval hesitation time and user satisfaction. Int J Ind Ergon2020; 76: 102901.
19.
LuPHsiaoS-WWuF.A product shape design and evaluation model based on morphology preference and macroscopic shape information. Entropy2021; 23: 639.
20.
StamovT.Practical stability criteria for discrete fractional neural networks in product form design analysis. Chaos Solitons Fractals2024; 179: 114465.
21.
LiZWeiW.Modular design for optimum granularity with auto-generated DSM and improved elbow assessment method. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part B: J Eng Manuf2022; 236: 413–426.
22.
HeBWangWZhuX, et al. Integrate design structure matrix with carbon footprint for product low carbon design. Adv Eng Inform2023; 56: 102021.
23.
GanLYangGLiX, et al. An architecture decomposition method of pneumatic catapult system based on OPM and DSM. Chin J Aeronaut2023; 36: 168–181.
24.
TompkinsZGrennMRobertsB.Improving system maturity assessments by incorporating a design structure matrix. IEEE Trans Eng Manag2020; 67: 122–140.
25.
WangYBianSDongL, et al. Multiresolution modeling of a modular building design process based on design structure matrix. Buildings2023; 13: 2330.
26.
KhanmirzaEHaghbeigiMYazdanjueN.Enhanced genetic and imperialist competitive based algorithms for reducing design feedbacks in the design structure matrix. IEEE Trans Eng Manag2023; 70: 3156–3170.
27.
MollajanAIranmaneshSHTavakkoliMoghaddamR.A systems approach to improve reliability of a contract by modularising contract’s information flow architecture: a new contribution to risk mitigation in projects management. Enterp Inform Syst2023; 17: 1971773.
28.
WangSLiZHeC, et al. An integrated method for modular design based on auto-generated multi-attribute DSM and improved genetic algorithm. Symmetry2021; 14: 48.
29.
ParkSYoonJAnH, et al. Integration of axiomatic design and design structure matrix for the modular design of automobile parts. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part B: J Eng Manuf2022; 236: 296–306.
30.
LiuFDengY.Determine the number of unknown targets in open world based on elbow method. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst2021; 29: 986–995.
31.
BagirovAMAliguliyevRMSultanovaN.Finding compact and well-separated clusters: clustering using silhouette coefficients. Pattern Recognit2023; 135: 109144.
32.
AlizadeMKheniRPriceS, et al. A comparative study of clustering methods for nanoindentation mapping data. Integr Mater Manuf Innov2024; 13: 526–540.
33.
ChenCChengFSuS, et al. A product co-design team performance evaluation method with considering both satisfaction and collaboration. Adv Eng Inform2024; 60: 102420.
34.
HuZLinJ.An integrated multicriteria group decision making methodology for property concealment risk assessment under Z-number environment. Expert Syst Appl2022; 205: 117369.
35.
TanYChenZWangB, et al. A Z-number and MABAC method based on reliability analysis and evaluation of product design concept. Eksploatacja i Niezawodnosc – Maintenance and Reliability2024; 26: 178304.
